Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks
shrink wrote:After BOS uses Marcus Morris to clear the salary to sign Gordon Hayward, Hartford Whaler's suggests that maybe they send Morris here for Aldrich and the OKC 2nd?
http://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1592117
trevor0333 wrote:shrink wrote:After BOS uses Marcus Morris to clear the salary to sign Gordon Hayward, Hartford Whaler's suggests that maybe they send Morris here for Aldrich and the OKC 2nd?
http://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1592117
I like Morris but that is a steal for Bradley.
With Thibs love of running the offense off the wings, I would have absolutely loved the Wolves finding a way to get Bradley to run the PG over Teague.
Bradley/Wiggins/Butler/Dieng/Towns would be menacing defensively.
KGdaBom wrote:trevor0333 wrote:shrink wrote:After BOS uses Marcus Morris to clear the salary to sign Gordon Hayward, Hartford Whaler's suggests that maybe they send Morris here for Aldrich and the OKC 2nd?
http://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1592117
I like Morris but that is a steal for Bradley.
With Thibs love of running the offense off the wings, I would have absolutely loved the Wolves finding a way to get Bradley to run the PG over Teague.
Bradley/Wiggins/Butler/Dieng/Towns would be menacing defensively.
That actually is a very intriguing idea. Bradley has enough ball handling distributing skills to work in a pinch. With Butler as the Primary I would be fine with Bradley as the secondary. Probably more menacing defensively with Gibson than Dieng. Too late now of course, but cool idea.
Sign5 wrote:Yea not happening, I expected a better retort but what do I expect from realgm(ers) in 2025. Just quote and state things that lack context, then repeat the same thing over and over as if something new and profound was said. Just lol.
shrink wrote:KGdaBom wrote:trevor0333 wrote:
I like Morris but that is a steal for Bradley.
With Thibs love of running the offense off the wings, I would have absolutely loved the Wolves finding a way to get Bradley to run the PG over Teague.
Bradley/Wiggins/Butler/Dieng/Towns would be menacing defensively.
That actually is a very intriguing idea. Bradley has enough ball handling distributing skills to work in a pinch. With Butler as the Primary I would be fine with Bradley as the secondary. Probably more menacing defensively with Gibson than Dieng. Too late now of course, but cool idea.
The whole reason they are trading Bradley at all is to get the extra cap space they need to sign Paul George. Trading Bradley here does not do that for them.
shrink wrote:KGdaBom wrote:trevor0333 wrote:
I like Morris but that is a steal for Bradley.
With Thibs love of running the offense off the wings, I would have absolutely loved the Wolves finding a way to get Bradley to run the PG over Teague.
Bradley/Wiggins/Butler/Dieng/Towns would be menacing defensively.
That actually is a very intriguing idea. Bradley has enough ball handling distributing skills to work in a pinch. With Butler as the Primary I would be fine with Bradley as the secondary. Probably more menacing defensively with Gibson than Dieng. Too late now of course, but cool idea.
The whole reason they are trading Bradley at all is to get the extra cap space they need to sign Paul George. Trading Bradley here does not do that for them.
DaKidKG wrote:It seems like this board is relatively split on whether we should trade the 2018 OKC 1st and Aldrich for CJ Miles. I personally would not like that trade. That being said, I still think he would be a very good fit on our roster.
What if the Pacers were to include their 2018 2nd rd pick? The Pacers have lost a significant portion of their core this offseason, and may be looking at a rebuild. There is a very good chance that they will be one of the 10 worst teams in the league next season. OKC on the other hand looks very strong again with the Paul George acquisition. Very good chance they will be one of the 5-10 best teams in the league.
What do you guys think? We could basically be trading down 5 spots or as many as 20 spots.
DaKidKG wrote:It seems like this board is relatively split on whether we should trade the 2018 OKC 1st and Aldrich for CJ Miles. I personally would not like that trade. That being said, I still think he would be a very good fit on our roster.
What if the Pacers were to include their 2018 2nd rd pick? The Pacers have lost a significant portion of their core this offseason, and may be looking at a rebuild. There is a very good chance that they will be one of the 10 worst teams in the league next season. OKC on the other hand looks very strong again with the Paul George acquisition. Very good chance they will be one of the 5-10 best teams in the league.
What do you guys think? We could basically be trading down 5 spots or as many as 20 spots.
Doesn't seem like one to me. Any trading away of a First with Aldrich is a vast overpay. The standard is a 2nd for an expiring.KGdaBom wrote:DaKidKG wrote:It seems like this board is relatively split on whether we should trade the 2018 OKC 1st and Aldrich for CJ Miles. I personally would not like that trade. That being said, I still think he would be a very good fit on our roster.
What if the Pacers were to include their 2018 2nd rd pick? The Pacers have lost a significant portion of their core this offseason, and may be looking at a rebuild. There is a very good chance that they will be one of the 10 worst teams in the league next season. OKC on the other hand looks very strong again with the Paul George acquisition. Very good chance they will be one of the 5-10 best teams in the league.
What do you guys think? We could basically be trading down 5 spots or as many as 20 spots.
That seems like a reasonable compromise. I even think that Indi would do it. Or what if we give them a second round pick instead.
SO_MONEY wrote:Doesn't seem like one to me. Any trading away of a First with Aldrich is a vast overpay. The standard is a 2nd for an expiring.KGdaBom wrote:DaKidKG wrote:It seems like this board is relatively split on whether we should trade the 2018 OKC 1st and Aldrich for CJ Miles. I personally would not like that trade. That being said, I still think he would be a very good fit on our roster.
What if the Pacers were to include their 2018 2nd rd pick? The Pacers have lost a significant portion of their core this offseason, and may be looking at a rebuild. There is a very good chance that they will be one of the 10 worst teams in the league next season. OKC on the other hand looks very strong again with the Paul George acquisition. Very good chance they will be one of the 5-10 best teams in the league.
What do you guys think? We could basically be trading down 5 spots or as many as 20 spots.
That seems like a reasonable compromise. I even think that Indi would do it. Or what if we give them a second round pick instead.
Sent from my LGMS428 using Tapatalk
DaKidKG wrote:It seems like this board is relatively split on whether we should trade the 2018 OKC 1st and Aldrich for CJ Miles. I personally would not like that trade. That being said, I still think he would be a very good fit on our roster.
What if the Pacers were to include their 2018 2nd rd pick? The Pacers have lost a significant portion of their core this offseason, and may be looking at a rebuild. There is a very good chance that they will be one of the 10 worst teams in the league next season. OKC on the other hand looks very strong again with the Paul George acquisition. Very good chance they will be one of the 5-10 best teams in the league.
What do you guys think? We could basically be trading down 5 spots or as many as 20 spots.
Sign5 wrote:Yea not happening, I expected a better retort but what do I expect from realgm(ers) in 2025. Just quote and state things that lack context, then repeat the same thing over and over as if something new and profound was said. Just lol.
SBM wrote:Bradley is a good SG but he does not have the ability to run a team. When Thibs had Rose he was not running the team off the wings.
shrink wrote:I think I mentioned it already, but if I didn't, remember that Aldrich's contract is a mechanism we can use to add 2018 salary.
For example, suppose a win-later team has a mediocre contract at the deadline, and would like to add cap space for 2018. They may be very interested in trading a two year deal for Aldrich, with the end goal of waiving Aldridge. In PHX, Jared Dudley makes $10 mil this year and $9.6 mil in 2018. If they swapped him for Aldrich, they would get Cole plus a TPE for $2.7 mil this season, and next season they decline the team option, and are only responsible for $2 mil, adding $7.6 mil in cap space for 2018. MIN shouldn't mind the extra salary in 2018 either, because they are already over the cap, and I assume under the lux for that season.
SBM wrote:Why stop now other than the cap. If the cap is the problem work around it.
Sign5 wrote:Yea not happening, I expected a better retort but what do I expect from realgm(ers) in 2025. Just quote and state things that lack context, then repeat the same thing over and over as if something new and profound was said. Just lol.
DaKidKG wrote:It seems like this board is relatively split on whether we should trade the 2018 OKC 1st and Aldrich for CJ Miles. I personally would not like that trade. That being said, I still think he would be a very good fit on our roster.
What if the Pacers were to include their 2018 2nd rd pick? The Pacers have lost a significant portion of their core this offseason, and may be looking at a rebuild. There is a very good chance that they will be one of the 10 worst teams in the league next season. OKC on the other hand looks very strong again with the Paul George acquisition. Very good chance they will be one of the 5-10 best teams in the league.
What do you guys think? We could basically be trading down 5 spots or as many as 20 spots.
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves