The Julius Randle Thread
Moderators: Domejandro, Calinks, Worm Guts
Re: The Julius Randle Thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,317
- And1: 4,870
- Joined: Jan 28, 2011
- Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
-
Re: The Julius Randle Thread
I need to stop to post on mobile phone. I thought it happens only with twitter urls, but it seems that is general problem with Tapatalk and iOS 18
Re: The Julius Randle Thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 59,140
- And1: 19,104
- Joined: Sep 26, 2005
Re: The Julius Randle Thread
minimus wrote:I need to stop to post on mobile phone. I thought it happens only with twitter urls, but it seems that is general problem with Tapatalk and iOS 18
I just assume you are cursing at me, and it reads just fine.
Re: The Julius Randle Thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 59,140
- And1: 19,104
- Joined: Sep 26, 2005
Re: The Julius Randle Thread
I heard an interesting comment today. I don’t know how I feel, and I’m curious how others feel about it?
“Coaches can’t coach effort.”
“Coaches can’t coach effort.”
Re: The Julius Randle Thread
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,841
- And1: 1,046
- Joined: Feb 10, 2023
-
Re: The Julius Randle Thread
shrink wrote:I heard an interesting comment today. I don’t know how I feel, and I’m curious how others feel about it?
“Coaches can’t coach effort.”
The real point. I see Randle yesterday try to make a lay-up then falling down and did not even try to come back resulting an open 3 for SA. We were just lucky SA could not hit a shoot yesterday or we may have been in trouble.
Re: The Julius Randle Thread
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 68,037
- And1: 21,725
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: The Julius Randle Thread
FrenchMinnyFan wrote:shrink wrote:I heard an interesting comment today. I don’t know how I feel, and I’m curious how others feel about it?
“Coaches can’t coach effort.”
The real point. I see Randle yesterday try to make a lay-up then falling down and did not even try to come back resulting an open 3 for SA. We were just lucky SA could not hit a shoot yesterday or we may have been in trouble.
When 14 out of 15 players give maximum effort, the 1 who doesn't sticks out like a sore thumb. I think on the whole, Randle's effort level is not that different from the majority of the league. It just sticks out like a sore thumb on this team.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: The Julius Randle Thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 59,140
- And1: 19,104
- Joined: Sep 26, 2005
Re: The Julius Randle Thread
Klomp wrote:FrenchMinnyFan wrote:shrink wrote:I heard an interesting comment today. I don’t know how I feel, and I’m curious how others feel about it?
“Coaches can’t coach effort.”
The real point. I see Randle yesterday try to make a lay-up then falling down and did not even try to come back resulting an open 3 for SA. We were just lucky SA could not hit a shoot yesterday or we may have been in trouble.
When 14 out of 15 players give maximum effort, the 1 who doesn't sticks out like a sore thumb. I think on the whole, Randle's effort level is not that different from the majority of the league. It just sticks out like a sore thumb on this team.
So how much blame do you put on Finch for Randle’s lack of defensive effort?
Re: The Julius Randle Thread
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,068
- And1: 1,819
- Joined: Jan 18, 2009
Re: The Julius Randle Thread
Klomp wrote:When 14 out of 15 players give maximum effort, the 1 who doesn't sticks out like a sore thumb. I think on the whole, Randle's effort level is not that different from the majority of the league. It just sticks out like a sore thumb on this team.
The metaphor "one bad apple spoils the bunch" springs to mind...
All it takes is for one of the 14 to be influenced by Randle. The spread continues from there.
Re: The Julius Randle Thread
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,068
- And1: 1,819
- Joined: Jan 18, 2009
Re: The Julius Randle Thread
shrink wrote:So how much blame do you put on Finch for Randle’s lack of defensive effort?
A fair share, to be honest. One has to think he was involved in the discussions to bring in Randle. After all, he's previously worked with him in New Orleans.
Re: The Julius Randle Thread
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 68,037
- And1: 21,725
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: The Julius Randle Thread
shrink wrote:Klomp wrote:FrenchMinnyFan wrote:
The real point. I see Randle yesterday try to make a lay-up then falling down and did not even try to come back resulting an open 3 for SA. We were just lucky SA could not hit a shoot yesterday or we may have been in trouble.
When 14 out of 15 players give maximum effort, the 1 who doesn't sticks out like a sore thumb. I think on the whole, Randle's effort level is not that different from the majority of the league. It just sticks out like a sore thumb on this team.
So how much blame do you put on Finch for Randle’s lack of defensive effort?
I don't really like using the word "blame" for NBA coaches when talking about player effort. As someone said, effort can't really be coached. Now, you could say that Finch hasn't found the right situations to put Randle (and DiVincenzo to a lesser extent) in, but that's a different discussion to me.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: The Julius Randle Thread
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,298
- And1: 607
- Joined: Nov 21, 2023
-
Re: The Julius Randle Thread
The effort is one thing .. Randle's biggest problem is the negative attitude he wears on his sleeves + the internal thought in his mind that he is a no. 1.
Re: The Julius Randle Thread
-
- Ballboy
- Posts: 26
- And1: 19
- Joined: Nov 13, 2024
Re: The Julius Randle Thread
I agree with both points and also the lack of effort. He seems to play for stats more than to win. Against the Spurs, he didn't look happy to win, barely smiled when the whole team was celebrating the Dillingham to Minott dunk. I believe it was because he tied his season low at 11 points and was on the bench.Loaf_of_bread wrote:The effort is one thing .. Randle's biggest problem is the negative attitude he wears on his sleeves + the internal thought in his mind that he is a no. 1.
At the beginning of the season, Randle was playing like this is his team. In games where he gets too many attempts, the game ends badly for the Wolves. The more attempts and ball time Randle got, McDaniels, Conley, NAW, Goberb, and Edwards ended up going cold. When he plays like a role player and doesn't force bad attempts, Wolves play better. His passing after too much dribbling is sketchy. He struggles passing in the paint because he dribbles in to get a shot off for himself but not looking to set someone up. He doesn't know where Gobert is, horrible unreachable pass or turnover. He's a talented player but lacks speed. I think that's why he constantly gets burned on defense. It's his speed that makes him look like he has poor or no effort defense. You can only be a little faster with more effort. It's a trait, not a talent.
With all that said, I still think he is a weapon for this team to have. The team has to use him the right way. In addition, he has to accept it. He usually goes right at the defense no matter what. He can stop runs and slow the tempo by getting fouled easily. He can finish in the paint well. Is he going to be happy scoring 11 a game to win? Doesn't really look like it after seeing his body language. He's an offense only player, low to average defense at best
Sent from my SM-S916U1 using RealGM mobile app
Re: The Julius Randle Thread
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,298
- And1: 607
- Joined: Nov 21, 2023
-
Re: The Julius Randle Thread
Benjams wrote:I agree with both points and also the lack of effort. He seems to play for stats more than to win. Against the Spurs, he didn't look happy to win, barely smiled when the whole team was celebrating the Dillingham to Minott dunk. I believe it was because he tied his season low at 11 points and was on the bench.Loaf_of_bread wrote:The effort is one thing .. Randle's biggest problem is the negative attitude he wears on his sleeves + the internal thought in his mind that he is a no. 1.
At the beginning of the season, Randle was playing like this is his team. In games where he gets too many attempts, the game ends badly for the Wolves. The more attempts and ball time Randle got, McDaniels, Conley, NAW, Goberb, and Edwards ended up going cold. When he plays like a role player and doesn't force bad attempts, Wolves play better. His passing after too much dribbling is sketchy. He struggles passing in the paint because he dribbles in to get a shot off for himself but not looking to set someone up. He doesn't know where Gobert is, horrible unreachable pass or turnover. He's a talented player but lacks speed. I think that's why he constantly gets burned on defense. It's his speed that makes him look like he has poor or no effort defense. You can only be a little faster with more effort. It's a trait, not a talent.
With all that said, I still think he is a weapon for this team to have. The team has to use him the right way. In addition, he has to accept it. He usually goes right at the defense no matter what. He can stop runs and slow the tempo by getting fouled easily. He can finish in the paint well. Is he going to be happy scoring 11 a game to win? Doesn't really look like it after seeing his body language. He's an offense only player, low to average defense at best
Sent from my SM-S916U1 using RealGM mobile app
Nice post. He needs to let the game come to him, instead of going into a possession with the mentality: "I'm going to get mine, and force it pickup style."
Unfortunately, intellectual capacity is the problem with him.
Re: The Julius Randle Thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,317
- And1: 4,870
- Joined: Jan 28, 2011
- Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
-
Re: The Julius Randle Thread
https://theboxandone.substack.com/p/strength-4-identifying-the-next-wave
I feel like the hope before Randle trade was that he can be such Strength-4 PLUS some drive-and-kick game. Keshad Johnson might a good example of such player archetype.
I feel like the hope before Randle trade was that he can be such Strength-4 PLUS some drive-and-kick game. Keshad Johnson might a good example of such player archetype.
Re: The Julius Randle Thread
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 68,037
- And1: 21,725
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: The Julius Randle Thread
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: The Julius Randle Thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 59,140
- And1: 19,104
- Joined: Sep 26, 2005
Re: The Julius Randle Thread
After going 5-for-6 in an upset win over HOU, Randle is now shooting 38.2% 3P on 4.6 3PA
Over his last three, Randle is 10-18 3P, 10.3 RPG, 7.7 APG, 23.0 PPG.
Over his last three, Randle is 10-18 3P, 10.3 RPG, 7.7 APG, 23.0 PPG.
Re: The Julius Randle Thread
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,190
- And1: 764
- Joined: Jul 26, 2017
-
Re: The Julius Randle Thread
shrink wrote:After going 5-for-6 in an upset win over HOU, Randle is now shooting 38.2% 3P on 4.6 3PA
Over his last three, Randle is 10-18 3P, 10.3 RPG, 7.7 APG, 23.0 PPG.
Sell high....
Re: The Julius Randle Thread
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 818
- And1: 296
- Joined: Jan 06, 2022
Re: The Julius Randle Thread
Julius, Jaden, and DD for Giannis!!
I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy.
Re: The Julius Randle Thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 59,140
- And1: 19,104
- Joined: Sep 26, 2005
Re: The Julius Randle Thread
cmoss84 wrote:Julius, Jaden, and DD for Giannis!!
Can you even imagine our defense end of games?!?
Ant + NAW + Naz + Giannis + Gobert?!?

Re: The Julius Randle Thread
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 818
- And1: 296
- Joined: Jan 06, 2022
Re: The Julius Randle Thread
Get it done ARod!
I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy.
Re: The Julius Randle Thread
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 68,037
- And1: 21,725
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: The Julius Randle Thread
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves