ImageImageImage

Rotation for 21-22

Moderators: Domejandro, Calinks, Worm Guts

wolves_89
General Manager
Posts: 8,167
And1: 4,659
Joined: Jul 10, 2012
 

Re: Rotation for 21-22 

Post#101 » by wolves_89 » Tue Jan 4, 2022 9:12 pm

I think if the Wolves trade for a rotation big it will have a ripple effect that improves multiple positions. Letting McDaniels play most of his minutes at SF would help his game immensely, so adding a rotation caliber PF would improve two positions. Adding a starting center (Turner is probably the only guy that would make sense) could potentially improve three positions with McDaniels shifting to SF, Towns playing 15-20 minutes at PF, and Turner at C. There are so many ways that adding a big makes sense that I hope Gupta can finally accomplish the goal after a year and half of failing to make what should be an obvious move (though the failing can be mostly attributed to Rosas).
life_saver
General Manager
Posts: 9,328
And1: 6,823
Joined: Nov 08, 2017

Re: Rotation for 21-22 

Post#102 » by life_saver » Tue Jan 4, 2022 9:45 pm

Jaden has been very good over the last few weeks...his ability to defend even the quicker guards is a huge asset. I think he still bit sloppy & clumsy on offense when he is trying to do anything other than Catch & Shoot but he is getting better...he definitely isn't as one-dimensional on offense as I originally thought. Fouling Rate has decreased in recent weeks but it still is probably his biggest issue.
wolves_89
General Manager
Posts: 8,167
And1: 4,659
Joined: Jul 10, 2012
 

Re: Rotation for 21-22 

Post#103 » by wolves_89 » Wed Jan 5, 2022 5:59 am

Out of the top 20 3-man combinations in terms of minutes this year, there are 7 that have a negative point differential. The common factor in all 7 of those combinations is Malik Beasley. I do have to wonder if Finch is going to cut back Beasley's minutes at some point since he seems to be a major factor dragging down the team.
Baseline81
Analyst
Posts: 3,282
And1: 1,914
Joined: Jan 18, 2009

Re: Rotation for 21-22 

Post#104 » by Baseline81 » Wed Jan 5, 2022 4:52 pm

Read on Twitter
Tor_Raps
RealGM
Posts: 32,916
And1: 47,688
Joined: Oct 14, 2018

Re: Rotation for 21-22 

Post#105 » by Tor_Raps » Wed Jan 5, 2022 5:50 pm

Baseline81 wrote:
Read on Twitter


I came onto this board to ask why wasn't Monroe brought back when he played really well for them?
life_saver
General Manager
Posts: 9,328
And1: 6,823
Joined: Nov 08, 2017

Re: Rotation for 21-22 

Post#106 » by life_saver » Wed Jan 5, 2022 6:08 pm

Tor_Raps wrote:
Baseline81 wrote:
Read on Twitter


I came onto this board to ask why wasn't Monroe brought back when he played really well for them?

Wolves would get into luxury tax if they signe Monroe...I guess that's probably the major reason why they didn't sign him
Tor_Raps
RealGM
Posts: 32,916
And1: 47,688
Joined: Oct 14, 2018

Re: Rotation for 21-22 

Post#107 » by Tor_Raps » Wed Jan 5, 2022 6:14 pm

life_saver wrote:
Tor_Raps wrote:
Baseline81 wrote:
Read on Twitter


I came onto this board to ask why wasn't Monroe brought back when he played really well for them?

Wolves would get into luxury tax if they signe Monroe...I guess that's probably the major reason why they didn't sign him


We were in the same position with DJ Wilson who we all wanted back too. Sucks.
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,543
And1: 6,044
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: Rotation for 21-22 

Post#108 » by winforlose » Wed Jan 5, 2022 7:36 pm

life_saver wrote:
Tor_Raps wrote:
Baseline81 wrote:
Read on Twitter


I came onto this board to ask why wasn't Monroe brought back when he played really well for them?

Wolves would get into luxury tax if they signe Monroe...I guess that's probably the major reason why they didn't sign him


This, plus we are probably going to be active at the deadline. An extra roster space goes a long way under these circumstances.
TheProdigy
Starter
Posts: 2,443
And1: 1,130
Joined: Feb 21, 2001

Re: Rotation for 21-22 

Post#109 » by TheProdigy » Thu Jan 6, 2022 2:01 pm

Here are the updated RAPTOR and WAR stats after last night's game.

1. Russell 4.3 RAPTOR / 3.3 WAR
2. Beverley 5.6 RAPTOR / 3.1 WAR
3. Vanderbilt 4.6 RAPTOR / 3.1 WAR
4. Edwards 1.7 RAPTOR / 2.6 WAR
5. Towns 0.2 RAPTOR / 1.6 WAR
6. Okogie 3.1 RAPTOR / 0.9 WAR
7. Knight 3.6 RAPTOR / 0.6 WAR
8. McDaniels -1.5 RAPTOR / 0.6 WAR
9. Nowell -0.4 RAPTOR / 0.4 WAR
10. Bolmaro -4.2 RAPTOR / -0.1 WAR
11. Layman -4.2 RAPTOR / -0.1 WAR
12. Wright -26.6 RAPTOR / -0.1 WAR
13. McLaughlin -5.9 RAPTOR / -0.5 WAR
14. Prince -5.2 RAPTOR / -0.5 WAR
15. Reid -5.2 RAPTOR / -0.8 WAR
16. Beasley -4.8 RAPTOR / -1.1 WAR
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,695
And1: 19,790
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: Rotation for 21-22 

Post#110 » by shrink » Thu Jan 6, 2022 3:12 pm

TheProdigy wrote:Here are the updated RAPTOR and WAR stats after last night's game.

1. Russell 4.3 RAPTOR / 3.3 WAR
2. Beverley 5.6 RAPTOR / 3.1 WAR
3. Vanderbilt 4.6 RAPTOR / 3.1 WAR
4. Edwards 1.7 RAPTOR / 2.6 WAR
5. Towns 0.2 RAPTOR / 1.6 WAR
6. Okogie 3.1 RAPTOR / 0.9 WAR
7. Knight 3.6 RAPTOR / 0.6 WAR
8. McDaniels -1.5 RAPTOR / 0.6 WAR
9. Nowell -0.4 RAPTOR / 0.4 WAR
10. Bolmaro -4.2 RAPTOR / -0.1 WAR
11. Layman -4.2 RAPTOR / -0.1 WAR
12. Wright -26.6 RAPTOR / -0.1 WAR
13. McLaughlin -5.9 RAPTOR / -0.5 WAR
14. Prince -5.2 RAPTOR / -0.5 WAR
15. Reid -5.2 RAPTOR / -0.8 WAR
16. Beasley -4.8 RAPTOR / -1.1 WAR


While I never liked RAPTOR because of its numbers are so dependent on the other nine people on the court, I have to admit I’ve been following it since several Wolves are doing so well. But as an example of how flawed the stat is…

#13 Beverley +4.1 OFF, +1.6 DEF, +5.6 Overall
#21 DRussell +1.9 OFF, +2.4 DEF, +4.3 Overall

The fact that Beverley’s numbers show him stronger on offense, and Russell stronger on defense should make people suspicious.

Incidentally, Jarred Vanderbilt is #19, so I’m going to keep watching that stat!
TheProdigy
Starter
Posts: 2,443
And1: 1,130
Joined: Feb 21, 2001

Re: Rotation for 21-22 

Post#111 » by TheProdigy » Thu Jan 6, 2022 3:36 pm

shrink wrote:
TheProdigy wrote:Here are the updated RAPTOR and WAR stats after last night's game.

1. Russell 4.3 RAPTOR / 3.3 WAR
2. Beverley 5.6 RAPTOR / 3.1 WAR
3. Vanderbilt 4.6 RAPTOR / 3.1 WAR
4. Edwards 1.7 RAPTOR / 2.6 WAR
5. Towns 0.2 RAPTOR / 1.6 WAR
6. Okogie 3.1 RAPTOR / 0.9 WAR
7. Knight 3.6 RAPTOR / 0.6 WAR
8. McDaniels -1.5 RAPTOR / 0.6 WAR
9. Nowell -0.4 RAPTOR / 0.4 WAR
10. Bolmaro -4.2 RAPTOR / -0.1 WAR
11. Layman -4.2 RAPTOR / -0.1 WAR
12. Wright -26.6 RAPTOR / -0.1 WAR
13. McLaughlin -5.9 RAPTOR / -0.5 WAR
14. Prince -5.2 RAPTOR / -0.5 WAR
15. Reid -5.2 RAPTOR / -0.8 WAR
16. Beasley -4.8 RAPTOR / -1.1 WAR


While I never liked RAPTOR because of its numbers are so dependent on the other nine people on the court, I have to admit I’ve been following it since several Wolves are doing so well. But as an example of how flawed the stat is…

#13 Beverley +4.1 OFF, +1.6 DEF, +5.6 Overall
#21 DRussell +1.9 OFF, +2.4 DEF, +4.3 Overall

The fact that Beverley’s numbers show him stronger on offense, and Russell stronger on defense should make people suspicious.

Incidentally, Jarred Vanderbilt is #19, so I’m going to keep watching that stat!

No doubt RAPTOR and WAR have limitations. It's so hard to summarize a player's performance and value on a single stat because there are so many variables. Although RAPTOR is supposed to make adjustments based on who is on the floor together, on court synergy is extremely difficult to quantify. That being said, I do think RAPTOR/WAR is one of the best aggregated stats that is publicly available. Are there any other stats that you prefer to follow?

Also, as to your point about DLo being a better defender than Beverley according to RAPTOR, I do think there is noise in these numbers in smaller sample sizes like now with less than half the season completed. Over time I would expect the numbers to normalize with Beverley ahead in defensive RAPTOR. Though I do think there may be something to the idea that DLo picked up defensive communication skills from Draymond while he briefly played for the Warriors. Along with you I've been a huge DLo critic but this would be a game changer for him if he can quarterback a defense. That was arguably KG's strongest skill (DLo is nowhere near the same level as an overall defender though due to athleticism limitations).

Read on Twitter
life_saver
General Manager
Posts: 9,328
And1: 6,823
Joined: Nov 08, 2017

Re: Rotation for 21-22 

Post#112 » by life_saver » Thu Jan 6, 2022 5:14 pm

Finch's trust in Nowell is increasing with every game...he did close it out with Nowell yesterday.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,810
And1: 23,116
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Rotation for 21-22 

Post#113 » by Klomp » Thu Jan 6, 2022 9:07 pm

At what point does this stat become more than just a small sample size?

Read on Twitter
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Worm Guts
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 27,513
And1: 12,388
Joined: Dec 27, 2003
     

Re: Rotation for 21-22 

Post#114 » by Worm Guts » Thu Jan 6, 2022 9:36 pm

Klomp wrote:At what point does this stat become more than just a small sample size?

Read on Twitter


When it shows in our record.
TheProdigy
Starter
Posts: 2,443
And1: 1,130
Joined: Feb 21, 2001

Re: Rotation for 21-22 

Post#115 » by TheProdigy » Thu Jan 6, 2022 9:36 pm

Klomp wrote:At what point does this stat become more than just a small sample size?

Read on Twitter

As Shrink said in the other thread - don't touch the starting line up, fix the bench instead.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,810
And1: 23,116
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Rotation for 21-22 

Post#116 » by Klomp » Thu Jan 6, 2022 10:12 pm

Worm Guts wrote:
Klomp wrote:At what point does this stat become more than just a small sample size?

Read on Twitter


When it shows in our record.

You mean like how that starting group has a 9-2 record?
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Worm Guts
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 27,513
And1: 12,388
Joined: Dec 27, 2003
     

Re: Rotation for 21-22 

Post#117 » by Worm Guts » Thu Jan 6, 2022 10:18 pm

Klomp wrote:
Worm Guts wrote:
Klomp wrote:At what point does this stat become more than just a small sample size?

Read on Twitter


When it shows in our record.

You mean like how that starting group has a 9-2 record?

Like when they’re playing enough so the team has a winning record.
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,543
And1: 6,044
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: Rotation for 21-22 

Post#118 » by winforlose » Thu Jan 6, 2022 11:57 pm

Worm Guts wrote:
Klomp wrote:
Worm Guts wrote:
When it shows in our record.

You mean like how that starting group has a 9-2 record?

Like when they’re playing enough so the team has a winning record.


Also having a winning record against teams with winning records. Last night is a game we should win against a near bottom team. Pull it off against the top of the east and west and now we can talk. Also note worthy that while that group started the game, it didn’t finish it.
TheZachAttack
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,766
And1: 1,327
Joined: Jul 23, 2014
       

Re: Rotation for 21-22 

Post#119 » by TheZachAttack » Mon Jan 10, 2022 10:36 am

Interesting rotation trends for me
___________________________
Internal Development
___________________________
Wolves fans haven't seen a lot of internal players improve from end of the bench players into rotation players often yet alone key rotation players, starters, or building blocks. This season we are seeing two players go from end of the rotation type players into key roles and potentially key parts of the Wolves future going forward--Nowell and Vanderbilt. Both players are just 22 years old and are playing at elite levels within roles they are developing into. Nowell especially needs more time to prove that this isn't a hot streak, but both players pass the eye test in a big way. Both players add a key skillset to the Wolves rotation that they don't have and the Wolves haven't even had to give up any assets to add these skillsets to their roster!

Vanderbilt has filled the Wolves needs for a starting 4 that can anchor the Wolves defense, provide rebounding, and play with Towns/Edwards/D Lo. Vanderbilt has said why not me and started playing like a mini-Rodman this season. Vanderbilt is among the league leaders in offensive rebounds and second-chance points generated as well as putting up an all-defense team level campaign as a great on-ball defender even in space against big wings, big time turnover generator, and finisher of possessions with his rebounding. There's a reason that Vanderbilt essentially leads the team in ORTG, DRTG, NTRG, and one of the players in just about every one of the Wolves best 5-man lineups. Vanderbilt plays winning basketball and increases the Wolves margin for error in winning. He does have a unique skillset, but he's clearly a player the Wolves should keep around long-term.

Nowell has finally shown the shot creation and ball-handling abilities he did below the NBA level. Nowell has been playing at a 6th man of the year level since entering the starting lineup and if you watch him play he's breaking the eye test. Nowell, at times, looks like the best player on the floor. Nowell is an above-average NBA level athlete with above-average NBA shotmaking skills. The Wolves have desperately needed to add a player who can both create his own shot and playmake for others on the second unit. In addition, they have needed a 3rd ball-handler for awhile. Nowell's development into a 6th man allows the Wolves to fit that role much better than Beasley, who is more limited as a player. The Wolves ability to get creative and have more options to keep multiple ball-handlers on the floor is exciting now.
___________________________

Players who are changing their playstyle in surprising ways leading to winning basketball
___________________________

Russell has gotten criticism in the past about his PG skills or lack thereof and his ability to play winning basketball. This season, Russell has struggled from the field but has underlying numbers that are highly associated with the Wolves winning games when he plays. The reason that Russell has still been impacting games in such a positive way is because Russell has made changes to his game this season that should lead to more winning basketball.

Russell's assist & TO numbers are among the top 10 in the league on the year and near the top 5 in terms of limiting turnovers. His usage rate has also dropped significantly this season down from 30-32% to 26% to just 24% over his last 15 games. Those low end usage numbers compare most similarly to PGs like Jrue Holiday, Darius Garlund, Malcolm Brogden, and Fred Van Fleet who in a general sense are known as being initiators but are also being known as the kinds of options that are good to pair with a wing star because they can also be really successful spacing in the half court off of that type of star.

Russell has taken steps forward to be a different type of PG, especially over the last 15 games. Aside from the 24% usage rate, D Lo is 5th in the league in assists and there are only 2 players in the top 20 in assists that have less turnovers. In addition, he continues to play near league-best defense according to the stats. In addition, Russell's shooting appears to be returning to its norms. In the past 15 games (half of his season), his shooting splits are ~37% on 8+ attempts per game. He's still shooting below his career average from 2pt, but he's right there.

Russell has seemingly made some big stylistic changes that have led to outputs that would suggest he's basically been playing like the opposite of what the conception of him is. I thought that I pretty much knew I knew everything to know about the D Lo era for the Wolves. If D Lo is changing his style like the data suggests, there may be some new things to learn just yet.

________________________________

A healthy Wolves rotation for me focused around the following players

PG: D Lo
SG: Beverly
SF: Edwards
PF: Vanderbilt
C: Towns

6th: Nowell
Bench wings: Beasley/McDaniels
Bench Big: Naz

I would like to see the Wolves try and package a combination of Okogie, Naz, Bolmaro, Prince, draft picksand depending on the player Beasley to get a big that has more typical big man skills (lob/pnr/rim protection) and continue to add spacing.
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,543
And1: 6,044
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: Rotation for 21-22 

Post#120 » by winforlose » Sun Jan 16, 2022 12:45 pm

With JMAC in protocols, Nowell having an ankle injury, and Beasley not being good at ball handling or facilitating, it looks like we might see some Wright at backup PG.

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves