ImageImageImage

Trade Talk (Part Five)

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

Merc_Porto
General Manager
Posts: 9,941
And1: 3,540
Joined: Nov 21, 2013
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1441 » by Merc_Porto » Mon Jan 4, 2021 5:05 pm

RiRuHoops wrote:Dlo for Tobias Harris.

Wolves get a Pf, Sixers save money.


Is not ideal because they are both overpaid and Tobias has one more year.
But i also like the fit of Tobias on this team and hes better player than Dlo.

Add Layman going to Philly (cant be Juancho unfortunely)

Rubio | Jmac
Beasley | Edwards | Nowell
Culver | Okogie | Vanderbilt
Tobias | Juancho | McDaniels
KAT | Naz | Davis
User avatar
Killboard
Analyst
Posts: 3,374
And1: 943
Joined: Jul 16, 2010

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1442 » by Killboard » Mon Jan 4, 2021 5:40 pm

mercgold3 wrote:
RiRuHoops wrote:Dlo for Tobias Harris.

Wolves get a Pf, Sixers save money.


Is not ideal because they are both overpaid and Tobias has one more year.
But i also like the fit of Tobias on this team and hes better player than Dlo.

Add Layman going to Philly (cant be Juancho unfortunely)

Rubio | Jmac
Beasley | Edwards | Nowell
Culver | Okogie | Vanderbilt
Tobias | Juancho | McDaniels
KAT | Naz | Davis


While the trade would make the Wolves better I don't think Dlo is going anywhere anytime soon. Towns vouched for him and the front office won't go against that except KAT ask for it.

If they want Harris (who is overpaid but also a good fit) Beasley+Juancho(Expiring next season)+Davis (expiring) would work.

Dlo | Rubio | Jmac
Edwards | Nowell |
Okogie | Culver | Layman
Harris | Vanderbilt | McDaniels
Towns | Naz

Philly bails out of Harris contract while adding a young shooter as Beasley locked for several years.
jscott
Analyst
Posts: 3,062
And1: 1,355
Joined: Oct 14, 2004
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1443 » by jscott » Mon Jan 4, 2021 5:53 pm

Killboard wrote:
mercgold3 wrote:
RiRuHoops wrote:Dlo for Tobias Harris.

Wolves get a Pf, Sixers save money.


Is not ideal because they are both overpaid and Tobias has one more year.
But i also like the fit of Tobias on this team and hes better player than Dlo.

Add Layman going to Philly (cant be Juancho unfortunely)

Rubio | Jmac
Beasley | Edwards | Nowell
Culver | Okogie | Vanderbilt
Tobias | Juancho | McDaniels
KAT | Naz | Davis


While the trade would make the Wolves better I don't think Dlo is going anywhere anytime soon. Towns vouched for him and the front office won't go against that except KAT ask for it.

If they want Harris (who is overpaid but also a good fit) Beasley+Juancho(Expiring next season)+Davis (expiring) would work.

Dlo | Rubio | Jmac
Edwards | Nowell |
Okogie | Culver | Layman
Harris | Vanderbilt | McDaniels
Towns | Naz

Philly bails out of Harris contract while adding a young shooter as Beasley locked for several years.

It’s just that I feel Beasley is a better player than DLo and much better value than Harris. If anything, 76ers need to include some sweetener on a deal like that.
thinktank
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,302
And1: 2,641
Joined: Jul 02, 2010
Location: Mpls

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1444 » by thinktank » Mon Jan 4, 2021 5:57 pm

KG_And1 wrote:
IceManBK1 wrote:At the trade deadline
Dlo/Rubio
Edwards/Okogie
RHJ-bring him back/Culver
Aaron Gordon-Beasley+2nd rder trade/Juancho
Towns/Reid


This would actually be perfect.

We’re going to need Gordon/RHJ to guard Durant in the Finals.


Why for 4 - 2 ORL?

I think they say no.
RiRuHoops
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,390
And1: 2,020
Joined: Sep 06, 2019
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1445 » by RiRuHoops » Mon Jan 4, 2021 6:02 pm

Killboard wrote:
mercgold3 wrote:
RiRuHoops wrote:Dlo for Tobias Harris.

Wolves get a Pf, Sixers save money.


Is not ideal because they are both overpaid and Tobias has one more year.
But i also like the fit of Tobias on this team and hes better player than Dlo.

Add Layman going to Philly (cant be Juancho unfortunely)

Rubio | Jmac
Beasley | Edwards | Nowell
Culver | Okogie | Vanderbilt
Tobias | Juancho | McDaniels
KAT | Naz | Davis


While the trade would make the Wolves better I don't think Dlo is going anywhere anytime soon. Towns vouched for him and the front office won't go against that except KAT ask for it.

If they want Harris (who is overpaid but also a good fit) Beasley+Juancho(Expiring next season)+Davis (expiring) would work.

Dlo | Rubio | Jmac
Edwards | Nowell |
Okogie | Culver | Layman
Harris | Vanderbilt | McDaniels
Towns | Naz

Philly bails out of Harris contract while adding a young shooter as Beasley locked for several years.



Having two overpaid fake stars like DLo and Tobias is cap hell suicide for small market franchise. It's one or another to me.
DLo is a bum who was acquired in exchange for another bum. I wouldn't care what KAT thinks about his bum friend. He's under contract for a few years. Wolves need to acquire better player around him(KAT). Harris is a better player than Dlo, if Sixers agree to it, you go for it.

Also I take Beasley over Dlo every day.
User avatar
Killboard
Analyst
Posts: 3,374
And1: 943
Joined: Jul 16, 2010

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1446 » by Killboard » Mon Jan 4, 2021 6:41 pm

RiRuHoops wrote:
Killboard wrote:
mercgold3 wrote:
Is not ideal because they are both overpaid and Tobias has one more year.
But i also like the fit of Tobias on this team and hes better player than Dlo.

Add Layman going to Philly (cant be Juancho unfortunely)

Rubio | Jmac
Beasley | Edwards | Nowell
Culver | Okogie | Vanderbilt
Tobias | Juancho | McDaniels
KAT | Naz | Davis


While the trade would make the Wolves better I don't think Dlo is going anywhere anytime soon. Towns vouched for him and the front office won't go against that except KAT ask for it.

If they want Harris (who is overpaid but also a good fit) Beasley+Juancho(Expiring next season)+Davis (expiring) would work.

Dlo | Rubio | Jmac
Edwards | Nowell |
Okogie | Culver | Layman
Harris | Vanderbilt | McDaniels
Towns | Naz

Philly bails out of Harris contract while adding a young shooter as Beasley locked for several years.



Having two overpaid fake stars like DLo and Tobias is cap hell suicide for small market franchise. It's one or another to me.
DLo is a bum who was acquired in exchange for another bum. I wouldn't care what KAT thinks about his bum friend. He's under contract for a few years. Wolves need to acquire better player around him(KAT). Harris is a better player than Dlo, if Sixers agree to it, you go for it.

Also I take Beasley over Dlo every day.


It's not what I would do, but what I think the FO could do. If you don't care what KAT thinks you may as well trade him.
User avatar
Killboard
Analyst
Posts: 3,374
And1: 943
Joined: Jul 16, 2010

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1447 » by Killboard » Mon Jan 4, 2021 6:44 pm

jscott wrote:
Killboard wrote:
mercgold3 wrote:
Is not ideal because they are both overpaid and Tobias has one more year.
But i also like the fit of Tobias on this team and hes better player than Dlo.

Add Layman going to Philly (cant be Juancho unfortunely)

Rubio | Jmac
Beasley | Edwards | Nowell
Culver | Okogie | Vanderbilt
Tobias | Juancho | McDaniels
KAT | Naz | Davis


While the trade would make the Wolves better I don't think Dlo is going anywhere anytime soon. Towns vouched for him and the front office won't go against that except KAT ask for it.

If they want Harris (who is overpaid but also a good fit) Beasley+Juancho(Expiring next season)+Davis (expiring) would work.

Dlo | Rubio | Jmac
Edwards | Nowell |
Okogie | Culver | Layman
Harris | Vanderbilt | McDaniels
Towns | Naz

Philly bails out of Harris contract while adding a young shooter as Beasley locked for several years.

It’s just that I feel Beasley is a better player than DLo and much better value than Harris. If anything, 76ers need to include some sweetener on a deal like that.


I think Dlo and Beasley (playing at his best, not in their current form) are pretty similar in overall value, and definetly Beasley is the better asset with a contract worth half. And yes, he is definetly a better asset than Harris under his current contract, for which other assets would be included.
User avatar
Domejandro
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 20,459
And1: 30,833
Joined: Jul 29, 2014

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1448 » by Domejandro » Mon Jan 4, 2021 8:13 pm

Philadelphia almost certainly is not changing things up, after this start to their season.
Neeva
Head Coach
Posts: 7,490
And1: 2,882
Joined: Jun 03, 2016

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1449 » by Neeva » Mon Jan 4, 2021 8:28 pm

They have only beaten east teams and only good ones are Toronto and Orlando.
DaMplsKid
Junior
Posts: 342
And1: 158
Joined: Jun 24, 2017
       

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1450 » by DaMplsKid » Mon Jan 4, 2021 9:13 pm

The ideal player I would love to bring in would be Al Harford. He has winning experience, great rebounder, defender and can knock down open 3's Plus add in that facts him and Towns have a bond together and he plays on a team trying to rebuild. I just hate that contract and cant find a way to bring him in without moving one of our top 3 salaries which would be counter productive.
Neeva
Head Coach
Posts: 7,490
And1: 2,882
Joined: Jun 03, 2016

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1451 » by Neeva » Tue Jan 5, 2021 12:18 am

How about try to get Malik
monk on the cheap? For Layman+ extra?
Norseman79
Starter
Posts: 2,407
And1: 873
Joined: Jul 26, 2017
     

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1452 » by Norseman79 » Tue Jan 5, 2021 1:34 am

Neeva wrote:How about try to get Malik
monk on the cheap? For Layman+ extra?


Because we need another guard? (Don't get me wrong, I do like Monk, but why another guard?)
Jedzz
RealGM
Posts: 12,322
And1: 2,506
Joined: Oct 05, 2018

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1453 » by Jedzz » Tue Jan 5, 2021 1:37 am

Neeva wrote:How about try to get Malik
monk on the cheap? For Layman+ extra?


Best idea I heard yet. Gold stars for everyone!


Let's add yet another combo guard and dump another 6'8 player in doing so to make this roster smaller. You even hinted at a + asset. Who else can we throw in? Edwards maybe? Needs be a lot because Monk's 28% 3FG shooting in his 3rd season just excites!
Neeva
Head Coach
Posts: 7,490
And1: 2,882
Joined: Jun 03, 2016

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1454 » by Neeva » Tue Jan 5, 2021 1:43 am

because we could use a guard when we trade beasley to get a starting pf! Monk needs a change of scenery and he can be useful.
Neeva
Head Coach
Posts: 7,490
And1: 2,882
Joined: Jun 03, 2016

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1455 » by Neeva » Tue Jan 5, 2021 1:43 am

Jedzz wrote:
Neeva wrote:How about try to get Malik
monk on the cheap? For Layman+ extra?


Best idea I heard yet. Gold stars for everyone!


Let's add yet another combo guard and dump another 6'8 player in doing so to make this roster smaller. You even hinted at a + asset. Who else can we throw in? Edwards maybe? Needs be a lot because Monk's 28% 3FG shooting in his 3rd season just excites!


Layman miught as well be 6’4 because that is what he plays like.
Jedzz
RealGM
Posts: 12,322
And1: 2,506
Joined: Oct 05, 2018

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1456 » by Jedzz » Tue Jan 5, 2021 1:48 am

Neeva wrote:
Jedzz wrote:
Neeva wrote:How about try to get Malik
monk on the cheap? For Layman+ extra?


Best idea I heard yet. Gold stars for everyone!


Let's add yet another combo guard and dump another 6'8 player in doing so to make this roster smaller. You even hinted at a + asset. Who else can we throw in? Edwards maybe? Needs be a lot because Monk's 28% 3FG shooting in his 3rd season just excites!


Layman miught as well be 6’4 because that is what he plays like.


Maybe so, but that doesn't mean we need another guard. We need two to be traded away maybe.
Jedzz
RealGM
Posts: 12,322
And1: 2,506
Joined: Oct 05, 2018

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1457 » by Jedzz » Tue Jan 5, 2021 1:56 am

Neeva wrote:because we could use a guard when we trade beasley to get a starting pf! Monk needs a change of scenery and he can be useful.


He's a career 39% FG shooter, nets you less than 2 assists in 20 minutes and when the season is done if you want to restrict him the QO is 7million. This is why too many FRP players can be a problem. They don't extend cheap. But hey this sounds like a Rosas special. He can float that 7MM and use it to get another guard. Just try to forget for a second that he was a first round pick years back. Now go review his stats and tell me why you don't think JMac is 3x better.

What was the drug policy that got him bounced last season? I don't know the details.

We don't need more guards even if you trade Beasley. But we definitely would need a replacement shooter.
RiRuHoops
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,390
And1: 2,020
Joined: Sep 06, 2019
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1458 » by RiRuHoops » Tue Jan 5, 2021 2:05 am

DaMplsKid wrote:The ideal player I would love to bring in would be Al Harford. He has winning experience, great rebounder, defender and can knock down open 3's Plus add in that facts him and Towns have a bond together and he plays on a team trying to rebuild. I just hate that contract and cant find a way to bring him in without moving one of our top 3 salaries which would be counter productive.


I seriously would take Horford over Russel. Might as well start playing defense at some point in this club history and get Towns a mentor who can protect his soft ass.
IceManBK1
Analyst
Posts: 3,232
And1: 330
Joined: Jul 14, 2017
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1459 » by IceManBK1 » Tue Jan 5, 2021 4:23 am

Rubio+Layman for Randle+knox. Randle having MIP type of season. Knox is a throw in.
theGreatRC
RealGM
Posts: 18,530
And1: 4,992
Joined: Oct 12, 2006
Location: California
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1460 » by theGreatRC » Tue Jan 5, 2021 4:26 am

Do 10 day contracts not exist this season? We have 3 players injured and can't get a decent big? No RHJ, Taj, Patton, anyone?
Dysfunctional Wolves fan

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves