ImageImageImage

The Rob Dillingham Thread

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

User avatar
Domejandro
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 20,354
And1: 30,654
Joined: Jul 29, 2014

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#101 » by Domejandro » Thu Jun 27, 2024 6:39 pm

I will warn people that he isn't a particularly good decision maker, is a one-handed passer (this is a HUGE problem), has tunnel vision, and is horrible defensively. He has a ton of interesting skills that make him intriguing, but there is a reason why he went eighth overall in a pretty bad draft.
KGdaBom
RealGM
Posts: 22,855
And1: 6,203
Joined: Jun 22, 2017
         

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#102 » by KGdaBom » Thu Jun 27, 2024 6:48 pm

Klomp wrote:
shangrila wrote:You know what? **** it.

He's the next Kyrie Irving.


I see a little bit of Kyrie in his game, with a little bit of the flare that made Stephon Marbury so fun to watch in Minnesota!

The difference is Kyrie and Steph were much bigger.
thinktank
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,300
And1: 2,639
Joined: Jul 02, 2010
Location: Mpls

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#103 » by thinktank » Thu Jun 27, 2024 8:06 pm

KGdaBom wrote:
Klomp wrote:
shangrila wrote:You know what? **** it.

He's the next Kyrie Irving.


I see a little bit of Kyrie in his game, with a little bit of the flare that made Stephon Marbury so fun to watch in Minnesota!

The difference is Kyrie and Steph were much bigger.


Much bigger?

Maybe 1.5 inches in height / wingspan, but that's not much when you have never once in your life seen Kyrie or Curry do this:



He took off from the rim near Edwards territory. Could still be growing too...
BlacJacMac
Analyst
Posts: 3,699
And1: 3,396
Joined: Aug 25, 2020
       

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#104 » by BlacJacMac » Thu Jun 27, 2024 8:09 pm

thinktank wrote:
KGdaBom wrote:
Klomp wrote:
I see a little bit of Kyrie in his game, with a little bit of the flare that made Stephon Marbury so fun to watch in Minnesota!

The difference is Kyrie and Steph were much bigger.


Much bigger?

Maybe 1.5 inches in height / wingspan, but that's not much when you have never once in your life seen Kyrie or Curry do this:



He took off from the rim near Edwards territory.


Irving weighed 191 at the combine. That's much bigger than 164.
Neeva
Head Coach
Posts: 7,444
And1: 2,861
Joined: Jun 03, 2016

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#105 » by Neeva » Thu Jun 27, 2024 8:16 pm

:lol: If Wemby didn’t have a foot and a half on Rob he would weigh 164 as well
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,021
And1: 22,560
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#106 » by Klomp » Thu Jun 27, 2024 8:34 pm

Ja Morant is like 6-foot-3 and 175.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
BlacJacMac
Analyst
Posts: 3,699
And1: 3,396
Joined: Aug 25, 2020
       

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#107 » by BlacJacMac » Thu Jun 27, 2024 8:39 pm

Klomp wrote:Ja Morant is like 6-foot-3 and 175.


With a 6'7 wingspan.

(And hurt all the time...)
thinktank
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,300
And1: 2,639
Joined: Jul 02, 2010
Location: Mpls

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#108 » by thinktank » Thu Jun 27, 2024 8:50 pm

BlacJacMac wrote:
thinktank wrote:
KGdaBom wrote:The difference is Kyrie and Steph were much bigger.


Much bigger?

Maybe 1.5 inches in height / wingspan, but that's not much when you have never once in your life seen Kyrie or Curry do this:



He took off from the rim near Edwards territory.


Irving weighed 191 at the combine. That's much bigger than 164.


Again, is that much bigger when Dilly is doing windmills and Kyrie is fully under the rim?

See the full context.

Kyrie is not using his size. He earns zero FTs! His whole thing is don’t touch anyone.

In short, pun intended, I don’t think Dilly’s size will matter just like it doesn’t for Kyrie or Curry or any other teeny fast guard.
life_saver
General Manager
Posts: 9,321
And1: 6,813
Joined: Nov 08, 2017

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#109 » by life_saver » Thu Jun 27, 2024 8:52 pm

I have zero clue about any of the players eligible for draft but it's so comforting to see that this guy shot 44% from 3 in college...I was tired of drafting poor shooters.
BlacJacMac
Analyst
Posts: 3,699
And1: 3,396
Joined: Aug 25, 2020
       

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#110 » by BlacJacMac » Thu Jun 27, 2024 8:56 pm

thinktank wrote:
BlacJacMac wrote:
thinktank wrote:
Much bigger?

Maybe 1.5 inches in height / wingspan, but that's not much when you have never once in your life seen Kyrie or Curry do this:



He took off from the rim near Edwards territory.


Irving weighed 191 at the combine. That's much bigger than 164.


Again, is that much bigger when Dilly is doing windmills and Kyrie is fully under the rim?

See the full context.

Kyrie is not using his size. He earns zero FTs! His whole thing is don’t touch anyone.

In short, pun intended, I don’t think Dilly’s size will matter just like it doesn’t for Kyrie or Curry or any other teeny fast guard.


And my concern is the tiny guy doing windmills getting hurt. These super-aggressive, slight of build guys all seem to miss a lot of games.

If I'm absorbing contact, I'd rather be 191 than 164.
thinktank
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,300
And1: 2,639
Joined: Jul 02, 2010
Location: Mpls

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#111 » by thinktank » Thu Jun 27, 2024 8:58 pm

BlacJacMac wrote:
thinktank wrote:
BlacJacMac wrote:
Irving weighed 191 at the combine. That's much bigger than 164.


Again, is that much bigger when Dilly is doing windmills and Kyrie is fully under the rim?

See the full context.

Kyrie is not using his size. He earns zero FTs! His whole thing is don’t touch anyone.

In short, pun intended, I don’t think Dilly’s size will matter just like it doesn’t for Kyrie or Curry or any other teeny fast guard.


And my concern is the tiny guy doing windmills getting hurt. These super-aggressive, slight of build guys all seem to miss a lot of games.

If I'm absorbing contact, I'd rather be 191 than 164.


That’s not how these guys are getting hurt.

They’re getting hurt in their ankles stepping on people making moves, etc.

I can’t think of a time when Irving or Curry got hurt because they bounced off a guy and broke a wrist, etc. Maybe there are instances that you can show me?
jpatrick
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,733
And1: 1,955
Joined: May 30, 2007
 

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#112 » by jpatrick » Thu Jun 27, 2024 8:58 pm

I don’t know if he’ll ever be able to defend or have the ability to run a team sufficient to be a starting PG. He could be Garland, could be Lou Williams. What I know is he score and create shots, something we drastically need. If we had Lou Williams off the bench, we don’t lose to Dallas in 5. And Dillingham is not afraid of big shots, he’s an Ant-like irrational confidence guy.
KGdaBom
RealGM
Posts: 22,855
And1: 6,203
Joined: Jun 22, 2017
         

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#113 » by KGdaBom » Thu Jun 27, 2024 9:28 pm

thinktank wrote:
KGdaBom wrote:
Klomp wrote:
I see a little bit of Kyrie in his game, with a little bit of the flare that made Stephon Marbury so fun to watch in Minnesota!

The difference is Kyrie and Steph were much bigger.


Much bigger?

Maybe 1.5 inches in height / wingspan, but that's not much when you have never once in your life seen Kyrie or Curry do this:



He took off from the rim near Edwards territory. Could still be growing too...

Nice dunk. I stand by Kyrie and Steph being much bigger than the 164 pound Dillingham. I'm not saying Dillingham won't be good/great. I'm just acknowledging the size and defense concerns.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,021
And1: 22,560
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#114 » by Klomp » Thu Jun 27, 2024 9:46 pm

Rudy Gobert is about to be for Rob Dillingham what Steven Adams is for Ja Morant!
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
KGdaBom
RealGM
Posts: 22,855
And1: 6,203
Joined: Jun 22, 2017
         

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#115 » by KGdaBom » Thu Jun 27, 2024 9:51 pm

Klomp wrote:Rudy Gobert is about to be for Rob Dillingham what Steven Adams is for Ja Morant!

Rudy can't be Steven Adam's until he grows a pornstache.
MN7725
Veteran
Posts: 2,959
And1: 1,269
Joined: Jun 19, 2017

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#116 » by MN7725 » Thu Jun 27, 2024 9:52 pm

jpatrick wrote:I don’t know if he’ll ever be able to defend or have the ability to run a team sufficient to be a starting PG. He could be Garland, could be Lou Williams. What I know is he score and create shots, something we drastically need. If we had Lou Williams off the bench, we don’t lose to Dallas in 5. And Dillingham is not afraid of big shots, he’s an Ant-like irrational confidence guy.


my signature this past season should have been "Wolves need to get Lou WIlliams out of retirement" since I posted it about every two weeks :lol:

hopefully Rob can get to the FT line like Lou did
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,021
And1: 22,560
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#117 » by Klomp » Thu Jun 27, 2024 11:24 pm

Read on Twitter
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,021
And1: 22,560
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#118 » by Klomp » Thu Jun 27, 2024 11:45 pm

I've got Dillingham on the all-rookie 1st team next year with an outside shot at ROY.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
TheProdigy
Starter
Posts: 2,428
And1: 1,119
Joined: Feb 21, 2001

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#119 » by TheProdigy » Thu Jun 27, 2024 11:47 pm

jpatrick wrote:I don’t know if he’ll ever be able to defend or have the ability to run a team sufficient to be a starting PG. He could be Garland, could be Lou Williams. What I know is he score and create shots, something we drastically need. If we had Lou Williams off the bench, we don’t lose to Dallas in 5. And Dillingham is not afraid of big shots, he’s an Ant-like irrational confidence guy.

He gets to learn from Mike Conley. I can't think of a better opportunity for him to learn how to be a point guard.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,021
And1: 22,560
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#120 » by Klomp » Thu Jun 27, 2024 11:54 pm

Fun fact: Jamal Crawford was also the No. 8 pick in his draft class.

Other No. 8s include....
1957: Sam Jones
1976: Robert Parish
1977: Jack Sikma
1985: Detlef Schrempf
1998: Larry Hughes
1999: Andre Miller
2006: Rudy Gay
2021: Franz Wagner
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves