ImageImageImage

Adelman wants a "very aggressive" off season

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Adelman wants a "very aggressive" off season 

Post#41 » by Krapinsky » Thu Apr 26, 2012 1:12 am

Narf wrote:
Krapinsky wrote:Your reliance on these stats is flawed. By this logic Joakim Noah is a bad defender since Chicago is 7 points better defensively when he is of the court. Your stats ignore Wallace's impact and the Noah stats ignore Asik/Gibson's impact, among other rotation players.

Your understanding of these stats is the problem.

Ask any Bulls fan who's defense is better, Asik's or Noah's. Then you'll figure out why Chicago is better defensively when Noah is on the bench.

I'm just showing you that year in and year out when Batum is on the floor Portland's defense is terrible. And there's no arguing it either.


You either didn't read my post or failed to comprehend. The fact that Chicago is better defensively with Noah on the bench (true) does not make Noah a bad defender. In fact, it doesn't say anything about Noah defensively, only that the Bulls second unit (w/ Asik) is better defensively then the first unit (w/ Noah), and it certainly does not help you compare Noah to other defensive centers.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.

NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
Narf
Head Coach
Posts: 6,550
And1: 882
Joined: Sep 05, 2009

Re: Adelman wants a "very aggressive" off season 

Post#42 » by Narf » Thu Apr 26, 2012 1:21 am

Krapinsky wrote:You either didn't read my post or failed to comprehend. The fact that Chicago is better defensively with Noah on the bench (true) does not make Noah a bad defender. In fact, it doesn't say anything about Noah defensively, only that the Bulls second unit (w/ Asik) is better defensively then the first unit (w/ Noah), and it certainly does not help you compare Noah to other defensive centers.

I comprehend just fine.
Batum is not a good defender. 102 points per 100 possessions (Noah) good. 110 per 100 possessions (Batum) bad. I wasn't showing you the +/-, I was showing you that Batum is a consistently overrated defender regardless of how good or bad the rest of his team is. And not just overrated, but poor. He's a poor defender.

Also, Batum is guarding the other team's SF with Wes Matthews guarding the SG. Matthews is not guarding Artest while Batum guards Kobe.
NewWolvesOrder
Head Coach
Posts: 6,943
And1: 1,262
Joined: Dec 20, 2008

Re: Adelman wants a "very aggressive" off season 

Post#43 » by NewWolvesOrder » Thu Apr 26, 2012 1:33 am

Williams and Darko for Varejao

Wes for Prince

Webster, Miller and Utah and Mem' pick for Iguodala.



Rubio/Ridnour
Iggy/Barea
Prince/Iggy/Tolliver
Love/Vareajao/Tolliver
Pekovic/Varejao


Is it good enough for a deep playoff run?
moss_is_1
RealGM
Posts: 10,971
And1: 2,385
Joined: May 20, 2009
   

Re: Adelman wants a "very aggressive" off season 

Post#44 » by moss_is_1 » Thu Apr 26, 2012 1:36 am

Turnover_21 wrote:Williams and Darko for Varejao

Wes for Prince

Webster, Miller and Utah and Mem' pick for Iguodala.



Rubio/Ridnour
Iggy/Barea
Prince/Iggy/Tolliver
Love/Vareajao/Tolliver
Pekovic/Varejao


Is it good enough for a deep playoff run?

DId you mix up Webster / Miller with Williams? No way in Hell I trade Derrick Williams for AV
NewWolvesOrder
Head Coach
Posts: 6,943
And1: 1,262
Joined: Dec 20, 2008

Re: Adelman wants a "very aggressive" off season 

Post#45 » by NewWolvesOrder » Thu Apr 26, 2012 1:41 am

To pawn a negative(Darko) you need to combine it with something good(Williams) to get a positive return. Besides, AV is the kind of big man that we need to become a respectable playoff team.
moss_is_1
RealGM
Posts: 10,971
And1: 2,385
Joined: May 20, 2009
   

Re: Adelman wants a "very aggressive" off season 

Post#46 » by moss_is_1 » Thu Apr 26, 2012 1:43 am

We shouldn't have to add value to dump Darko, we can just amnesty him.
NewWolvesOrder
Head Coach
Posts: 6,943
And1: 1,262
Joined: Dec 20, 2008

Re: Adelman wants a "very aggressive" off season 

Post#47 » by NewWolvesOrder » Thu Apr 26, 2012 1:46 am

moss_is_1 wrote:We shouldn't have to add value to dump Darko, we can just amnesty him.


I think Taylor will take any trade before amnesty and AV is exactly the type of player Adelman would love.
User avatar
Grits n Gravy
General Manager
Posts: 9,627
And1: 1,804
Joined: Feb 22, 2010
Location: New Zealand
 

Re: Adelman wants a "very aggressive" off season 

Post#48 » by Grits n Gravy » Thu Apr 26, 2012 1:46 am

Turnover_21 wrote:To pawn a negative(Darko) you need to combine it with something good(Williams) to get a positive return. Besides, AV is the kind of big man that we need to become a respectable playoff team.

he's earning 10 million or so a year isn't he? can we afford to pay that for a bench guy with pek coming up for an extension next year? i think we need to invest funds in wings rather than more front court help where we are pretty set imo
NewWolvesOrder
Head Coach
Posts: 6,943
And1: 1,262
Joined: Dec 20, 2008

Re: Adelman wants a "very aggressive" off season 

Post#49 » by NewWolvesOrder » Thu Apr 26, 2012 1:49 am

Grits n Gravy wrote:
Turnover_21 wrote:To pawn a negative(Darko) you need to combine it with something good(Williams) to get a positive return. Besides, AV is the kind of big man that we need to become a respectable playoff team.

he's earning 10 million or so a year isn't he? can we afford to pay that for a bench guy with pek coming up for an extension next year? i think we need to invest funds in wings rather than more front court help where we are pretty set imo


8,368,182 9,036,364 9,704,595 for the next 3 seasons, he never reaches 10 mil. His impact is more significant than any obtainable wing.
Narf
Head Coach
Posts: 6,550
And1: 882
Joined: Sep 05, 2009

Re: Adelman wants a "very aggressive" off season 

Post#50 » by Narf » Thu Apr 26, 2012 1:50 am

Turnover_21 wrote:
Grits n Gravy wrote:
Turnover_21 wrote:To pawn a negative(Darko) you need to combine it with something good(Williams) to get a positive return. Besides, AV is the kind of big man that we need to become a respectable playoff team.

he's earning 10 million or so a year isn't he? can we afford to pay that for a bench guy with pek coming up for an extension next year? i think we need to invest funds in wings rather than more front court help where we are pretty set imo


8,368,182 9,036,364 9,704,595 for the next 3 seasons, he never reaches 10 mil. His impact is more significant than any obtainable wing.

Bigger impact than Iggy?
NewWolvesOrder
Head Coach
Posts: 6,943
And1: 1,262
Joined: Dec 20, 2008

Re: Adelman wants a "very aggressive" off season 

Post#51 » by NewWolvesOrder » Thu Apr 26, 2012 1:52 am

Yes, i believe so.

Iggy is the guy who's grossly overpaid, AV is paid just about right.
User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Adelman wants a "very aggressive" off season 

Post#52 » by Krapinsky » Thu Apr 26, 2012 1:54 am

Narf wrote:I comprehend just fine.
Batum is not a good defender. 102 points per 100 possessions (Noah) good. 110 per 100 possessions (Batum) bad. I wasn't showing you the +/-, I was showing you that Batum is a consistently overrated defender regardless of how good or bad the rest of his team is. And not just overrated, but poor. He's a poor defender.

Agree to disagree then.

Narf wrote:
Also, Batum is guarding the other team's SF with Wes Matthews guarding the SG. Matthews is not guarding Artest while Batum guards Kobe.


Batum has been guarding Kobe most of the time they face face off dating back to 2010. Batum doesn't play as many minutes as Kobe so Matthews will get matched up with him here and there.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.

NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
NewWolvesOrder
Head Coach
Posts: 6,943
And1: 1,262
Joined: Dec 20, 2008

Re: Adelman wants a "very aggressive" off season 

Post#53 » by NewWolvesOrder » Thu Apr 26, 2012 1:57 am

A few DW trades

DW, Darko for Prince and their pick

DW for Matthews and blazers pick
moss_is_1
RealGM
Posts: 10,971
And1: 2,385
Joined: May 20, 2009
   

Re: Adelman wants a "very aggressive" off season 

Post#54 » by moss_is_1 » Thu Apr 26, 2012 1:58 am

I just don't see the point in trading D-will unless we are packaging him with someone else. No need to break him down, IMO.
NewWolvesOrder
Head Coach
Posts: 6,943
And1: 1,262
Joined: Dec 20, 2008

Re: Adelman wants a "very aggressive" off season 

Post#55 » by NewWolvesOrder » Thu Apr 26, 2012 2:06 am

So is this team good enough to make noise?

Rubio/Ridnour
Iggy/Barea
Prince/Iggy/Tolliver
Love/Vareajao/Tolliver
Pekovic/Varejao
User avatar
AQuintus
RealGM
Posts: 10,425
And1: 2,458
Joined: Jan 10, 2008
Location: But let me speak for the weak, I mean the rookies
   

Re: Adelman wants a "very aggressive" off season 

Post#56 » by AQuintus » Thu Apr 26, 2012 2:14 am

Turnover_21 wrote:So is this team good enough to make noise?

Rubio/Ridnour
Iggy/Barea
Prince/Iggy/Tolliver
Love/Vareajao/Tolliver
Pekovic/Varejao


Probably not. Iggy and Prince is really redundant, and so is Barea and Ridnour. Assuming we can get Iggy without giving up Williams, we'd be much better off trading Williams for a SG like Eric Gordon or Bradley Beal.

Assuming that Portland's pick (from New Jersey) is in line to get Beal, then a deal of Williams (plus Utah's pick) for Matthews and the New Jersey pick would be good, though It would probably have to be a 3 team deal. As far as Prince + Detroit's pick, even if it is in line for Beal, I don't think I'd do it. As much as I like Prince, I don't think that his play justifies his contract, so I'd consider him negative value.

Rubio/ Barea
Matthews/ Beal
Iggy/ Matthews
Love/ ??? (Ridnour trade and/or cap space)
Pekovic/ ??? (Ridnour trade and/or cap space) ...

... would probably be a pretty good team.
Image
NewWolvesOrder
Head Coach
Posts: 6,943
And1: 1,262
Joined: Dec 20, 2008

Re: Adelman wants a "very aggressive" off season 

Post#57 » by NewWolvesOrder » Thu Apr 26, 2012 2:23 am

Portland would never trade Matthews and Beal for Williams and a mid pick(which will have to go to Philly anyway), who will be their SG? Your lineup lack a good big. Varejao is the man. And how Iggy and Prince are redundant?
User avatar
AQuintus
RealGM
Posts: 10,425
And1: 2,458
Joined: Jan 10, 2008
Location: But let me speak for the weak, I mean the rookies
   

Re: Adelman wants a "very aggressive" off season 

Post#58 » by AQuintus » Thu Apr 26, 2012 2:29 am

Turnover_21 wrote:Portland would never trade Matthews and Beal for Williams and a mid pick(which will have to go to Philly anyway), who will be their SG?


Probably not, but that's the only way I'd do that trade.

Your lineup lack a good big.


Love and Pekovic?

Varejao is the man.


Love - 36 mpg
Pekovic - 33 mpg

That leaves a maximum of 27 mpg for Varejao; that's not enough to justify his contract.

And how Iggy and Prince are redundant?


They're both SFs, neither is a great outside shooter, and neither is a scoring threat. They're both defensive role-players, extremely good role-players (especially Iggy), but role-players nonetheless. We need a scoring threat on the wings to take pressure off of Love and Pek.
Image
NewWolvesOrder
Head Coach
Posts: 6,943
And1: 1,262
Joined: Dec 20, 2008

Re: Adelman wants a "very aggressive" off season 

Post#59 » by NewWolvesOrder » Thu Apr 26, 2012 2:38 am

AQuintus wrote:
Your lineup lack a good big.


Love and Pekovic?

So you want to get through the season and playoffs just with 2 good bigs?

Varejao is the man.


Love - 36 mpg
Pekovic - 33 mpg

That leaves a maximum of 27 mpg for Varejao; that's not enough to justify his contract.

Love 36, Pek 30, AV 30 if everybody healthy but it's not realistic, so their mpg will be higher

And how Iggy and Prince are redundant?


They're both SFs, neither is a great outside shooter, and neither is a scoring threat. They're both defensive role-players, extremely good role-players (especially Iggy), but role-players nonetheless. We need a scoring threat on the wings to take pressure off of Love and Pek.


Iggy is almost 40% 3pts this season, Prince is 36,5%, they have been better than anything we had bar Beasley. iguodala can get you 15 ppg easily, so can Prince.
User avatar
Breakdown777
Veteran
Posts: 2,759
And1: 47
Joined: Sep 17, 2009
Location: MN

Re: Adelman wants a "very aggressive" off season 

Post#60 » by Breakdown777 » Thu Apr 26, 2012 2:45 am

AQuintus wrote:They're both SFs, neither is a great outside shooter, and neither is a scoring threat. They're both defensive role-players, extremely good role-players (especially Iggy), but role-players nonetheless. We need a scoring threat on the wings to take pressure off of Love and Pek.


Iggy can be a scoring threat, especially if Rubio is opening things up for everyone.
I think that if Wes can unlearn his mechanics this year and start canning 3's like his rookie season, having Iggy/Wes on the wings could be very solid methinks. But then again, I'm a Wes believer and almost everyone here hates him.
"Llevaré mi talento a Minnesota".

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves