Valuable trade asset: Ed Davis ($5 million, UFA) and Juancho Hernangomez ($6.5 million, UFA 2023)
What?
Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks
Valuable trade asset: Ed Davis ($5 million, UFA) and Juancho Hernangomez ($6.5 million, UFA 2023)
Sign5 wrote:Yea not happening, I expected a better retort but what do I expect from realgm(ers) in 2025. Just quote and state things that lack context, then repeat the same thing over and over as if something new and profound was said. Just lol.
winforlose wrote:AbeVigodaLive wrote:winforlose wrote:
Look at what happens to teams who lose their best player for a long stretch. Add to that our lack of chemistry, long offseason thanks to Covid, and our insanely bad coaching (I would argue we have the worst head coach in the history of the NBA who literally could not get hired as an assistant coach without using his daddy’s name.) Assuming things remain semi normal the rest of the season (Covid vaccine is a good thing,) I do think we will be better out the gate next season. If KAT stays healthy I do think we can compete for the 6-8 spots in the competitive west. That said, we need to drop small ball, fill in the gaps on our bench and look to move people like Rubio. We agree this season is lost, next season is up in the air, and of course KAT needs to stay healthy.
I don't have confidence in Saunders. I don't think he's a good coach. There's even a good chance he's a terrible coach.
But you might need to take a closer look at former head coaches... and I'm ONLY talking about this organization. The legacy of bad Wolves coaches might even be more "impressive" than the team's legacy of bad players.
I agree it is a joke how poorly Glen has run things. Bad POBOs and GMs have blown it in ways that defy not just belief but also the law of averages. That said, nepotism hires seldom get promoted to head coach of an NBA team. Ryan has literally no talent whatsoever for coaching. His players don’t listen to him and are not motivated by him. His schemes are the dreams of other teams. At least one player will have a season best against us every single game. When a team is in a slump they thank god they play the wolves. Ryan has to go. He makes Thibs looks like a genius for gods sake.
winforlose wrote:Wolveswin wrote:Fact is when/if Rosas gets a call on any player on Wolves roster — even Towns — they are available for right price. And no, that doesn’t mean only listen to Doncic for Towns unrealistic offers. Legit make this franchise better in long run offers — all will and should be considered.
Yes, if the nets call and offer us Durant and Irving for KAT and Dlo (I know the money doesn’t work, but it’s the easiest off the top of my head example,) we would hard pressed to say no. But what realistic offer is coming in to acquire any of the six I listed as untouchable or should be untouchable. The last thing we need is another rebuild. We have a talent filled core now. What we lack is coaching, scheme, and leadership. Also, you can do harm by answering the phone and discussing trades. Players find out, leaks happen. We overpaid Beasley by a few mil given his legal trouble and earned a lot of loyalty from him. Start shopping him and you lose that loyalty. Start shopping KAT and have it get out and watch KAT want to leave even more. I strongly disagree with you.
Sign5 wrote:Yea not happening, I expected a better retort but what do I expect from realgm(ers) in 2025. Just quote and state things that lack context, then repeat the same thing over and over as if something new and profound was said. Just lol.
The finances: Minnesota has an open roster spot and is $2.8 million below the luxury tax. In 2020-21, the Timberwolves have $130 million in salary (but with 12 players under contract) and are projected $5 million below the tax.
Sign5 wrote:Yea not happening, I expected a better retort but what do I expect from realgm(ers) in 2025. Just quote and state things that lack context, then repeat the same thing over and over as if something new and profound was said. Just lol.
shrink wrote:The finances: Minnesota has an open roster spot and is $2.8 million below the luxury tax. In 2020-21, the Timberwolves have $130 million in salary (but with 12 players under contract) and are projected $5 million below the tax.
To me, this is the most interesting part.
MIN will be sure to stay under the lux this season, especially since Glen gave permission to Rosas to slip over it last year and will want to avoid the repeater tax for a non-playoff team. However, there are few teams that can do a 1-for-2 trade without having to buy out one of their current players first. If DLo is back, you might see Rubio (or other bigger contracts) traded in a 1-for-2 deal, particularly if it reduces our financial commitments for next season.
If we make no action and that slot still exists, you might see Rosas try to get McLaughlin to sign a guaranteed deal to lock him up and get him off the two-way.
Looking at how close we are to the lux next year, do you think we’d offer Vanderbilt another contract next year? And for how much?
winforlose wrote:shrink wrote:The finances: Minnesota has an open roster spot and is $2.8 million below the luxury tax. In 2020-21, the Timberwolves have $130 million in salary (but with 12 players under contract) and are projected $5 million below the tax.
To me, this is the most interesting part.
MIN will be sure to stay under the lux this season, especially since Glen gave permission to Rosas to slip over it last year and will want to avoid the repeater tax for a non-playoff team. However, there are few teams that can do a 1-for-2 trade without having to buy out one of their current players first. If DLo is back, you might see Rubio (or other bigger contracts) traded in a 1-for-2 deal, particularly if it reduces our financial commitments for next season.
If we make no action and that slot still exists, you might see Rosas try to get McLaughlin to sign a guaranteed deal to lock him up and get him off the two-way.
Looking at how close we are to the lux next year, do you think we’d offer Vanderbilt another contract next year? And for how much?
Boston seems like the perfect destination for Rubio. The more I look into it they have a 28 million exemption and plenty of cap space to absorb Ricky. They also need a backup center would likely take Ed Davis off our hands. The question is what we get back. I doubt they part with Pritchard, but there is no doubt Boston would love to have more PG depth.
Sign5 wrote:Yea not happening, I expected a better retort but what do I expect from realgm(ers) in 2025. Just quote and state things that lack context, then repeat the same thing over and over as if something new and profound was said. Just lol.
shrink wrote:winforlose wrote:shrink wrote:To me, this is the most interesting part.
MIN will be sure to stay under the lux this season, especially since Glen gave permission to Rosas to slip over it last year and will want to avoid the repeater tax for a non-playoff team. However, there are few teams that can do a 1-for-2 trade without having to buy out one of their current players first. If DLo is back, you might see Rubio (or other bigger contracts) traded in a 1-for-2 deal, particularly if it reduces our financial commitments for next season.
If we make no action and that slot still exists, you might see Rosas try to get McLaughlin to sign a guaranteed deal to lock him up and get him off the two-way.
Looking at how close we are to the lux next year, do you think we’d offer Vanderbilt another contract next year? And for how much?
Boston seems like the perfect destination for Rubio. The more I look into it they have a 28 million exemption and plenty of cap space to absorb Ricky. They also need a backup center would likely take Ed Davis off our hands. The question is what we get back. I doubt they part with Pritchard, but there is no doubt Boston would love to have more PG depth.
I could see it. Rubio is my favorite Wolf, and second favorite of all-time, but I realistically think he could be traded. There are limited places where he would fit, because the PG position is just so crowded right now. However, for a playoff team that has an injured or unproductive starter, like Kemba, I think you are absolutely right - they might be a good match.
I wouldn’t expect a big return for Rubio either. Even though many 2021 free agents signed extensions, reducing the value of cap space, his $19 mil next year is pretty steep if he is coming off your bench. We basically got him for an expiring James Johnson (I think the pick trade was relatively even. #17 and future 2nd for #23 and #28). Hopefully Rubio’s weeks starting will help rehab his value a little, but for a player like Rubio .. not a lot is needed. He has played so many games that GM’s know who he is, and who he is not.
shrink wrote:The finances: Minnesota has an open roster spot and is $2.8 million below the luxury tax. In 2020-21, the Timberwolves have $130 million in salary (but with 12 players under contract) and are projected $5 million below the tax.
To me, this is the most interesting part.
MIN will be sure to stay under the lux this season, especially since Glen gave permission to Rosas to slip over it last year and will want to avoid the repeater tax for a non-playoff team. However, there are few teams that can do a 1-for-2 trade without having to buy out one of their current players first. If DLo is back, you might see Rubio (or other bigger contracts) traded in a 1-for-2 deal, particularly if it reduces our financial commitments for next season.
If we make no action and that slot still exists, you might see Rosas try to get McLaughlin to sign a guaranteed deal to lock him up and get him off the two-way.
Looking at how close we are to the lux next year, do you think we’d offer Vanderbilt another contract next year? And for how much?
UnFadeable21 wrote:As long as KAT wants DLo here, we can’t move him

tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
UnFadeable21 wrote:Juancho, Ed Davis, and Okogie for Larry Nance
Dewey wrote:30,000’ view... let’s assume one or the other...
1.) A .500 record maybe with a complete roster from day 1.
2.) A .250 record with absent key players and young’s players improving.
This where I flip flop ... right now, would DLo be helping us or would he be merely washing out production of Rubio and ANT? Are he or Beasley willing to play winning basketball in that 6th man role? We need to know these things, but seem we’ll never get the the whole roster in the floor
Jedzz wrote:Dewey wrote:30,000’ view... let’s assume one or the other...
1.) A .500 record maybe with a complete roster from day 1.
2.) A .250 record with absent key players and young’s players improving.
This where I flip flop ... right now, would DLo be helping us or would he be merely washing out production of Rubio and ANT? Are he or Beasley willing to play winning basketball in that 6th man role? We need to know these things, but seem we’ll never get the the whole roster in the floor
Are you capable of allowing a rookie to be the 6th or 7th man? I don't think enough were, are, ever open to it. Because he could still get 29-31 minutes as 6th or 7th. Rubio could have been 6th/7th as well. But people think #1 picks have to start, former #6 picks have to start, and hoped for Rubio to start, and that is what has broken this team this year. The rest is a bunch of crying about players that would have been great to watch this year had none of this occured.
30,000 view? We had one before this offseason of mistakes. Haven't had a single forward looking view since.
IceManBK1 wrote:I doubt Rosas can get any major trades happen w/o us getting fleeced. Giving a top 3 protected pick for dlo is overpriced. I pray to God we stay in top 3 with this blatant tanking.
Dewey wrote:Jedzz wrote:Dewey wrote:30,000’ view... let’s assume one or the other...
1.) A .500 record maybe with a complete roster from day 1.
2.) A .250 record with absent key players and young’s players improving.
This where I flip flop ... right now, would DLo be helping us or would he be merely washing out production of Rubio and ANT? Are he or Beasley willing to play winning basketball in that 6th man role? We need to know these things, but seem we’ll never get the the whole roster in the floor
Are you capable of allowing a rookie to be the 6th or 7th man? I don't think enough were, are, ever open to it. Because he could still get 29-31 minutes as 6th or 7th. Rubio could have been 6th/7th as well. But people think #1 picks have to start, former #6 picks have to start, and hoped for Rubio to start, and that is what has broken this team this year. The rest is a bunch of crying about players that would have been great to watch this year had none of this occured.
30,000 view? We had one before this offseason of mistakes. Haven't had a single forward looking view since.
I think we are seriously fractured - but not broken. There’s been some spirit and some drive we have not seen for a while ... we just desperately lack that player that “wants” to and “can” lead this team. It seems to be a burden instead of an opportunity because of talent and the fact it’s a very unstable environment when your flipping rosters and staff. Players Tend to try to survive rather than accommodate the team cause they dont know if they be here and are also playing for their job. About the closet thing we have is Ricky like it or not ... if he’d steady his game he’d be the only one right now imo
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves