D1SGRUNTL3D wrote:Klomp wrote:
Banks>Conway
LOL! “Cake Eater.”
Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks
D1SGRUNTL3D wrote:Klomp wrote:
Banks>Conway
shrink wrote:D1SGRUNTL3D wrote:Klomp wrote:
Banks>Conway
LOL! “Cake Eater.”
like saying at the Minnesota state hockey tournament-"A while back,'' Cardinal said, "I took a picture of the standings and texted it to Love, just to bust his chops,'' Cardinal said. "He sent me a picture back of a snowdrift.''
DaMplsKid wrote:I am not against the signing. I just don’t seem him as a pure PG and he has never been the shooter he was supposed to be as a prospect.
It will be interesting to see how Rivers and Nowell mins/playing time will shake out. Which one will be the primary ball handler to start the offense off the bench.
We needed another guard and he brings some veteran presence to the team which I like. Plus he is a coaches son which can help the locker room.
Movics wrote:Never liked him because I thought he was only in the league due to nepotism. Last few years I kept hearing that he is a gym rat and a great locker room presence. Couldn’t be happier for his arrival.
SO_MONEY wrote:Rivers is very Blah...but that is why he is getting the minimum. I still think there were better options within our constraints, but it is what it is.
horaceworthy wrote:Austin Rivers was drafted with the unprotected pick* the Wolves sent to the Clippers along with Sam Cassell in a contract year in exchange for Marko Jaric (it went to New Orleans in the Chris Paul trade).
Life finds a way.
*Pick became unprotected after lotto protection ran out
D1SGRUNTL3D wrote:shrink wrote:D1SGRUNTL3D wrote:Banks>Conway
LOL! “Cake Eater.”like saying at the Minnesota state hockey tournament-
Where the north hates the metro
The small schools hate the big schools
The public schools hate the private schools
And everybody hates Edina
winforlose wrote:I asked about him and Forbes in the Denver board. Only a few responses but they don’t seem to high on either.
moss_is_1 wrote:winforlose wrote:I asked about him and Forbes in the Denver board. Only a few responses but they don’t seem to high on either.
Yeah I wouldn't expect much out of Forbes or Rivers. They're veteran, end of the bench guys who shouldn't be in a rotation, but if injuries happen they are capable to get a few minutes and not mess up.

winforlose wrote:I asked about him and Forbes in the Denver board. Only a few responses but they don’t seem to high on either.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Klomp wrote:winforlose wrote:I asked about him and Forbes in the Denver board. Only a few responses but they don’t seem to high on either.
OK fine, they're on minimum deals. It's not like we paid them $40 million
DaMplsKid wrote:SO_MONEY wrote:Rivers is very Blah...but that is why he is getting the minimum. I still think there were better options within our constraints, but it is what it is.
I agree looking at his advanced stats I am surprised Connelly signed him. My guess is he a great locker room guy which I am ok. It's a long season and you need guys in the locker room that can help.
He's a career 35% from 3 which isn't stellar (not sure if he has hot spots in the corner or something) but not the type of guy you think about hitting big shots as a roll player.
He is a negative player both on offense and defense with a below average win share.
I can't say I have watch a ton of Rivers games but the ones I have watched he didn't wow me in anyway. Matter of a fact I thought he was a liability most of the time.
I just wish we would of used this money/roster spot on a true PG. I think PG and C are two position you want to have 3 quality players at. Right now we only have 2 PG IMO and wish JMac was our 3rd option.
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves