The thing is, going into the draft, we have two big holes: starting shooting guard and backup big.
Most here are assuming we will want to address the need at SG at 9 because theres better talent there than at 26. However, when you have multiple needs and multiple picks, that might not be the best line of thinking.
According to Flip Saunders, there's a lot of depth at SG, and I believe him:
"I really think there's six or seven quality (shooting guards),'' Timberwolves President Flip Saunders said on Thursday after his team worked out several of them. "I really believe that the 2 spot probably has the most depth of any spot in the draft. There's more guys there that have the ability to get taken, and pretty high probably.''
Conversely, there's much less depth in the post. At 26, you'd probably be choosing between Withey, Nogueira, and Muscala. Not terrible talents, but there's a big gap between them and the bigs that will likely go in the lottery.
So do you sacrifice a lot at C to get a slightly better SG, or do you sacrifice a little at SG to get a much better C?