2017 Draft Thread
Moderators: Domejandro, Calinks, Worm Guts
Re: 2017 Draft Thread
-
Baseline81
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,310
- And1: 1,927
- Joined: Jan 18, 2009
Re: 2017 Draft Thread
How reliable is LegionHoops.com?
Re: 2017 Draft Thread
- Mattya
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,608
- And1: 8,070
- Joined: Aug 08, 2008
-
Re: 2017 Draft Thread
Baseline81 wrote:
How reliable is LegionHoops.com?
I don't think it is reliable, but I wouldn't be shocked at the possibility.
Re: 2017 Draft Thread
- wildvikeswolves
- Starter
- Posts: 2,025
- And1: 577
- Joined: Feb 12, 2009
-
Re: 2017 Draft Thread
Baseline81 wrote:
How reliable is LegionHoops.com?
I've rarely, if ever seen that source be correct. The Mavs have absolutely nothing to give us.
Re: 2017 Draft Thread
-
Baseline81
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,310
- And1: 1,927
- Joined: Jan 18, 2009
Re: 2017 Draft Thread
Mattya wrote:I don't think it is reliable, but I wouldn't be shocked at the possibility.
Dallas likely deals with the Wolves in order to move ahead of New York for Ntilikina or Smith. If Minny decides to pass on one of the remaining PG prospects, trading back to receive an additional asset makes sense. It's why I wouldn't draft Markkanen at no. 7.
Re: 2017 Draft Thread
- Mattya
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,608
- And1: 8,070
- Joined: Aug 08, 2008
-
Re: 2017 Draft Thread
I see them mentioned a lot on a bunch of boards here, and I have never seen any of their rumors actually happen.
Re: 2017 Draft Thread
- Mattya
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,608
- And1: 8,070
- Joined: Aug 08, 2008
-
Re: 2017 Draft Thread
Baseline81 wrote:Mattya wrote:I don't think it is reliable, but I wouldn't be shocked at the possibility.
Dallas likely deals with the Wolves in order to move ahead of New York for Ntilikina or Smith. If Minny decides to pass on one of the remaining PG prospects, trading back to receive an additional asset makes sense. It's why I wouldn't draft Markkanen at no. 7.
Agreed. I just don't really know what they have to offer. Maybe a Curry for Aldrich swap? I thought Dorian Finney Smith was a good prospect last draft as well.
Re: 2017 Draft Thread
-
Baseline81
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,310
- And1: 1,927
- Joined: Jan 18, 2009
Re: 2017 Draft Thread
Mattya wrote:Agreed. I just don't really know what they have to offer. Maybe a Curry for Aldrich swap? I thought Dorian Finney Smith was a good prospect last draft as well.
Would the Mavs offer a future lottery protected pick?
Not sure I would even accept that considering how far away Dallas is from reaching the playoffs.
Re: 2017 Draft Thread
- Mattya
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,608
- And1: 8,070
- Joined: Aug 08, 2008
-
Re: 2017 Draft Thread
Baseline81 wrote:Mattya wrote:Agreed. I just don't really know what they have to offer. Maybe a Curry for Aldrich swap? I thought Dorian Finney Smith was a good prospect last draft as well.
Would the Mavs offer a future lottery protected pick?
Not sure I would even accept that considering how far away Dallas is from reaching the playoffs.
Yea, they have a solid foundation and a great coach, but the West is stacked and doesn't look to be getting any easier. Could be a while before you get anything.
Re: 2017 Draft Thread
-
wolves_89
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,249
- And1: 4,754
- Joined: Jul 10, 2012
-
Re: 2017 Draft Thread
Mattya wrote:Baseline81 wrote:Mattya wrote:I don't think it is reliable, but I wouldn't be shocked at the possibility.
Dallas likely deals with the Wolves in order to move ahead of New York for Ntilikina or Smith. If Minny decides to pass on one of the remaining PG prospects, trading back to receive an additional asset makes sense. It's why I wouldn't draft Markkanen at no. 7.
Agreed. I just don't really know what they have to offer. Maybe a Curry for Aldrich swap? I thought Dorian Finney Smith was a good prospect last draft as well.
In theory Dallas and Minnesota make sense in terms of swapping picks, the problem is the Mavs complete lack of attractive assets. I have no interest in the contract of Matthews and Curry/Finney-Smith don't have the value to get it done.
Re: 2017 Draft Thread
-
MN7725
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,998
- And1: 1,314
- Joined: Jun 19, 2017
Re: 2017 Draft Thread
Baseline81 wrote:Mattya wrote:Agreed. I just don't really know what they have to offer. Maybe a Curry for Aldrich swap? I thought Dorian Finney Smith was a good prospect last draft as well.
Would the Mavs offer a future lottery protected pick?
Not sure I would even accept that considering how far away Dallas is from reaching the playoffs.
If that's the only offer, still worth doing just to get back some of the flexibility lost from losing the '18 pick in Payne trade
That's if Wolves don't have interest in the guys likely to be taken by NYK and Dallas
Re: 2017 Draft Thread
-
Slim Tubby
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,117
- And1: 2,747
- Joined: Jun 03, 2017
-
Re: 2017 Draft Thread
wolves_89 wrote:Mattya wrote:Baseline81 wrote:Dallas likely deals with the Wolves in order to move ahead of New York for Ntilikina or Smith. If Minny decides to pass on one of the remaining PG prospects, trading back to receive an additional asset makes sense. It's why I wouldn't draft Markkanen at no. 7.
Agreed. I just don't really know what they have to offer. Maybe a Curry for Aldrich swap? I thought Dorian Finney Smith was a good prospect last draft as well.
In theory Dallas and Minnesota make sense in terms of swapping picks, the problem is the Mavs complete lack of attractive assets. I have no interest in the contract of Matthews and Curry/Finney-Smith don't have the value to get it done.
Agreed. The only player on DAL that has any appeal to me would be Barnes. I would personally do Rubio and #7 for Barnes, #9 and the crappy contract of Mathews but that's probably much too good for our club. Maybe the source is half correct and instead of #7, it's straight up Rubio for #9 to give Dirk some immediate help? DSJ and Zach Collins would be a hell of a nice haul for the Wolves and DSJ, Dunn and Tyus can push each other for minutes at PG. I would give just about anything to be able to follow Thibs around the next two days listening to all of the draft talk and trade offers that come our way.
Glen Taylor: "Is this moron #1 (Layden)? Put moron #2 (Thibs) on the phone."
Re: 2017 Draft Thread
-
Slim Tubby
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,117
- And1: 2,747
- Joined: Jun 03, 2017
-
Re: 2017 Draft Thread
MN7725 wrote:Baseline81 wrote:Mattya wrote:Agreed. I just don't really know what they have to offer. Maybe a Curry for Aldrich swap? I thought Dorian Finney Smith was a good prospect last draft as well.
Would the Mavs offer a future lottery protected pick?
Not sure I would even accept that considering how far away Dallas is from reaching the playoffs.
If that's the only offer, still worth doing just to get back some of the flexibility lost from losing the '18 pick in Payne trade
That's if Wolves don't have interest in the guys likely to be taken by NYK and Dallas
MN should really be in the driver's seat here with NYK and DAL both craving a PG. Not to mention if SAC misses out on Fox at #5. The problem is all three (3) of those teams have literally crap to offer us unless SAC wants to part with WCS and #10 if they believe Skal is ready to take a larger role this year.
Glen Taylor: "Is this moron #1 (Layden)? Put moron #2 (Thibs) on the phone."
Re: 2017 Draft Thread
-
HitmanCapone
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 750
- And1: 130
- Joined: Jun 19, 2013
-
Re: 2017 Draft Thread
Klomp wrote:Worm Guts wrote:Streakers33 wrote:Good year to trade it.. last year we all agreed Dunn was the guy to get at pick 5.. year before we all agreed.. this year we all over.
I don't think last year we all agreed on Dunn, at least not here. We're probably as close this year on Isaac, maybe closer.
Yeah the people who wanted Dunn last year were in the vast minority. Same thing the previous year with LaVine.
KAT?
Re: 2017 Draft Thread
-
MN7725
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,998
- And1: 1,314
- Joined: Jun 19, 2017
Re: 2017 Draft Thread
Slim Tubby wrote:MN7725 wrote:Baseline81 wrote:Would the Mavs offer a future lottery protected pick?
Not sure I would even accept that considering how far away Dallas is from reaching the playoffs.
If that's the only offer, still worth doing just to get back some of the flexibility lost from losing the '18 pick in Payne trade
That's if Wolves don't have interest in the guys likely to be taken by NYK and Dallas
MN should really be in the driver's seat here with NYK and DAL both craving a PG. Not to mention if SAC misses out on Fox at #5. The problem is all three (3) of those teams have literally crap to offer us unless SAC wants to part with WCS and #10 if they believe Skal is ready to take a larger role this year.
They might not though
Mavs have been reported to go after Holliday, Carlisle is not exactly a player development guy and obviously PG is the hardest position, need a lot of patience
Knicks have money to spend in FA too, maybe Phil is in love with Lauri.
Who knows?
Just as easily could be that Wolves end up with four PGs on the roster and no leverage
Re: 2017 Draft Thread
-
Klomp
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 70,629
- And1: 23,683
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: 2017 Draft Thread
HitmanCapone wrote:Klomp wrote:Worm Guts wrote:
I don't think last year we all agreed on Dunn, at least not here. We're probably as close this year on Isaac, maybe closer.
Yeah the people who wanted Dunn last year were in the vast minority. Same thing the previous year with LaVine.
KAT?
Haha oops. Two years previous.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: 2017 Draft Thread
-
Baseline81
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,310
- And1: 1,927
- Joined: Jan 18, 2009
Re: 2017 Draft Thread
Givony and Woj both think the top 6 in the draft is locked in (not the order but rather the prospects).
DSJ, Markannen or Monk...
DSJ, Markannen or Monk...
Re: 2017 Draft Thread
-
wolves_89
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,249
- And1: 4,754
- Joined: Jul 10, 2012
-
Re: 2017 Draft Thread
Baseline81 wrote:Givony and Woj both think the top 6 in the draft is locked in (not the order but rather the prospects).
Seems like a familiar scenario, the Wolves move down in the draft at the lottery and end up one pick too low to get a player they really want.
Re: 2017 Draft Thread
-
Slim Tubby
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,117
- And1: 2,747
- Joined: Jun 03, 2017
-
Re: 2017 Draft Thread
MN7725 wrote:Slim Tubby wrote:MN7725 wrote:
If that's the only offer, still worth doing just to get back some of the flexibility lost from losing the '18 pick in Payne trade
That's if Wolves don't have interest in the guys likely to be taken by NYK and Dallas
MN should really be in the driver's seat here with NYK and DAL both craving a PG. Not to mention if SAC misses out on Fox at #5. The problem is all three (3) of those teams have literally crap to offer us unless SAC wants to part with WCS and #10 if they believe Skal is ready to take a larger role this year.
They might not though
Mavs have been reported to go after Holliday, Carlisle is not exactly a player development guy and obviously PG is the hardest position, need a lot of patience
Knicks have money to spend in FA too, maybe Phil is in love with Lauri.
Who knows?
Just as easily could be that Wolves end up with four PGs on the roster and no leverage
Good point....I do remember reading somewhere that DAL was going to try to sign both Holiday brothers. I guess I've always expected Jrue to stay with the Pelicans for a chance to play with AD and Boogie.
Glen Taylor: "Is this moron #1 (Layden)? Put moron #2 (Thibs) on the phone."
Re: 2017 Draft Thread
-
Klomp
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 70,629
- And1: 23,683
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: 2017 Draft Thread
wolves_89 wrote:Baseline81 wrote:Givony and Woj both think the top 6 in the draft is locked in (not the order but rather the prospects).
Seems like a familiar scenario, the Wolves move down in the draft at the lottery and end up one pick too low to get a player they really want.
That's assuming the player they really want is in the Top 6.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: 2017 Draft Thread
-
Klomp
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 70,629
- And1: 23,683
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: 2017 Draft Thread
wolves_89 wrote:Baseline81 wrote:Givony and Woj both think the top 6 in the draft is locked in (not the order but rather the prospects).
Seems like a familiar scenario, the Wolves move down in the draft at the lottery and end up one pick too low to get a player they really want.
That's assuming the player they really want is in the Top 6.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves



