2016 draft thread: Part 2
Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
-
- Junior
- Posts: 257
- And1: 22
- Joined: Jul 30, 2008
-
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
Skill is looking good in workouts
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
- firyGM
- Junior
- Posts: 301
- And1: 62
- Joined: Jul 10, 2014
- Location: Spain
-
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
Trade our 5# picks and Shazz, get 5 picks and draft Luwawu, Skal, Sabonis, Hernangomez, Zhou Qi. Probably one of them could be an All-Star lol.
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
-
- Junior
- Posts: 257
- And1: 22
- Joined: Jul 30, 2008
-
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
Worm Guts wrote:After watching a couple of videos of Skal's workouts, it's obvious that he's another Kentucky big who didn't get to fully utilize his jump shot in college. I still don't think we could consider him because he looked so soft at Kentucky, but a potential floor stretcher/rim protector is always tempting.
Could Skal be this years Myles Turner?
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
- horaceworthy
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,650
- And1: 250
- Joined: Jan 17, 2006
- Location: Ruining Fuddrucker's for everyone
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
Worm Guts wrote:Fischella wrote:Knowing Thibs I am sure he is all in for either Bender or Dunn, if none are available thats another argument, I'd go Baldwin/Luwawu in that case
Baldwin hasn't really been talked about here, and I don't know much about him. I have noticed he has a giant wingspan (6'11) and was a 40 percent 3 point shooter. I don't know that he's on the radar though.
He's also a former high school teammate of Towns.
"A while back,'' Cardinal said, "I took a picture of the standings and texted it to Love, just to bust his chops,'' Cardinal said. "He sent me a picture back of a snowdrift.''
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,733
- And1: 1,955
- Joined: May 30, 2007
-
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
Just watched Skal's DX workout video. Loved him after the Hoops Summit but hated everything about his play at UK. However, he's going top ten, maybe higher, to someone, not us though. If he can improve his rebounding/toughness, he has some Ibaka to his game, as he he an athletic shot blocker that can stretch the floor. That combo is a unicorn in the current NBA.
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 69,098
- And1: 22,627
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hj34wOSl_DE[/youtube]
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,733
- And1: 1,955
- Joined: May 30, 2007
-
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
canucklife21 wrote:Worm Guts wrote:After watching a couple of videos of Skal's workouts, it's obvious that he's another Kentucky big who didn't get to fully utilize his jump shot in college. I still don't think we could consider him because he looked so soft at Kentucky, but a potential floor stretcher/rim protector is always tempting.
Could Skal be this years Myles Turner?
Turner was light years more productive at TX than Skal was at Kentucky. Skal's problems are toughness and a lack of BBIQ. Those won't show up in drills. However, he was so good at the Hoops Summit game, I refuse to give up on him.
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
- Krapinsky
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,712
- And1: 1,952
- Joined: May 13, 2007
- Location: Los Angeles
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
Skal has an 8'9.5" standing reach. Turner has a 9'4" reach. 6.5 inch difference there is pretty significant when talking up Skal's potential as a rim protector.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.
NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
- Krapinsky
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,712
- And1: 1,952
- Joined: May 13, 2007
- Location: Los Angeles
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
Not sure what Skal would give us that we don't already get from Dieng.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.
NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,733
- And1: 1,955
- Joined: May 30, 2007
-
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
Krapinsky wrote:Skal has an 8'9.5" standing reach. Turner has a 9'4" reach. 6.5 inch difference there is pretty significant when talking up Skal's potential as a rim protector.
I don't want Skal, but you can't go by the combine's standing reach numbers. It's been reported on multiple sites that there were errors with that measurement at the combine. With Skal, he has measured at 9' or above on multiple occasions, that's probably more accurate.
http://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/241983/League-Office-Reviewing-Draft-Combine-Measurements
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
-
- Junior
- Posts: 257
- And1: 22
- Joined: Jul 30, 2008
-
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
Skal is definitely not worth taking at 5 however, he could easily be a impactful player in the league with the right role.
Jury still out on him but teams drafting from 8 to 14 will keep a close eye on him.
Jury still out on him but teams drafting from 8 to 14 will keep a close eye on him.
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 162
- And1: 15
- Joined: Apr 17, 2016
-
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
Krapinsky wrote:Not sure what Skal would give us that we don't already get from Dieng.
Better perimeter defense and he should be able to stretch the floor better.
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
- Krapinsky
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,712
- And1: 1,952
- Joined: May 13, 2007
- Location: Los Angeles
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
jpatrick wrote:Krapinsky wrote:Skal has an 8'9.5" standing reach. Turner has a 9'4" reach. 6.5 inch difference there is pretty significant when talking up Skal's potential as a rim protector.
I don't want Skal, but you can't go by the combine's standing reach numbers. It's been reported on multiple sites that there were errors with that measurement at the combine. With Skal, he has measured at 9' or above on multiple occasions, that's probably more accurate.
http://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/241983/League-Office-Reviewing-Draft-Combine-Measurements
Hadn't heard that, but makes sense based on the low measurements across the board.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.
NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
- Krapinsky
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,712
- And1: 1,952
- Joined: May 13, 2007
- Location: Los Angeles
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
gopher wolf wrote:Krapinsky wrote:Not sure what Skal would give us that we don't already get from Dieng.
Better perimeter defense and he should be able to stretch the floor better.
I doubt both of those things.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.
NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 162
- And1: 15
- Joined: Apr 17, 2016
-
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
jpatrick wrote:canucklife21 wrote:Worm Guts wrote:After watching a couple of videos of Skal's workouts, it's obvious that he's another Kentucky big who didn't get to fully utilize his jump shot in college. I still don't think we could consider him because he looked so soft at Kentucky, but a potential floor stretcher/rim protector is always tempting.
Could Skal be this years Myles Turner?
Turner was light years more productive at TX than Skal was at Kentucky. Skal's problems are toughness and a lack of BBIQ. Those won't show up in drills. However, he was so good at the Hoops Summit game, I refuse to give up on him.
Turner 22.1MPG 10.1 PPG 6.1 RPG 2.6 BPG .455FG%
Skal 15.6M PG 6.6 PPG 3.1 RPG 1.6 BPG .516FG%
In more minutes he was better but certainly not "lightyears" more productive. Anyways I think if you had to chose two players from last years draft and this years draft to compare, this one would be the most valid. In HS, both shot up out of nowhere in the recruiting rankings all the way to #2 on ESPN's rankings, both were the projected #1 picks going into college but had disappointed years and Skal is projected to go in the same range as Turner. Myles went #11 and Skal's most common projection is at #11 to the Magic.
When you go on the court, they are just as if not more similar. Both of their DX weaknesses videos are nearly identical and 3 of the 4 weaknesses listed for each were mutual: strength/tougness, offensive polish and fundamentals on D. It's a virtual copy and paste. Skal is also actually considered more mobile and a better perimeter defender so theres that.
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,733
- And1: 1,955
- Joined: May 30, 2007
-
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
If you think Turner and Skal had the same impact on their college teams, I don't know what to tell you. I watched a lot of TX that year and Kentucky last year, outside of a couple of games, Skal was never impactful. Turner on the other hand altered numerous shots and clogged the paint defensively.
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
- bwgood77
- Global Mod
- Posts: 98,176
- And1: 61,017
- Joined: Feb 06, 2009
- Location: Austin
- Contact:
-
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
What do you think the chances are that you try to trade up to #3 to take Bender?
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,943
- And1: 1,262
- Joined: Dec 20, 2008
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
bwgood77 wrote:What do you think the chances are that you try to trade up to #3 to take Bender?
If all it took was Shabazz I'd do it yesterday. We don't know what would Ainge want. he could be a real ass to deal with.
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
- bwgood77
- Global Mod
- Posts: 98,176
- And1: 61,017
- Joined: Feb 06, 2009
- Location: Austin
- Contact:
-
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
NewWolvesOrder wrote:bwgood77 wrote:What do you think the chances are that you try to trade up to #3 to take Bender?
If all it took was Shabazz I'd do it yesterday. We don't know what would Ainge want. he could be a real ass to deal with.
I'm sure he'd want more than that but who knows?
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,943
- And1: 1,262
- Joined: Dec 20, 2008
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
bwgood77 wrote:NewWolvesOrder wrote:bwgood77 wrote:What do you think the chances are that you try to trade up to #3 to take Bender?
If all it took was Shabazz I'd do it yesterday. We don't know what would Ainge want. he could be a real ass to deal with.
I'm sure he'd want more than that but who knows?
Or we could talk trade with Celts and Sixers where Celts pick Bender and trade him for Okafor and Sixers then flip Bender for Dunn and Shabazz. This way Suns don't steal Bender and have to settle for Chriss.
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves