ImageImageImage

Trade Talk (Part 15): Trade Deadline Day (and onwards!)

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

Norseman79
Starter
Posts: 2,420
And1: 876
Joined: Jul 26, 2017
     

Re: Trade Talk (Part 15): Trade Deadline Day (and onwards!) 

Post#1021 » by Norseman79 » Sun Jun 16, 2024 11:35 am

Domejandro wrote:I'm not trying to be a jerk, but I legitimately see absolutely zero reasonable arguments why the Washington Wizards would rather have Naz Reid on a 1+1 (PO) deal over Deni Avdija on a fully guaranteed, descending 55/4 deal. Even if we grant the (respectfully, wrong) argument that Naz Reid is a better player, that contract is easily in the top five biggest steals in the NBA right now.

Naz Reid: $13,986,432 / $15,022,464 (PO)
vs.
Deni Avdija: $15,625,000 / $14,375,000 / $13,125,000 / $11,875,000

Even if Deni Avdija never improved and stayed as a decent-level starter, he is making 11% of the salary cap next season, with a contract that is decending by $1.3MM each season (while the salary cap continues to climb). That is an unbelievable bargain, the Washington Wizards would be obscenely dumb to make that swap, even with the overrating of Naz Reid's impact that is happening.


I literally just threw out Deni because it was a different name on a different team than what we have been discussing. I think you have great reasons for your view. Personally, I don't think we change anything. If we do it will be big, but I doubt it. Avdija does have a great contract it was part of why I chose him. People were saying Naz has been valued up to the number 5 pick in this draft, if that is true, then I think Washington does it. However, for reasons you stated, if Wizards just see Naz as a good bench piece then they wouldn't touch it.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,616
And1: 22,978
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part 15): Trade Deadline Day (and onwards!) 

Post#1022 » by Klomp » Sun Jun 16, 2024 10:34 pm

If we played around with an offer that started out as Naz Reid ($13,986,432) + Nickeil Alexander-Walker ($4,312,500) for Jordan Clarkson ($14,092,577) + Walker Kessler ($2,965,920), where does value need to be added?

MIN Out: $18,298,932
UTA Out: $17,058,497
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
KATKlownFeet
Junior
Posts: 258
And1: 103
Joined: Jul 30, 2021
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part 15): Trade Deadline Day (and onwards!) 

Post#1023 » by KATKlownFeet » Mon Jun 17, 2024 1:59 am

Klomp wrote:If we played around with an offer that started out as Naz Reid ($13,986,432) + Nickeil Alexander-Walker ($4,312,500) for Jordan Clarkson ($14,092,577) + Walker Kessler ($2,965,920), where does value need to be added?

MIN Out: $18,298,932
UTA Out: $17,058,497


I can't see Utah trading Kessler for those names. I think he's viewed as one of their core pieces.
Note30
Head Coach
Posts: 6,207
And1: 1,916
Joined: Feb 25, 2014
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part 15): Trade Deadline Day (and onwards!) 

Post#1024 » by Note30 » Mon Jun 17, 2024 2:14 am

Klomp wrote:If we played around with an offer that started out as Naz Reid ($13,986,432) + Nickeil Alexander-Walker ($4,312,500) for Jordan Clarkson ($14,092,577) + Walker Kessler ($2,965,920), where does value need to be added?

MIN Out: $18,298,932
UTA Out: $17,058,497


Though we couldn't aggregate salaries?
BlacJacMac
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,887
And1: 3,566
Joined: Aug 25, 2020
       

Re: Trade Talk (Part 15): Trade Deadline Day (and onwards!) 

Post#1025 » by BlacJacMac » Mon Jun 17, 2024 2:41 am

Note30 wrote:
Klomp wrote:If we played around with an offer that started out as Naz Reid ($13,986,432) + Nickeil Alexander-Walker ($4,312,500) for Jordan Clarkson ($14,092,577) + Walker Kessler ($2,965,920), where does value need to be added?

MIN Out: $18,298,932
UTA Out: $17,058,497


Though we couldn't aggregate salaries?


