2013 Draft Targets (#9, #26, #52, #59)
Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
- Grits n Gravy
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,627
- And1: 1,804
- Joined: Feb 22, 2010
- Location: New Zealand
- 
                    
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
- 
               Klomp
- Retired Mod 
- Posts: 69,392
- And1: 22,802
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
- 
                        
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
Worm Guts wrote:The reason Chris Johnson doesn't play is probably a little more involved than he's skinny and athletic.
Oh I definitely agree. But I do think Gobert is quite a bit more than "a taller Chris Johnson"
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
- 
               GreenRiddler
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,747
- And1: 1,444
- Joined: May 19, 2012
- Location: Blazer fan from Toronto
- 
                        
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
What do you guys think about K-C-P? Measured good today.
            
                                    
                                    
                        Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
- Grits n Gravy
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,627
- And1: 1,804
- Joined: Feb 22, 2010
- Location: New Zealand
- 
                    
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
GreenRiddler wrote:What do you guys think about K-C-P? Measured good today.
Never seen him play but he sounds like he'd be a pretty good fit for us. Agree very good measurements- not sure what to make of his inability or refusal to get into the paint and his love for jumpshots.
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
- 
               Devilzsidewalk
- RealGM
- Posts: 32,031
- And1: 6,051
- Joined: Oct 09, 2005
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
http://www.draftexpress.com/profile/Steven-Adams-6301/
I dont like the sound of Steven Adams' scouting report at all; it's a laundry list of detailed, bad stuff. And this isn't just some schmo, this from President/CEO/founding father Jon G himself:
If I were to make a list of things I don't want to see on a big man's scouting report...I mean, anything else they'd like to add? I think they got everything.
            
                                    
                                    I dont like the sound of Steven Adams' scouting report at all; it's a laundry list of detailed, bad stuff. And this isn't just some schmo, this from President/CEO/founding father Jon G himself:
Offensively, Adams was a very limited player at Pitt, averaging 7 points in 23 minutes, or 12.3 points per-40 minutes, which is the fourth lowest rate of any of the 75 college players in our top-100 prospects
Adams has very crude footwork in the post and little in the ways of countermoves
Even more concerning though is how poor of a finisher he appeared to be around the basket this year. Adams had a difficult time catching the ball cleanly all season long resulting in quite a few turnovers. He bobbles the ball on the catch regularly, as he seems to need to have it thrown to him perfectly so he can get two hands around it, at times using his chest to assist him.
Adams has a bit of a subdued, non-chalant demeanor on the floor, rarely looking angry or in much of a hurry
Stepping away from the basket, Adams is not much of a threat, as you would probably guess by his mediocre free throw shooting percentages (44%). He shoots the ball with poor mechanics, locking his elbow, not setting his feet, and showing no follow through on his release.
Adams also isn't as good of a defensive rebounder as you might hope, ranking second to last in that category among top-100 collegiate centers. He rarely boxes out opponents, mistimes his jumps, and has a difficult time coming away with loose balls in traffic because of his questionable hands
If I were to make a list of things I don't want to see on a big man's scouting report...I mean, anything else they'd like to add? I think they got everything.

Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
- 
               Klomp
- Retired Mod 
- Posts: 69,392
- And1: 22,802
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
- 
                        
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
Not impressive athletic numbers so far from Gobert, but with that wingspan, a big vertical not as important
            
                                    
                                    tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
- 
               Klomp
- Retired Mod 
- Posts: 69,392
- And1: 22,802
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
- 
                        
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
Standing Vertical
Gobert: 25"
Zeller: 35.5"
            
                                    
                                    Gobert: 25"
Zeller: 35.5"
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
- Krapinsky
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,712
- And1: 1,952
- Joined: May 13, 2007
- Location: Los Angeles
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
Grits n Gravy wrote:GreenRiddler wrote:What do you guys think about K-C-P? Measured good today.
Never seen him play but he sounds like he'd be a pretty good fit for us. Agree very good measurements- not sure what to make of his inability or refusal to get into the paint and his love for jumpshots.
Had to deal with collapsing defenses. He played on a horrible team and really had no one to pass to. His FTA/g is not that bad at all.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.
NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
- Grits n Gravy
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,627
- And1: 1,804
- Joined: Feb 22, 2010
- Location: New Zealand
- 
                    
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
Aalso the worst on agility drill.
            
                                    
                                    
                        Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
- champalift
- Junior
- Posts: 454
- And1: 12
- Joined: Jun 17, 2009
- Location: Madison
- 
                          
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
Klomp wrote:champalift wrote:Klomp wrote:And 10 times better
Ten times? D'Okay...
No questions asked he would be the #1 pick if at 7'1"+ without shoes he is ten times better than ANY NBA player.
Give CJ 2" and send him to France to play against some of those guys, I am sure an amazing highlight film would be created. Youtube scouting, woo hoo!!
You act like he's the same weight as Johnson too. He's 238 lbs. Sure that seems light for 7'2", but he still looks a lot stronger than Johnson.
Johnson is a stick. 210 lbs. that's a big reason why Adelman didn't play him, because he got absolutely bullied in the post. Gobert at least has a little more weight to him.
Are they the same exact player, absolutely not. But as far as comparisons go, that is who came to mind watching youtube videos. Sorry that there height to weight ratios aren't exactly the same. "Looks stronger"... sure...
Is Gobert's playing style more similar to Kevin Love? Pekovic? Stiemsma? Chris Johnson? It is called a comparison, not saying his ceiling is Chris Johnson, I am saying at 20 years old with his frame and the way he moves with that frame, he reminds me of Chris Johnson. Would you prefer a Javale McGee comparison?
Take it easy Klomp. There has been a trend of me saying something and you are the first one to just jump on it and tell me why I am wrong. Sorry I had an opinion Mr. Moderator. You said you liked Gobert, I said I did too and he reminded me of Chris Johnson and based on everything I have seen and read about what Adelman wants in a center, I don't think Adelman wants to work with a 20 year old French project when his coaching years are numbered.
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
- 
               Klomp
- Retired Mod 
- Posts: 69,392
- And1: 22,802
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
- 
                        
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
I'd actually say he's closer to Stiemsma because of his more advanced level on defense
I wasn't trying to get after you. It seemed to be a trend around here where Johnson was way overhyped to where people were pissed he didn't play. I liked his game to, but realize he has major limitations.
I thought you were saying we already have a guy like Gobert in Johnson who Adelman refuses to play so drafting Gobert would be a waste. I was just saying that Johnson isn't as good as most here make him out to be
            
                                    
                                    I wasn't trying to get after you. It seemed to be a trend around here where Johnson was way overhyped to where people were pissed he didn't play. I liked his game to, but realize he has major limitations.
I thought you were saying we already have a guy like Gobert in Johnson who Adelman refuses to play so drafting Gobert would be a waste. I was just saying that Johnson isn't as good as most here make him out to be
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
- Maefteda
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,600
- And1: 575
- Joined: Feb 18, 2012
- 
                        
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
If we don't move up in the lottery, I hope the Suns get the top pick and push Bobcats down to #3. Noel and McLemore would be gone, and Oladipo isn't the greatest fit for Bobcats who need a shooter. Trading down for our 9th pick and get Williams as well would make more sense for them, as Burke, Bennett and Porter don't make much sense for them. We can then go on to pick Oladipo at #3, and finally get a solid 2 guard.
            
                                    
                                    
                        Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
- Esohny
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,613
- And1: 339
- Joined: Apr 18, 2009
- Location: Saint Paul
- 
                          
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
Krapinsky wrote:Grits n Gravy wrote:GreenRiddler wrote:What do you guys think about K-C-P? Measured good today.
Never seen him play but he sounds like he'd be a pretty good fit for us. Agree very good measurements- not sure what to make of his inability or refusal to get into the paint and his love for jumpshots.
Had to deal with collapsing defenses. He played on a horrible team and really had no one to pass to. His FTA/g is not that bad at all.
He certainly has shown the ability to get into the paint. Hopefully he'd focus on going to the rim more or taking 3s, instead of settling for long 2s. He also doesn't seem to be a dolt like Beasley, so it doesn't seem like it's asking too much.
SMAC-K wrote:Mayo>>>>Love and that 5th pick
OJ Mayo is one of the best defenders in the league, hes a two way player and hes a great passer and playmaker.
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
- 
               Klomp
- Retired Mod 
- Posts: 69,392
- And1: 22,802
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
- 
                        
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
[tweet]https://twitter.com/chadfordinsider/status/335425553899347969[/tweet]
            
                                    
                                    tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
- Grits n Gravy
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,627
- And1: 1,804
- Joined: Feb 22, 2010
- Location: New Zealand
- 
                    
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
Oladipo is really a clone of Tony Allen physically.
edit:
42'" max vert. nice.
            
                                    
                                    
                        edit:
42'" max vert. nice.
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
- Mattya
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,523
- And1: 7,916
- Joined: Aug 08, 2008
- 
                      
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
I'm content with staying at 9 unless it doesn't take much to move up to grab Oladipo.
            
                                    
                                    
                        Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
- champalift
- Junior
- Posts: 454
- And1: 12
- Joined: Jun 17, 2009
- Location: Madison
- 
                          
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
Klomp wrote:I'd actually say he's closer to Stiemsma because of his more advanced level on defense
I wasn't trying to get after you. It seemed to be a trend around here where Johnson was way overhyped to where people were pissed he didn't play. I liked his game to, but realize he has major limitations.
I thought you were saying we already have a guy like Gobert in Johnson who Adelman refuses to play so drafting Gobert would be a waste. I was just saying that Johnson isn't as good as most here make him out to be
Alright, well to each their own. I see a much more similar game to Chris Johnson as they have very thin frames for their size and offensively, their game is just hang out around the rip for an ally-oop or a tip. Did not see a single jump shot out of Gobert in all the videos I saw.
And a note on Chris Johnson, I do not think he is good enough to get much run in the NBA, I just thought it was odd that when we were down to literally 8-9 guys, he still wasn't getting run by Adelman despite the energy he brought in the games prior to Adelman's return under Terry Porter. Is he the Timberwolves savior? Hell no. I just thought he got a raw deal as the energy he brought in some of those games was some of the best of the season out of any Wolf.
Gobert is very intriguing, but as you have said earlier, only if all the off guards we value are gone does Gobert come into play for the Wolves at #9.
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
- Nitroglycerin
- Starter
- Posts: 2,475
- And1: 528
- Joined: Dec 15, 2012
- Location: Philippines
- 
                    
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
LordBaldric wrote:Kahn touch this wrote:heck lets pick gobert
ther'es no more cheap centers around that is a shotblocker and plays above the rim
there are still many attainable wings
but i still want to go all-in for mclemore or oladipo
Your avatar is freaking me out man.
made by the devil himself....devilzsidewalk that is
Trust the PRosas!
                        Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
- 
               theGreatRC
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,530
- And1: 4,992
- Joined: Oct 12, 2006
- Location: California
- 
                    
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
I won't get my hopes up to grab Dipo or Mclemore, but even staying at 9 I hope we trade for Dipo, I wouldn't mind NOT going after Ben-Mc
            
                                    
                                    Dysfunctional Wolves fan
                        Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
- Krapinsky
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,712
- And1: 1,952
- Joined: May 13, 2007
- Location: Los Angeles
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
Oladipo or Mclemore would be a such a difference maker for us. I'd trade D-Will + #9 + #26 for either of them.
            
                                    
                                    FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.
NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves











