winforlose wrote:Wolf_Cry wrote:winforlose wrote:
So much is different in these situations it is hard to compare. Beasley did most of his shooting last season with KAT out and Ant yet to emerge. Philly had a lot more threats to cover including Embiid and Harris. Also Seth Curry seems to be a lower volume shooter than MB. Who knows what happens to his percentage if he is forced to share the load. It is also true that he blew up a bit on his current deal. I assure you his value will be at or above Beasley’s current level by the time he negotiates his next contract. In practice 39-40 percent isn’t bad for a sharpshooter. I do agree that he needs to be more than a 3 point shooter, which is why I am pleased to see improvements to his defense and passing. Beasley is a role player who is struggling to fulfill his role. He showed in the Denver game that he still has the ability, he just needs to be as you said more consistent. However, the same can be said for Ant, Dlo, Prince, MCD, ect… Find me 5 to 10 consistent 50% 3 point shooters or even 45% 3 point shooters and we can talk about how to acquire one.
No offense, but all I hear are excuses. He didn't have this or that. Nobody has it perfect in the NBA- and honestly the more excuses I hear for a guys it seems the truer the accusations. For example, I love KAt. Love the guy- he's the reason I still started watching Wolves game again after being bad for so long. But I always made excuses that he wasn't as good as Jokic or Embiid because he didn't have their supporting cast. Which is true in a sense, but what's even more true now is that he just isn't as good. It's just the truth. Just like Beasley, despite all the excuses you want to throw at him- he just isn't very good. He has his limitations.
And if you want to talk about shot attempts- that's what I'm getting at. Curry is one of the best 3 point shooters in the game, yet he takes LESS than Beasley. You know why? Because when he's not hot, he stops shooting the damn ball. It's hurting his team over all. Beasley chucking up 3 more misses after starting 1/5 isn't helping this team. He's literally trying to shoot himself out of slump in the middle of a game- and he just isn't good enough for that. The same can be said for DLO. They need to affect the game in different ways other than chucking up 3's and if they can't, this team is doomed. And it's looking that way honestly. Beas keeps talking about how he wants to guard the other teams best player because he wants to show he's a dog on defense, but I barely see the effort. DLo is at least a little more honest and has openly admitted he shouldn't be running PG.
It's not about acquiring consistent shooters. It's about building a consistent team. This team doesn't need to just be 3 point shooting- which it clearly is trying so hard to be. Like the joke says- we're a wanna-be Darryl Morey's James Harden-less Houston Rocket. It's embarrassing. There's other ways to score the ball. Other ways to play the game. It's Finch's job to get that through to his player, and it's just as well on the player to start getting that philosophy. If neither can't, so be it like I said. We're just going to continue to suck, and Gupta's gonna have some hard decisions in front of him very soon.
I am getting some mixed messages from you. On the one hand you basically criticize Beasley for not shooting as well as Curry, but on the other hand you praise Curry for not taking enough shots to win games despite being the superior shooter. When you have a lineup of Embiid, Simmons, Butler, Harris, and Al Horford (a couple of years ago,) you don’t need a Seth Curry taking a lot of shots. The roster may have turned over a bit but the point remains that they have a lot of scoring players. Beasley shoots a lot because that’s what we need from him. If he makes 40% consistently then we win. I cannot stress this enough. In the Denver game when our big 3 had career worst games Beasley kept us alive with 6-10 3 point shooting. Our entire design is based around getting open and nailing 3s.
To your other point about other ways to score. I don’t know that you are being honest with yourself or me. We are one of the smallest teams in the league. Small teams have trouble offensive rebounding and getting a lot of put backs. We already score fairly well in the paint (I haven’t checked the standings in a while, but the points in the paint battles don’t seem that skewed.) The only other consist methods of scoring are mid range shooting (something that is less efficient and being slowly eliminated for a reason,) and points off of drives. Now I have been saying Ant needs to drive more, and KAT has proven himself off of the drive. Beyond those two it is hard to find efficient driving talent on this team. JMAC cannot finish well, Okogie is struggling to finish. V8 doesn’t so much drive as cut and get the timely pass when he catches it he sometimes finishes sometimes gets stripped. My point is we are built for the small ball long ball. Now I have been very vocal that I hate small ball. But telling Finch to play pocket aces when he is holding a pair of 9s doesn’t work. You play the hand your dealt. If you read the article above, we are getting open looks and guys who have decent numbers last season and for their careers are not hitting them. This is not an excuse this is the numbers and numbers don’t lie. So please tell me specifically what changes you would make to be more consistent?
I'm saying Beasley needs to shoot less when he's not on a hot streak, and use Seth Curry as a good milestone for him to one day reach if he wants to be an important role player on our team. And I disagree- just because we don't have all those Philly players you mentioned, that doesn't mean Beas
needs to chuck up more shots. It's that kind of basketball philosophy that contributes to the Wolves being a bottom dweller. A lot of these players need to learn when to shoot and when to pass.
As for other methods of scoring- there has to be a way. If anything, it's worth it to explore other options then chucking up 50-60 3's a game. Sure we're a small team, but that doesn't mean we're forced to play one style. Golden State's arguably just as small as us and they run a beautiful offense. Of course having Stephen Curry helps, but that's besides the point. We need to try and tweak this offense so it's more pliable when the 3 ball isn't dropping. If we truly have no offense other than that- well then Gupta needs to get to work right away. I'm not blaming him or Finch too much since this was Rosas' roster, but it's become increasingly clear it's not going to work.
I keep hearing the open look argument, but they're open for a reason. Teams don't fear us dropping 3's on them. It doesn't matter what your career numbers are if you aren't one of the great shooters. Taurean Prince is a career 36% 3 pt shooter- respectable. But if he's 1/5 for the night, there's a reason he's gonna have 3-4 more open shots. Again, it goes back to streakiness and have the hot hand. Gotta be more consistent.
What changes would I make specifically? Well if I had the answer to that I'd be a coach in the NBA. I can offer some suggestion though. For starter, stop using KAT in the high post so much. He's not Jokic. He's not as good. I don't mind running that play, but not as our bread and butter. KAT needs to either in the post trying to score, or outside the arc ready to shoot the 3. Second tweak I would make is to have more cutters when KAT or Ant gets the ball. I don't care if you can't make a lay up. Movement alone creates offense. It creates opportunities. No matter how sucky you are, teams still have to account for you if you're literally 3 ft from the basket. The 3rd thing I would change is more post up opportunities for DLo and Ant. Jim Pete keeps saying it every game, but before he got to MN, DLo was actually a really good post up guard. Why not give him a chance down there, especially when he's struggling shooting the 3 ball? Not just those two, but hell let's see what McDaniels has in the post. It might be a bad idea, who knows. If anything, it's just as bad as shooting 3 clips at a bad rate.