ImageImageImage

2013 Draft Targets (#9, #26, #52, #59)

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

User avatar
Grits n Gravy
General Manager
Posts: 9,627
And1: 1,804
Joined: Feb 22, 2010
Location: New Zealand
 

Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59) 

Post#1121 » by Grits n Gravy » Fri May 17, 2013 2:38 pm

ronzone!
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,392
And1: 22,802
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59) 

Post#1122 » by Klomp » Fri May 17, 2013 2:38 pm

Worm Guts wrote:The reason Chris Johnson doesn't play is probably a little more involved than he's skinny and athletic.

Oh I definitely agree. But I do think Gobert is quite a bit more than "a taller Chris Johnson"
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
GreenRiddler
General Manager
Posts: 9,747
And1: 1,444
Joined: May 19, 2012
Location: Blazer fan from Toronto
     

Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59) 

Post#1123 » by GreenRiddler » Fri May 17, 2013 2:55 pm

What do you guys think about K-C-P? Measured good today.
User avatar
Grits n Gravy
General Manager
Posts: 9,627
And1: 1,804
Joined: Feb 22, 2010
Location: New Zealand
 

Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59) 

Post#1124 » by Grits n Gravy » Fri May 17, 2013 3:11 pm

GreenRiddler wrote:What do you guys think about K-C-P? Measured good today.

Never seen him play but he sounds like he'd be a pretty good fit for us. Agree very good measurements- not sure what to make of his inability or refusal to get into the paint and his love for jumpshots.
Devilzsidewalk
RealGM
Posts: 32,031
And1: 6,051
Joined: Oct 09, 2005

Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59) 

Post#1125 » by Devilzsidewalk » Fri May 17, 2013 3:18 pm

http://www.draftexpress.com/profile/Steven-Adams-6301/

I dont like the sound of Steven Adams' scouting report at all; it's a laundry list of detailed, bad stuff. And this isn't just some schmo, this from President/CEO/founding father Jon G himself:

Offensively, Adams was a very limited player at Pitt, averaging 7 points in 23 minutes, or 12.3 points per-40 minutes, which is the fourth lowest rate of any of the 75 college players in our top-100 prospects


Adams has very crude footwork in the post and little in the ways of countermoves


Even more concerning though is how poor of a finisher he appeared to be around the basket this year. Adams had a difficult time catching the ball cleanly all season long resulting in quite a few turnovers. He bobbles the ball on the catch regularly, as he seems to need to have it thrown to him perfectly so he can get two hands around it, at times using his chest to assist him.


Adams has a bit of a subdued, non-chalant demeanor on the floor, rarely looking angry or in much of a hurry


Stepping away from the basket, Adams is not much of a threat, as you would probably guess by his mediocre free throw shooting percentages (44%). He shoots the ball with poor mechanics, locking his elbow, not setting his feet, and showing no follow through on his release.


Adams also isn't as good of a defensive rebounder as you might hope, ranking second to last in that category among top-100 collegiate centers. He rarely boxes out opponents, mistimes his jumps, and has a difficult time coming away with loose balls in traffic because of his questionable hands


If I were to make a list of things I don't want to see on a big man's scouting report...I mean, anything else they'd like to add? I think they got everything.
Image
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,392
And1: 22,802
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59) 

Post#1126 » by Klomp » Fri May 17, 2013 3:22 pm

Not impressive athletic numbers so far from Gobert, but with that wingspan, a big vertical not as important
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,392
And1: 22,802
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59) 

Post#1127 » by Klomp » Fri May 17, 2013 3:27 pm

Standing Vertical
Gobert: 25"
Zeller: 35.5"
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59) 

Post#1128 » by Krapinsky » Fri May 17, 2013 3:37 pm

Grits n Gravy wrote:
GreenRiddler wrote:What do you guys think about K-C-P? Measured good today.

Never seen him play but he sounds like he'd be a pretty good fit for us. Agree very good measurements- not sure what to make of his inability or refusal to get into the paint and his love for jumpshots.


Had to deal with collapsing defenses. He played on a horrible team and really had no one to pass to. His FTA/g is not that bad at all.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.

NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
User avatar
Grits n Gravy
General Manager
Posts: 9,627
And1: 1,804
Joined: Feb 22, 2010
Location: New Zealand
 

Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59) 

Post#1129 » by Grits n Gravy » Fri May 17, 2013 3:38 pm

Aalso the worst on agility drill.
User avatar
champalift
Junior
Posts: 454
And1: 12
Joined: Jun 17, 2009
Location: Madison
     

Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59) 

Post#1130 » by champalift » Fri May 17, 2013 3:41 pm

Klomp wrote:
champalift wrote:
Klomp wrote:And 10 times better

Ten times? D'Okay...
No questions asked he would be the #1 pick if at 7'1"+ without shoes he is ten times better than ANY NBA player.
Give CJ 2" and send him to France to play against some of those guys, I am sure an amazing highlight film would be created. Youtube scouting, woo hoo!! :lol:

You act like he's the same weight as Johnson too. He's 238 lbs. Sure that seems light for 7'2", but he still looks a lot stronger than Johnson.

Johnson is a stick. 210 lbs. that's a big reason why Adelman didn't play him, because he got absolutely bullied in the post. Gobert at least has a little more weight to him.


Are they the same exact player, absolutely not. But as far as comparisons go, that is who came to mind watching youtube videos. Sorry that there height to weight ratios aren't exactly the same. "Looks stronger"... sure...
Is Gobert's playing style more similar to Kevin Love? Pekovic? Stiemsma? Chris Johnson? It is called a comparison, not saying his ceiling is Chris Johnson, I am saying at 20 years old with his frame and the way he moves with that frame, he reminds me of Chris Johnson. Would you prefer a Javale McGee comparison?

Take it easy Klomp. There has been a trend of me saying something and you are the first one to just jump on it and tell me why I am wrong. Sorry I had an opinion Mr. Moderator. You said you liked Gobert, I said I did too and he reminded me of Chris Johnson and based on everything I have seen and read about what Adelman wants in a center, I don't think Adelman wants to work with a 20 year old French project when his coaching years are numbered.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,392
And1: 22,802
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59) 

Post#1131 » by Klomp » Fri May 17, 2013 3:50 pm

I'd actually say he's closer to Stiemsma because of his more advanced level on defense

I wasn't trying to get after you. It seemed to be a trend around here where Johnson was way overhyped to where people were pissed he didn't play. I liked his game to, but realize he has major limitations.

I thought you were saying we already have a guy like Gobert in Johnson who Adelman refuses to play so drafting Gobert would be a waste. I was just saying that Johnson isn't as good as most here make him out to be
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
User avatar
Maefteda
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,600
And1: 575
Joined: Feb 18, 2012
     

Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59) 

Post#1132 » by Maefteda » Fri May 17, 2013 4:00 pm

If we don't move up in the lottery, I hope the Suns get the top pick and push Bobcats down to #3. Noel and McLemore would be gone, and Oladipo isn't the greatest fit for Bobcats who need a shooter. Trading down for our 9th pick and get Williams as well would make more sense for them, as Burke, Bennett and Porter don't make much sense for them. We can then go on to pick Oladipo at #3, and finally get a solid 2 guard.
User avatar
Esohny
RealGM
Posts: 11,613
And1: 339
Joined: Apr 18, 2009
Location: Saint Paul
     

Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59) 

Post#1133 » by Esohny » Fri May 17, 2013 4:03 pm

Krapinsky wrote:
Grits n Gravy wrote:
GreenRiddler wrote:What do you guys think about K-C-P? Measured good today.

Never seen him play but he sounds like he'd be a pretty good fit for us. Agree very good measurements- not sure what to make of his inability or refusal to get into the paint and his love for jumpshots.


Had to deal with collapsing defenses. He played on a horrible team and really had no one to pass to. His FTA/g is not that bad at all.


He certainly has shown the ability to get into the paint. Hopefully he'd focus on going to the rim more or taking 3s, instead of settling for long 2s. He also doesn't seem to be a dolt like Beasley, so it doesn't seem like it's asking too much.
SMAC-K wrote:Mayo>>>>Love and that 5th pick
OJ Mayo is one of the best defenders in the league, hes a two way player and hes a great passer and playmaker.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,392
And1: 22,802
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59) 

Post#1134 » by Klomp » Fri May 17, 2013 4:05 pm

[tweet]https://twitter.com/chadfordinsider/status/335425553899347969[/tweet]
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
User avatar
Grits n Gravy
General Manager
Posts: 9,627
And1: 1,804
Joined: Feb 22, 2010
Location: New Zealand
 

Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59) 

Post#1135 » by Grits n Gravy » Fri May 17, 2013 4:10 pm

Oladipo is really a clone of Tony Allen physically.

edit:
42'" max vert. nice.
User avatar
Mattya
RealGM
Posts: 17,523
And1: 7,916
Joined: Aug 08, 2008
   

Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59) 

Post#1136 » by Mattya » Fri May 17, 2013 4:10 pm

I'm content with staying at 9 unless it doesn't take much to move up to grab Oladipo.
User avatar
champalift
Junior
Posts: 454
And1: 12
Joined: Jun 17, 2009
Location: Madison
     

Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59) 

Post#1137 » by champalift » Fri May 17, 2013 4:11 pm

Klomp wrote:I'd actually say he's closer to Stiemsma because of his more advanced level on defense

I wasn't trying to get after you. It seemed to be a trend around here where Johnson was way overhyped to where people were pissed he didn't play. I liked his game to, but realize he has major limitations.

I thought you were saying we already have a guy like Gobert in Johnson who Adelman refuses to play so drafting Gobert would be a waste. I was just saying that Johnson isn't as good as most here make him out to be


Alright, well to each their own. I see a much more similar game to Chris Johnson as they have very thin frames for their size and offensively, their game is just hang out around the rip for an ally-oop or a tip. Did not see a single jump shot out of Gobert in all the videos I saw.

And a note on Chris Johnson, I do not think he is good enough to get much run in the NBA, I just thought it was odd that when we were down to literally 8-9 guys, he still wasn't getting run by Adelman despite the energy he brought in the games prior to Adelman's return under Terry Porter. Is he the Timberwolves savior? Hell no. I just thought he got a raw deal as the energy he brought in some of those games was some of the best of the season out of any Wolf.

Gobert is very intriguing, but as you have said earlier, only if all the off guards we value are gone does Gobert come into play for the Wolves at #9.
User avatar
Nitroglycerin
Starter
Posts: 2,475
And1: 528
Joined: Dec 15, 2012
Location: Philippines
 

Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59) 

Post#1138 » by Nitroglycerin » Fri May 17, 2013 4:13 pm

LordBaldric wrote:
Kahn touch this wrote:heck lets pick gobert

ther'es no more cheap centers around that is a shotblocker and plays above the rim

there are still many attainable wings

but i still want to go all-in for mclemore or oladipo


Your avatar is freaking me out man.

made by the devil himself....devilzsidewalk that is
Trust the PRosas!
theGreatRC
RealGM
Posts: 18,530
And1: 4,992
Joined: Oct 12, 2006
Location: California
 

Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59) 

Post#1139 » by theGreatRC » Fri May 17, 2013 4:55 pm

I won't get my hopes up to grab Dipo or Mclemore, but even staying at 9 I hope we trade for Dipo, I wouldn't mind NOT going after Ben-Mc
Dysfunctional Wolves fan
User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59) 

Post#1140 » by Krapinsky » Fri May 17, 2013 5:04 pm

Oladipo or Mclemore would be a such a difference maker for us. I'd trade D-Will + #9 + #26 for either of them.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.

NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves