ImageImageImage

Trade Talk (Part Five)

Moderators: Domejandro, Calinks, Worm Guts

wolves_89
General Manager
Posts: 8,134
And1: 4,621
Joined: Jul 10, 2012
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1361 » by wolves_89 » Mon Dec 28, 2020 12:15 am

The biggest problem with the Wolves making a trade to upgrade PF is that the guys we would be looking to move have restrictions on when/how they can be traded. Davis' salary can't be aggregated with another player until January 22 and Hernangomez can't be traded at all until March 2.

Here are how I see the options going forward (assuming pick(s) added to each deal):
- In the short term, Davis could be used to match the salaries of Bjelica or PJ Tucker.
- After January 22, Davis+Layman could be used for Larry Nance.
- After March 2, Hernangomez+Davis could be used for Nance or Hernangomez+Davis+Layman for Aaron Gordon
Jedzz
RealGM
Posts: 12,322
And1: 2,506
Joined: Oct 05, 2018

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1362 » by Jedzz » Mon Dec 28, 2020 12:25 am

wolves_89 wrote:The biggest problem with the Wolves making a trade to upgrade PF is that the guys we would be looking to move have restrictions on when/how they can be traded. Davis' salary can't be aggregated with another player until January 22 and Hernangomez can't be traded at all until March 2.

Here are how I see the options going forward (assuming pick(s) added to each deal):
- In the short term, Davis could be used to match the salaries of Bjelica or PJ Tucker.
- After January 22, Davis+Layman could be used for Larry Nance.
- After March 2, Hernangomez+Davis could be used for Nance or Hernangomez+Davis+Layman for Aaron Gordon


Why exactly would other teams want to take your assumed lessor PFs for their assumed better PF? Oh the picks? Might want to entertain the idea of Culver, Okogie or Edwards or someone with value is getting traded. But I also don't think it would be for someone like Bjelica. Not sure about the others stated either.

Anything short of an absolute stud is going to probably do very little from this PF role here and not be worth a trade. They would need to be very aggressive on both ends. Does Gordon still fit that? Not certain. Still thinking the Ben Simmons route either directly or in 3 team deal with Houston if Culver/Edwards can get their value up.
jpatrick
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,744
And1: 1,965
Joined: May 30, 2007
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1363 » by jpatrick » Mon Dec 28, 2020 1:55 am

I know some people might be against him but I still see Rosas making a play for PJ Tucker. He’d come cheaper than a Nance or Gordon and would just be a bandaid. But he’d add toughness, can shoot it some, be switchable on D, and knows how to win, which is underrated. Rosas is also familiar with him from his rocket days.

I could see something like Juancho, McDaniels, and Nowell for Tucker. Tucker would take Layman’s spots in the starting lineup and the 25 minutes that would otherwise go to Juancho/Layman. He could also play some backup center when Naz doesn’t have it.

The other name I could see being cheaper than expected is Markannen. I don’t think the Bulls want to pay him. I’m not sure he’s what Rosas wants at PF though. I think they want someone defensive, athletic, that can shoot somewhat. Markannen can shoot and would be great on offense but doesn’t fit what we need defensively, like a Tucker, Gordon, or Nance.
Neeva
General Manager
Posts: 7,514
And1: 2,896
Joined: Jun 03, 2016

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1364 » by Neeva » Mon Dec 28, 2020 2:18 am

No way I am giving away Jaden for Tucker. Jaden has too much potential.If the wolves are getting a stop gap like Tucker, they need to keep Jaden so he is ready to step in as the starter when Tucker is finished.
Neeva
General Manager
Posts: 7,514
And1: 2,896
Joined: Jun 03, 2016

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1365 » by Neeva » Mon Dec 28, 2020 2:20 am

What is going on with Thybulle and the sixers? He looked
okay as a rookie now barely plays. maybe we can swoop in and get him.. I like him.
Neeva
General Manager
Posts: 7,514
And1: 2,896
Joined: Jun 03, 2016

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1366 » by Neeva » Mon Dec 28, 2020 2:22 am

Aaron Gordon is looking Meh as usual and just plain bad for his contract.
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,741
And1: 5,227
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1367 » by minimus » Mon Dec 28, 2020 3:21 pm

Would you trade Ed Davis, Nowell for Richaun Holmes (2021 UFA + Early Bird Rights)?
jpatrick
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,744
And1: 1,965
Joined: May 30, 2007
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1368 » by jpatrick » Mon Dec 28, 2020 4:42 pm

minimus wrote:Would you trade Ed Davis, Nowell for Richaun Holmes (2021 UFA + Early Bird Rights)?


Why would the Kings do this? They are trying to win and Holmes is currently starting. As fans, I think we give Nowell trade value, I highly doubt if he has any real trade value in the NBA.
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,741
And1: 5,227
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1369 » by minimus » Mon Dec 28, 2020 5:38 pm

jpatrick wrote:
minimus wrote:Would you trade Ed Davis, Nowell for Richaun Holmes (2021 UFA + Early Bird Rights)?


Why would the Kings do this? They are trying to win and Holmes is currently starting. As fans, I think we give Nowell trade value, I highly doubt if he has any real trade value in the NBA.


Fair enough. I thought that SAC dont value him enough, so they brought Hassan to replace Holmes.
Chello1
Junior
Posts: 476
And1: 114
Joined: Jun 05, 2014
       

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1370 » by Chello1 » Mon Dec 28, 2020 9:42 pm

trade DLO and whatever else is needed for good starting 4. Tell KAT- I know he is your friend but the guy is a chucker and we need to balance the roster out. The new lineup is better with many different names at the 4 and Rubio running the show full time.
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,741
And1: 5,227
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1371 » by minimus » Mon Dec 28, 2020 9:56 pm

Considering KAT injury, what do you think about Ed Davis, Culver for Larry Nance Jr?
Rookie-Mistake
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,435
And1: 523
Joined: Jun 27, 2008
       

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1372 » by Rookie-Mistake » Mon Dec 28, 2020 9:59 pm

The AG fanboys have been very quiet.
Neeva wrote:Aaron Gordon is looking Meh as usual and just plain bad for his contract.


Sent from my ONEPLUS A6003 using RealGM mobile app
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,741
And1: 5,227
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1373 » by minimus » Mon Dec 28, 2020 10:19 pm

Rookie-Mistake wrote:The AG fanboys have been very quiet.
Neeva wrote:Aaron Gordon is looking Meh as usual and just plain bad for his contract.



1) he plays career low 25mpg
2) ORL have winning record 3:0
3) his ORtg is 123, DRtg is 105

Small sample size
User avatar
karch34
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,888
And1: 864
Joined: Jul 05, 2001
Location: Valley of the Sun
     

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1374 » by karch34 » Mon Dec 28, 2020 10:20 pm

Neeva wrote:No way I am giving away Jaden for Tucker. Jaden has too much potential.If the wolves are getting a stop gap like Tucker, they need to keep Jaden so he is ready to step in as the starter when Tucker is finished.

I always thought the Tucker interest is a bridge to/mentor for McDaniels
jpatrick
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,744
And1: 1,965
Joined: May 30, 2007
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1375 » by jpatrick » Mon Dec 28, 2020 10:22 pm

Rookie-Mistake wrote:The AG fanboys have been very quiet.
Neeva wrote:Aaron Gordon is looking Meh as usual and just plain bad for his contract.


Sent from my ONEPLUS A6003 using RealGM mobile app


He actually played very well the first two games before only playing 19 minutes in game 3. He’s essentially Okogie, except four inches taller with a significantly better handle. Isn’t that what we’re looking for in a PF? No need to discuss it though. Orlando is undefeated, will probably be in playoff contention, and therefore won’t move him. Plus, we have no salary to trade for Gordon until Juancho, Beasley, etc are eligible to be moved.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,448
And1: 19,496
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1376 » by shrink » Mon Dec 28, 2020 11:03 pm

I was amused by a couple Orlando fans over on the Trade Board, hoping that once James Harden gets traded, a team that missed out will overpay for Aaron Gordon.
Sign5 wrote:Yea not happening, I expected a better retort but what do I expect from realgm(ers) in 2025. Just quote and state things that lack context, then repeat the same thing over and over as if something new and profound was said. Just lol.
wolfen
Senior
Posts: 703
And1: 216
Joined: Apr 05, 2014
     

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1377 » by wolfen » Tue Dec 29, 2020 2:32 am

Honestly, a bag of hot garbage would be an upgrade over Layman or Juancho at this point. Layman is better used as a 3 where he can use his size advantage over most SF's. Both of them though are just not big and strong enough to be starting PF's on any NBA team, and Okogie at PF is foolish IMO. We need physical presence at the PF position, somebody, anybody who plays hard, rebounds, and at least defend at an average level against PF's. Why not throw Tyler Cook out there for a few games and see how that goes? He's gotta be better than hot garbage. He's big, strong, rebounds, attacks the rim, and at least has a chance to be a solid defender. Plus, he's a waaaaay better shooter than Ed Davis :lol: :lol:

But trades for PF's - I can think of 2 younger guys who we could probably nab on the cheap that might fit the description:
Jonathan Motley / Chieck Diallo

Both are buried on the bench in Phoenix, and both are of similar age to KAT. And of course they offer real size and athleticism, both could play the 4 or the 5. Holy crap, PHX waived Motley just last week. Bring him in and kick the tires. D-league numbers from last year:

For the Agua Caliente Clippers last year, the 25-year-old Motley averaged 24.0 points on 51.7% shooting.

The 6-foot-8, 230-pound big man grabbed 8.1 rebounds, adding 3.2 assists and 1.0 blocks in 26 games last year.
Neeva
General Manager
Posts: 7,514
And1: 2,896
Joined: Jun 03, 2016

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1378 » by Neeva » Tue Dec 29, 2020 2:46 am

shrink wrote:I was amused by a couple Orlando fans over on the Trade Board, hoping that once James Harden gets traded, a team that missed out will overpay for Aaron Gordon.


It is hard to deal with the delusion of the Magic fan base, but they take after their deluded gm. Warrior fans are up there also.
Slim Tubby
Veteran
Posts: 2,926
And1: 2,545
Joined: Jun 03, 2017
         

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1379 » by Slim Tubby » Tue Dec 29, 2020 3:57 am

wolfen wrote:Honestly, a bag of hot garbage would be an upgrade over Layman or Juancho at this point. Layman is better used as a 3 where he can use his size advantage over most SF's. Both of them though are just not big and strong enough to be starting PF's on any NBA team, and Okogie at PF is foolish IMO. We need physical presence at the PF position, somebody, anybody who plays hard, rebounds, and at least defend at an average level against PF's. Why not throw Tyler Cook out there for a few games and see how that goes? He's gotta be better than hot garbage. He's big, strong, rebounds, attacks the rim, and at least has a chance to be a solid defender. Plus, he's a waaaaay better shooter than Ed Davis :lol: :lol:

But trades for PF's - I can think of 2 younger guys who we could probably nab on the cheap that might fit the description:
Jonathan Motley / Chieck Diallo

Both are buried on the bench in Phoenix, and both are of similar age to KAT. And of course they offer real size and athleticism, both could play the 4 or the 5. Holy crap, PHX waived Motley just last week. Bring him in and kick the tires. D-league numbers from last year:

For the Agua Caliente Clippers last year, the 25-year-old Motley averaged 24.0 points on 51.7% shooting.

The 6-foot-8, 230-pound big man grabbed 8.1 rebounds, adding 3.2 assists and 1.0 blocks in 26 games last year.

You, sir, earned yourself an “A” for the week for pulling out the Agua Caliente Clippers. Muy bueno, amigo!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Glen Taylor: "Is this moron #1 (Layden)? Put moron #2 (Thibs) on the phone."
Guidus88
Junior
Posts: 344
And1: 177
Joined: Jul 08, 2010
Location: Florence - Italy
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1380 » by Guidus88 » Tue Dec 29, 2020 9:56 am

IF and this is a big IF, in the next few months Culver and Edwards continue to improve and Mcdaniels shows to be a potential legit starter, would you trade KAT for Wiseman + Min 2021 1st pick, GSW 2021 and 2022 1st round pick + fillers?

Of course the next step would be to trade also DAR for the best offer.

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves