ImageImageImage

Kevin Love Trade thread pt. III

Moderators: Domejandro, Calinks, Worm Guts

Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 70,671
And1: 23,695
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Kevin Love Trade thread pt. III 

Post#101 » by Klomp » Thu Jun 19, 2014 6:32 pm

Its gonna happen, I bet

[tweet]https://twitter.com/ESPNSteinLine/status/479691537886871552[/tweet]
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
moss_is_1
RealGM
Posts: 11,143
And1: 2,520
Joined: May 20, 2009
   

Re: Kevin Love Trade thread pt. III 

Post#102 » by moss_is_1 » Thu Jun 19, 2014 6:33 pm

Krapinsky wrote:Yikes. I'd be pretty upset if Barnes isn't in there. I know no one likes Barnes but me, but I'd much rather have him than a lowly future first.

I also still like Barnes. He definitely has to be in a deal with GSW.

I think it would have to at least be Lee, Klay, Barnes and then one of GSW 2015 1st or Draymond Green for us to take the deal. I really don't want Lee on this team so we can have a horrible defending front court again. Would there be any potential suitors for him?

Washington if they lost Gortat? Slide Nene to the 5.
Lakers strike out and get desperate?
Brooklyn loves spending money.
User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Kevin Love Trade thread pt. III 

Post#103 » by Krapinsky » Thu Jun 19, 2014 6:38 pm

moss_is_1 wrote:
Krapinsky wrote:Yikes. I'd be pretty upset if Barnes isn't in there. I know no one likes Barnes but me, but I'd much rather have him than a lowly future first.

I also still like Barnes. He definitely has to be in a deal with GSW.

I think it would have to at least be Lee, Klay, Barnes and then one of GSW 2015 1st or Draymond Green for us to take the deal. I really don't want Lee on this team so we can have a horrible defending front court again. Would there be any potential suitors for him?

Washington if they lost Gortat? Slide Nene to the 5.
Lakers strike out and get desperate?
Brooklyn loves spending money.


While I think that's undeniable, on the bright side we would be much better defending on the wings and stopping dribble penetration.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.

NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Kevin Love Trade thread pt. III 

Post#104 » by Krapinsky » Thu Jun 19, 2014 6:39 pm

Seems like GSW played this smartly. They started with 'can't put Klay in the deal' so that when they agreed to put him in they could then take out Barnes.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.

NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
theGreatRC
RealGM
Posts: 18,532
And1: 4,995
Joined: Oct 12, 2006
Location: California
 

Re: Kevin Love Trade thread pt. III 

Post#105 » by theGreatRC » Thu Jun 19, 2014 6:43 pm

Krapinsky wrote:Seems like GSW played this smartly. They started with 'can't put Klay in the deal' so that when they agreed to put him in they could then take out Barnes.


Their FO is one of the tops in the league, hope Flip doesnt get owned and we lose out on assets that can put in the trade
Dysfunctional Wolves fan
moss_is_1
RealGM
Posts: 11,143
And1: 2,520
Joined: May 20, 2009
   

Re: Kevin Love Trade thread pt. III 

Post#106 » by moss_is_1 » Thu Jun 19, 2014 6:44 pm

Krapinsky wrote:While I think that's undeniable, on the bright side we would be much better defending on the wings and stopping dribble penetration.

I suppose that swapping Martin for Thompson would help out on the wings. I'd just like a shot blocker at the bigs to build our team around. If we could move Pek or Lee for one(letting Dieng start) then I'd be happy.
User avatar
Magilla_Gorilla
RealGM
Posts: 32,059
And1: 4,481
Joined: Oct 24, 2006
Location: Sunday Morning coming down...
         

Re: Kevin Love Trade thread pt. III 

Post#107 » by Magilla_Gorilla » Thu Jun 19, 2014 6:45 pm

Looks like GSW is going to do this. I hope this gets done prior to draft day - the wait is going to kill me.
Sham - Y U NO sell me a t-shirt? Best OB/GYN Houston
Merc_Porto
General Manager
Posts: 9,941
And1: 3,540
Joined: Nov 21, 2013
   

Re: Kevin Love Trade thread pt. III 

Post#108 » by Merc_Porto » Thu Jun 19, 2014 6:46 pm

On the Celtics board mostly think that is a bad deal for Minnesota.

On Chicago board mostly think is a bad deal for the Warriors.

:lol:
User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Kevin Love Trade thread pt. III 

Post#109 » by Krapinsky » Thu Jun 19, 2014 6:48 pm

Aquintus must be somewhere banging his head against the wall over the latest GSW rumor
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.

NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
theGreatRC
RealGM
Posts: 18,532
And1: 4,995
Joined: Oct 12, 2006
Location: California
 

Re: Kevin Love Trade thread pt. III 

Post#110 » by theGreatRC » Thu Jun 19, 2014 6:50 pm

Now that i think about it, id want Barnes in the deal. We dont have a clear cut SF, might as well let them all duke it out.
Dysfunctional Wolves fan
JimmyTD3
Banned User
Posts: 4,419
And1: 1,641
Joined: Aug 17, 2003

Re: Kevin Love Trade thread pt. III 

Post#111 » by JimmyTD3 » Thu Jun 19, 2014 6:51 pm

Dubs fan here.

I know how I, personally, feel about this trade, which is: PLEASE GET IT DONE!

How do you guys feel?

Objectively speaking:

1) David Lee = he's not prime Duncan on D, but you're getting an excellent offensive PF, double double machine. He is a great finisher with either hand, and has a J out to 18 feet or so (although it regressed a bit last year). Great passer for a big man, too. I'm a fan of his, unlike people on our board.

2) Klay Thompson = this guy would be the real coup for you guys. Young 6'7 SG who is a top-5 three-point shooter in the league, a very good defender (legit two-way player), and has shocked us fans with how quickly he's expanded his game. He's added the ability to drive in the last year, which Dubs fans thought he'd never do. This dude is good. He is not just a spot up shooter.

3) Harrison Barnes = honestly...we're not that impressed with him, yet. Doesn't seem he has the killer instinct, mentality, whatever you want to call it, to be a great player. But his physical tools, all around game, and ability to play 3 or stretch 4 are valuable. Plus, if he puts it together, we're looking at a Deng or Deng-lite type of guy. Maybe being able to compete for a starting spot on your guys team will push him a bit, with us, he's firmly stuck behind Iggy and (now) Draymond.

^ That's as honest a breakdown as I can give on these guys. What do yall think?
ILOVEIT
RealGM
Posts: 15,201
And1: 3,740
Joined: May 28, 2004

Re: Kevin Love Trade thread pt. III 

Post#112 » by ILOVEIT » Thu Jun 19, 2014 6:52 pm

mercgold3 wrote:On the Celtics board mostly think that is a bad deal for Minnesota.

On Chicago board mostly think is a bad deal for the Warriors.

:lol:


LOL

Look ...for a trade involving a star player that wants out...I can't recall better return value. Lee was AN ALL STAR LAST YEAR people :banghead: He is one of a few that averages close to 20 and 10.....

So Last years All Star PF and a top 5 two way 6'7" shooting guard for an All Star PF and salary saving in trading away Kevin Martin.....

That is as fair as you'll ever get.
2021/22 - The return of the Ring.
Worm Guts
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 27,563
And1: 12,425
Joined: Dec 27, 2003
     

Re: Kevin Love Trade thread pt. III 

Post#113 » by Worm Guts » Thu Jun 19, 2014 6:53 pm

Klomp wrote:
Worm Guts wrote:He's a starting caliber PF for a team that needs a starting PF.

He's not a great fit with our other players, though.

If he's not a great roster fit and we can't trade him because we won't get anything good in return, I fail to see how he's ever neutral trade filler.

I'm not completely opposed to the deal simply because of Thompson, but I'm not too fond of acquiring Lee.


Let's put it this way: I'd rather have David Lee as our starting PF than Dante Cunningham. If we're going to trade with Golden State, I'd rather have Lee than not have him.
criteriado
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,807
And1: 1,257
Joined: Sep 20, 2010
     

Re: Kevin Love Trade thread pt. III 

Post#114 » by criteriado » Thu Jun 19, 2014 6:53 pm

Okay. Let me say this: This trade is terrible. That's it. 10th seed here we come!
fattymcgee
Senior
Posts: 577
And1: 315
Joined: Apr 03, 2008

Re: Kevin Love Trade thread pt. III 

Post#115 » by fattymcgee » Thu Jun 19, 2014 6:53 pm

Worm Guts wrote:
mercgold3 wrote:Trade Pek or make him the 6th man.

And go with Dieng (Defense) and D.Lee (offense).

That is a balance front court right ?



That oversimplifies things, there are plenty of advanced stats that say Pek is a better defender than Dieng at this point.


I would disagree and agree with that at the same time. I watched almost every TWolves game that was on TV last year and Dieng is a great help defender while Pek (and KLove) are horrible help defenders. Where Dieng lacks is with man-to-man defense (which is what Pek is good at). Dieng got abused by Cousins and other big centers where Pek actually owned Cousins most of the time. If Dieng can add strength and improve his man-to-man defense, we would be in great shape.
ILOVEIT
RealGM
Posts: 15,201
And1: 3,740
Joined: May 28, 2004

Re: Kevin Love Trade thread pt. III 

Post#116 » by ILOVEIT » Thu Jun 19, 2014 6:54 pm

theGreatRC wrote:Now that i think about it, id want Barnes in the deal. We dont have a clear cut SF, might as well let them all duke it out.


Oh...so NOWWWW Barnes is not garbage? lol....kidding.
2021/22 - The return of the Ring.
DarkAzcura
General Manager
Posts: 8,879
And1: 7,338
Joined: Apr 21, 2006

Re: Kevin Love Trade thread pt. III 

Post#117 » by DarkAzcura » Thu Jun 19, 2014 6:55 pm

Krapinsky wrote:Aquintus must be somewhere banging his head against the wall over the latest GSW rumor


I know I am for you guys.

Just forget I'm a Boston fan for a second. I'd be so pissed if that was what we got for Rondo, and his value is much lower than Love's. I just can't.
criteriado
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,807
And1: 1,257
Joined: Sep 20, 2010
     

Re: Kevin Love Trade thread pt. III 

Post#118 » by criteriado » Thu Jun 19, 2014 6:56 pm

ILOVEIT wrote:
theGreatRC wrote:Now that i think about it, id want Barnes in the deal. We dont have a clear cut SF, might as well let them all duke it out.


Oh...so NOWWWW Barnes is not garbage? lol....kidding.


Barnes is garbage. You should know it, you're an GSW fan.
Worm Guts
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 27,563
And1: 12,425
Joined: Dec 27, 2003
     

Re: Kevin Love Trade thread pt. III 

Post#119 » by Worm Guts » Thu Jun 19, 2014 6:57 pm

fattymcgee wrote:
Worm Guts wrote:
mercgold3 wrote:Trade Pek or make him the 6th man.

And go with Dieng (Defense) and D.Lee (offense).

That is a balance front court right ?



That oversimplifies things, there are plenty of advanced stats that say Pek is a better defender than Dieng at this point.


I would disagree and agree with that at the same time. I watched almost every TWolves game that was on TV last year and Dieng is a great help defender while Pek (and KLove) are horrible help defenders. Where Dieng lacks is with man-to-man defense (which is what Pek is good at). Dieng got abused by Cousins and other big centers where Pek actually owned Cousins most of the time. If Dieng can add strength and improve his man-to-man defense, we would be in great shape.


I also think Pek is a smarter defender at this point of his career than Gorgui. Gorgui can be a little over anxious. But that's why I'd like to keep both, it's possible that Gorgui is our center of the future but I don't trust him enough yet to dump Pek.
Worm Guts
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 27,563
And1: 12,425
Joined: Dec 27, 2003
     

Re: Kevin Love Trade thread pt. III 

Post#120 » by Worm Guts » Thu Jun 19, 2014 6:59 pm

criteriado wrote:Okay. Let me say this: This trade is terrible. That's it. 10th seed here we come!


I'd rather be the 10th seed than 11th seed.

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves