The draft pick will be the third player at a low salary. Okogie would be in the rotation. Okogie, Richardson and Wiggins can rotate because Richardson is versatile enough to play the 2 and 3. The fact that they are young and locked up with good long term deals is a plus not a minus. Each player making 10 to 12 per yr is a dam good contract.Crazy-Canuck wrote:twix2500 wrote:I havent commented on what the Wolves should take from the Heat. But if I was the Wolves you have to really consider the Heat offer. 3 good YOUNG role players for 19 mill. They are not gonna find that rate on the free agent market next summer for 19 mill. And the Wolves will have only 9 mill of capspace to get FA if they let Jimmy walk. Richardson, Waiters or Olynyk or Winslow and FRP. The team has gotten deeper without making their cap bigger. The Wolves will not be getting old players who will be out of the league in a few years.
PG: Teague
SG: Richardson
SF: Wiggins
PF: Olynyk
Cc: Towns
Bench: 2 first rounders, Dieng, Bates-Diop, Okogie
That's a good YOUNG ten man rotation that will allow Wiggins and Towns to have the ball going into next yr. Improved shooting, passing, well coached and knows how to play their roles. And the Wolves do not have to go into the luxury tax to fill up their roster.
Sent from my SM-T550 using Tapatalk
Yeah, Minnesota isnt going to take long term salary back in a jimmy deal unless dieng goes out.
Id rather have okogie than Winslow. Olynyk spaces our offense, but doesnt help our defense. And Richardson is a nice player, but he isnt some young game changer you trade a top 15 NBA player for. Wheres 3? I see only 2 unless you are including dieng and/or you can see into the future and know that pick will be decent.
With the emergence of okogie, I think Im good with a Okogie/Wiggins wing tandem going into the next decade.
Sent from my SM-T550 using Tapatalk