Before July 1st we can.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,616
And1: 22,978
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part 15): Trade Deadline Day (and onwards!) 

Post#1026 » by Klomp » Mon Jun 17, 2024 3:26 am

Note30 wrote:
Klomp wrote:If we played around with an offer that started out as Naz Reid ($13,986,432) + Nickeil Alexander-Walker ($4,312,500) for Jordan Clarkson ($14,092,577) + Walker Kessler ($2,965,920), where does value need to be added?

MIN Out: $18,298,932
UTA Out: $17,058,497


Though we couldn't aggregate salaries?

It's a tricky thing because two people outgoing in a trade doesn't necessarily mean their salaries are being aggregated. Though in my example above I don't believe I could technically do the Clarkson/Reid part of the swap after looking again, because we'd be adding salary in that part.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,616
And1: 22,978
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part 15): Trade Deadline Day (and onwards!) 

Post#1027 » by Klomp » Mon Jun 17, 2024 3:29 am

BlacJacMac wrote:
Note30 wrote:
Klomp wrote:If we played around with an offer that started out as Naz Reid ($13,986,432) + Nickeil Alexander-Walker ($4,312,500) for Jordan Clarkson ($14,092,577) + Walker Kessler ($2,965,920), where does value need to be added?

MIN Out: $18,298,932
UTA Out: $17,058,497


Though we couldn't aggregate salaries?


Before July 1st we can.

Clarkson's cap number is currently much higher, so not sure if it would work now in the suggested format.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Neeva
General Manager
Posts: 7,541
And1: 2,914
Joined: Jun 03, 2016

Re: Trade Talk (Part 15): Trade Deadline Day (and onwards!) 

Post#1028 » by Neeva » Mon Jun 17, 2024 5:30 am

Klomp wrote:If we played around with an offer that started out as Naz Reid ($13,986,432) + Nickeil Alexander-Walker ($4,312,500) for Jordan Clarkson ($14,092,577) + Walker Kessler ($2,965,920), where does value need to be added?

MIN Out: $18,298,932
UTA Out: $17,058,497


This would take a 27 for 10 swap to be even IMO but Utah probably wouldn’t go for that.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,491
And1: 19,567
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: Trade Talk (Part 15): Trade Deadline Day (and onwards!) 

Post#1029 » by shrink » Mon Jun 17, 2024 1:45 pm

Klomp wrote:If we played around with an offer that started out as Naz Reid ($13,986,432) + Nickeil Alexander-Walker ($4,312,500) for Jordan Clarkson ($14,092,577) + Walker Kessler ($2,965,920), where does value need to be added?

MIN Out: $18,298,932
UTA Out: $17,058,497

So if we are looking longterm, the concept here is good. The teams that should place extra value on our players who will be free agents next year is exactly a team like Utah, who is not a free agent destination, and has plenty of financial flexibility to re-sign both players with Bird rights. We would likely struggle to bring either back ourselves, so those are the teams we would target.

That said, I am not a big enough fan of Clarkson or Kessler to pull the trigger. I could see how Clarkson could become MIN’s sixth man, but the team has an advantage with Naz in that role, throwing 5 quality players 6-9 or taller at opponents, and seeing if they are deep enough to keep up. I haven’t been impressed with Kessler, who has gone from people, last year saying “he’s a cheaper Gobert! Lol” to not even starting for the Jazz last season.

While this type of deal could be an advantage longterm, I think it makes us worse next year, affecting our continuity and style of play, and fans love Naz, so I’d rather see what we can do next year. Maybe a Naz trade would work for me with a different player tipping he scales? But the concept here is sound from a GM perspective.
cmoss84
Pro Prospect
Posts: 965
And1: 330
Joined: Jan 06, 2022

Re: Trade Talk (Part 15): Trade Deadline Day (and onwards!) 

Post#1030 » by cmoss84 » Mon Jun 17, 2024 6:36 pm

I'm sure it never happens...but what if KAT and Naz are both traded in off season?
I know this sounds ridiculous, but both players have significant reasons to get traded.
How would you maximize each trade?
I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,616
And1: 22,978
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part 15): Trade Deadline Day (and onwards!) 

Post#1031 » by Klomp » Mon Jun 17, 2024 7:38 pm

shrink wrote:
Klomp wrote:If we played around with an offer that started out as Naz Reid ($13,986,432) + Nickeil Alexander-Walker ($4,312,500) for Jordan Clarkson ($14,092,577) + Walker Kessler ($2,965,920), where does value need to be added?

MIN Out: $18,298,932
UTA Out: $17,058,497

So if we are looking longterm, the concept here is good. The teams that should place extra value on our players who will be free agents next year is exactly a team like Utah, who is not a free agent destination, and has plenty of financial flexibility to re-sign both players with Bird rights. We would likely struggle to bring either back ourselves, so those are the teams we would target.

That said, I am not a big enough fan of Clarkson or Kessler to pull the trigger. I could see how Clarkson could become MIN’s sixth man, but the team has an advantage with Naz in that role, throwing 5 quality players 6-9 or taller at opponents, and seeing if they are deep enough to keep up. I haven’t been impressed with Kessler, who has gone from people, last year saying “he’s a cheaper Gobert! Lol” to not even starting for the Jazz last season.

While this type of deal could be an advantage longterm, I think it makes us worse next year, affecting our continuity and style of play, and fans love Naz, so I’d rather see what we can do next year. Maybe a Naz trade would work for me with a different player tipping he scales? But the concept here is sound from a GM perspective.


I wanted to address this specifically. I actually don't think the team will shy away from a move that might seem like a step back in the short-term if they believe it sets them up longterm. Your point about Naz is 100% correct though. Trust me, I am in no rush to trade Naz Reid. I even think there is still room for growth in his game.

But on Walker Kessler, I'd imagine the front office is still a fan of his. And if we are looking to continue the big lineup, at some point we will need a defensive big man to continue playing this way. Ideally I would pair Reid and Kessler instead of Towns and Kessler, but that might not be an option.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,491
And1: 19,567
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: Trade Talk (Part 15): Trade Deadline Day (and onwards!) 

Post#1032 » by shrink » Mon Jun 17, 2024 7:40 pm

Tim Connelly had to wait almost ten years between drafting Gobert, and seeing him play for his team.

You’re right, maybe he doesn’t want to wait that long on Kessler?
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,616
And1: 22,978
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part 15): Trade Deadline Day (and onwards!) 

Post#1033 » by Klomp » Mon Jun 17, 2024 8:10 pm

If we want to look at teams who might have an interest in Towns and might have pieces we'd be interested in, I wonder about Houston.

Dillon Brooks ($22,255,493 declining) and Steven Adams (12,600,000 expiring) provide a pretty good starting point to get to the higher salary total necessary, and then you could mix and match a young piece or two from there.

Trading within the conference isn't ideal, however.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Norseman79
Starter
Posts: 2,420
And1: 876
Joined: Jul 26, 2017
     

Re: Trade Talk (Part 15): Trade Deadline Day (and onwards!) 

Post#1034 » by Norseman79 » Mon Jun 17, 2024 8:38 pm

Klomp wrote:If we want to look at teams who might have an interest in Towns and might have pieces we'd be interested in, I wonder about Houston.

Dillon Brooks ($22,255,493 declining) and Steven Adams (12,600,000 expiring) provide a pretty good starting point to get to the higher salary total necessary, and then you could mix and match a young piece or two from there.

Trading within the conference isn't ideal, however.


I like Jabari Smith, I know I'm probably on an island...

Min out: Towns
In: Adams, Smith, 24 2nd, 25 OKC/Brooklyn 1, 27 Brooklyn 1

Houston out: Adams,Smith.....
In: Towns

Houston:
VanVleet
Green
Brooks/Thompson
Towns
Klingen

Min:
Conley Jr
Edwards
McDaniels
Smith, Reid
Gobert, Adams

27 million in cap relief.

Keep Brooks outta here

(Maybe sign Fultz and Oubre if we can)
Note30
Head Coach
Posts: 6,207
And1: 1,916
Joined: Feb 25, 2014
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part 15): Trade Deadline Day (and onwards!) 

Post#1035 » by Note30 » Mon Jun 17, 2024 8:58 pm

MIN Out: Reid, NAW, #27, #37, 2028 1st swap, 2030 1st swap
NO Out: Murphy III, Herb Jones, Alvarado


It's a huge risk but. We keep Towns and can look into trading McDaniels for a PG.

Conley/Alvarado
Edwards/Murphy
McDaniels/Jones
Towns/Anderson
Gobert/Towns
jpatrick
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,744
And1: 1,965
Joined: May 30, 2007
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part 15): Trade Deadline Day (and onwards!) 

Post#1036 » by jpatrick » Mon Jun 17, 2024 9:32 pm

Norseman79 wrote:
Klomp wrote:If we want to look at teams who might have an interest in Towns and might have pieces we'd be interested in, I wonder about Houston.

Dillon Brooks ($22,255,493 declining) and Steven Adams (12,600,000 expiring) provide a pretty good starting point to get to the higher salary total necessary, and then you could mix and match a young piece or two from there.

Trading within the conference isn't ideal, however.


I like Jabari Smith, I know I'm probably on an island...

Min out: Towns
In: Adams, Smith, 24 2nd, 25 OKC/Brooklyn 1, 27 Brooklyn 1

Houston out: Adams,Smith.....
In: Towns

Houston:
VanVleet
Green
Brooks/Thompson
Towns
Klingen

Min:
Conley Jr
Edwards
McDaniels
Smith, Reid
Gobert, Adams

27 million in cap relief.

Keep Brooks outta here

(Maybe sign Fultz and Oubre if we can)


I’m firmly on Smith Island. Versatile defender. Can shoot. And put up very good numbers as a big at age 20. He’s still younger than half the 2024 draft prospects. If the Rockets would move Smith/filler/#3, I’d absolutely listen (I’d be shocked if they make that offer though). Smith won’t be the scorer Towns is, but longterm he may make us a better team due to his defense (3&D PF).
Norseman79
Starter
Posts: 2,420
And1: 876
Joined: Jul 26, 2017
     

Re: Trade Talk (Part 15): Trade Deadline Day (and onwards!) 

Post#1037 » by Norseman79 » Tue Jun 18, 2024 2:03 am

jpatrick wrote:
Norseman79 wrote:
Klomp wrote:If we want to look at teams who might have an interest in Towns and might have pieces we'd be interested in, I wonder about Houston.

Dillon Brooks ($22,255,493 declining) and Steven Adams (12,600,000 expiring) provide a pretty good starting point to get to the higher salary total necessary, and then you could mix and match a young piece or two from there.

Trading within the conference isn't ideal, however.


I like Jabari Smith, I know I'm probably on an island...

Min out: Towns
In: Adams, Smith, 24 2nd, 25 OKC/Brooklyn 1, 27 Brooklyn 1

Houston out: Adams,Smith.....
In: Towns

Houston:
VanVleet
Green
Brooks/Thompson
Towns
Klingen

Min:
Conley Jr
Edwards
McDaniels
Smith, Reid
Gobert, Adams

27 million in cap relief.

Keep Brooks outta here

(Maybe sign Fultz and Oubre if we can)


I’m firmly on Smith Island. Versatile defender. Can shoot. And put up very good numbers as a big at age 20. He’s still younger than half the 2024 draft prospects. If the Rockets would move Smith/filler/#3, I’d absolutely listen (I’d be shocked if they make that offer though). Smith won’t be the scorer Towns is, but longterm he may make us a better team due to his defense (3&D PF).


I don't want the three, it's unrealistic. I'd rather grab next year's 2, and then get 27 & 29 firsts back. Like I said, we save almost 27 million in that trade

I'm not a great cap mind like some of the others on here, but imagine if..

Conley, Fultz
Edwards, Naw
McDaniels, Oubre
Smith, Reid
Gobert, Adams
Biff Cooper
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,751
And1: 343
Joined: Jan 02, 2009
Location: Northern Minnesota
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part 15): Trade Deadline Day (and onwards!) 

Post#1038 » by Biff Cooper » Tue Jun 18, 2024 6:49 pm

Norseman79 wrote:
jpatrick wrote:
Norseman79 wrote:
I like Jabari Smith, I know I'm probably on an island...

Min out: Towns
In: Adams, Smith, 24 2nd, 25 OKC/Brooklyn 1, 27 Brooklyn 1

Houston out: Adams,Smith.....
In: Towns

Houston:
VanVleet
Green
Brooks/Thompson
Towns
Klingen

Min:
Conley Jr
Edwards
McDaniels
Smith, Reid
Gobert, Adams

27 million in cap relief.

Keep Brooks outta here

(Maybe sign Fultz and Oubre if we can)


I’m firmly on Smith Island. Versatile defender. Can shoot. And put up very good numbers as a big at age 20. He’s still younger than half the 2024 draft prospects. If the Rockets would move Smith/filler/#3, I’d absolutely listen (I’d be shocked if they make that offer though). Smith won’t be the scorer Towns is, but longterm he may make us a better team due to his defense (3&D PF).


I don't want the three, it's unrealistic. I'd rather grab next year's 2, and then get 27 & 29 firsts back. Like I said, we save almost 27 million in that trade

I'm not a great cap mind like some of the others on here, but imagine if..

Conley, Fultz
Edwards, Naw
McDaniels, Oubre
Smith, Reid
Gobert, Adams


What if it is just Towns for Smith, Brooks, and Adams and skip the picks? I'd definitely consider it.
Norseman79
Starter
Posts: 2,420
And1: 876
Joined: Jul 26, 2017
     

Re: Trade Talk (Part 15): Trade Deadline Day (and onwards!) 

Post#1039 » by Norseman79 » Tue Jun 18, 2024 6:56 pm

Biff Cooper wrote:
Norseman79 wrote:
jpatrick wrote:
I’m firmly on Smith Island. Versatile defender. Can shoot. And put up very good numbers as a big at age 20. He’s still younger than half the 2024 draft prospects. If the Rockets would move Smith/filler/#3, I’d absolutely listen (I’d be shocked if they make that offer though). Smith won’t be the scorer Towns is, but longterm he may make us a better team due to his defense (3&D PF).


I don't want the three, it's unrealistic. I'd rather grab next year's 2, and then get 27 & 29 firsts back. Like I said, we save almost 27 million in that trade

I'm not a great cap mind like some of the others on here, but imagine if..

Conley, Fultz
Edwards, Naw
McDaniels, Oubre
Smith, Reid
Gobert, Adams


What if it is just Towns for Smith, Brooks, and Adams and skip the picks? I'd definitely consider it.


No thanks to Brooks. Why take him back at all? He isn't needed for salary purposes. If you want a physical wing type back, ask for Eason as well.
Slim Tubby
Veteran
Posts: 2,931
And1: 2,548
Joined: Jun 03, 2017
         

Re: Trade Talk (Part 15): Trade Deadline Day (and onwards!) 

Post#1040 » by Slim Tubby » Tue Jun 18, 2024 7:07 pm

Domejandro wrote:
Norseman79 wrote:3 team Naz Reid....(I don't want to trade Naz)

Washington in: Naz Reid
Out: Avdija, 26

Heat in: Moore, Minott, 27
Out: Jovic

Wolves in: Avdija, Jovic, 26
Out: Reid, Minott, Moore, 27

PG Conley, NAW
SG Edwards Clark
SF McDaniels, Avdija
PF Towns, Jovic
C Gobert

Really we just need to add a point guard and a legit back up five

Deni Avdija has significantly more value that Naz Reid.
You're probably right. It's so hard to assess a player's value and true production when they play on a dismal team with little talent around them.

Sent from my N152DL using RealGM mobile app
Glen Taylor: "Is this moron #1 (Layden)? Put moron #2 (Thibs) on the phone."

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves