shangrila wrote:Note30 wrote:shangrila wrote:KAT is nowhere close to KG so it's not a great comparison.
Realistically people should be taking a second to contemplate whether their valuations of KAT's trade value might have been wrong. In typical fashion the majority are burying their heads in the sand and screaming that everyone that doesn't agree with them is an idiot.
It's not about trade value it's about what he meant to this franchise. Yes he's not KG but he is one the most tenured players here. He represents a whole decade and all the good and bad times had. To just cast him aside for two players who are objectively worse is disgusting. What's even worse than that is the manner in which it happened.
Things are deeper than a representation on an Excel sheet somewhere. It's a sport and we are fans. If we were at Morgan Stanley crunching numbers on some commodity that's one thing, but this is inherently emotional or we wouldn't be investing time and energy into this.
Cast him aside? Give me a break. We sent him to an Eastern contender, to (roughly) his home town and one of the premier markets in the league. I'd argue we did him a favour honestly, the Knicks have a better chance of winning the title than we do (with or without KAT).
If you want to care about "tenure" then that's your choice, personally I don't. He's a nice guy and I wish him well, but he was just a repeat of Kevin Love. The only difference is he stuck around to get supermaxed.
You don't deserve to see your teams win if this is what you think of Towns.