ImageImageImage

The Official Mike Conley Thread

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

wolves_89
General Manager
Posts: 8,108
And1: 4,593
Joined: Jul 10, 2012
 

Re: The Official Mike Conley Thread 

Post#141 » by wolves_89 » Fri Dec 8, 2023 3:48 pm

shrink wrote:So I was trying to look a little deeper into Mike Conley’s contract, and noticed a few things.

First, this year isn’t fully guaranteed. He makes $24.36, but only $14.32 is guaranteed. In the tragic event that Mike suffered a season-ending injury, he could be waived and we would have room under the lux threshold to sign a replacement.

Second, he has that $1.5 mil unlikely bonus that Spotrac summarizes as :

“LTBE: $0, ULTBE: $1,500,000 (>-60% playoff games + finals)”

This apparently must just be poorly written and means that Mike only gets his bonus if the team plays in the finals. I’ve heard this rumored before, but couldn’t find confirmation until I noticed he had the same bonus last year. He played in 100% of our playoff games, and he did not receive the bonus.


There was a deadline before the season where Conley's contract became fully guaranteed.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,353
And1: 19,384
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: The Official Mike Conley Thread 

Post#142 » by shrink » Fri Dec 8, 2023 3:51 pm

wolves_89 wrote:
shrink wrote:So I was trying to look a little deeper into Mike Conley’s contract, and noticed a few things.

First, this year isn’t fully guaranteed. He makes $24.36, but only $14.32 is guaranteed. In the tragic event that Mike suffered a season-ending injury, he could be waived and we would have room under the lux threshold to sign a replacement.

Second, he has that $1.5 mil unlikely bonus that Spotrac summarizes as :

“LTBE: $0, ULTBE: $1,500,000 (>-60% playoff games + finals)”

This apparently must just be poorly written and means that Mike only gets his bonus if the team plays in the finals. I’ve heard this rumored before, but couldn’t find confirmation until I noticed he had the same bonus last year. He played in 100% of our playoff games, and he did not receive the bonus.


There was a deadline before the season where Conley's contract became fully guaranteed.

Thanks! I went out looking, and it became fully guaranteed 48 hours after the draft.
Colbinii
RealGM
Posts: 34,243
And1: 21,858
Joined: Feb 13, 2013

Re: The Official Mike Conley Thread 

Post#143 » by Colbinii » Fri Dec 8, 2023 4:05 pm

shrink wrote:
wolves_89 wrote:
shrink wrote:So I was trying to look a little deeper into Mike Conley’s contract, and noticed a few things.

First, this year isn’t fully guaranteed. He makes $24.36, but only $14.32 is guaranteed. In the tragic event that Mike suffered a season-ending injury, he could be waived and we would have room under the lux threshold to sign a replacement.

Second, he has that $1.5 mil unlikely bonus that Spotrac summarizes as :

“LTBE: $0, ULTBE: $1,500,000 (>-60% playoff games + finals)”

This apparently must just be poorly written and means that Mike only gets his bonus if the team plays in the finals. I’ve heard this rumored before, but couldn’t find confirmation until I noticed he had the same bonus last year. He played in 100% of our playoff games, and he did not receive the bonus.


There was a deadline before the season where Conley's contract became fully guaranteed.

Thanks! I went out looking, and it became fully guaranteed 48 hours after the draft.


Shrink, you should start using Spotrac.

You are too good of a poster to not be using the best resources.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,353
And1: 19,384
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: The Official Mike Conley Thread 

Post#144 » by shrink » Fri Dec 8, 2023 4:20 pm

Colbinii wrote:
shrink wrote:
wolves_89 wrote:There was a deadline before the season where Conley's contract became fully guaranteed.

Thanks! I went out looking, and it became fully guaranteed 48 hours after the draft.


Shrink, you should start using Spotrac.

You are too good of a poster to not be using the best resources.

Thanks! I’ve been shifting more and more + it takes me time to adjust to the new formats.

This is actually the fifth or sixth place I’ve used over all my years!

Storyteller
MarkDeeks’
Pelton’s - Basketball Insiders, I think it was called
Something before this one - not hoopshype.
BBRef
Spotrac

Spotrac is about to launch a trade checker too, that will be 100% correct!
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,073
And1: 22,603
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: The Official Mike Conley Thread 

Post#145 » by Klomp » Tue Dec 19, 2023 12:39 am

Read on Twitter
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,353
And1: 19,384
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: The Official Mike Conley Thread 

Post#146 » by shrink » Fri Dec 22, 2023 3:11 pm

Last night after the game, Chris Finch was asked about Mike Conley playing too many minutes.

To paraphrase, he said that he is always asking Mike how he’s feeling, and Mike gets tired of being asked. He also told Finch he plays better in the second game of back-to-backs. Finch looked it up and statistically it seems to be true, so he said he’s forced to believe him.

EDIT: It must suck to be a coach some time. Conley is pushing him for minutes, and how can you say no when he leads the team so beautifully to a record like this? But you just know that the first time Mike gets an injury, like every player does, a horde of fans are going to descend on Finch and say, “See!?! I knew Conley was going to get hurt, and it’s all Finch’s fault for playing him so much! I knew it!”

Conley is becoming one of my favorite Wolves of all time, and to me, losing Mike would create a huge hole in the team. However, it made me feel good to hear that Mike feels healthy and isn’t tired by the minutes - in fact, he has said that the bigger role in Minnesota has rejuvenated him. I watch him play so well, and I believe him too.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,073
And1: 22,603
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: The Official Mike Conley Thread 

Post#147 » by Klomp » Sat Dec 23, 2023 6:25 pm

It's interesting to me how worried people are about Mike potentially breaking down. It probably has to do with the current state of the PG depth, or maybe just nightmares from 20 years ago.

Conley is one of 9 players 35 or older currently averaging 25+ mpg

LeBron (39) 34.1 mpg
CP3 (38) 27.5
Horford (37) 26.7
Lowry (37) 29.4
Conley (36) 29.4
Steph (35) 33.9
KD (35) 36.7
EG (35) 31.8
Lopez (35) 30.9

Just missed the minutes cut: Russ, Batum
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,100
And1: 5,721
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: The Official Mike Conley Thread 

Post#148 » by winforlose » Sat Dec 23, 2023 6:34 pm

Klomp wrote:It's interesting to me how worried people are about Mike potentially breaking down. It probably has to do with the current state of the PG depth, or maybe just nightmares from 20 years ago.

Conley is one of 9 players 35 or older currently averaging 25+ mpg

LeBron (39) 34.1 mpg
CP3 (38) 27.5
Horford (37) 26.7
Lowry (37) 29.4
Conley (36) 29.4
Steph (35) 33.9
KD (35) 36.7
EG (35) 31.8
Lopez (35) 30.9

Just missed the minutes cut: Russ, Batum


All of the above. When Sam went down the scenery fell down and the whole play got canceled. It wouldn’t have been that bad if the play reopened the next year. But of course it took 20 years to find the right cast and the play still hasn’t even happened yet. We are in the early preview stages. Worse, we are stacked with depth, but one of our most important actor’s doesn’t have a proper understudy. I know the show must go on, but we aren’t exactly the only game in town.

To stop torturing the metaphor, we can win as many regular season games as we like, but that means nothing without winning the WCF and getting some god damn glory. To do that we need a backup PG who can step in if Mike goes down. We have NAW backing up the Wings, Naz the bigs, but we have no one backing the PG and that simply isn’t going to work.
User avatar
m2002brian
Analyst
Posts: 3,307
And1: 1,366
Joined: May 29, 2009
     

Re: The Official Mike Conley Thread 

Post#149 » by m2002brian » Sun Dec 24, 2023 7:11 am

Mike Miller gives me ptsd of former acquisitions who could who suddenly couldn’t in a wolves uniform.

But… Bite Bite is changing all of that. AE5 is my favorite player, but if I were to get a jersey, to wear and show to the world, it would be #10. Just pure class and an approach to the game that transcends the borders of team. He is and will continue to be the hope of this team.
BLUEGREENRED
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,100
And1: 5,721
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: The Official Mike Conley Thread 

Post#150 » by winforlose » Sun Dec 24, 2023 7:14 am

m2002brian wrote:Mike Miller gives me ptsd of former acquisitions who could who suddenly couldn’t in a wolves uniform.

But… Bite Bite is changing all of that. AE5 is my favorite player, but if I were to get a jersey, to wear and show to the world, it would be #10. Just pure class and an approach to the game that transcends the borders of team. He is and will continue to be the hope of this team.


Ant had the right nickname for Mike but for the wrong reason. He says it’s because Mike always looks ready to bite someone. I say it’s because Mike does so many little things to take a bite out of you. Tonight a poke away is bite one, then he gets the cross court pass and hits the layup in transition for bite number 2.

Also, if we win the title, Mike should bite Ant. Just bring the thing full circle.
younggunsmn
Head Coach
Posts: 6,763
And1: 2,592
Joined: May 28, 2007
Location: Hiding from the thought police.

Re: The Official Mike Conley Thread 

Post#151 » by younggunsmn » Sun Dec 24, 2023 7:27 am

Klomp wrote:It's interesting to me how worried people are about Mike potentially breaking down. It probably has to do with the current state of the PG depth, or maybe just nightmares from 20 years ago.

Conley is one of 9 players 35 or older currently averaging 25+ mpg

LeBron (39) 34.1 mpg
CP3 (38) 27.5
Horford (37) 26.7
Lowry (37) 29.4
Conley (36) 29.4
Steph (35) 33.9
KD (35) 36.7
EG (35) 31.8
Lopez (35) 30.9

Just missed the minutes cut: Russ, Batum


So Mike is a year younger than Lowry and a year older than Steph and KD.
That makes me feel a little better about him playing 2-3 more years after this year.
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,100
And1: 5,721
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: The Official Mike Conley Thread 

Post#152 » by winforlose » Sun Dec 24, 2023 7:38 am

younggunsmn wrote:
Klomp wrote:It's interesting to me how worried people are about Mike potentially breaking down. It probably has to do with the current state of the PG depth, or maybe just nightmares from 20 years ago.

Conley is one of 9 players 35 or older currently averaging 25+ mpg

LeBron (39) 34.1 mpg
CP3 (38) 27.5
Horford (37) 26.7
Lowry (37) 29.4
Conley (36) 29.4
Steph (35) 33.9
KD (35) 36.7
EG (35) 31.8
Lopez (35) 30.9

Just missed the minutes cut: Russ, Batum


So Mike is a year younger than Lowry and a year older than Steph and KD.
That makes me feel a little better about him playing 2-3 more years after this year.


Remind me how much time has Curry missed, KD missed, Lowry missed? You cannot count on a 36 or 37 or 38 year old for 82 games. You cannot even count on them for 72 games. If you get 72, great, but don’t bet on it. Regardless, no one is saying dump Mike. We are saying we need someone behind him who can help shoulder the burden and eventually help transition him to the bench next year when he is older and needs fewer minutes to stay healthy.
FrenchMinnyFan
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,978
And1: 1,190
Joined: Feb 10, 2023
     

Re: The Official Mike Conley Thread 

Post#153 » by FrenchMinnyFan » Sun Dec 24, 2023 8:10 am

The option was i think that Shake will be good enough to take out 5-7 min from Mike and limit him to 23/25 min per game but unfortunatly it did not work out. The most important will be if we can secure our position as early as possible to rest Mike, ANT, KAT and Rudy a litle bit to make sure they are 100% at PO time.
But injury apart i'm not too worry for Mike. I follow him since he got drafted and he is one of he most professional and serious player you can find. I'm sure he got 2 or 3 more years in the tank.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,353
And1: 19,384
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: The Official Mike Conley Thread 

Post#154 » by shrink » Sun Dec 24, 2023 2:46 pm

i was traveling for Christmas and missed the game, and the radio was out in my car, but still had a cool experience, I wanted to share.

I pulled off at about midnight just after the game ended, and on the TV I saw a smiling Mike Conley doing an on court, post game interview. It made me happy to know that the Wolves beat the formidable Kings, but even happier to know that Mike must have been particularly good to be selected to be interviewed. He is quickly becoming one of my favorite Wolves of all time, and I love to know that he’s happy and did well!
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,073
And1: 22,603
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: The Official Mike Conley Thread 

Post#155 » by Klomp » Sun Dec 24, 2023 7:18 pm

I don't know what this all means, but it seems good.

Read on Twitter
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,100
And1: 5,721
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: The Official Mike Conley Thread 

Post#156 » by winforlose » Sun Dec 24, 2023 7:32 pm

Klomp wrote:I don't know what this all means, but it seems good.

Read on Twitter


4 of our top 5 in the top 50 is probably good. No one in the top 24 not as good.
Loaf_of_bread
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,364
And1: 642
Joined: Nov 21, 2023
     

Re: The Official Mike Conley Thread 

Post#157 » by Loaf_of_bread » Mon Dec 25, 2023 7:02 am

winforlose wrote:
Klomp wrote:I don't know what this all means, but it seems good.

Read on Twitter


4 of our top 5 in the top 50 is probably good. No one in the top 24 not as good.


Thanks for the breakdown.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,353
And1: 19,384
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: The Official Mike Conley Thread 

Post#158 » by shrink » Mon Dec 25, 2023 8:19 am

So many of these stats are based on usage, that I’m not surprised that we don’t have anyone in the Top 24, IF we have four guys between 25-50. We have deep starting talent.
KGdaBom
RealGM
Posts: 22,881
And1: 6,220
Joined: Jun 22, 2017
         

Re: The Official Mike Conley Thread 

Post#159 » by KGdaBom » Mon Dec 25, 2023 7:26 pm

winforlose wrote:
Klomp wrote:It's interesting to me how worried people are about Mike potentially breaking down. It probably has to do with the current state of the PG depth, or maybe just nightmares from 20 years ago.

Conley is one of 9 players 35 or older currently averaging 25+ mpg

LeBron (39) 34.1 mpg
CP3 (38) 27.5
Horford (37) 26.7
Lowry (37) 29.4
Conley (36) 29.4
Steph (35) 33.9
KD (35) 36.7
EG (35) 31.8
Lopez (35) 30.9

Just missed the minutes cut: Russ, Batum


All of the above. When Sam went down the scenery fell down and the whole play got canceled. It wouldn’t have been that bad if the play reopened the next year. But of course it took 20 years to find the right cast and the play still hasn’t even happened yet. We are in the early preview stages. Worse, we are stacked with depth, but one of our most important actor’s doesn’t have a proper understudy. I know the show must go on, but we aren’t exactly the only game in town.

To stop torturing the metaphor, we can win as many regular season games as we like, but that means nothing without winning the WCF and getting some god damn glory. To do that we need a backup PG who can step in if Mike goes down. We have NAW backing up the Wings, Naz the bigs, but we have no one backing the PG and that simply isn’t going to work.

How about Mike not going down. Problem solved. It's not a guarantee that Mike goes down. It would be nice to have a high quality backup PG, but it's not an absolute necessity.
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,100
And1: 5,721
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: The Official Mike Conley Thread 

Post#160 » by winforlose » Mon Dec 25, 2023 7:34 pm

KGdaBom wrote:
winforlose wrote:
Klomp wrote:It's interesting to me how worried people are about Mike potentially breaking down. It probably has to do with the current state of the PG depth, or maybe just nightmares from 20 years ago.

Conley is one of 9 players 35 or older currently averaging 25+ mpg

LeBron (39) 34.1 mpg
CP3 (38) 27.5
Horford (37) 26.7
Lowry (37) 29.4
Conley (36) 29.4
Steph (35) 33.9
KD (35) 36.7
EG (35) 31.8
Lopez (35) 30.9

Just missed the minutes cut: Russ, Batum


All of the above. When Sam went down the scenery fell down and the whole play got canceled. It wouldn’t have been that bad if the play reopened the next year. But of course it took 20 years to find the right cast and the play still hasn’t even happened yet. We are in the early preview stages. Worse, we are stacked with depth, but one of our most important actor’s doesn’t have a proper understudy. I know the show must go on, but we aren’t exactly the only game in town.

To stop torturing the metaphor, we can win as many regular season games as we like, but that means nothing without winning the WCF and getting some god damn glory. To do that we need a backup PG who can step in if Mike goes down. We have NAW backing up the Wings, Naz the bigs, but we have no one backing the PG and that simply isn’t going to work.

How about Mike not going down. Problem solved. It's not a guarantee that Mike goes down. It would be nice to have a high quality backup PG, but it's not an absolute necessity.


Hope for the best. Plan for the worst. Also next season we are basically stuck in cement with the cap. If you want to plan for the future you must do it now.

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves