Just let him walk if that is the best we can get.vagelis wrote:I think Butler's price decreases with the time.
So at the current situation Whiteside + Winslow would be an acceptable deal for me
Sent from my LGMS428 using Tapatalk
Moderators: Domejandro, Calinks, Worm Guts
Just let him walk if that is the best we can get.vagelis wrote:I think Butler's price decreases with the time.
So at the current situation Whiteside + Winslow would be an acceptable deal for me
Killboard wrote:karch34 wrote:shrink wrote:I think there is a tendency to like one good player, and dismiss a bad contract attached to him in the package.
For example, we all like Josh Richardson at three years, $10 mil a year.
However, no one should like Richardson plus Dion Waiters. That package costs $22 mil a year for three years. Waiters is awful, and it’s hard to look at Richardson alone as a $22 mil player, at least at this point in his career.
Great point. Taking the "goal" of moving Dieng out of the picture, I think we're going to have a negative value contract included regardless (Dieng ensures it IMO). That's been a big part of my liking Philly idea that even if Fultz is the bad contract it's not Waiters level bad and there's still a chance for upside.
Fultz only makes 1/3 of Jimmy money. You need a lot more coming back.
Currently Richardson is at 2.1 BPM, 24% usage and .134 WS48 while playing above 280 minutes.
Its early in the season but this is the complete list of players with those numbers so far.
Richarson is only one year older than the youngest. I think he definetly is worth 20M for the next 3 seasons.
Sign5 wrote:Yea not happening, I expected a better retort but what do I expect from realgm(ers) in 2025. Just quote and state things that lack context, then repeat the same thing over and over as if something new and profound was said. Just lol.
shrink wrote:Here’s an interesting fact that you can give people who talk about all the “heavy minutes” Butler has played, and all the wear and tear that makes a 5th year such a bad contract.
As many of you know, Jimmy spent four years in college, and he rode the bench for 1.5 years under Thibs, until Luol Dieng got injured in early 2013. At that age, Jimmy had played less than 1000 NBA minutes. At the same age, Wiggins had played almost 11,000 more minutes.
Two guys that are the same age (29) right now as Jimmy, (Harden and DeRozan) have played over 23,000 minutes versus Jimmy’s 15. Most people tell you it’s because Jimmy gets injured all the time under Thibs, but that ignores the main fact. Jimmy has missed 800 more minutes than Derozan since he became a starter, but the gap is 8 THOUSAND. Jimmy plays harder in his minutes, but Derozan and Harden were both subjected to very heavy workloads at a far earlier age than Jimmy. People should be talking more about “a lot of miles on those bodies,” rather than Jimmy’s.
PharmD wrote:shrink wrote:Here’s an interesting fact that you can give people who talk about all the “heavy minutes” Butler has played, and all the wear and tear that makes a 5th year such a bad contract.
As many of you know, Jimmy spent four years in college, and he rode the bench for 1.5 years under Thibs, until Luol Dieng got injured in early 2013. At that age, Jimmy had played less than 1000 NBA minutes. At the same age, Wiggins had played almost 11,000 more minutes.
Two guys that are the same age (29) right now as Jimmy, (Harden and DeRozan) have played over 23,000 minutes versus Jimmy’s 15. Most people tell you it’s because Jimmy gets injured all the time under Thibs, but that ignores the main fact. Jimmy has missed 800 more minutes than Derozan since he became a starter, but the gap is 8 THOUSAND. Jimmy plays harder in his minutes, but Derozan and Harden were both subjected to very heavy workloads at a far earlier age than Jimmy. People should be talking more about “a lot of miles on those bodies,” rather than Jimmy’s.
Do we have any evidence that minutes played is meaningful other than as a way to accumulate injuries? Seems like straight up age is a much better predictor of decline.
Sign5 wrote:Yea not happening, I expected a better retort but what do I expect from realgm(ers) in 2025. Just quote and state things that lack context, then repeat the same thing over and over as if something new and profound was said. Just lol.
karch34 wrote:Killboard wrote:karch34 wrote:
Great point. Taking the "goal" of moving Dieng out of the picture, I think we're going to have a negative value contract included regardless (Dieng ensures it IMO). That's been a big part of my liking Philly idea that even if Fultz is the bad contract it's not Waiters level bad and there's still a chance for upside.
Fultz only makes 1/3 of Jimmy money. You need a lot more coming back.
Currently Richardson is at 2.1 BPM, 24% usage and .134 WS48 while playing above 280 minutes.
Its early in the season but this is the complete list of players with those numbers so far.
Richarson is only one year older than the youngest. I think he definetly is worth 20M for the next 3 seasons.
My point was that if the main piece was JRich or RoCo then i would prefer the "bad" contract be the 20 year old on 3/$25 who was the clear #1 pick 18 months ago that even if his shot mysteriously disappered can still provide other things vs. the 26 year old on 3/$35 who's out of shape and only had only one good stretch as a chucker only player in a contract year.
PharmD wrote:shrink wrote:Here’s an interesting fact that you can give people who talk about all the “heavy minutes” Butler has played, and all the wear and tear that makes a 5th year such a bad contract.
As many of you know, Jimmy spent four years in college, and he rode the bench for 1.5 years under Thibs, until Luol Dieng got injured in early 2013. At that age, Jimmy had played less than 1000 NBA minutes. At the same age, Wiggins had played almost 11,000 more minutes.
Two guys that are the same age (29) right now as Jimmy, (Harden and DeRozan) have played over 23,000 minutes versus Jimmy’s 15. Most people tell you it’s because Jimmy gets injured all the time under Thibs, but that ignores the main fact. Jimmy has missed 800 more minutes than Derozan since he became a starter, but the gap is 8 THOUSAND. Jimmy plays harder in his minutes, but Derozan and Harden were both subjected to very heavy workloads at a far earlier age than Jimmy. People should be talking more about “a lot of miles on those bodies,” rather than Jimmy’s.
Do we have any evidence that minutes played is meaningful other than as a way to accumulate injuries? Seems like straight up age is a much better predictor of decline.
mplsfonz23 wrote:I think we are all dreaming now about what we will get back for JB. He is damaging the product. GM's are talking and wondering if this is the "real" Jimmy? Right now he needs to go into damage control, keep his face out of the media, and play ball EVERY game before we get a good/ decent deal. It's up to him. His ego thinks the NBA loves him, but he may be wrong. The NBA players might, but the players don't pay the salary.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Klomp wrote:mplsfonz23 wrote:I think we are all dreaming now about what we will get back for JB. He is damaging the product. GM's are talking and wondering if this is the "real" Jimmy? Right now he needs to go into damage control, keep his face out of the media, and play ball EVERY game before we get a good/ decent deal. It's up to him. His ego thinks the NBA loves him, but he may be wrong. The NBA players might, but the players don't pay the salary.
I loved hearing what Mark Jackson had to say last night about it.
PharmD wrote:shrink wrote:Here’s an interesting fact that you can give people who talk about all the “heavy minutes” Butler has played, and all the wear and tear that makes a 5th year such a bad contract.
As many of you know, Jimmy spent four years in college, and he rode the bench for 1.5 years under Thibs, until Luol Dieng got injured in early 2013. At that age, Jimmy had played less than 1000 NBA minutes. At the same age, Wiggins had played almost 11,000 more minutes.
Two guys that are the same age (29) right now as Jimmy, (Harden and DeRozan) have played over 23,000 minutes versus Jimmy’s 15. Most people tell you it’s because Jimmy gets injured all the time under Thibs, but that ignores the main fact. Jimmy has missed 800 more minutes than Derozan since he became a starter, but the gap is 8 THOUSAND. Jimmy plays harder in his minutes, but Derozan and Harden were both subjected to very heavy workloads at a far earlier age than Jimmy. People should be talking more about “a lot of miles on those bodies,” rather than Jimmy’s.
Do we have any evidence that minutes played is meaningful other than as a way to accumulate injuries? Seems like straight up age is a much better predictor of decline.
Calinks wrote:Klomp wrote:mplsfonz23 wrote:I think we are all dreaming now about what we will get back for JB. He is damaging the product. GM's are talking and wondering if this is the "real" Jimmy? Right now he needs to go into damage control, keep his face out of the media, and play ball EVERY game before we get a good/ decent deal. It's up to him. His ego thinks the NBA loves him, but he may be wrong. The NBA players might, but the players don't pay the salary.
I loved hearing what Mark Jackson had to say last night about it.
I wonder if he's auditioning. He totally took the wolves side and he was speaking really highly of Wiggins.
NattaNerNutta wrote:I missed the Jackson comments. But I did catch Billups saying a lot of nice things about KAT and Wiggins. Maybe he's eying our GM position?
mplsfonz23 wrote:NattaNerNutta wrote:I missed the Jackson comments. But I did catch Billups saying a lot of nice things about KAT and Wiggins. Maybe he's eying our GM position?
Billups for GM and Jackson for a coach.
I like that however, will Taylor be willing to pay top dollar, to them while still paying off Thib-iso?
DaBeard wrote:
There’s “belief around the NBA” that both Philadelphia and Miami could “re-emerge” in discussions with the Timberwolves to potentially deal for the 29-year-old forward, according to a report from The Athletic (Shams).
Sign5 wrote:Yea not happening, I expected a better retort but what do I expect from realgm(ers) in 2025. Just quote and state things that lack context, then repeat the same thing over and over as if something new and profound was said. Just lol.
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves