Neeva wrote:I don’t think Brodgdan has that much value though so it would have to be something like Towns/19/filler for Brogdan/Turner/indiana’s lotto pick!
Last I checked Brogdon was amazing. Did he regress this year?
Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks
Neeva wrote:I don’t think Brodgdan has that much value though so it would have to be something like Towns/19/filler for Brogdan/Turner/indiana’s lotto pick!
m2002brian wrote:If it’s because DLo not slashing enough, then just run the pick-n-roll with KAT and Ant and make them decide who to load up on.
m2002brian wrote:And so it goes. 1 good. Game makes up for 1 horrible game.
Is it too much to ask for consistency for our “best player”?
His talents were on full display last night, but his talents are not why this thread exists.
Maturity matters on if we plan to even sniff a championship.
Baseline81 wrote:m2002brian wrote:And so it goes. 1 good. Game makes up for 1 horrible game.
Is it too much to ask for consistency for our “best player”?
His talents were on full display last night, but his talents are not why this thread exists.
Maturity matters on if we plan to even sniff a championship.
What are you on about?
You realize "star" players have bad games? Look no further than Trae Young in this year's playoffs against the Heat -- one good and three abysmal games. Do you think Atlanta fans now want him moved?
m2002brian wrote:Baseline81 wrote:m2002brian wrote:And so it goes. 1 good. Game makes up for 1 horrible game.
Is it too much to ask for consistency for our “best player”?
His talents were on full display last night, but his talents are not why this thread exists.
Maturity matters on if we plan to even sniff a championship.
What are you on about?
You realize "star" players have bad games? Look no further than Trae Young in this year's playoffs against the Heat -- one good and three abysmal games. Do you think Atlanta fans now want him moved?
Maturity aka attitude, personal accountability.
We’re not talking about stats.
Anyone can have a bad game, a bad series.
DLo has been possibly worse statistically, but still the light is on KAT for the things beyond the stat sheet. Far less heat an DLo.
KD bad series
Ja a couple low scoring games
But the heat is on KAT because:
Bad attitudes and lack of accountability are what rots teams from the inside out.
KGdaBom wrote:m2002brian wrote:Baseline81 wrote:What are you on about?
You realize "star" players have bad games? Look no further than Trae Young in this year's playoffs against the Heat -- one good and three abysmal games. Do you think Atlanta fans now want him moved?
Maturity aka attitude, personal accountability.
We’re not talking about stats.
Anyone can have a bad game, a bad series.
DLo has been possibly worse statistically, but still the light is on KAT for the things beyond the stat sheet. Far less heat an DLo.
KD bad series
Ja a couple low scoring games
But the heat is on KAT because:
Bad attitudes and lack of accountability are what rots teams from the inside out.
If KAT is a cancer rotting the Wolves from the inside out maybe you should find another team to support until he's gone.
m2002brian wrote:KGdaBom wrote:m2002brian wrote:
Maturity aka attitude, personal accountability.
We’re not talking about stats.
Anyone can have a bad game, a bad series.
DLo has been possibly worse statistically, but still the light is on KAT for the things beyond the stat sheet. Far less heat an DLo.
KD bad series
Ja a couple low scoring games
But the heat is on KAT because:
Bad attitudes and lack of accountability are what rots teams from the inside out.
If KAT is a cancer rotting the Wolves from the inside out maybe you should find another team to support until he's gone.
1. I’m a Wolves fan not a KAT fan.
2. Seems you don’t know the difference between nationalism and patriotism.
3. I’ve consistently said I’d love to have KAT around if he can clean up his attitude. Go get some damn therapy.
m2002brian wrote:Baseline81 wrote:m2002brian wrote:And so it goes. 1 good. Game makes up for 1 horrible game.
Is it too much to ask for consistency for our “best player”?
His talents were on full display last night, but his talents are not why this thread exists.
Maturity matters on if we plan to even sniff a championship.
What are you on about?
You realize "star" players have bad games? Look no further than Trae Young in this year's playoffs against the Heat -- one good and three abysmal games. Do you think Atlanta fans now want him moved?
Maturity aka attitude, personal accountability.
We’re not talking about stats.
Anyone can have a bad game, a bad series.
DLo has been possibly worse statistically, but still the light is on KAT for the things beyond the stat sheet. Far less heat an DLo.
KD bad series
Ja a couple low scoring games
But the heat is on KAT because:
Bad attitudes and lack of accountability are what rots teams from the inside out.

tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Klomp wrote:

King Malta wrote:There's a lot of hyperbole surrounding the KAT discussion IMO.
Our team has doubled it's win total from last season, is 2-2 in a series against the two seed despite an awful choke job and our flawed cornerstone (who is probably no longer the cornerstone given Ant's trajectory) made the all-star team and has a pretty good chance of being named the third team centre.
Comments about him being a cancer or rotting the team from the inside out are over the top. I honestly feel like some of the reactions are fueled somewhat by our conditioning to failure and disaster over the years; we seem like we've finally got a good thing going on and everyone is expecting it to blow up in our faces so wants drastic changes made.
If before the seasons started I offered you a 7th placed finish, a play-in win and taking the Grizzlies to 6 or 7 games I assume almost everyone on this forum would've been thrilled with that progression. If I added on the fact that KAT would achieve the afore-mentioned accolades but we'd still be talking about it being Ant's team now, I assume the reaction would've been unanimous glee.
As mentioned numerous times, KAT is far from perfect and has a tonne of warts, but he's still a very good fit next to Ant and an excellent #2 on a contending team as far as I'm concerned. He drives me crazy with his complaining, vulnerability to the double-team and 'stray voltage' too, and if he was the unequivocal cornerstone we were building around I would advocate moving on and trying something different. But he's not that guy, he just needs to be Ant's running mate. So I don't see actively turfing him to another team to be the best way forward for the construction of this roster.
Klomp wrote:Calinks wrote:I very much believe that a good 80 percent of his perception will change, simply if he starts winning games. His defense can not improve from what it is right now but if the Wolves (or whatever team he was on) wins 50 games, his stock will fly way up. In the NBA losing is extremely damaging to the perception of an individual player.
Or will Edwards be credited more for the winning?
Klomp wrote:Klomp wrote:It was a "down" season for Towns yet he still basically averaged 25/10/5.
I just want to add on to this because I think this is the reason why KAT may not get as much credit for the winning as say Edwards. If he puts up another 25/10/5 season but they win 40 games instead of 23, they'll say Towns didn't even change his game and just did what he always does. It'll be Edwards' growth (if he puts up his late rookie season numbers up over a full year) or adding Simmons to the equation that will be the reason for success.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Klomp wrote:King Malta wrote:There's a lot of hyperbole surrounding the KAT discussion IMO.
Our team has doubled it's win total from last season, is 2-2 in a series against the two seed despite an awful choke job and our flawed cornerstone (who is probably no longer the cornerstone given Ant's trajectory) made the all-star team and has a pretty good chance of being named the third team centre.
Comments about him being a cancer or rotting the team from the inside out are over the top. I honestly feel like some of the reactions are fueled somewhat by our conditioning to failure and disaster over the years; we seem like we've finally got a good thing going on and everyone is expecting it to blow up in our faces so wants drastic changes made.
If before the seasons started I offered you a 7th placed finish, a play-in win and taking the Grizzlies to 6 or 7 games I assume almost everyone on this forum would've been thrilled with that progression. If I added on the fact that KAT would achieve the afore-mentioned accolades but we'd still be talking about it being Ant's team now, I assume the reaction would've been unanimous glee.
As mentioned numerous times, KAT is far from perfect and has a tonne of warts, but he's still a very good fit next to Ant and an excellent #2 on a contending team as far as I'm concerned. He drives me crazy with his complaining, vulnerability to the double-team and 'stray voltage' too, and if he was the unequivocal cornerstone we were building around I would advocate moving on and trying something different. But he's not that guy, he just needs to be Ant's running mate. So I don't see actively turfing him to another team to be the best way forward for the construction of this roster.
I 1000% called this way back in September, Towns not getting the credit he deserves.Klomp wrote:Calinks wrote:I very much believe that a good 80 percent of his perception will change, simply if he starts winning games. His defense can not improve from what it is right now but if the Wolves (or whatever team he was on) wins 50 games, his stock will fly way up. In the NBA losing is extremely damaging to the perception of an individual player.
Or will Edwards be credited more for the winning?Klomp wrote:Klomp wrote:It was a "down" season for Towns yet he still basically averaged 25/10/5.
I just want to add on to this because I think this is the reason why KAT may not get as much credit for the winning as say Edwards. If he puts up another 25/10/5 season but they win 40 games instead of 23, they'll say Towns didn't even change his game and just did what he always does. It'll be Edwards' growth (if he puts up his late rookie season numbers up over a full year) or adding Simmons to the equation that will be the reason for success.
Now, Towns has gotten a decent share of credit...but then again, he did in 2017-18 as well, while also getting reamed by Butler and in the media many nights. So has his perception changed? I'm not sure it has.
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves