moss_is_1 wrote:shrink wrote:moss_is_1 wrote:With Connelly mentioning how he doesn't see much difference in prospects I wonder if he takes that opportunity to move back and gain more assets, either more cheap rookies for this year or the future.
Brooklyn has 5 picks - 8, 19, 26, 27, 36
Utah Jazz (4): 5, 21, 43, 53
Orlando Magic (4): 16, 25, 46, 57
San Antonio Spurs (3): 2, 14, 38
Charlotte Hornets (3): 4, 33, 34
Washington Wizards (3): 6, 18, 40
Oklahoma City Thunder (3): 15, 24, 44
Alot of those teams just have so many players already, they aren't going to have the roster spots so maybe they're packaging them to move up.
I ran my numbers, and these are the fair offers for MIN’s #17:
BRK: #19, #27 (should be worth #14). #19, #36 (should be worth #16). #26, #27 (should get #18).
UTA: #21, #43, #53
ORL: #25, #46, #57, future 2nd
SAS: 2030 1st pick swap (most favorable of MIN, SAS, DAL), #38 .. (what do you think? I have no math for that)
WAS: #18, #40 (should be worth #16)
OKC: #24, #44 (should only be worth #21, but OKC has many future 2nds and late 1sts)
(Keep in mind, this math is only for an average draft, and teams overpay for a specific player they want in that specific draft.)
Touching back now, Brooklyn has #22 now as well. If we don't love anyone at 17 then can see us moving picks.
would it be preferable to move back (for #22 and #27 as an example) or to move out of the draft for a future pick?