Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST)
Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks
Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST)
- Krapinsky
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,690
- And1: 1,934
- Joined: May 13, 2007
- Location: Los Angeles
Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST)
Harris-Maxey for D-Lo, who says no?
Towns/Naz
Harris/Vanderbilt/Knight
Prince/McDaniels/Okogie
Edwards/Beasley/Nowell
Beverly/Maxey/Wright
Don't hate it.
Towns/Naz
Harris/Vanderbilt/Knight
Prince/McDaniels/Okogie
Edwards/Beasley/Nowell
Beverly/Maxey/Wright
Don't hate it.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.
NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,590
- And1: 5,706
- Joined: Jun 22, 2017
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST)
Krapinsky wrote:Harris-Maxey for D-Lo, who says no?
Towns/Naz
Harris/Vanderbilt/Knight
Prince/McDaniels/Okogie
Edwards/Beasley/Nowell
Beverly/Maxey/Wright
Don't hate it.
I like it because it gives us a good PF and we can let Beverley be our PG. Plus we get a young kind of exciting player thrown in.
Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST)
- andyhop
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,626
- And1: 1,318
- Joined: May 08, 2007
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST)
Krapinsky wrote:Harris-Maxey for D-Lo, who says no?
The Sixers given they give up the best player and add value to it as well
"Football is not a matter of life and death...it's much more important than that."- Bill Shankley
Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 58,944
- And1: 18,915
- Joined: Sep 26, 2005
Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST)
andyhop wrote:Krapinsky wrote:Harris-Maxey for D-Lo, who says no?
The Sixers given they give up the best player and add value to it as well
Probably.
And the Wolves say no, trading KAT’s pal and adding $8.6 mil this year and more in the future.
And the NBA front office says no, since MIN is taking back more money than is legal.
Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST)
- Krapinsky
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,690
- And1: 1,934
- Joined: May 13, 2007
- Location: Los Angeles
Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST)
shrink wrote:andyhop wrote:Krapinsky wrote:Harris-Maxey for D-Lo, who says no?
The Sixers given they give up the best player and add value to it as well
Probably.
And the Wolves say no, trading KAT’s pal and adding $8.6 mil this year and more in the future.
And the NBA front office says no, since MIN is taking back more money than is legal.
Obviously that can be rectified. Add Layman.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.
NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST)
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,597
- And1: 1,845
- Joined: May 30, 2007
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST)
Krapinsky wrote:shrink wrote:andyhop wrote:The Sixers given they give up the best player and add value to it as well
Probably.
And the Wolves say no, trading KAT’s pal and adding $8.6 mil this year and more in the future.
And the NBA front office says no, since MIN is taking back more money than is legal.
Obviously that can be rectified. Add Layman.
I’ll take D’Lo over Harris all day long, and I’m not a DLo fan. Go talk to 76ers fans about Harris. They think he’s a mediocre role player getting paid 40m+ per year. He prefers mid range jumpers, even though he’s a good three point shooter, and adds no real value in any other areas besides scoring (passing, rebounding, defense, etc). DLo while flawed, does have gravity on offense.
Plus, if I’m pissing off KAT by trading his BFF, I’m not doing it for Harris.
Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST)
-
- Senior
- Posts: 534
- And1: 404
- Joined: Jun 14, 2017
- Location: Fountain Inn, SC
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST)
With the addition of Millsap and likely LMA, how about dancing with the Nets?
Okogie for Claxton and Sharpe? I think the money works and gets the Nets a roster spot for LMA.
Okogie for Claxton and Sharpe? I think the money works and gets the Nets a roster spot for LMA.
Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST)
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 67,800
- And1: 21,570
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST)
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,590
- And1: 5,706
- Joined: Jun 22, 2017
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST)
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,202
- And1: 2,720
- Joined: Jun 03, 2016
Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST)
How the **** did Rosas not get that package for Jauncho jesus he is just terrible at trades.
Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,590
- And1: 5,706
- Joined: Jun 22, 2017
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST)
Neeva wrote:How the **** did Rosas not get that package for Jauncho jesus he is just terrible at trades.
Didn't he get Beverley for Juancho? IMO that's better.
Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST)
- moonpie
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,015
- And1: 2,690
- Joined: Dec 14, 2010
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST)
- karch34
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,842
- And1: 836
- Joined: Jul 05, 2001
- Location: Valley of the Sun
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST)
moonpie wrote:
Read Jordan giving $4 million as part if the buyout. I’d have thrown two 2nds at Detroit for Demboya.
Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST)
- moonpie
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,015
- And1: 2,690
- Joined: Dec 14, 2010
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST)
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,799
- And1: 1,032
- Joined: Sep 11, 2009
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST)
Alize Johnson would be a great target.
Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST)
- _AIJ_
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,063
- And1: 4,591
- Joined: Oct 15, 2008
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST)
Neeva wrote:How the **** did Rosas not get that package for Jauncho jesus he is just terrible at trades.
What the hell is new with you??? You’re the king of complaining!
LETS GO WOLVES!!! 

Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST)
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,799
- And1: 1,032
- Joined: Sep 11, 2009
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST)
KGdaBom wrote:Neeva wrote:How the **** did Rosas not get that package for Jauncho jesus he is just terrible at trades.
Didn't he get Beverley for Juancho? IMO that's better.
It is. A bunch of 2nds for all that money, not that great of a deal to begin with. The move saved Brooklyn $47mil and they didn't even get a 1st for that level of help. Rather have the expiring deal we could perhaps flip latter in trade.
Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST)
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,202
- And1: 2,720
- Joined: Jun 03, 2016
Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST)
_AIJ_ wrote:Neeva wrote:How the **** did Rosas not get that package for Jauncho jesus he is just terrible at trades.
What the hell is new with you??? You’re the king of complaining!
Why do you care this is countless posts you keep quoting me saying the same thing, don’t like my posts fine, scroll on by.
I had thought boston gave up a second for Jauncho as well lol but it was just a “possible” pick swap.
Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST)
-
- Senior
- Posts: 541
- And1: 284
- Joined: Apr 03, 2008
Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST)
Neeva wrote:How the **** did Rosas not get that package for Jauncho jesus he is just terrible at trades.
So you'd rather have Kris Dunn who can't shoot a lick instead of Beverly?
Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST)
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,202
- And1: 2,720
- Joined: Jun 03, 2016
Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST)
fattymcgee wrote:Neeva wrote:How the **** did Rosas not get that package for Jauncho jesus he is just terrible at trades.
So you'd rather have Kris Dunn who can't shoot a lick instead of Beverly?
Another gm would have gotten better for Jauncho and Culver I am sure of that. Can’t wait for Rosas to be gone in less than a year it is inevitable.
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves