Domejandro wrote:winforlose wrote:Loaf_of_bread wrote:The stars have aligned!
Anthony "the legend killer" Edwards has his sights set on demolishing the vertically challenged Golden State Doves.
This series could get ugly! My main concern is the psychopath Draymond Green intentionally injures someone.
If the wolves don't beat themselves, this is a sweep.
Oh, and screw Jimmy.
I think we wins game 1, 2, and 5. I think we split 3 and 4. Wolves in 5.
Compare GSW to LAL for a minute.
Is Curry that much better than Luka? Especially with the thumb swelling?
Is Jimmy that much better than Lebron?
Is Green that much more impactful than Reaves? Reaves was a defensive liability, Green is an offensive liability.
I think they are gonna struggle to contain Jaden and Rudy. The resources required to guard Julius (Butler or Green,) will be costly for there overall defense. We should feast on the glass. Our biggest weakness is coaching (Kerr is more experienced and better than Finch,) but I don’t think that will be enough. We are bigger, deeper, and younger. Plus I think talent wise we are overall better.
Draymond Green is far less of a liability offensively than Austin Reaves is defensively. Still a great passer and screener (even if many are illegal screens).
Honestly, Stephen Curry is much less of a defensive liability than Luka Dončić is, and him being a more capable off-ball player does test the defense more than just stationing Jaden McDaniels on him.
I think that Golden State is kind of mediocre, but they matchup with us better than the Lakers did. Far less defensive liabilities on this team, and they have more offensively capable depth.
Let’s assume for the sake of argument this take is 100% correct. The Wolves still shot terribly from deep in games 3-5. The Wolves still have a size advantage for rebounding, and the Warriors still matchup poorly with us overall. If they designate Butler and Green for Ant and Randle, who stops Jaden from cooking GS in the mid range and at the rim? If Curry defends better than AR and Luka how does that impact the game in a way that LAL could not? I guess what I am saying is we played poorly by our standards in 4 of the 5 games and far from perfect in game 1, and we still won. Maybe the Warriors score a few more points than the Lakers, maybe they force a few more turnovers, and maybe they grab a few more boards. Even with all of that being true, the Wolves can still easily outperform themselves from series 1, just on the premise that they shot worse, and executed worse in that series than in the regular season.
If I am wrong, what am I missing?










