minimus wrote:Otto Porter physical tools suggest that he should be better at defending, rebounding. Did he make his team better in the playoff? Not really: 12.2 ppg, 53% FG, 23% 3pt, 6.9rpg, 1.7 apg
Otto Porter had a 3.1 BPM, WS/48 of 166, 13.3 ppg, 7.6 rpg, 1.9 apg, 1.8 spg, .6 bpg with a .635 TS% in this season's playoffs.
Yes that is definitely indicative of someone who made their team better.
It's kinda funny that you're disparaging another player not using their physical tools in a Wiggins thread though. That's one of the most defining failures of Wiggins career thus far. He does not come remotely close to fully utilizing his physical tools.
Oh and btw, Otto Porter is listed at 6'8 198 lbs and has split his time in his career 80% SF, 17% PF, 3% SG. Wiggins is 6'8 199 lbs, Porter has a bit longer wingspan but I believe a shorter standing reach and Wiggins has a much higher max vert yet somehow Porter can handle SF and even playing PF in small ball lineups yet everyone says SG is Wiggins natural position and he's been at this big disadvantage for most of his career and that's the reason why he's struggled at some of these ancillary things.