2022 NBA Draft Talk: Never too soon
Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks
Re: 2022 NBA Draft Talk: Never too soon
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,519
- And1: 6,594
- Joined: Dec 21, 2009
- Location: Land of Aus
-
Re: 2022 NBA Draft Talk: Never too soon
A guy I'm getting high on now is Quenton Jackson from Texas A&M.
6-5 guard, 34% from 3, 82% from the line, 3.9 STL% and 2.5 BLK%. Negative AST/TO ratio, so probably not much of a PG right now, and an older prospect as a 5yr senior, but basically a potential 3 and D guy that could be that long term replacement for Bev.
The best part? Currently he's going undrafted, so we can pick him up for CHEAP.
6-5 guard, 34% from 3, 82% from the line, 3.9 STL% and 2.5 BLK%. Negative AST/TO ratio, so probably not much of a PG right now, and an older prospect as a 5yr senior, but basically a potential 3 and D guy that could be that long term replacement for Bev.
The best part? Currently he's going undrafted, so we can pick him up for CHEAP.
Re: 2022 NBA Draft Talk: Never too soon
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,913
- And1: 2,533
- Joined: Jun 03, 2017
-
Re: 2022 NBA Draft Talk: Never too soon
Klomp wrote:Just thinking with our deep rotation of guys under contract, we can probably afford to take a chance on someone with loads of potential who may not be ready right away. I give you...
A dream scenario for me, personally, unless one of the Centers fall to 19.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Glen Taylor: "Is this moron #1 (Layden)? Put moron #2 (Thibs) on the phone."
Re: 2022 NBA Draft Talk: Never too soon
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,949
- And1: 6,238
- Joined: Jun 22, 2017
-
Re: 2022 NBA Draft Talk: Never too soon
shangrila wrote:KGdaBom wrote:minimus wrote:
Yeah, he is 21 yo, so I would be happy if he falls down to 19 pick. Or trade up by using Nowell is also a good variant.
OK I need to decide on who I'm backing for our draft pick and It's got to be Eason.
25ppg
10RPG
4.5 stocks.
He won't be available. Short of an injury or something else dramatic he's going to be a lottery pick.
not according to Tankathon.
Re: 2022 NBA Draft Talk: Never too soon
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,519
- And1: 6,594
- Joined: Dec 21, 2009
- Location: Land of Aus
-
Re: 2022 NBA Draft Talk: Never too soon
KGdaBom wrote:shangrila wrote:KGdaBom wrote:OK I need to decide on who I'm backing for our draft pick and It's got to be Eason.
25ppg
10RPG
4.5 stocks.
He won't be available. Short of an injury or something else dramatic he's going to be a lottery pick.
not according to Tankathon.
Well, what’s that favourite phrase of yours?
“They have a right to be wrong”
Re: 2022 NBA Draft Talk: Never too soon
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,265
- And1: 1,901
- Joined: Jan 18, 2009
Re: 2022 NBA Draft Talk: Never too soon
Thoughts on TyTy Washington? Or would Kennedy Chandler be the one to draft if going PG?
He's currently mocked to the Wolves on Tankathon.
Seems to have a similar profile, other than FT rate, to Maxey. NOT SAYING HE WILL BE MAXEY.
Washington
https://www.sports-reference.com/cbb/players/tyty-washingtonjr-1.html
Maxey
https://www.sports-reference.com/cbb/players/tyrese-maxey-1.html
He's currently mocked to the Wolves on Tankathon.
Seems to have a similar profile, other than FT rate, to Maxey. NOT SAYING HE WILL BE MAXEY.
Washington
https://www.sports-reference.com/cbb/players/tyty-washingtonjr-1.html
Maxey
https://www.sports-reference.com/cbb/players/tyrese-maxey-1.html
Re: 2022 NBA Draft Talk: Never too soon
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,452
- And1: 2,867
- Joined: Jun 03, 2016
Re: 2022 NBA Draft Talk: Never too soon
I think washington lacks athleticism and reminds me of an even less athletic DLO :/
Re: 2022 NBA Draft Talk: Never too soon
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 949
- And1: 328
- Joined: Jan 06, 2022
Re: 2022 NBA Draft Talk: Never too soon
Justin Lewis anyone? physical 6'7" forward who can shoot the rock?
I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy.
Re: 2022 NBA Draft Talk: Never too soon
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,519
- And1: 6,594
- Joined: Dec 21, 2009
- Location: Land of Aus
-
Re: 2022 NBA Draft Talk: Never too soon
cmoss84 wrote:Justin Lewis anyone? physical 6'7" forward who can shoot the rock?
I watched a few games of his and came away hating his defensive intensity. He looks like he's strictly a 4 defensively at this point, without the speed or much desire to bother guys on the perimeter.
Re: 2022 NBA Draft Talk: Never too soon
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,519
- And1: 6,594
- Joined: Dec 21, 2009
- Location: Land of Aus
-
Re: 2022 NBA Draft Talk: Never too soon
Baseline81 wrote:Thoughts on TyTy Washington? Or would Kennedy Chandler be the one to draft if going PG?
He's currently mocked to the Wolves on Tankathon.
Seems to have a similar profile, other than FT rate, to Maxey. NOT SAYING HE WILL BE MAXEY.
Washington
https://www.sports-reference.com/cbb/players/tyty-washingtonjr-1.html
Maxey
https://www.sports-reference.com/cbb/players/tyrese-maxey-1.html
Washington is probably a better PG and shooter but worse athlete. Neither of them are/seem good on defence (Maxey got hyped for that in predraft but has sucked on that end in the league from what I've seen) but if I were betting on one of them in a Pat Bev kind of role offensively, it'd be Washington. I buy him off ball more and as a playmaker.
Chandler is interesting to me. Bit of a throwback PG at this point given how the league is trending towards combos there (even if he's more CP3/Deron Williams than Kidd/Rondo stylistically) but he's a good, in control playmaker that has good form on his shot (FT% should be a red flag but he's been a 90%-ish guy his whole career so I'd be willing to overlook it), is a good finisher around the rim (Hoop-Math has him at 59% which isn't elite, but still good) and seems to have great instincts and competitiveness on defence. He probably won't be a lockdown guy on that end due to his slight frame but I think, after some time in the weight room, he won't necessarily be hunted down there and should be a positive contributor from day 1 on that end regardless.
I hate to say it, especially since he's finally getting love, but Chandler might be the idealised version of Jordan McLaughlin; speedy PG that gets us into sets quickly, can finish at the rim, make shots, make good passes and competes defensively.
Re: 2022 NBA Draft Talk: Never too soon
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 69,116
- And1: 22,635
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: 2022 NBA Draft Talk: Never too soon
shangrila wrote:Chandler is interesting to me. Bit of a throwback PG at this point given how the league is trending towards combos there (even if he's more CP3/Deron Williams than Kidd/Rondo stylistically) but he's a good, in control playmaker that has good form on his shot (FT% should be a red flag but he's been a 90%-ish guy his whole career so I'd be willing to overlook it), is a good finisher around the rim (Hoop-Math has him at 59% which isn't elite, but still good) and seems to have great instincts and competitiveness on defence. He probably won't be a lockdown guy on that end due to his slight frame but I think, after some time in the weight room, he won't necessarily be hunted down there and should be a positive contributor from day 1 on that end regardless.
I hate to say it, especially since he's finally getting love, but Chandler might be the idealised version of Jordan McLaughlin; speedy PG that gets us into sets quickly, can finish at the rim, make shots, make good passes and competes defensively.
I really like the tempo he plays with.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: 2022 NBA Draft Talk: Never too soon
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,949
- And1: 6,238
- Joined: Jun 22, 2017
-
Re: 2022 NBA Draft Talk: Never too soon
shangrila wrote:KGdaBom wrote:shangrila wrote:He won't be available. Short of an injury or something else dramatic he's going to be a lottery pick.
not according to Tankathon.
Well, what’s that favourite phrase of yours?
“They have a right to be wrong”
In this case I very much hope they are right. Go Wolves.
Re: 2022 NBA Draft Talk: Never too soon
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,949
- And1: 6,238
- Joined: Jun 22, 2017
-
Re: 2022 NBA Draft Talk: Never too soon
Baseline81 wrote:Thoughts on TyTy Washington? Or would Kennedy Chandler be the one to draft if going PG?
He's currently mocked to the Wolves on Tankathon.
Seems to have a similar profile, other than FT rate, to Maxey. NOT SAYING HE WILL BE MAXEY.
Washington
https://www.sports-reference.com/cbb/players/tyty-washingtonjr-1.html
Maxey
https://www.sports-reference.com/cbb/players/tyrese-maxey-1.html
I just simulated the lottery 10 times and we ended up with Eason 9 times and Ty Ty 1.
Re: 2022 NBA Draft Talk: Never too soon
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 69,116
- And1: 22,635
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: 2022 NBA Draft Talk: Never too soon
Not a sexy pick, but I love the potential fit of Jake LaRavia. The NBA is about putting the right pieces around your stars to complement them, and I believe this kid has the skills we want playing off of Towns and Edwards.
LaRavia is an easy fit at the highest level because of his versatility as a 6-8 modern 4. He can move all over the floor offensively, as he's capable of initiating offense in transition, functioning as a pick-and-roll ball-handler, playing out of the post to score or facilitate (one of his best skills), or picking and popping to space for spot 3s (40%), closeout attacks or quick reads (4.3 assists per 40 minutes).
LaRavia has a lot of the ingredients you generally see in draft risers given his intangibles, late-blooming status, skill level, feel and productivity. Younger than freshmen such as Kentucky's TyTy Washington, LaRavia was only 6-4 when former Indiana State head coach Greg Lansing first started watching him at Lawrence Central High School in Indiana.
Whether it's an undrafted 6-10 forward such as Dean Wade or a top-10 pick in Deni Avdija, there are players LaRavia resembles who have found success in the NBA, and another big performance surely gives LaRavia more of a runway to convince scouts and evaluators that he's worthy of true first-round consideration like his productivity and versatility suggest. -- Schmitz
LaRavia is an easy fit at the highest level because of his versatility as a 6-8 modern 4. He can move all over the floor offensively, as he's capable of initiating offense in transition, functioning as a pick-and-roll ball-handler, playing out of the post to score or facilitate (one of his best skills), or picking and popping to space for spot 3s (40%), closeout attacks or quick reads (4.3 assists per 40 minutes).
LaRavia has a lot of the ingredients you generally see in draft risers given his intangibles, late-blooming status, skill level, feel and productivity. Younger than freshmen such as Kentucky's TyTy Washington, LaRavia was only 6-4 when former Indiana State head coach Greg Lansing first started watching him at Lawrence Central High School in Indiana.
Whether it's an undrafted 6-10 forward such as Dean Wade or a top-10 pick in Deni Avdija, there are players LaRavia resembles who have found success in the NBA, and another big performance surely gives LaRavia more of a runway to convince scouts and evaluators that he's worthy of true first-round consideration like his productivity and versatility suggest. -- Schmitz
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: 2022 NBA Draft Talk: Never too soon
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,519
- And1: 6,594
- Joined: Dec 21, 2009
- Location: Land of Aus
-
Re: 2022 NBA Draft Talk: Never too soon
Is LaRavia 6-10? I thought he was 6-8.
If he is 6-10 that changes some things, but at 6-8 I had him pegged as a more athletic (or pre-injury?) Robbie Hummel. A guy that doesn't specialise in any one thing but does so many things at a high level.
He's worth one of our 2nds for sure. Not worth 19 and not sure if he's worth moving up for (if that's what it takes).
If he is 6-10 that changes some things, but at 6-8 I had him pegged as a more athletic (or pre-injury?) Robbie Hummel. A guy that doesn't specialise in any one thing but does so many things at a high level.
He's worth one of our 2nds for sure. Not worth 19 and not sure if he's worth moving up for (if that's what it takes).
Re: 2022 NBA Draft Talk: Never too soon
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,519
- And1: 6,594
- Joined: Dec 21, 2009
- Location: Land of Aus
-
Re: 2022 NBA Draft Talk: Never too soon
Klomp wrote:shangrila wrote:Chandler is interesting to me. Bit of a throwback PG at this point given how the league is trending towards combos there (even if he's more CP3/Deron Williams than Kidd/Rondo stylistically) but he's a good, in control playmaker that has good form on his shot (FT% should be a red flag but he's been a 90%-ish guy his whole career so I'd be willing to overlook it), is a good finisher around the rim (Hoop-Math has him at 59% which isn't elite, but still good) and seems to have great instincts and competitiveness on defence. He probably won't be a lockdown guy on that end due to his slight frame but I think, after some time in the weight room, he won't necessarily be hunted down there and should be a positive contributor from day 1 on that end regardless.
I hate to say it, especially since he's finally getting love, but Chandler might be the idealised version of Jordan McLaughlin; speedy PG that gets us into sets quickly, can finish at the rim, make shots, make good passes and competes defensively.
I really like the tempo he plays with.
Yeah, I think the only real knock on him is that he's 6ft with a slight frame in a league that's all about switching and bigger guards (which is ironic given how small bigs are getting).
Aside from that he ticks every box you'd want from a PG.
Re: 2022 NBA Draft Talk: Never too soon
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 69,116
- And1: 22,635
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: 2022 NBA Draft Talk: Never too soon
shangrila wrote:Is LaRavia 6-10? I thought he was 6-8.
If he is 6-10 that changes some things, but at 6-8 I had him pegged as a more athletic (or pre-injury?) Robbie Hummel. A guy that doesn't specialise in any one thing but does so many things at a high level.
He's worth one of our 2nds for sure. Not worth 19 and not sure if he's worth moving up for (if that's what it takes).
He's 6'8" (the 6'10" was referring to Wade)
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: 2022 NBA Draft Talk: Never too soon
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,682
- And1: 5,187
- Joined: Jan 28, 2011
- Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
-
Re: 2022 NBA Draft Talk: Never too soon
Klomp wrote:shangrila wrote:Is LaRavia 6-10? I thought he was 6-8.
If he is 6-10 that changes some things, but at 6-8 I had him pegged as a more athletic (or pre-injury?) Robbie Hummel. A guy that doesn't specialise in any one thing but does so many things at a high level.
He's worth one of our 2nds for sure. Not worth 19 and not sure if he's worth moving up for (if that's what it takes).
He's 6'8" (the 6'10" was referring to Wade)
I have psychological trauma, after watching for many years Chase Budinger, Robbie Hummel, Jake Layman. Always liked their skillset, but they never lived up expectations.
Re: 2022 NBA Draft Talk: Never too soon
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,971
- And1: 2,385
- Joined: May 20, 2009
-
Re: 2022 NBA Draft Talk: Never too soon
I've mentioned LaRivia, I'd be fine with him in the 2nd round. He has skills, good shooter, and he's young for his draft class.
Re: 2022 NBA Draft Talk: Never too soon
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 69,116
- And1: 22,635
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: 2022 NBA Draft Talk: Never too soon
minimus wrote:I have psychological trauma, after watching for many years Chase Budinger, Robbie Hummel, Jake Layman. Always liked their skillset, but they never lived up expectations.
We never really had the top-end talent for them to play off.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: 2022 NBA Draft Talk: Never too soon
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 69,116
- And1: 22,635
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: 2022 NBA Draft Talk: Never too soon
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves