winforlose wrote: Yes we can win regardless, but with a prime Pop (or some other elite coach,) we are not 6th, and we leave a lot less doubt.
And what available coach falls into that category?
Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

winforlose wrote: Yes we can win regardless, but with a prime Pop (or some other elite coach,) we are not 6th, and we leave a lot less doubt.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
winforlose wrote:
Me for one!!! I don’t look at that series and see a masterclass in coaching. I see Rudy in games 1-4 as a shell of what he should be. I look at game 5 as what should have been happening all along. Who on the Lakers can actually guard or box out Rudy? If they are overwhelming him with bodies than other guys should be getting in their and putting 2nd chance points at will.
Klomp wrote:winforlose wrote: Yes we can win regardless, but with a prime Pop (or some other elite coach,) we are not 6th, and we leave a lot less doubt.
And what available coach falls into that category?

Loaf_of_bread wrote:Could someone help me out with how to post Youtube videos? Video from account "Anthony edwards" from 7 hrs ago is fantastic
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
I don't know you personally from a bar of soap, but your comments come across as extremely negative and pessimistic, and views on coaching are way too unrealistic.winforlose wrote:Rookie-Mistake wrote:Wasn't there someone very vocal in the fire finch forum saying that finch can't be accredited with coaching us to a series win?Klomp wrote:
Sent from my SM-G991B using RealGM mobile app
Me for one!!! I don’t look at that series and see a masterclass in coaching. I see Rudy in games 1-4 as a shell of what he should be. I look at game 5 as what should have been happening all along. Who on the Lakers can actually guard or box out Rudy? If they are overwhelming him with bodies than other guys should be getting in their and putting 2nd chance points at will. I look at the way Jaden didn’t exploit the mismatches in games 2 and 4 and I think that is a great way to extend a series instead of sweep one. I look at the way we blew quarters in close wins and I ask would a good coach have better demonstrated the true talent disparity involved here?
Remember I am the guy who said months ago that we get to the WCF against anyone so long as we avoid OKC. I am also the guy who said the only way LAL beats us is with an unfair whistle. I view Finch as driving a high end sports car and treating it like a minivan. Yes we can win regardless, but with a prime Pop (or some other elite coach,) we are not 6th, and we leave a lot less doubt.
Rookie-Mistake wrote:I don't know you personally from a bar of soap, but your comments come across as extremely negative and pessimistic, and views on coaching are way too unrealistic.winforlose wrote:Rookie-Mistake wrote:Wasn't there someone very vocal in the fire finch forum saying that finch can't be accredited with coaching us to a series win?
Sent from my SM-G991B using RealGM mobile app
Me for one!!! I don’t look at that series and see a masterclass in coaching. I see Rudy in games 1-4 as a shell of what he should be. I look at game 5 as what should have been happening all along. Who on the Lakers can actually guard or box out Rudy? If they are overwhelming him with bodies than other guys should be getting in their and putting 2nd chance points at will. I look at the way Jaden didn’t exploit the mismatches in games 2 and 4 and I think that is a great way to extend a series instead of sweep one. I look at the way we blew quarters in close wins and I ask would a good coach have better demonstrated the true talent disparity involved here?
Remember I am the guy who said months ago that we get to the WCF against anyone so long as we avoid OKC. I am also the guy who said the only way LAL beats us is with an unfair whistle. I view Finch as driving a high end sports car and treating it like a minivan. Yes we can win regardless, but with a prime Pop (or some other elite coach,) we are not 6th, and we leave a lot less doubt.
I would like to know, have you ever coached any basketball team ever? If so, at what level and what places your ideology above all?
And with all of Finchs flaws (im not saying he is perfect, no one is), who do you propose to be the heir apparent?
As I mentioned earlier, we have never ever gone back to back first round playoff series wins. In the history of this club, it is a time for celebration that we aren't the **** kickers of the league anymore and as a die hard wolves fan it's time to get around everyone and that includes the coach that largely has orchestrated this.
Sent from my SM-G991B using RealGM mobile app
Rookie-Mistake wrote:I don't know you personally from a bar of soap, but your comments come across as extremely negative and pessimistic, and views on coaching are way too unrealistic.winforlose wrote:Rookie-Mistake wrote:Wasn't there someone very vocal in the fire finch forum saying that finch can't be accredited with coaching us to a series win?
Sent from my SM-G991B using RealGM mobile app
Me for one!!! I don’t look at that series and see a masterclass in coaching. I see Rudy in games 1-4 as a shell of what he should be. I look at game 5 as what should have been happening all along. Who on the Lakers can actually guard or box out Rudy? If they are overwhelming him with bodies than other guys should be getting in their and putting 2nd chance points at will. I look at the way Jaden didn’t exploit the mismatches in games 2 and 4 and I think that is a great way to extend a series instead of sweep one. I look at the way we blew quarters in close wins and I ask would a good coach have better demonstrated the true talent disparity involved here?
Remember I am the guy who said months ago that we get to the WCF against anyone so long as we avoid OKC. I am also the guy who said the only way LAL beats us is with an unfair whistle. I view Finch as driving a high end sports car and treating it like a minivan. Yes we can win regardless, but with a prime Pop (or some other elite coach,) we are not 6th, and we leave a lot less doubt.
I would like to know, have you ever coached any basketball team ever? If so, at what level and what places your ideology above all?
And with all of Finchs flaws (im not saying he is perfect, no one is), who do you propose to be the heir apparent?
As I mentioned earlier, we have never ever gone back to back first round playoff series wins. In the history of this club, it is a time for celebration that we aren't the **** kickers of the league anymore and as a die hard wolves fan it's time to get around everyone and that includes the coach that largely has orchestrated this.
Sent from my SM-G991B using RealGM mobile app
Klomp wrote:
winforlose wrote:Klomp wrote:winforlose wrote:I would settle for national media people catching themselves when talking about Jaden McDaniels. The guy basically won two games for us and they keep calling him Jaden Daniels.
Technically they're calling him Jayden....as in Washington Commanders QB Jayden Daniels. It's easy to slip up names when they're so similar, just ask shrink....
I know, but the spelling difference isn’t necessary in the post. Hence “catch themselves” when mixing them up. Kinda like Britt calling Julius, John.
shrink wrote:winforlose wrote:Klomp wrote:Technically they're calling him Jayden....as in Washington Commanders QB Jayden Daniels. It's easy to slip up names when they're so similar, just ask shrink....
I know, but the spelling difference isn’t necessary in the post. Hence “catch themselves” when mixing them up. Kinda like Britt calling Julius, John.
LOL! And we talk about how good the Randle McDaniels combo has been, my mind goes to Randall McDaniel.
I’m just lucky I’m not a Thunder fan!
winforlose wrote:shrink wrote:winforlose wrote:
I know, but the spelling difference isn’t necessary in the post. Hence “catch themselves” when mixing them up. Kinda like Britt calling Julius, John.
LOL! And we talk about how good the Randle McDaniels combo has been, my mind goes to Randall McDaniel.
I’m just lucky I’m not a Thunder fan!
My mind goes there too. That part is just plain being human. But Jaden has earned the right for them to get it right on air.
BlacJacMac wrote:winforlose wrote:
Me for one!!! I don’t look at that series and see a masterclass in coaching. I see Rudy in games 1-4 as a shell of what he should be. I look at game 5 as what should have been happening all along. Who on the Lakers can actually guard or box out Rudy? If they are overwhelming him with bodies than other guys should be getting in their and putting 2nd chance points at will.
Why do you think we had an absolutely absurd # of open 3s in games 1-4?
I'd give this a watch.
BlacJacMac wrote:BlacJacMac wrote:winforlose wrote:
Me for one!!! I don’t look at that series and see a masterclass in coaching. I see Rudy in games 1-4 as a shell of what he should be. I look at game 5 as what should have been happening all along. Who on the Lakers can actually guard or box out Rudy? If they are overwhelming him with bodies than other guys should be getting in their and putting 2nd chance points at will.
Why do you think we had an absolutely absurd # of open 3s in games 1-4?
I'd give this a watch.
More. This kid is really sharp. Worth a subscription.
BlacJacMac wrote:BlacJacMac wrote:winforlose wrote:
Me for one!!! I don’t look at that series and see a masterclass in coaching. I see Rudy in games 1-4 as a shell of what he should be. I look at game 5 as what should have been happening all along. Who on the Lakers can actually guard or box out Rudy? If they are overwhelming him with bodies than other guys should be getting in their and putting 2nd chance points at will.
Why do you think we had an absolutely absurd # of open 3s in games 1-4?
I'd give this a watch.
More. This kid is really sharp. Worth a subscription.
winforlose wrote:BlacJacMac wrote:BlacJacMac wrote:
Why do you think we had an absolutely absurd # of open 3s in games 1-4?
I'd give this a watch.
More. This kid is really sharp. Worth a subscription.
I watched both videos. I agree Rudy was very defensively impactful in the series. But the numbers are simply 14 points and 25 rebounds total in games 1-4. Against a team that basically played Lebron and Rui Hachimura at C this is… not optimal. Likewise Jaden had a lot of exploitable matchups and was not a major focus of the offense in games 2 or 4 (to some degree game 5 as well, but foul trouble clouds that,) and this too was… questionable.
My entire point was that you can have a significant talent advantage to the point where you can win while not playing well. That was us in this series. But do you honestly we didn’t leave a lot of meat on the bone? If yes would that have been the case with better game planning?
KGdaBom wrote:winforlose wrote:
I watched both videos. I agree Rudy was very defensively impactful in the series. But the numbers are simply 14 points and 25 rebounds total in games 1-4. Against a team that basically played Lebron and Rui Hachimura at C this is… not optimal. Likewise Jaden had a lot of exploitable matchups and was not a major focus of the offense in games 2 or 4 (to some degree game 5 as well, but foul trouble clouds that,) and this too was… questionable.
My entire point was that you can have a significant talent advantage to the point where you can win while not playing well. That was us in this series. But do you honestly we didn’t leave a lot of meat on the bone? If yes would that have been the case with better game planning?
Every game that every team ever plays they leave a lot of meat on the bone. Winning is all that matters. I might give a rat's ass about winning pretty, but not much more than that.
winforlose wrote:KGdaBom wrote:winforlose wrote:
I watched both videos. I agree Rudy was very defensively impactful in the series. But the numbers are simply 14 points and 25 rebounds total in games 1-4. Against a team that basically played Lebron and Rui Hachimura at C this is… not optimal. Likewise Jaden had a lot of exploitable matchups and was not a major focus of the offense in games 2 or 4 (to some degree game 5 as well, but foul trouble clouds that,) and this too was… questionable.
My entire point was that you can have a significant talent advantage to the point where you can win while not playing well. That was us in this series. But do you honestly we didn’t leave a lot of meat on the bone? If yes would that have been the case with better game planning?
Every game that every team ever plays they leave a lot of meat on the bone. Winning is all that matters. I might give a rat's ass about winning pretty, but not much more than that.
If you think I am talking about winning pretty, then you are not following my point. Exploiting mismatches and getting players to play to their potential is a sign of good coaching. Rudy had a massive mismatch and did not exploit it 4 out of 5 games. We need to exploit them against OKC or whoever comes out of the East. We overwhelmed the Lakers with our talent advantage, something I think we can/will do again to GSW. But, that only works when the team isn’t as good as you. OKC is every bit as good as us, so is Cleveland/Boston. For them we need good coaching or we are in serious jeopardy.
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves