That was pretty great.
The Official Jaden McDaniels Thread
Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks
Re: The Official Jaden McDaniels Thread
-
KGdaBom
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,161
- And1: 6,300
- Joined: Jun 22, 2017
-
Re: The Official Jaden McDaniels Thread
-
KGdaBom
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,161
- And1: 6,300
- Joined: Jun 22, 2017
-
Re: The Official Jaden McDaniels Thread
BlacJacMac wrote:Guest84 wrote:What does Jaden have to do to be recognized as a top defender? Seems like he's never really considered for the defensive teams.
He was NBA All-Defensive Second Team last season.
Behind more deserving first team players?
Re: The Official Jaden McDaniels Thread
-
winforlose
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,225
- And1: 5,802
- Joined: Feb 27, 2020
Re: The Official Jaden McDaniels Thread
Honestly this smells like politics to me. It is hard to give a 49 win team two all defensive players. Especially when they are not the top defensive team in the league. Rudy being Defensive Player of the Year last year forces them to place him on second team this year. Jaden just gets the short end of that stick.
Re: The Official Jaden McDaniels Thread
-
minimus
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,707
- And1: 5,202
- Joined: Jan 28, 2011
- Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
-
Re: The Official Jaden McDaniels Thread
-
minimus
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,707
- And1: 5,202
- Joined: Jan 28, 2011
- Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
-
Re: The Official Jaden McDaniels Thread
-
minimus
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,707
- And1: 5,202
- Joined: Jan 28, 2011
- Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
-
Re: The Official Jaden McDaniels Thread
-
Klomp
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 69,337
- And1: 22,761
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: The Official Jaden McDaniels Thread
minimus wrote:I still believe Jaden can be that second option
I definitely believe he has the capability....the question becomes if he has the mentality. Honestly -- and this is probably going to come off as worse than I mean for it to -- I wonder if his mentality towards offense is a little bit of the Wiggins syndrome, where he's just a bit too passive to be relied on in that way. You see it once he was traded to Golden State, he was fine as a third or fourth option where he didn't have the same expectations on a nightly basis. You could also throw an Andre Iguodala comp in there, similarly. I worry that Jaden's offense will never scale up to where we'd be satisfied with him as a second option on a contending team.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: The Official Jaden McDaniels Thread
-
FrenchMinnyFan
- Starter
- Posts: 2,009
- And1: 1,222
- Joined: Feb 10, 2023
-
Re: The Official Jaden McDaniels Thread
Klomp wrote:minimus wrote:I still believe Jaden can be that second option
I definitely believe he has the capability....the question becomes if he has the mentality. Honestly -- and this is probably going to come off as worse than I mean for it to -- I wonder if his mentality towards offense is a little bit of the Wiggins syndrome, where he's just a bit too passive to be relied on in that way. You see it once he was traded to Golden State, he was fine as a third or fourth option where he didn't have the same expectations on a nightly basis. You could also throw an Andre Iguodala comp in there, similarly. I worry that Jaden's offense will never scale up to where we'd be satisfied with him as a second option on a contending team.
I agree with you, Jaden will remain for me a 3rd option when it comes to offense. But i expect him to be a DPOY on the future. Hope Randle can be consistent at 20 PPG per night as we will need that to compete. That's also why i was full in for KD as it would have been a near perfect fit (except age).
Re: The Official Jaden McDaniels Thread
-
Klomp
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 69,337
- And1: 22,761
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: The Official Jaden McDaniels Thread
FrenchMinnyFan wrote:Hope Randle can be consistent at 20 PPG per night as we will need that to compete. That's also why i was full in for KD as it would have been a near perfect fit (except age).
I am still so optimistic about the franchise's longterm trajectory, because I feel so confident that we have our first (Ant), third (Jaden) and fourth option (Naz) locked in, plus both short-term (Rudy) and longterm (Joan) pieces at center. What we need is that second piece. The team-friendly deals signed by Jaden and Naz (and acquired in Donte) plus the cap-friendly development pieces (TJ, Rob, Jaylen) leaves that much more flexibility on the cap sheet to aggressively pursue a second option, whether it's a PF who keeps Naz as 6th man going forward or a PG who caps Rob as a 6th man upside going forward.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: The Official Jaden McDaniels Thread
-
KGdaBom
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,161
- And1: 6,300
- Joined: Jun 22, 2017
-
Re: The Official Jaden McDaniels Thread
FrenchMinnyFan wrote:Klomp wrote:minimus wrote:I still believe Jaden can be that second option
I definitely believe he has the capability....the question becomes if he has the mentality. Honestly -- and this is probably going to come off as worse than I mean for it to -- I wonder if his mentality towards offense is a little bit of the Wiggins syndrome, where he's just a bit too passive to be relied on in that way. You see it once he was traded to Golden State, he was fine as a third or fourth option where he didn't have the same expectations on a nightly basis. You could also throw an Andre Iguodala comp in there, similarly. I worry that Jaden's offense will never scale up to where we'd be satisfied with him as a second option on a contending team.
I agree with you, Jaden will remain for me a 3rd option when it comes to offense. But i expect him to be a DPOY on the future. Hope Randle can be consistent at 20 PPG per night as we will need that to compete. That's also why i was full in for KD as it would have been a near perfect fit (except age).
Randle will have no problem carrying as much of a scoring load as we want to give him.
Re: The Official Jaden McDaniels Thread
-
KGdaBom
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,161
- And1: 6,300
- Joined: Jun 22, 2017
-
Re: The Official Jaden McDaniels Thread
Klomp wrote:FrenchMinnyFan wrote:Hope Randle can be consistent at 20 PPG per night as we will need that to compete. That's also why i was full in for KD as it would have been a near perfect fit (except age).
I am still so optimistic about the franchise's longterm trajectory, because I feel so confident that we have our first (Ant), third (Jaden) and fourth option (Naz) locked in, plus both short-term (Rudy) and longterm (Joan) pieces at center. What we need is that second piece. The team-friendly deals signed by Jaden and Naz (and acquired in Donte) plus the cap-friendly development pieces (TJ, Rob, Jaylen) leaves that much more flexibility on the cap sheet to aggressively pursue a second option, whether it's a PF who keeps Naz as 6th man going forward or a PG who caps Rob as a 6th man upside going forward.
Make it a PG if Rob can be the next Lou Williams.
Re: The Official Jaden McDaniels Thread
-
Wolveswin
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,266
- And1: 2,976
- Joined: Aug 22, 2020
-
Re: The Official Jaden McDaniels Thread
Klomp wrote:FrenchMinnyFan wrote:Hope Randle can be consistent at 20 PPG per night as we will need that to compete. That's also why i was full in for KD as it would have been a near perfect fit (except age).
I am still so optimistic about the franchise's longterm trajectory, because I feel so confident that we have our first (Ant), third (Jaden) and fourth option (Naz) locked in, plus both short-term (Rudy) and longterm (Joan) pieces at center. What we need is that second piece. The team-friendly deals signed by Jaden and Naz (and acquired in Donte) plus the cap-friendly development pieces (TJ, Rob, Jaylen) leaves that much more flexibility on the cap sheet to aggressively pursue a second option, whether it's a PF who keeps Naz as 6th man going forward or a PG who caps Rob as a 6th man upside going forward.
Great post.
I think with Randle as 2nd option, Wolves are capped out as WCF (which wasn’t competitive). Jaden is 3rd option for sure.
Wolves need an all-in trade. It will cost them Randle, DDV (most likely), Dilly (for right PG upgrade) and other assets. To get over that WCF hump, that all-in trade needs to be perfectly aligned and executed.
Re: The Official Jaden McDaniels Thread
-
Dewey
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,903
- And1: 1,072
- Joined: May 22, 2001
Re: The Official Jaden McDaniels Thread
Wolveswin wrote:Klomp wrote:FrenchMinnyFan wrote:Hope Randle can be consistent at 20 PPG per night as we will need that to compete. That's also why i was full in for KD as it would have been a near perfect fit (except age).
I am still so optimistic about the franchise's longterm trajectory, because I feel so confident that we have our first (Ant), third (Jaden) and fourth option (Naz) locked in, plus both short-term (Rudy) and longterm (Joan) pieces at center. What we need is that second piece. The team-friendly deals signed by Jaden and Naz (and acquired in Donte) plus the cap-friendly development pieces (TJ, Rob, Jaylen) leaves that much more flexibility on the cap sheet to aggressively pursue a second option, whether it's a PF who keeps Naz as 6th man going forward or a PG who caps Rob as a 6th man upside going forward.
Great post.
I think with Randle as 2nd option, Wolves are capped out as WCF (which wasn’t competitive). Jaden is 3rd option for sure.
Wolves need an all-in trade. It will cost them Randle, DDV (most likely), Dilly (for right PG upgrade) and other assets. To get over that WCF hump, that all-in trade needs to be perfectly aligned and executed.
All-in Trade is our only chance to exceed being just a mediocre playoff team
Flip response to Love wanting out, "He has no reason to be upset, you're either a part of the problem or a part of the solution"
Re: The Official Jaden McDaniels Thread
-
KGdaBom
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,161
- And1: 6,300
- Joined: Jun 22, 2017
-
Re: The Official Jaden McDaniels Thread
Dewey wrote:Wolveswin wrote:Klomp wrote:I am still so optimistic about the franchise's longterm trajectory, because I feel so confident that we have our first (Ant), third (Jaden) and fourth option (Naz) locked in, plus both short-term (Rudy) and longterm (Joan) pieces at center. What we need is that second piece. The team-friendly deals signed by Jaden and Naz (and acquired in Donte) plus the cap-friendly development pieces (TJ, Rob, Jaylen) leaves that much more flexibility on the cap sheet to aggressively pursue a second option, whether it's a PF who keeps Naz as 6th man going forward or a PG who caps Rob as a 6th man upside going forward.
Great post.
I think with Randle as 2nd option, Wolves are capped out as WCF (which wasn’t competitive). Jaden is 3rd option for sure.
Wolves need an all-in trade. It will cost them Randle, DDV (most likely), Dilly (for right PG upgrade) and other assets. To get over that WCF hump, that all-in trade needs to be perfectly aligned and executed.
All-in Trade is our only chance to exceed being just a mediocre playoff team
I don't buy this line of thinking for a second. Michael Jordan won his first title at 28 years old. Ant is 24. No drastic all in move is needed and it could destroy the team.
Re: The Official Jaden McDaniels Thread
-
Norseman79
- Starter
- Posts: 2,401
- And1: 872
- Joined: Jul 26, 2017
-
Re: The Official Jaden McDaniels Thread
Wolveswin wrote:Klomp wrote:FrenchMinnyFan wrote:Hope Randle can be consistent at 20 PPG per night as we will need that to compete. That's also why i was full in for KD as it would have been a near perfect fit (except age).
I am still so optimistic about the franchise's longterm trajectory, because I feel so confident that we have our first (Ant), third (Jaden) and fourth option (Naz) locked in, plus both short-term (Rudy) and longterm (Joan) pieces at center. What we need is that second piece. The team-friendly deals signed by Jaden and Naz (and acquired in Donte) plus the cap-friendly development pieces (TJ, Rob, Jaylen) leaves that much more flexibility on the cap sheet to aggressively pursue a second option, whether it's a PF who keeps Naz as 6th man going forward or a PG who caps Rob as a 6th man upside going forward.
Great post.
I think with Randle as 2nd option, Wolves are capped out as WCF (which wasn’t competitive). Jaden is 3rd option for sure.
Wolves need an all-in trade. It will cost them Randle, DDV (most likely), Dilly (for right PG upgrade) and other assets. To get over that WCF hump, that all-in trade needs to be perfectly aligned and executed.
Here's the problem, which PG, that might be realistically available, is actually worth that package?
Re: The Official Jaden McDaniels Thread
-
KGdaBom
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,161
- And1: 6,300
- Joined: Jun 22, 2017
-
Re: The Official Jaden McDaniels Thread
Norseman79 wrote:Wolveswin wrote:Klomp wrote:I am still so optimistic about the franchise's longterm trajectory, because I feel so confident that we have our first (Ant), third (Jaden) and fourth option (Naz) locked in, plus both short-term (Rudy) and longterm (Joan) pieces at center. What we need is that second piece. The team-friendly deals signed by Jaden and Naz (and acquired in Donte) plus the cap-friendly development pieces (TJ, Rob, Jaylen) leaves that much more flexibility on the cap sheet to aggressively pursue a second option, whether it's a PF who keeps Naz as 6th man going forward or a PG who caps Rob as a 6th man upside going forward.
Great post.
I think with Randle as 2nd option, Wolves are capped out as WCF (which wasn’t competitive). Jaden is 3rd option for sure.
Wolves need an all-in trade. It will cost them Randle, DDV (most likely), Dilly (for right PG upgrade) and other assets. To get over that WCF hump, that all-in trade needs to be perfectly aligned and executed.
Here's the problem, which PG, that might be realistically available, is actually worth that package?
None.
Re: The Official Jaden McDaniels Thread
-
Wolveswin
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,266
- And1: 2,976
- Joined: Aug 22, 2020
-
Re: The Official Jaden McDaniels Thread
KGdaBom wrote:Dewey wrote:Wolveswin wrote:Great post.
I think with Randle as 2nd option, Wolves are capped out as WCF (which wasn’t competitive). Jaden is 3rd option for sure.
Wolves need an all-in trade. It will cost them Randle, DDV (most likely), Dilly (for right PG upgrade) and other assets. To get over that WCF hump, that all-in trade needs to be perfectly aligned and executed.
All-in Trade is our only chance to exceed being just a mediocre playoff team
I don't buy this line of thinking for a second. Michael Jordan won his first title at 28 years old. Ant is 24. No drastic all in move is needed and it could destroy the team.
Using an outlier like Jordan (the GOAT) isn’t a realistic comparison for team building modeling.
Re: The Official Jaden McDaniels Thread
-
Wolveswin
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,266
- And1: 2,976
- Joined: Aug 22, 2020
-
Re: The Official Jaden McDaniels Thread
Norseman79 wrote:Wolveswin wrote:Klomp wrote:I am still so optimistic about the franchise's longterm trajectory, because I feel so confident that we have our first (Ant), third (Jaden) and fourth option (Naz) locked in, plus both short-term (Rudy) and longterm (Joan) pieces at center. What we need is that second piece. The team-friendly deals signed by Jaden and Naz (and acquired in Donte) plus the cap-friendly development pieces (TJ, Rob, Jaylen) leaves that much more flexibility on the cap sheet to aggressively pursue a second option, whether it's a PF who keeps Naz as 6th man going forward or a PG who caps Rob as a 6th man upside going forward.
Great post.
I think with Randle as 2nd option, Wolves are capped out as WCF (which wasn’t competitive). Jaden is 3rd option for sure.
Wolves need an all-in trade. It will cost them Randle, DDV (most likely), Dilly (for right PG upgrade) and other assets. To get over that WCF hump, that all-in trade needs to be perfectly aligned and executed.
Here's the problem, which PG, that might be realistically available, is actually worth that package?
Perfect isn’t available. Perfect also isn’t in Wolves price range. But is a roster upgrade available that takes Wolves to next level and in trade, a finals winning level. Names that can be mentioned we all will poke holes based on our own personal preference - but point is, Wolves need to make the trade and find out. Sitting back and hoping Edwards becomes Jordan and McDaniels becomes Pippen while hoping OKC and others sit on hands and regress isn’t a plan.
Re: The Official Jaden McDaniels Thread
-
Klomp
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 69,337
- And1: 22,761
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: The Official Jaden McDaniels Thread
Dewey wrote:All-in Trade is our only chance to exceed being just a mediocre playoff team
We have been in the last two WCFs. We are not a mediocre playoff team.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: The Official Jaden McDaniels Thread
-
shrink
- RealGM
- Posts: 59,410
- And1: 19,461
- Joined: Sep 26, 2005
Re: The Official Jaden McDaniels Thread
Klomp wrote:Dewey wrote:All-in Trade is our only chance to exceed being just a mediocre playoff team
We have been in the last two WCFs. We are not a mediocre playoff team.
I’m not so sure.
Two years ago we made the WCF, but we were just a top three Western Conference team.
Last year we made the finals too, but I wouldn’t say we were significantly better than about seven western teams.
Yes, we were 4-2 the last two years in the playoffs, but we weren’t heavily favored in any of them - many even picked PHX to upset su because it was a bad match up.
I’m not saying we’re a bad team, and we have the chance for internal growth. And the playoffs wins rose expectations. But I wouldn’t disagree with anyone who said we have been a mediocre playoff team that got some upset wins. And most of our rivals in the West got better in the off-season, while we probably declined.
I think it will take some tremendous growth and a lot of luck for us to get back to the WCF without a big move. And maybe that’s okay. But those playoff upsets the last two years will quickly be forgotten by the “Fire Finch!” crowd if we don’t get back to the WCF again this year.
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves


