minimus wrote:3) one big issue is bench play. When starters play, they are in top-10 in rebounds, when our bench plays they are 35th in rebounds. To me is something they need to figure out, our bench players still dont play fast enough, still dont recognise their advantages as fast pace group. In some sense they ARE a small ball unit, but they dont play like smallball unit AND get killed in defense like a small units do. Both Ingles and Conley are struggling mightily, I think at some point Finch will have to make a decision about their role and playing time.
The Naz/Randle lineups are very bad right now. Offensively it's fine, but defensively it's a complete mess. Last year the Naz/KAT lineups had their flaws, but they got by by being big and high effort. It culminated in that incredible playoff performance when Gobert sat out a game against Denver. Our dual-big lineups were always a defensive plus. (Plus we could play SloMo as a big whenver we wanted).
So far it's looking like we've lost that advantage. Gobert/Naz is still very good (60 minutes so far), but Gobert/Randle isn't good, and Naz/Randle is a complete disaster.
Our perimeter defense hasn't been amazing yet but I'm confident that's going to come along. I'm pretty shocked by how awful Randle's low effort style of defense breaks our system so far. We have a sad 119 Drtg (-2.7 net) in his 177 minutes. In 63 non-Randle minutes, we're 102.3 Drtg (+8.1 net). Yet everyone is raving about how his offensive style makes us look less clunky.