Official Anthony Edwards Thread

Post #1441 » by **Klomp** » Wed Jan 26, 2022 9:26 pm

He's the one, jack!

Read on Twitter

Post #1442 » by **Klomp** » Thu Jan 27, 2022 3:19 am

Read on Twitter

BlacJacMac · Post #1443 » by **BlacJacMac** » Thu Jan 27, 2022 4:28 pm

Klomp wrote:

Read on Twitter

I'm always amazed that Wally averaged only two 3PA/game for his career. And never more than 3.5 in a season. That's absurd for a 41% career shooter.

He was definitely born a decade too early...

KGdaBom · Post #1444 » by **KGdaBom** » Thu Jan 27, 2022 5:05 pm

Wow. Just checked in on the last couple pages. I don't read or respond to posts longer than 2 maybe 3 standard paragraphs. Probably some good stuff in those, but way beyond my attention span.

winforlose · Post #1445 » by **winforlose** » Thu Jan 27, 2022 11:12 pm

Watch on YouTube

fattymcgee · Post #1446 » by **fattymcgee** » Sun Jan 30, 2022 3:32 pm

Here's an advance stat that really likes Ant.

And also hates KAT.

life_saver · Post #1447 » by **life_saver** » Sun Jan 30, 2022 7:58 pm

Ant had 10 assists against Suns...that must be his career high right?

fattymcgee · Post #1448 » by **fattymcgee** » Sun Jan 30, 2022 9:04 pm

life_saver wrote:Ant had 10 assists against Suns...that must be his career high right?

Yes, it was 7 before that.

Slim Tubby · Post #1449 » by **Slim Tubby** » Wed Feb 2, 2022 4:41 am

I hope I’m wrong but Ant looked like he wasn’t feeling himself tonight (knee?).

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

fattymcgee · Post #1450 » by **fattymcgee** » Wed Feb 2, 2022 7:18 pm

Slim Tubby wrote:I hope I’m wrong but Ant looked like he wasn’t feeling himself tonight (knee?).

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

He said his knees were bothering him.

Slim Tubby · Post #1451 » by **Slim Tubby** » Wed Feb 2, 2022 7:30 pm

fattymcgee wrote:
Slim Tubby wrote:I hope I’m wrong but Ant looked like he wasn’t feeling himself tonight (knee?).

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

He said his knees were bothering him.

I thought he looked hesitant last night...I guess that explains it. Maybe they should shut him down for a few days of rest but I highly doubt Ant would accept that decision.

King Malta · Post #1452 » by **King Malta** » Wed Feb 2, 2022 11:48 pm

I liked the way he didn't force the issue when it was clear he wasn't having a great night and other guys were to be honest. Shows some maturity (and good coaching in fairness) for him not to try and furiously chuck his way out of the slump but instead defer to the hotter hands

life_saver · Post #1453 » by **life_saver** » Fri Feb 4, 2022 8:25 pm

I was reading Lowe's article and he mentioned that so far this season, Ant is shooting 43% on Catch-and-shoot 3's which is excellent but only 31% of pull-up 3's.

andyhop · Post #1454 » by **andyhop** » Sat Feb 5, 2022 1:37 am

Are Wolves fans prepared for all of the message board drama of Ant turning down a max deal to play on his QO at the end of his rookie deal?

Post #1455 » by **Worm Guts** » Sat Feb 5, 2022 2:31 am

andyhop wrote:Are Wolves fans prepared for all of the message board drama of Ant turning down a max deal to play on his QO at the end of his rookie deal?

Are you just attempting to antagonize people?

andyhop · Post #1456 » by **andyhop** » Sat Feb 5, 2022 3:28 am

Worm Guts wrote:
andyhop wrote:Are Wolves fans prepared for all of the message board drama of Ant turning down a max deal to play on his QO at the end of his rookie deal?

Are you just attempting to antagonize people?

No just interested in if people have been paying attention to what is going to happen with players from his draft

_AIJ_ · Post #1457 » by **_AIJ_** » Sat Feb 5, 2022 3:30 am

andyhop wrote:
Worm Guts wrote:
andyhop wrote:Are Wolves fans prepared for all of the message board drama of Ant turning down a max deal to play on his QO at the end of his rookie deal?

Are you just attempting to antagonize people?

No just interested in if people have been paying attention to what is going to happen with players from his draft

Ummmm what???

andyhop · Post #1458 » by **andyhop** » Sat Feb 5, 2022 3:38 am

_AIJ_ wrote:
andyhop wrote:
Worm Guts wrote:

Are you just attempting to antagonize people?

No just interested in if people have been paying attention to what is going to happen with players from his draft

Ummmm what???

Look at when the TV deal runs out and the massive jump in salary cap that is being talked about due to a new deal.

Taking the QO , so that their next deal is signed under the new cap is likely to be a no brainer for anybody who can command the max from that draft.

younggunsmn · Post #1459 » by **younggunsmn** » Sat Feb 5, 2022 3:46 am

andyhop wrote:
_AIJ_ wrote:
andyhop wrote:
No just interested in if people have been paying attention to what is going to happen with players from his draft

Ummmm what???

Look at when the TV deal runs out and the massive jump in salary cap that is being talked about due to a new deal.

Taking the QO , so that their next deal is signed under the new cap is likely to be a no brainer for anybody who can command the max from that draft.

Unless I'm mistaken, they can tie those extensions to a certain % of the cap, which would make this moot.
As far as economic uncertainty, an upcoming TV deal is the least of the team's worries. We're in for a rough next few years.

andyhop · Post #1460 » by **andyhop** » Sat Feb 5, 2022 3:55 am

younggunsmn wrote:
andyhop wrote:
_AIJ_ wrote:Ummmm what???

Look at when the TV deal runs out and the massive jump in salary cap that is being talked about due to a new deal.

Taking the QO , so that their next deal is signed under the new cap is likely to be a no brainer for anybody who can command the max from that draft.

Unless I'm mistaken, they can tie those extensions to a certain % of the cap, which would make this moot.
As far as economic uncertainty, an upcoming TV deal is the least of the team's worries. We're in for a rough next few years.

Yes but the extension starts the year before the cap jump if he signs it. so the percentage is the same just a percentage of a much lower number if projections of the TV deals size are correct.