Klomp wrote:winforlose wrote:cmoss84 wrote:Want to really roll the dice and bet on low usage upside to compliment Mike and Rob?
Detroit IN: DDV
Detroit OUT: 2 FRPs, 1 SRP
Cha IN: Randle and SRP
Cha OUT: Ball
MN IN: Ball, 2 FRP
MN OUT: Randle and DDV
This is an example of not understanding how the apron system works. You take Randles 31 million off the team, you turn DDV’s near 12 into Ball’s 10 million. This saves a ton of money for the owners (well done,) but creates a talent gap you cannot refill. Even if Ball is as good as DDV (he isn’t, nor is he as likely to be available,) you have removed all the talent of Randle with no way to replace it. We cannot sign any player to go above the cap, we cannot easily add salary in trade under the new CBA (no excess money without a hard cap at the first apron,) and we only get the MLE which also hard caps at the first apron. So in essence, we have removed a top 5 player from our rotation, and cannot replace him. That kind of trade is the type you make as tanking team trying to shed salary, (except when taking on bad salary) and acquire picks. We want to add as much salary as possible under the 2nd apron threshold while assembling the best team possible. Also it is worth remembering we have three recent first round picks already in development, and three more seconds behind them. Getting more picks isn’t a major priority.
'Ball doesn't make $10 million.
https://www.spotrac.com/nba/player/_/id/23597/lonzo-ball










