With the 2nd pick in 2011 NBA Draft, Minnesota selects

Post #21 » by **C.lupus** » Wed May 18, 2011 1:15 am

Take Kanter at 2 and do the Kanter for Biyombo + Crawford trade that Nate suggested?

AQuintus · Post #22 » by **AQuintus** » Wed May 18, 2011 1:16 am

phonzadellika wrote:Take Williams. Trade Beasley + whoever to the Wizards for 5 and take Biyombo.

Williams is a PF.

Cyborg21 · Post #23 » by **Cyborg21** » Wed May 18, 2011 1:17 am

Trade it for Ellis or Bynum.

ty123 · Post #24 » by **ty123** » Wed May 18, 2011 1:17 am

C.lupus wrote:Take Kanter at 2 and do the Kanter for Biyombo + Crawford trade that Nate suggested?

We'll give you Biyombo + Whatever the hell you want for the #2.

Post #25 » by **C.lupus** » Wed May 18, 2011 1:18 am

ty123 wrote:
C.lupus wrote:Take Kanter at 2 and do the Kanter for Biyombo + Crawford trade that Nate suggested?

We'll give you Biyombo + Whatever the hell you want for the #2.

Deal!

Post #26 » by **Klomp** » Wed May 18, 2011 1:19 am

C.lupus wrote:Take Kanter at 2 and do the Kanter for Biyombo + Crawford trade that Nate suggested?

Honestly, I'm not sure BB falls to 6.

phonzadellika · Post #27 » by **phonzadellika** » Wed May 18, 2011 1:19 am

Williams is a PF.

So is Beasley.

Post #28 » by **Klomp** » Wed May 18, 2011 1:20 am

ty123 wrote:
C.lupus wrote:Take Kanter at 2 and do the Kanter for Biyombo + Crawford trade that Nate suggested?

We'll give you Biyombo + Whatever the hell you want for the #2.

DeRozan it is, then

pumunga · Post #29 » by **pumunga** » Wed May 18, 2011 1:21 am

Cyborg21 wrote:Trade it for Ellis or Bynum.

that wasn't really necessary

sisibilio · Post #30 » by **sisibilio** » Wed May 18, 2011 1:22 am

Klomp wrote:Rubio / Ridnour
Johnson / Ellington
Beasley / Webster / Hayward
Love / Williams / Tolliver
Milicic / Randolph / Pekovic

Rubio/Ridnour
Johnson / Ellington
Beasley / Webster / Hayward
Love / Randoiph / Tolliver
Varejao / Milicic / Valanciunas?

Looks better to me.

Esohny · Post #31 » by **Esohny** » Wed May 18, 2011 1:24 am

sisibilio wrote:
Klomp wrote:Rubio / Ridnour
Johnson / Ellington
Beasley / Webster / Hayward
Love / Williams / Tolliver
Milicic / Randolph / Pekovic

Rubio/Ridnour
Johnson / Ellington
Beasley / Webster / Hayward
Love / Randoiph / Tolliver
Varejao / Milicic / Valanciunas?

Looks better to me.

Now that's an interesting thought. Williams traded to the Cavs for #4 and Varejao, either take Kanter at #4 or use the #4 in a package for a vet SG.

Post #32 » by **The J Rocka** » Wed May 18, 2011 1:25 am

pumunga wrote:
Cyborg21 wrote:Trade it for Ellis or Bynum.

your........ dumb

Not a bad idea, they are proven talent. Bynum can play defense and is a legit 7 footer.

Esohny · Post #33 » by **Esohny** » Wed May 18, 2011 1:26 am

The J Rocka wrote:
pumunga wrote:
Cyborg21 wrote:Trade it for Ellis or Bynum.

your........ dumb

Not a bad idea, they are proven talent. Bynum can play defense and is a legit 7 footer.

Bynum maybe you could entertain, but the #2 for Ellis? Overpaying like mad, unless you're old rem and instead of eating food, you wolf down LSD and horse steroids.

Krapinsky · Post #34 » by **Krapinsky** » Wed May 18, 2011 1:29 am

Trade it for Turner? Just a thought....

AQuintus · Post #35 » by **AQuintus** » Wed May 18, 2011 1:30 am

Krapinsky wrote:Trade it for Turner? Just a thought....

Would you trade the #2 for Wes? Because that's essentially what you're suggesting.

AQuintus · Post #36 » by **AQuintus** » Wed May 18, 2011 1:31 am

phonzadellika wrote:
So is Beasley.

No he's not.

Kumar · Post #37 » by **Kumar** » Wed May 18, 2011 1:32 am

Esohny wrote:
sisibilio wrote:
Klomp wrote:Rubio / Ridnour
Johnson / Ellington
Beasley / Webster / Hayward
Love / Williams / Tolliver
Milicic / Randolph / Pekovic

Rubio/Ridnour
Johnson / Ellington
Beasley / Webster / Hayward
Love / Randoiph / Tolliver
Varejao / Milicic / Valanciunas?

Looks better to me.

Now that's an interesting thought. Williams traded to the Cavs for #4 and Varejao, either take Kanter at #4 or use the #4 in a package for a vet SG.

Wolves don't need Williams. Jazz don't need Williams.

Cavs could just wait and snatch him up at #4.

How disgusting would that be?

pumunga · Post #38 » by **pumunga** » Wed May 18, 2011 1:33 am

Bynum and Ellis are light years ahead of the #2 pick.
imo Bynum is the 3rd best center an Ellis is 3rd best sg.

Esohny · Post #39 » by **Esohny** » Wed May 18, 2011 1:33 am

AQuintus wrote:
Krapinsky wrote:Trade it for Turner? Just a thought....

Would you trade the #2 for Wes? Because that's essentially what you're suggesting.

Could we trade Wes for Turner? Because I'd do that. But I wouldn't trade the #2.

Post #40 » by **C.lupus** » Wed May 18, 2011 1:34 am

Klomp wrote:
ty123 wrote:
C.lupus wrote:Take Kanter at 2 and do the Kanter for Biyombo + Crawford trade that Nate suggested?

We'll give you Biyombo + Whatever the hell you want for the #2.

DeRozan it is, then

Who would you draft