ImageImageImage

The Julius Randle Thread

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

WentzerWuver
Veteran
Posts: 2,814
And1: 713
Joined: Jul 25, 2023

Re: The Julius Randle Thread 

Post#281 » by WentzerWuver » Wed Jan 8, 2025 9:07 pm

BlacJacMac wrote:
frankenwolf wrote:
winforlose wrote:What we really need is another creator who can also develop some gravity. I like DeJounte Murray for that, but good luck getting him. Everything depends on whose available and how much trade value Randle can generate.


Yes, if we could get Murray for Randle that would be great, but I don't think that would fill the other hole you want filled, a back up 5. I don't do trade machine, because I'm terrible at it, but can you figure a trade that NO & MN would do for those two and bring in a backup 5? I'm sure it would be a three team set up.


Murray and Messi for Randle and the Detroit pick would be a godsend.

But, The Pelicans would laugh and hang up on us...
So true as I was laughing so much that soda came outta my nose LMAO

So many Randy hypers in here....
BlacJacMac
Analyst
Posts: 3,699
And1: 3,396
Joined: Aug 25, 2020
       

Re: The Julius Randle Thread 

Post#282 » by BlacJacMac » Wed Jan 8, 2025 9:13 pm

winforlose wrote:
BlacJacMac wrote:
frankenwolf wrote:
Yes, if we could get Murray for Randle that would be great, but I don't think that would fill the other hole you want filled, a back up 5. I don't do trade machine, because I'm terrible at it, but can you figure a trade that NO & MN would do for those two and bring in a backup 5? I'm sure it would be a three team set up.


Murray and Messi for Randle and the Detroit pick would be a godsend.

But, The Pelicans would laugh and hang up on us...


True. I didn’t know Messi was a ROTY candidate until last night. But I never said Messi’s name, you did. DJM for Randle and the pick plus signing on of the recently cut Cs would be good enough for me.


Correct. But that's not really germane, since I wasn't responding to you. I was responding to FW's idea of a trade with NOP that nets us Murray and a 5.
BlacJacMac
Analyst
Posts: 3,699
And1: 3,396
Joined: Aug 25, 2020
       

Re: The Julius Randle Thread 

Post#283 » by BlacJacMac » Wed Jan 8, 2025 9:17 pm

Klomp wrote:Yeah Missi is not going to happen. I don't even know if including Dillingham would get it done.


I would do that in a heartbeat as Murray would make DIllingham a luxury, not a necessity. But I still don't see NOP doing it.

Murray/Conley/DDV
Ant/DDV/NAW
McDaniels/NAW/Minott/TSJ
Naz/McDaniels/Miller
Gobert/Missi

I probably try to move NAW as well.
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,096
And1: 5,721
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: The Julius Randle Thread 

Post#284 » by winforlose » Wed Jan 8, 2025 9:18 pm

shrink wrote:
winforlose wrote:The bigger issue is asking whether playing without a proper PG and C but using Randle as a hybrid of these is better or worst than a 9 or 10 man rotation with proper roster balance?

I think that’s a good way to look at the problem. But if you turn Randle into 2-3 players to try to cover all the holes in the dam he has his fingers in already, say goodbye to giving minutes to develop young players too. Finch is not going to run an 11-12 man rotation.

There is value to consolidating talent in star players, because only five can be on the court at a time. Even if we were able to trade Randle for a 20 PPG point guard, when we play him our rebounds will drop. If we are covering rebounds by playing our back up center, points and assists will fall.

I don’t think Randle is a perfect fit. Neither was Towns. Star players aren’t perfect, but they help you in a lot of team needs, all over the board. I would be more focused right now on moving other pieces to fix our needs, rather than fixating on the things we don’t like about Randle. He is improving, and fitting in better, asked to do many new things.


I think you have it backwards. If playing Randle diminishes Mike and Naz then you better be winning big every game. If Randle has a bad game and you keep Mike and Naz suppressed, you have just created a sure fire loss. Restoring Mike to his proper role increases his production. Giving Naz his proper role increases his production. Now you need less production from everyone else. In trying to fit a square peg into a round hole we destabilized the entire board. Now by getting the square out of there, we allow the game to be played the way it should.

Mike/Ant/Jaden/Naz/Rudy (let’s say 32 minutes each with 28 for Mike.) 32 x 4 =128. 128 + 28 =156. 240 - 156 =84. 84 minutes shared between NAW (23,) DDV (27), Minott (15,) and backup C (16,) with 3 minutes assigned to whoever is feeling it on that night. Seems like a good formula to me. If you add in the PG like DJM he goes up to 32 minutes, Mike gets the other 16. Rudy and C2 split the 48 C minutes. Now Minott might lose some as Jaden plays some backup 4 to give more minutes to DDV and NAW, but that is better roster balance and acceptable for the season.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,018
And1: 22,557
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: The Julius Randle Thread 

Post#285 » by Klomp » Wed Jan 8, 2025 9:22 pm

shrink wrote:So like many of us, I’ve been trying to come up with the right player to trade Randle for to improve the overall team. Like any trade, we will be trying to give up something, to get something we need more. The general perception is that Randle doesn’t defend hard enough, and he’s too willing to drive instead of pass. But what categories can we give up in Randle to trade for a player that’s better in others.

For example, Randle is our #2 scorer. Do we need a #2 scorer in return? Some people hope Naz could step into that role, but we don’t know. Even with Randle, the team is 23rd in scoring, so it seems like we need a scorer.

Randle is our #1 assist guy. Do we need a #1 assist guy in return? With Conley struggling and no true back up PG on the roster except Dilly, that’s a hard category to take a step back in. Even with Randle, the team is #22 in assists, so it seems like we need assists back.

Randle is our #2 rebound guy. Do we need a #2 rebound guy back? Gobert gets his, but Naz and Jaden have never been great rebounders. Even with Randle, the team is #19 in rebounding, so it seems like we need a rebounder back too.

To me, we can’t take a step back in any of those three categories we’re already bad at. And to replace Randle, we’d want a player that can do these things, PLUS swing the ball more, plus be a better defender. I doubt we can find that with our trade assets.


To be honest, this exercise reminds me of the people last year that were often demanding we trade Towns, and they would focus on the things he can’t do. Many of those same people are now doing the same with Randle, and it makes me wonder if this is a poster problem, with a few people that can only see the negatives in players they don’t like, and can’t see the necessary things they bring.

Honestly, I think only a few individuals could come close to offering so much, and very few packages overall.

Aaron Gordon: But then you have spacing questions.
Ball/Smith combo: This squeezes Minott out of the rotation, and likely lessens the role for one of Conley, Ball, DiVincenzo or Alexander-Walker to the 9th man/half rotation.
Bruce Brown/filler: Still a lot lacking
Brogdon/Valanciunas: Feels like a sell low
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,018
And1: 22,557
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: The Julius Randle Thread 

Post#286 » by Klomp » Wed Jan 8, 2025 9:26 pm

winforlose wrote:
shrink wrote:
winforlose wrote:The bigger issue is asking whether playing without a proper PG and C but using Randle as a hybrid of these is better or worst than a 9 or 10 man rotation with proper roster balance?

I think that’s a good way to look at the problem. But if you turn Randle into 2-3 players to try to cover all the holes in the dam he has his fingers in already, say goodbye to giving minutes to develop young players too. Finch is not going to run an 11-12 man rotation.

There is value to consolidating talent in star players, because only five can be on the court at a time. Even if we were able to trade Randle for a 20 PPG point guard, when we play him our rebounds will drop. If we are covering rebounds by playing our back up center, points and assists will fall.

I don’t think Randle is a perfect fit. Neither was Towns. Star players aren’t perfect, but they help you in a lot of team needs, all over the board. I would be more focused right now on moving other pieces to fix our needs, rather than fixating on the things we don’t like about Randle. He is improving, and fitting in better, asked to do many new things.


I think you have it backwards. If playing Randle diminishes Mike and Naz then you better be winning big every game. If Randle has a bad game and you keep Mike and Naz suppressed, you have just created a sure fire loss. Restoring Mike to his proper role increases his production. Giving Naz his proper role increases his production. Now you need less production from everyone else. In trying to fit a square peg into a round hole we destabilized the entire board. Now by getting the square out of there, we allow the game to be played the way it should.

Mike/Ant/Jaden/Naz/Rudy (let’s say 32 minutes each with 28 for Mike.) 32 x 4 =128. 128 + 28 =156. 240 - 156 =84. 84 minutes shared between NAW (23,) DDV (27), Minott (15,) and backup C (16,) with 3 minutes assigned to whoever is feeling it on that night. Seems like a good formula to me. If you add in the PG like DJM he goes up to 32 minutes, Mike gets the other 16. Rudy and C2 split the 48 C minutes. Now Minott might lose some as Jaden plays some backup 4 to give more minutes to DDV and NAW, but that is better roster balance and acceptable for the season.

Small sample size, but a takeaway from the starting lineup change that happened might also be unlocking more from Naz Reid. He's not fighting for shots with DiVincenzo, and is running with Conley who can set him up. The last two games have been two of Reid's six highest shot volumes this season.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,096
And1: 5,721
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: The Julius Randle Thread 

Post#287 » by winforlose » Wed Jan 8, 2025 9:29 pm

Klomp wrote:
shrink wrote:So like many of us, I’ve been trying to come up with the right player to trade Randle for to improve the overall team. Like any trade, we will be trying to give up something, to get something we need more. The general perception is that Randle doesn’t defend hard enough, and he’s too willing to drive instead of pass. But what categories can we give up in Randle to trade for a player that’s better in others.

For example, Randle is our #2 scorer. Do we need a #2 scorer in return? Some people hope Naz could step into that role, but we don’t know. Even with Randle, the team is 23rd in scoring, so it seems like we need a scorer.

Randle is our #1 assist guy. Do we need a #1 assist guy in return? With Conley struggling and no true back up PG on the roster except Dilly, that’s a hard category to take a step back in. Even with Randle, the team is #22 in assists, so it seems like we need assists back.

Randle is our #2 rebound guy. Do we need a #2 rebound guy back? Gobert gets his, but Naz and Jaden have never been great rebounders. Even with Randle, the team is #19 in rebounding, so it seems like we need a rebounder back too.

To me, we can’t take a step back in any of those three categories we’re already bad at. And to replace Randle, we’d want a player that can do these things, PLUS swing the ball more, plus be a better defender. I doubt we can find that with our trade assets.


To be honest, this exercise reminds me of the people last year that were often demanding we trade Towns, and they would focus on the things he can’t do. Many of those same people are now doing the same with Randle, and it makes me wonder if this is a poster problem, with a few people that can only see the negatives in players they don’t like, and can’t see the necessary things they bring.

Honestly, I think only a few individuals could come close to offering so much, and very few packages overall.

Aaron Gordon: But then you have spacing questions.
Ball/Smith combo: This squeezes Minott out of the rotation, and likely lessens the role for one of Conley, Ball, DiVincenzo or Alexander-Walker to the 9th man/half rotation.
Bruce Brown/filler: Still a lot lacking
Brogdon/Valanciunas: Feels like a sell low


I need to help you change your thought process. Here is an easy example. Look at KAT’s rebounding numbers next to Rudy. Now look at them in NYK. Fit and role change production. The question isn’t do. How do you replace all that Randle produces. The question is how much production does Randle suppress in his current role?
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,350
And1: 19,377
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: The Julius Randle Thread 

Post#288 » by shrink » Wed Jan 8, 2025 9:32 pm

I really don’t buy into the suppress argument either.

Randle scores points, he draws double teams, and he kicks out to players on the wing. That should help Mike and Naz, not suppress them. But I am enjoying hearing your reasoning, and maybe you can change my mind.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,018
And1: 22,557
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: The Julius Randle Thread 

Post#289 » by Klomp » Wed Jan 8, 2025 9:36 pm

winforlose wrote:
Klomp wrote:
shrink wrote:So like many of us, I’ve been trying to come up with the right player to trade Randle for to improve the overall team. Like any trade, we will be trying to give up something, to get something we need more. The general perception is that Randle doesn’t defend hard enough, and he’s too willing to drive instead of pass. But what categories can we give up in Randle to trade for a player that’s better in others.

For example, Randle is our #2 scorer. Do we need a #2 scorer in return? Some people hope Naz could step into that role, but we don’t know. Even with Randle, the team is 23rd in scoring, so it seems like we need a scorer.

Randle is our #1 assist guy. Do we need a #1 assist guy in return? With Conley struggling and no true back up PG on the roster except Dilly, that’s a hard category to take a step back in. Even with Randle, the team is #22 in assists, so it seems like we need assists back.

Randle is our #2 rebound guy. Do we need a #2 rebound guy back? Gobert gets his, but Naz and Jaden have never been great rebounders. Even with Randle, the team is #19 in rebounding, so it seems like we need a rebounder back too.

To me, we can’t take a step back in any of those three categories we’re already bad at. And to replace Randle, we’d want a player that can do these things, PLUS swing the ball more, plus be a better defender. I doubt we can find that with our trade assets.


To be honest, this exercise reminds me of the people last year that were often demanding we trade Towns, and they would focus on the things he can’t do. Many of those same people are now doing the same with Randle, and it makes me wonder if this is a poster problem, with a few people that can only see the negatives in players they don’t like, and can’t see the necessary things they bring.

Honestly, I think only a few individuals could come close to offering so much, and very few packages overall.

Aaron Gordon: But then you have spacing questions.
Ball/Smith combo: This squeezes Minott out of the rotation, and likely lessens the role for one of Conley, Ball, DiVincenzo or Alexander-Walker to the 9th man/half rotation.
Bruce Brown/filler: Still a lot lacking
Brogdon/Valanciunas: Feels like a sell low


I need to help you change your thought process. Here is an easy example. Look at KAT’s rebounding numbers next to Rudy. Now look at them in NYK. Fit and role change production. The question isn’t do. How do you replace all that Randle produces. The question is how much production does Randle suppress in his current role?

Look at Scottie Pippen in his role in Chicago, and how much production he suppressed!
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,096
And1: 5,721
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: The Julius Randle Thread 

Post#290 » by winforlose » Wed Jan 8, 2025 9:45 pm

shrink wrote:I really don’t buy into the suppress argument either.

Randle scores points, he draws double teams, and he kicks out to players on the wing. That should help Mike and Naz, not suppress them. But I am enjoying hearing your reasoning, and maybe you can change my mind.


LOL. I already gave you the example of the KAT rebounding, I already showed you the Mike quote. Do you think role is irrelevant in performance. DDV is an excellent catch and shoot 3 point shooter. We thought we could use him at the PG. Look at how badly things went for DDV outside the catch and Shoot role. Look at how much better he is in the catch and shoot role. Mike’s best role is an initiator. His most productive is when he is allowed to play PNR with Rudy, or run the offense to get Ant opportunities. Turn Mike into a corner running catch and shoot 3 point shooter look what happens. What do you call this if not suppression?
wolves_89
General Manager
Posts: 8,108
And1: 4,593
Joined: Jul 10, 2012
 

Re: The Julius Randle Thread 

Post#291 » by wolves_89 » Wed Jan 8, 2025 11:25 pm

shrink wrote:
winforlose wrote:The bigger issue is asking whether playing without a proper PG and C but using Randle as a hybrid of these is better or worst than a 9 or 10 man rotation with proper roster balance?

I think that’s a good way to look at the problem. But if you turn Randle into 2-3 players to try to cover all the holes in the dam he has his fingers in already, say goodbye to giving minutes to develop young players too. Finch won’t run an 11-12 man rotation.

There is value to consolidating talent in star players, because only five can be on the court at a time. Even if we were able to trade Randle for a 20 PPG point guard, when we play him our rebounds will drop. If we are covering rebounds by playing our back up center, points and assists will fall.

I agree with everyone, that I don’t think Randle is a perfect fit. Neither was Towns. Star players aren’t perfect, but they help you in a lot of team needs, all over the board. I would be more focused right now on moving other pieces to fix our needs, rather than fixating on the things we don’t like about Randle. He is improving, and fitting in better, asked to do many new things.


My primary concern with Randle has nothing to do with his talent level, it is all about fit. Randle has been a terrible fit with the starting groups, the Mike/Ant/Jaden/Julius/Rudy group has a -0.1 net rating and Donte/Ant/Jaden/Julius/Rudy is at -4.2 net rating. Having those lineups being 2 of the top 3 5-man groups in terms of minutes is a major problem. The additional issue is that I'm doutful that Finch will ever be willing to make any rotation adjustments that might "upset" Julius. There is a very real argument that moving Julius could be addition by subtraction, especially if we could get decent value in return.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,350
And1: 19,377
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: The Julius Randle Thread 

Post#292 » by shrink » Wed Jan 8, 2025 11:26 pm

winforlose wrote:
shrink wrote:I really don’t buy into the suppress argument either.

Randle scores points, he draws double teams, and he kicks out to players on the wing. That should help Mike and Naz, not suppress them. But I am enjoying hearing your reasoning, and maybe you can change my mind.


LOL. I already gave you the example of the KAT rebounding, I already showed you the Mike quote. Do you think role is irrelevant in performance. DDV is an excellent catch and shoot 3 point shooter. We thought we could use him at the PG. Look at how badly things went for DDV outside the catch and Shoot role. Look at how much better he is in the catch and shoot role. Mike’s best role is an initiator. His most productive is when he is allowed to play PNR with Rudy, or run the offense to get Ant opportunities. Turn Mike into a corner running catch and shoot 3 point shooter look what happens. What do you call this if not suppression?

I don’t think RANDLE is suppressing Mike or Naz.

The reason Mike isn’t initiating as much isn’t because of Randle, it’s because of Mike, and how slowly he started the season with his age and wrist injury. Everyone wanted Mike to remain the initiator, and there is no doubt we need him to be the player he was last year, but he wasn’t doing the job.

When Naz plays with Randle, he may be the de facto center on defense. It should mean more rebounds right, particularly without a better rebounding KAT here to “suppress” him? Hasn’t happened. On offense, as I said Randle is actually better at passing out to three point shooters than KAT was, and Naz’ volume should have gone up. That hasn’t happened either. Worse, Naz’ percentage has dropped from 41.4% to 35%.

It feels like you are excusing both players for their decline this year, and just blaming Randle as a scapegoat with a handwaving, “well somehow, he must be suppressing their games!” Moving Randle isn’t going to make Naz increase his rebounding percentage or get better looks for three’s he’s missing, or cause Mike to turn into a 32 year old again.
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,096
And1: 5,721
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: The Julius Randle Thread 

Post#293 » by winforlose » Wed Jan 8, 2025 11:37 pm

shrink wrote:
winforlose wrote:
shrink wrote:I really don’t buy into the suppress argument either.

Randle scores points, he draws double teams, and he kicks out to players on the wing. That should help Mike and Naz, not suppress them. But I am enjoying hearing your reasoning, and maybe you can change my mind.


LOL. I already gave you the example of the KAT rebounding, I already showed you the Mike quote. Do you think role is irrelevant in performance. DDV is an excellent catch and shoot 3 point shooter. We thought we could use him at the PG. Look at how badly things went for DDV outside the catch and Shoot role. Look at how much better he is in the catch and shoot role. Mike’s best role is an initiator. His most productive is when he is allowed to play PNR with Rudy, or run the offense to get Ant opportunities. Turn Mike into a corner running catch and shoot 3 point shooter look what happens. What do you call this if not suppression?

I don’t think RANDLE is suppressing Mike or Naz.

The reason Mike isn’t initiating as much isn’t because of Randle, it’s because of Mike, and how slowly he started the season with his age and wrist injury. Everyone wanted Mike to remain the initiator, and there is no doubt we need him to be the player he was last year, but he wasn’t doing the job.

When Naz plays with Randle, he may be the de facto center on defense. It should mean more rebounds right, particularly without a better rebounding KAT here to “suppress” him? Hasn’t happened. On offense, as I said Randle is actually better at passing out to three point shooters than KAT was, and Naz’ volume should have gone up. That hasn’t happened either. Worse, Naz’ percentage has dropped from 41.4% to 35%.

It feels like you are excusing both players for their decline this year, and just blaming Randle as a scapegoat with a handwaving, “well somehow, he must be suppressing their games!” Moving Randle isn’t going to make Naz start shooting three’s better, or cause Mike to turn into a 32 year old again.


I am not good with advanced stats, but I would be very curious to compare usage rates. Mike is having a down year, but how much of that is his wrist and how much is being thrown in a corner. How much better was Mike last year in the PG role than in Utah as the corner guy?

Naz needs to be better at rebounding as does Jaden. But if you watched last nights game you saw how out of position Jaden often was. Why was Jaden out of position, because he was chasing DJM and other guards who didn’t end positions down low very often. If Jaden crashes and misses then he is out of position to defend the second action. This is an example of how role and defensive assignment can interfere with rebounding. Then there is the fact that some Wolves just don’t box out. You always see Rudy competing with 2 or 3 guys down low, but you rarely see the reverse with the Wolves effectively boxing out the opposing big while also preventing the crasher from getting to the ball. Finally, having an undersized 4/5 duo trying to rebound against legit 4/5s causes problems. Getting better size down low should help.

Role and fit make a bigger difference than you want to admit. Again I point to DDV in his proper role vs out of it. I think you see some production increase in players who are allowed to resume their natural role instead of being displaced by Randle. If you don’t like Suppression, think of it is as addition by subtraction.
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,096
And1: 5,721
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: The Julius Randle Thread 

Post#294 » by winforlose » Thu Jan 9, 2025 1:23 am

I asked Google what percentage of Randle’s made field goals are assisted. This is what the AI said in response.

“ Julius Randle's field goal percentage assisted (FGM %AST) varies by shot distance:
25–29 ft: 76.5%
20–24 ft: 89.3%
10–14 ft: 27.8%
15–19 ft: 30.0%”
FrenchMinnyFan
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,968
And1: 1,183
Joined: Feb 10, 2023
     

Re: The Julius Randle Thread 

Post#295 » by FrenchMinnyFan » Thu Jan 9, 2025 1:29 am

shrink wrote:
winforlose wrote:
shrink wrote:I really don’t buy into the suppress argument either.

Randle scores points, he draws double teams, and he kicks out to players on the wing. That should help Mike and Naz, not suppress them. But I am enjoying hearing your reasoning, and maybe you can change my mind.


LOL. I already gave you the example of the KAT rebounding, I already showed you the Mike quote. Do you think role is irrelevant in performance. DDV is an excellent catch and shoot 3 point shooter. We thought we could use him at the PG. Look at how badly things went for DDV outside the catch and Shoot role. Look at how much better he is in the catch and shoot role. Mike’s best role is an initiator. His most productive is when he is allowed to play PNR with Rudy, or run the offense to get Ant opportunities. Turn Mike into a corner running catch and shoot 3 point shooter look what happens. What do you call this if not suppression?

I don’t think RANDLE is suppressing Mike or Naz.

The reason Mike isn’t initiating as much isn’t because of Randle, it’s because of Mike, and how slowly he started the season with his age and wrist injury. Everyone wanted Mike to remain the initiator, and there is no doubt we need him to be the player he was last year, but he wasn’t doing the job.

When Naz plays with Randle, he may be the de facto center on defense. It should mean more rebounds right, particularly without a better rebounding KAT here to “suppress” him? Hasn’t happened. On offense, as I said Randle is actually better at passing out to three point shooters than KAT was, and Naz’ volume should have gone up. That hasn’t happened either. Worse, Naz’ percentage has dropped from 41.4% to 35%.

It feels like you are excusing both players for their decline this year, and just blaming Randle as a scapegoat with a handwaving, “well somehow, he must be suppressing their games!” Moving Randle isn’t going to make Naz increase his rebounding percentage or get better looks for three’s he’s missing, or cause Mike to turn into a 32 year old again.


Can't disagree more. When Randle keep the ball 10 seconds trying to score , get double teams and throw a bomb to another players with 4 seconds to play, it's hard not to see you data not down, just because you have to shoot a very difficult shoot.

Mike is a PG old style, which mean he got to get the ball in hands. For 2 reasons, because he can pass well ( see his Assist-TO career ratio) and because he can shoot well specially when he got screen from Rudy.
It's also not a surprise if NAZ, NAW shoot much more when Mike is the ball handler.

We could think Mike decline because of his ages, understandable. But what about Rudy, Jaden? When you don't see the ball, you get cold and don't contribute well.

Randle penalize the team on both side of the field. But he is smart enough to take care his own data. If you look at the game yesterday, there is at least 4 times we miss shoot or TO the ball and NO go for a fast attack where you see 4 players of our teams ready to play defense and one, Randle being 3 or 4 meters, looking at the show. Totally unacceptable. IF we don't trade this guy we have zero chances to win anything.
ANT has also to improve this part of the game but he is our star so we have to accept he is the dominant players of our team. We were very lucky yesterday to win it with the last 4 min we play...
WentzerWuver
Veteran
Posts: 2,814
And1: 713
Joined: Jul 25, 2023

Re: The Julius Randle Thread 

Post#296 » by WentzerWuver » Thu Jan 9, 2025 2:11 am

winforlose wrote:I asked Google what percentage of Randle’s made field goals are assisted. This is what the AI said in response.

“ Julius Randle's field goal percentage assisted (FGM %AST) varies by shot distance:
25–29 ft: 76.5%
20–24 ft: 89.3%
10–14 ft: 27.8%
15–19 ft: 30.0%”
Those stats are pointless by avoiding the main issues which has nothing to do with his defense.

https://nypost.com/2023/11/03/sports/kendrick-perkins-eviscerates-ball-hogging-julius-randle-as-knicks-struggles-continue/
WentzerWuver
Veteran
Posts: 2,814
And1: 713
Joined: Jul 25, 2023

Re: The Julius Randle Thread 

Post#297 » by WentzerWuver » Thu Jan 9, 2025 2:22 am

FrenchMinnyFan wrote:Randle penalize the team on both side of the field. But he is smart enough to take care his own data. If you look at the game yesterday, there is at least 4 times we miss shoot or TO the ball and NO go for a fast attack where you see 4 players of our teams ready to play defense and one, Randle being 3 or 4 meters, looking at the show. Totally unacceptable. IF we don't trade this guy we have zero chances to win anything. ANT has also to improve this part of the game but he is our star so we have to accept he is the dominant players of our team. We were very lucky yesterday to win it with the last 4 min we play...
Problem is no team wants him other than his expiring contract, which would likely mean they will take on longer bad contracts in return. At least Minny got Donte in return from that trade. Best option is to just let his expiring contract end as he comes off the bench going forward due to his deficiencies.

https://nypost.com/2024/10/23/sports/lakers-threw-shade-at-julius-randle-after-opening-night/
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,096
And1: 5,721
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: The Julius Randle Thread 

Post#298 » by winforlose » Thu Jan 9, 2025 2:22 am

WentzerWuver wrote:
winforlose wrote:I asked Google what percentage of Randle’s made field goals are assisted. This is what the AI said in response.

“ Julius Randle's field goal percentage assisted (FGM %AST) varies by shot distance:
25–29 ft: 76.5%
20–24 ft: 89.3%
10–14 ft: 27.8%
15–19 ft: 30.0%”
Those stats are pointless by avoiding the main issues which has nothing to do with his defense.

https://nypost.com/2023/11/03/sports/kendrick-perkins-eviscerates-ball-hogging-julius-randle-as-knicks-struggles-continue/


Those stats show that between 10-19 feet Randle plays ISO about 70% of the time on made shots.
WentzerWuver
Veteran
Posts: 2,814
And1: 713
Joined: Jul 25, 2023

Re: The Julius Randle Thread 

Post#299 » by WentzerWuver » Thu Jan 9, 2025 2:42 am

winforlose wrote:
WentzerWuver wrote:
winforlose wrote:I asked Google what percentage of Randle’s made field goals are assisted. This is what the AI said in response.

“ Julius Randle's field goal percentage assisted (FGM %AST) varies by shot distance:
25–29 ft: 76.5%
20–24 ft: 89.3%
10–14 ft: 27.8%
15–19 ft: 30.0%”
Those stats are pointless by avoiding the main issues which has nothing to do with his defense.

https://nypost.com/2023/11/03/sports/kendrick-perkins-eviscerates-ball-hogging-julius-randle-as-knicks-struggles-continue/


Those stats show that between 10-19 feet Randle plays ISO about 70% of the time on made shots.
He ISO whenever he has his hand on the ball but tries to take shots closer to the basket, if he doesnt turn the ball over while getting there. Those stats are true for most players, not just Randle. In other words, meaningless.

https://youtu.be/BTjEJQI53qI?si=4QqZ1RiAzOpK1ZkC

His playoff performance is much more concerning. It's why "playoff" Jimmy is in hot demand!
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,096
And1: 5,721
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: The Julius Randle Thread 

Post#300 » by winforlose » Thu Jan 9, 2025 2:59 am

WentzerWuver wrote:
winforlose wrote:
WentzerWuver wrote:Those stats are pointless by avoiding the main issues which has nothing to do with his defense.

https://nypost.com/2023/11/03/sports/kendrick-perkins-eviscerates-ball-hogging-julius-randle-as-knicks-struggles-continue/


Those stats show that between 10-19 feet Randle plays ISO about 70% of the time on made shots.
He ISO whenever he has his hand on the ball but tries to take shots closer to the basket, if he doesnt turn the ball over while getting there. Those stats are true for most players, not just Randle. In other words, meaningless.

https://youtu.be/BTjEJQI53qI?si=4QqZ1RiAzOpK1ZkC

His playoff performance is much more concerning. It's why "playoff" Jimmy is in hot demand!


There are many flaws with his game. That doesn’t mean he isn’t valuable on another team. There are flaws in Ant’s game but people would trade for him. I don’t know why you would come to a Minnesota board and try to convince Minnesota fans that Randle is untradable. I think many of us suspect we acquired him to move him.

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves