Mattya wrote:shrink wrote:Mattya wrote:This makes no sense to me.
At first the big concern was that AROD and Lore wouldn't have the money to pay the tax. Now they add they guy who is worth about 50 times what Glen Taylor is worth who spent billions of dollars in a matter of months for his presidential campaign with reports that they want to set up a local sports station and build a stadium, and now you believe the team is even more likely to be broken up or moved?
Different issues. With ARod and Lore, I look at them and see a pair of guys that want to own a basketball team. I don’t think they have the bucks, but Taylor trusted they would keep the team in Minnesota. I don’t see Bloomberg as a guy who wants to own a basketball team - I see him as a guy who wants to turn a profit. We don’t know yet what percentage of the team Bloomberg will own, or how much leverage he’ll have if he threatened Lore and ARod to remove his money.
Maybe it’s just paranoia, because coincidentally, I’ve been reading a lot about expansion lately, and I heard one opinion that the NBA could open up third teams in LA and NY, and the markets would support them. Maybe that made me paranoid when I hear the freakin’ ex-mayor of New York could be a partial owner, and Lore and ARod previously tried to buy the Mets.
Yep it’s paranoia. Why would the NBA allow relocation when they are looking at expansion? Especially when there has been zero talk that I can find that has anyone but Vegas and Seattle being the expansion teams. Why would they be looking at starting local sports stations and even doing exploratory work on a new stadium? Do you realize the risk and cost of building a new stadium especially in New York to compete with The Knicks and Nets? Meanwhile for the same cost these guys could build a stadium, entertainment district, commercial real estate and housing, for the same cost in Minneapolis and not even cut into the increased value they have already seen in Minnesota.
NBA teams are individual companies, that are investments from specific owners. Owners want to protect the league, but they also want to protect the ability to do what they want with their investment, including being free to move a franchise if they can make more money elsewhere. Stopping someone else helps close a door for them down the road.
And your questions that would never happen have all happened in the past!
Why would the NBA allow relocation now? Why did they allow it in the past? Owners move teams in every sports league.
Why would new owners <tell us> they are looking into sports stations and new arenas? They want support from the public, including financial support. New arena talk is usually the catalyst for teams being moved, if they don’t get public funding.
Why would a new team compete in NY, and build an arena where it’s expensive? Don’t you think people said this about BRK?
Why would they let owners leave the lucrative MIN market? Why did they let owners leave SEA, for tiny OKC? Because the owner wanted to. And MIN hasn’t been very lucrative, while I read that NY’s huge population and economic base would be a better revenue generator than Vegas and potentially SEA. Hopefully the public gets behind this new team, but last year they had revenues $100 million less than the average NBA team.
Look, I desperately hope everything goes smoothly, and ownership really is committed to sinking lots of their own money into the team, and keeping it here. But all three of these guys are New York guys - Bloomberg has been the freaking mayor! If they brought moved the team and brought Ant and the 2028 Wolves to be the Bronx, they’d be heroes, and it would instantly get Bloomberg re-elected mayor if he wanted it. I don’t think there is a zero chance of relocation.