ImageImageImage

The PJ Dozier Thread

Moderators: Domejandro, Calinks, Worm Guts

Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 67,892
And1: 21,619
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: The PJ Dozier Thread 

Post#101 » by Klomp » Mon Jul 15, 2024 6:49 pm

shrink wrote:I checked Spotrac to see how much of Dozier’s deal is guaranteed, and was surprised that they listed it as fully guaranteed.

I thought I remembered Woj breaking it as partially guaranteed, and he said nothing about that. Jon Krawczinski was the one that tweeted that it “may” be partially guaranteed, and now I’m not even finding that.

Doogie said as of yesterday that it has not been officially filed.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 67,892
And1: 21,619
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: The PJ Dozier Thread 

Post#102 » by Klomp » Tue Jul 16, 2024 3:56 am

He's another long-armed versatile defender who can get out and push it in transition. That's what we've been looking for.

These two games were both within a 5-game stretch immediately before tearing his ACL in May 2021.


tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,245
And1: 4,832
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: The PJ Dozier Thread 

Post#103 » by minimus » Tue Jul 16, 2024 5:16 am

Klomp wrote:
shrink wrote:I checked Spotrac to see how much of Dozier’s deal is guaranteed, and was surprised that they listed it as fully guaranteed.

I thought I remembered Woj breaking it as partially guaranteed, and he said nothing about that. Jon Krawczinski was the one that tweeted that it “may” be partially guaranteed, and now I’m not even finding that.

Doogie said as of yesterday that it has not been officially filed.

Read on Twitter
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,245
And1: 4,832
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: The PJ Dozier Thread 

Post#104 » by minimus » Tue Jul 16, 2024 5:25 am

Read on Twitter
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 12,644
And1: 5,474
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: The PJ Dozier Thread 

Post#105 » by winforlose » Tue Jul 16, 2024 5:46 am

minimus wrote:
Read on Twitter


Any details on how partially and when it guarantees?
MN7725
Veteran
Posts: 2,885
And1: 1,221
Joined: Jun 19, 2017

Re: The PJ Dozier Thread 

Post#106 » by MN7725 » Tue Jul 16, 2024 11:02 pm

MN7725 wrote:strange, when there are so many more proven players (albeit probably washed players) still not signed

always a couple decent players that miss out on money and take a 1yr contract and prefer being on a good team


Gary Trent Jr signing with Bucks for minimum

He would choose them over Wolves because of opportunity, but original point remains
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 67,892
And1: 21,619
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: The PJ Dozier Thread 

Post#107 » by Klomp » Tue Jul 16, 2024 11:08 pm

MN7725 wrote:He would choose them over Wolves because of opportunity, but original point remains

If he wouldn't choose us then it would be idiotic to hold off from other moves on his behalf
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
BlacJacMac
Analyst
Posts: 3,195
And1: 2,898
Joined: Aug 25, 2020
       

Re: The PJ Dozier Thread 

Post#108 » by BlacJacMac » Tue Jul 16, 2024 11:11 pm

MN7725 wrote:
MN7725 wrote:strange, when there are so many more proven players (albeit probably washed players) still not signed

always a couple decent players that miss out on money and take a 1yr contract and prefer being on a good team


Gary Trent Jr signing with Bucks for minimum

He would choose them over Wolves because of opportunity, but original point remains


He's a good Beasley replacement. High volume, high % 3pt shooter that doesn't provide much else.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 67,892
And1: 21,619
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: The PJ Dozier Thread 

Post#109 » by Klomp » Wed Jul 17, 2024 12:10 am

Read on Twitter
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 12,644
And1: 5,474
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: The PJ Dozier Thread 

Post#110 » by winforlose » Wed Jul 17, 2024 12:27 am

Klomp wrote:
Read on Twitter


Am I correct that if we cut him, that 1 million still counts against the tax?
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 67,892
And1: 21,619
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: The PJ Dozier Thread 

Post#111 » by Klomp » Wed Jul 17, 2024 12:33 am

winforlose wrote:
Klomp wrote:
Read on Twitter


Am I correct that if we cut him, that 1 million still counts against the tax?

Correct.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
MN7725
Veteran
Posts: 2,885
And1: 1,221
Joined: Jun 19, 2017

Re: The PJ Dozier Thread 

Post#112 » by MN7725 » Wed Jul 17, 2024 1:22 am

BlacJacMac wrote:
MN7725 wrote:
MN7725 wrote:strange, when there are so many more proven players (albeit probably washed players) still not signed

always a couple decent players that miss out on money and take a 1yr contract and prefer being on a good team


Gary Trent Jr signing with Bucks for minimum

He would choose them over Wolves because of opportunity, but original point remains


He's a good Beasley replacement. High volume, high % 3pt shooter that doesn't provide much else.


Right

but he is a rotation player on pretty much any playoff caliber team

at the minimum

and there is still similar quality players still available

again, its strange that Wolves used a roster spot on Dozier before all these remaining players found spots

seems like Dozier would have been available August if thats the way things shook out, which I frankly think is how it would have since Wolves rotation is pretty locked in, so I'm not hating on signing Dozier, just find it unusual
User avatar
Chuck Everett
RealGM
Posts: 18,385
And1: 20,467
Joined: May 28, 2004
Location: Los Angeles
   

Re: The PJ Dozier Thread 

Post#113 » by Chuck Everett » Wed Jul 17, 2024 2:02 am

This guy is a good basketball player. He was poised to carve out a niche before the ACL. Here's hoping he can put that behind him and find a home in this league.
"Kill 'em with Grindness."
younggunsmn
Head Coach
Posts: 6,462
And1: 2,355
Joined: May 28, 2007
Location: Hiding from the thought police.

Re: The PJ Dozier Thread 

Post#114 » by younggunsmn » Wed Jul 17, 2024 3:14 am

MN7725 wrote:
BlacJacMac wrote:
MN7725 wrote:
Gary Trent Jr signing with Bucks for minimum

He would choose them over Wolves because of opportunity, but original point remains


He's a good Beasley replacement. High volume, high % 3pt shooter that doesn't provide much else.


Right

but he is a rotation player on pretty much any playoff caliber team

at the minimum

and there is still similar quality players still available

again, its strange that Wolves used a roster spot on Dozier before all these remaining players found spots

seems like Dozier would have been available August if thats the way things shook out, which I frankly think is how it would have since Wolves rotation is pretty locked in, so I'm not hating on signing Dozier, just find it unusual


I find it pretty damn disappointing that with a top 4 finish and 3 open roster spots, the only impactful veteran minimum free agent we could get to come here was Joe Ingles.

We couldnt even get one of Jmac or Monte to come back.

We need a veteran backup PG, I don't like putting so much pressure on DIllingham to fill a role on a team with title aspirations.
A role that is going to be pretty big with ~20 minutes per game needed to backup Conley, who is also probably going to be rested a bit too. We lost Jmac, Monte, and Kyle Anderson too who spent a lot of time as de facto backup PG.
And we're trying to replace all that with a 160 lbs 19 year old. That's too much pressure.
I don't want him to become Bones Hyland and for his career to flame out because he can't play defense well enough to stay on the court until his body is ready to compete with grown men.

I don't dislike the PJ Dozier signing because of PJ Dozier. Hey, he's quite an upgrade on Wendell Moore, great.
I dislike it because it fills up our likely last open roster spot when we still have a gaping hole at PG on the depth chart.
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,245
And1: 4,832
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: The PJ Dozier Thread 

Post#115 » by minimus » Wed Jul 17, 2024 5:34 am

younggunsmn wrote:
MN7725 wrote:
BlacJacMac wrote:
He's a good Beasley replacement. High volume, high % 3pt shooter that doesn't provide much else.


Right

but he is a rotation player on pretty much any playoff caliber team

at the minimum

and there is still similar quality players still available

again, its strange that Wolves used a roster spot on Dozier before all these remaining players found spots

seems like Dozier would have been available August if thats the way things shook out, which I frankly think is how it would have since Wolves rotation is pretty locked in, so I'm not hating on signing Dozier, just find it unusual


I find it pretty damn disappointing that with a top 4 finish and 3 open roster spots, the only impactful veteran minimum free agent we could get to come here was Joe Ingles


MIL got Prince, Wright and Trent because they have real holes in roster and opportunities to show themselves. Same with PHO and Morris. MIN roster is stacked. It was pretty clear before FA market opening that MIN was destined to lose in this offseason market because of lack of resources for trades, no cap space, and 2nd apron riles. So what Connelly did during draft is a proactive move to give MIN chance to improve roster BEFORE FA market. For years we saw FA not coming in MIN, so why would they sign now for minimum without promise of playing time?

So no, I don't see it as disappointment at all. Especially after Joe Ingles signing. I find it a brilliant from many perspectives that we got Ingles who has all chemistry in the world to play with Conley and Gobert, adding new dimensions to our offense, AND we got TSJ and Rob who are high potential rookies.

P.S. We are kind of looking under microscope our team problems and they look bigger then they are. MIA, DEN, GSW are dancing around 2nd apron and have much WORSE offseason. PHO are going all in AND had no bench entering offeason. 40mil of luxury tax for Okogie? This is insane.
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 12,644
And1: 5,474
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: The PJ Dozier Thread 

Post#116 » by winforlose » Wed Jul 17, 2024 6:17 am

minimus wrote:
younggunsmn wrote:
MN7725 wrote:
Right

but he is a rotation player on pretty much any playoff caliber team

at the minimum

and there is still similar quality players still available

again, its strange that Wolves used a roster spot on Dozier before all these remaining players found spots

seems like Dozier would have been available August if thats the way things shook out, which I frankly think is how it would have since Wolves rotation is pretty locked in, so I'm not hating on signing Dozier, just find it unusual


I find it pretty damn disappointing that with a top 4 finish and 3 open roster spots, the only impactful veteran minimum free agent we could get to come here was Joe Ingles


MIL got Prince, Wright and Trent because they have real holes in roster and opportunities to show themselves. Same with PHO and Morris. MIN roster is stacked. It was pretty clear before FA market opening that MIN was destined to lose in this offseason market because of lack of resources for trades, no cap space, and 2nd apron riles. So what Connelly did during draft is a proactive move to give MIN chance to improve roster BEFORE FA market. For years we saw FA not coming in MIN, so why would they sign now for minimum without promise of playing time?

So no, I don't see it as disappointment at all. Especially after Joe Ingles signing. I find it a brilliant from many perspectives that we got Ingles who has all chemistry in the world to play with Conley and Gobert, adding new dimensions to our offense, AND we got TSJ and Rob who are high potential rookies.

P.S. We are kind of looking under microscope our team problems and they look bigger then they are. MIA, DEN, GSW are dancing around 2nd apron and have much WORSE offseason. PHO are going all in AND had no bench entering offeason. 40mil of luxury tax for Okogie? This is insane.


Last year Mike played more games than in any year since he was 25. He also was banged up in the playoffs and actually missed a game. This year he is 37 and will have a shorter offseason to recover. Instead of having JMAC, Morris, and Kyle to share the load, we have Dilly, Dozier, and Jingles. Of course NAW was around as well, but he was as much the off ball guard to PG Ant as he was backup PG. If you think this isn’t a problem, all I can say is I pray you’re right.
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,245
And1: 4,832
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: The PJ Dozier Thread 

Post#117 » by minimus » Wed Jul 17, 2024 8:35 am

winforlose wrote:
minimus wrote:
younggunsmn wrote:
I find it pretty damn disappointing that with a top 4 finish and 3 open roster spots, the only impactful veteran minimum free agent we could get to come here was Joe Ingles


MIL got Prince, Wright and Trent because they have real holes in roster and opportunities to show themselves. Same with PHO and Morris. MIN roster is stacked. It was pretty clear before FA market opening that MIN was destined to lose in this offseason market because of lack of resources for trades, no cap space, and 2nd apron riles. So what Connelly did during draft is a proactive move to give MIN chance to improve roster BEFORE FA market. For years we saw FA not coming in MIN, so why would they sign now for minimum without promise of playing time?

So no, I don't see it as disappointment at all. Especially after Joe Ingles signing. I find it a brilliant from many perspectives that we got Ingles who has all chemistry in the world to play with Conley and Gobert, adding new dimensions to our offense, AND we got TSJ and Rob who are high potential rookies.

P.S. We are kind of looking under microscope our team problems and they look bigger then they are. MIA, DEN, GSW are dancing around 2nd apron and have much WORSE offseason. PHO are going all in AND had no bench entering offeason. 40mil of luxury tax for Okogie? This is insane.


Last year Mike played more games than in any year since he was 25. He also was banged up in the playoffs and actually missed a game. This year he is 37 and will have a shorter offseason to recover. Instead of having JMAC, Morris, and Kyle to share the load, we have Dilly, Dozier, and Jingles. Of course NAW was around as well, but he was as much the off ball guard to PG Ant as he was backup PG. If you think this isn’t a problem, all I can say is I pray you’re right.


It is definitely a risk. But it is a decision based on a set of factors:

1) Anderson saved our ass in first Rudy year when Towns went down, and he also played great this year when Towns was recovering. Having him playing from bench was luxury because we could counter some matchups with his size and playmaking. But Anderson is a slow methodical playmaker he was great in some situation (mostly playing PF/C) and he was near to unplayable in other situations. He wanted MLE contract, it was expected that we let him go. 40+ mil just for insurance is insane

2) Morris and McLaughlin have often been injured during last year. They are not iron men. And lets be honest, I can remember a game where Morris or McLaughlin replaced injured Conley and played well enough to say: they can be Conley replacement. They cant. Thats why NAW is starting at PG when Conley is not playing, and MIN change to more defensive minded style. The real problem when NAW started, is that we had a very short bench. This year we should have more options between Naz, Ingles, TSJ and Rob.

3) You are advocating for more opportunities for young players. But re-signing Anderson and Morris and paying HUGE luxury tax means you have to play them before young players. I cant think about more win now decision, considering Reid and NAW will be free agents next summer. Plus TC has added TSJ and Rob. Plus Anderson and Morris would not help to resolve our main problem: our best players are not our best decision makers. I see more sense in surrounding Towns and Ant with more capable off ball scorers, rather than adding ballhandlers who are not NBA level shooters. So what happened when Conley leaves? Between Anderson and Morris we would have no answer for starting PG and non controlled risk (new contracts of Anderson and Morris). We still have risk of losing NAW next summer, but at least we might have a future starting PG in Rob and cost controlled TSJ who can be really a financial workaround to keep core of this roster construction even if MIN is above 2nd apron. So I think it is investment in Rob and TSJ, and every investment is a risk. But if these guys pan out, this team will have much better chance to succeed

P.S. I also hope that Nix becomes that 0.5 3rd string emergency PG. He seems to improve as defender, and can offer defensive versatility at PG that Morris and McLaughlin could not
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 12,644
And1: 5,474
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: The PJ Dozier Thread 

Post#118 » by winforlose » Wed Jul 17, 2024 5:24 pm

minimus wrote:
winforlose wrote:
minimus wrote:
MIL got Prince, Wright and Trent because they have real holes in roster and opportunities to show themselves. Same with PHO and Morris. MIN roster is stacked. It was pretty clear before FA market opening that MIN was destined to lose in this offseason market because of lack of resources for trades, no cap space, and 2nd apron riles. So what Connelly did during draft is a proactive move to give MIN chance to improve roster BEFORE FA market. For years we saw FA not coming in MIN, so why would they sign now for minimum without promise of playing time?

So no, I don't see it as disappointment at all. Especially after Joe Ingles signing. I find it a brilliant from many perspectives that we got Ingles who has all chemistry in the world to play with Conley and Gobert, adding new dimensions to our offense, AND we got TSJ and Rob who are high potential rookies.

P.S. We are kind of looking under microscope our team problems and they look bigger then they are. MIA, DEN, GSW are dancing around 2nd apron and have much WORSE offseason. PHO are going all in AND had no bench entering offeason. 40mil of luxury tax for Okogie? This is insane.


Last year Mike played more games than in any year since he was 25. He also was banged up in the playoffs and actually missed a game. This year he is 37 and will have a shorter offseason to recover. Instead of having JMAC, Morris, and Kyle to share the load, we have Dilly, Dozier, and Jingles. Of course NAW was around as well, but he was as much the off ball guard to PG Ant as he was backup PG. If you think this isn’t a problem, all I can say is I pray you’re right.


It is definitely a risk. But it is a decision based on a set of factors:

1) Anderson saved our ass in first Rudy year when Towns went down, and he also played great this year when Towns was recovering. Having him playing from bench was luxury because we could counter some matchups with his size and playmaking. But Anderson is a slow methodical playmaker he was great in some situation (mostly playing PF/C) and he was near to unplayable in other situations. He wanted MLE contract, it was expected that we let him go. 40+ mil just for insurance is insane

2) Morris and McLaughlin have often been injured during last year. They are not iron men. And lets be honest, I can remember a game where Morris or McLaughlin replaced injured Conley and played well enough to say: they can be Conley replacement. They cant. Thats why NAW is starting at PG when Conley is not playing, and MIN change to more defensive minded style. The real problem when NAW started, is that we had a very short bench. This year we should have more options between Naz, Ingles, TSJ and Rob.

3) You are advocating for more opportunities for young players. But re-signing Anderson and Morris and paying HUGE luxury tax means you have to play them before young players. I cant think about more win now decision, considering Reid and NAW will be free agents next summer. Plus TC has added TSJ and Rob. Plus Anderson and Morris would not help to resolve our main problem: our best players are not our best decision makers. I see more sense in surrounding Towns and Ant with more capable off ball scorers, rather than adding ballhandlers who are not NBA level shooters. So what happened when Conley leaves? Between Anderson and Morris we would have no answer for starting PG and non controlled risk (new contracts of Anderson and Morris). We still have risk of losing NAW next summer, but at least we might have a future starting PG in Rob and cost controlled TSJ who can be really a financial workaround to keep core of this roster construction even if MIN is above 2nd apron. So I think it is investment in Rob and TSJ, and every investment is a risk. But if these guys pan out, this team will have much better chance to succeed

P.S. I also hope that Nix becomes that 0.5 3rd string emergency PG. He seems to improve as defender, and can offer defensive versatility at PG that Morris and McLaughlin could not



1. I didn’t want Kyle back. I want to be very clear, I have said repeatedly losing Kyle is addition by subtraction. The point was more that he represented someone who could play make.

2. Monte Morris went to the Suns on a minimum. We have seen years of what a healthy Monte can contribute, and I don’t think having a healthy Monte as PG2 while bringing RD along as PG3 would have harmed anyone. The bigger issue is we have high hopes for what RD can give this year. That doesn’t mean you need a bench without alternatives. This is why I am wondering if TC doesn’t trust Finch to play the rookie, and so he pulled a money ball and forced his hand. Either way the whole thing is weird.

3. Nix showed you what he is last night. The dude is a waste of a two way.
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,245
And1: 4,832
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: The PJ Dozier Thread 

Post#119 » by minimus » Wed Jul 17, 2024 8:19 pm

winforlose wrote:
minimus wrote:
winforlose wrote:
Last year Mike played more games than in any year since he was 25. He also was banged up in the playoffs and actually missed a game. This year he is 37 and will have a shorter offseason to recover. Instead of having JMAC, Morris, and Kyle to share the load, we have Dilly, Dozier, and Jingles. Of course NAW was around as well, but he was as much the off ball guard to PG Ant as he was backup PG. If you think this isn’t a problem, all I can say is I pray you’re right.


It is definitely a risk. But it is a decision based on a set of factors:

1) Anderson saved our ass in first Rudy year when Towns went down, and he also played great this year when Towns was recovering. Having him playing from bench was luxury because we could counter some matchups with his size and playmaking. But Anderson is a slow methodical playmaker he was great in some situation (mostly playing PF/C) and he was near to unplayable in other situations. He wanted MLE contract, it was expected that we let him go. 40+ mil just for insurance is insane

2) Morris and McLaughlin have often been injured during last year. They are not iron men. And lets be honest, I can remember a game where Morris or McLaughlin replaced injured Conley and played well enough to say: they can be Conley replacement. They cant. Thats why NAW is starting at PG when Conley is not playing, and MIN change to more defensive minded style. The real problem when NAW started, is that we had a very short bench. This year we should have more options between Naz, Ingles, TSJ and Rob.

3) You are advocating for more opportunities for young players. But re-signing Anderson and Morris and paying HUGE luxury tax means you have to play them before young players. I cant think about more win now decision, considering Reid and NAW will be free agents next summer. Plus TC has added TSJ and Rob. Plus Anderson and Morris would not help to resolve our main problem: our best players are not our best decision makers. I see more sense in surrounding Towns and Ant with more capable off ball scorers, rather than adding ballhandlers who are not NBA level shooters. So what happened when Conley leaves? Between Anderson and Morris we would have no answer for starting PG and non controlled risk (new contracts of Anderson and Morris). We still have risk of losing NAW next summer, but at least we might have a future starting PG in Rob and cost controlled TSJ who can be really a financial workaround to keep core of this roster construction even if MIN is above 2nd apron. So I think it is investment in Rob and TSJ, and every investment is a risk. But if these guys pan out, this team will have much better chance to succeed

P.S. I also hope that Nix becomes that 0.5 3rd string emergency PG. He seems to improve as defender, and can offer defensive versatility at PG that Morris and McLaughlin could not



1. I didn’t want Kyle back. I want to be very clear, I have said repeatedly losing Kyle is addition by subtraction. The point was more that he represented someone who could play make.

2. Monte Morris went to the Suns on a minimum. We have seen years of what a healthy Monte can contribute, and I don’t think having a healthy Monte as PG2 while bringing RD along as PG3 would have harmed anyone. The bigger issue is we have high hopes for what RD can give this year. That doesn’t mean you need a bench without alternatives. This is why I am wondering if TC doesn’t trust Finch to play the rookie, and so he pulled a money ball and forced his hand. Either way the whole thing is weird.

3. Nix showed you what he is last night. The dude is a waste of a two way.


We keep writing same thing, but I will try last time

2. Morris went to the Suns, because they offered him guaranteed minutes. In MIN he would not get these minutes. It would be great if he signs for minimum deal just ot sit behind Conley and Dilly, but it has nothing to do with reality. Let's dont bring conspiracy theories about Finch and Morris. Morris was injured, he missed some three point shots in playoff badly.

3. Nix has been the most consistent in terms of defense and physicality player in SL so far. He had some questionable moments last game, but given how bad that particular game was and SL atmosphere it is nothing to be worried about.

We keep looking under microscope at 3rd PG spot problem. But is it really a problem? At the end of the day we have deep, talented and well balanced roster. It means that 3rd PG problem is about who will get those 1500 total minutes (18 MPG) left from Morris, McLaughlin and Milton. And I really do see here multiple ways:

- give more minutes to Edwards as main ballhandler
- use Ingels as point forward + Towns as offensive hub
- use Ingels as point forward and NAW as pseudo PG
- use Rob as scorer and Nix as big PG
- give all minutes to Rob when he is hot. And I am sure he will get hot in some games
- use Nix if you want more size- use Dozier
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 12,644
And1: 5,474
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: The PJ Dozier Thread 

Post#120 » by winforlose » Wed Jul 17, 2024 8:29 pm

minimus wrote:
winforlose wrote:
minimus wrote:
It is definitely a risk. But it is a decision based on a set of factors:

1) Anderson saved our ass in first Rudy year when Towns went down, and he also played great this year when Towns was recovering. Having him playing from bench was luxury because we could counter some matchups with his size and playmaking. But Anderson is a slow methodical playmaker he was great in some situation (mostly playing PF/C) and he was near to unplayable in other situations. He wanted MLE contract, it was expected that we let him go. 40+ mil just for insurance is insane

2) Morris and McLaughlin have often been injured during last year. They are not iron men. And lets be honest, I can remember a game where Morris or McLaughlin replaced injured Conley and played well enough to say: they can be Conley replacement. They cant. Thats why NAW is starting at PG when Conley is not playing, and MIN change to more defensive minded style. The real problem when NAW started, is that we had a very short bench. This year we should have more options between Naz, Ingles, TSJ and Rob.

3) You are advocating for more opportunities for young players. But re-signing Anderson and Morris and paying HUGE luxury tax means you have to play them before young players. I cant think about more win now decision, considering Reid and NAW will be free agents next summer. Plus TC has added TSJ and Rob. Plus Anderson and Morris would not help to resolve our main problem: our best players are not our best decision makers. I see more sense in surrounding Towns and Ant with more capable off ball scorers, rather than adding ballhandlers who are not NBA level shooters. So what happened when Conley leaves? Between Anderson and Morris we would have no answer for starting PG and non controlled risk (new contracts of Anderson and Morris). We still have risk of losing NAW next summer, but at least we might have a future starting PG in Rob and cost controlled TSJ who can be really a financial workaround to keep core of this roster construction even if MIN is above 2nd apron. So I think it is investment in Rob and TSJ, and every investment is a risk. But if these guys pan out, this team will have much better chance to succeed

P.S. I also hope that Nix becomes that 0.5 3rd string emergency PG. He seems to improve as defender, and can offer defensive versatility at PG that Morris and McLaughlin could not



1. I didn’t want Kyle back. I want to be very clear, I have said repeatedly losing Kyle is addition by subtraction. The point was more that he represented someone who could play make.

2. Monte Morris went to the Suns on a minimum. We have seen years of what a healthy Monte can contribute, and I don’t think having a healthy Monte as PG2 while bringing RD along as PG3 would have harmed anyone. The bigger issue is we have high hopes for what RD can give this year. That doesn’t mean you need a bench without alternatives. This is why I am wondering if TC doesn’t trust Finch to play the rookie, and so he pulled a money ball and forced his hand. Either way the whole thing is weird.

3. Nix showed you what he is last night. The dude is a waste of a two way.


We keep writing same thing, but I will try last time

2. Morris went to the Suns, because they offered him guaranteed minutes. In MIN he would not get these minutes. It would be great if he signs for minimum deal just ot sit behind Conley and Dilly, but it has nothing to do with reality. Let's dont bring conspiracy theories about Finch and Morris. Morris was injured, he missed some three point shots in playoff badly.

3. Nix has been the most consistent in terms of defense and physicality player in SL so far. He had some questionable moments last game, but given how bad that particular game was and SL atmosphere it is nothing to be worried about.

We keep looking under microscope at 3rd PG spot problem. But is it really a problem? At the end of the day we have deep, talented and well balanced roster. It means that 3rd PG problem is about who will get those 1500 total minutes (18 MPG) left from Morris, McLaughlin and Milton. And I really do see here multiple ways:

- give more minutes to Edwards as main ballhandler
- use Ingels as point forward + Towns as offensive hub
- use Ingels as point forward and NAW as pseudo PG
- use Rob as scorer and Nix as big PG
- give all minutes to Rob when he is hot. And I am sure he will get hot in some games
- use Nix if you want more size- use Dozier


I hear you. I think what you aren’t addressing is that Mike is going to age out in the next 2 years. We have RD as the PG of the future, and no one behind him. A common misconception is that the PG is no longer important in the modern game. Yet the Suns blame getting swept on not having a PG, hence the addition of Morris with a promise of real minutes. We drafted RD to give us something we were missing last year so we handed him PG2 and said good luck. If he had been PG3 this year and brought along more slowly with Morris as PG2 (and the promise of real minute,) you have insurance, development, and a Mike Conley Succession plan. We have seen other offense struggle using guys who aren’t PGs to run the offense, hopefully we do it better.

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves