ILC wrote:Would love KD btw, one of my all time favs, but they need a point guard BAD
In modern NBA you can get playmaking from any position. Even from bigman.
Moderators: Domejandro, Calinks, Worm Guts
ILC wrote:Would love KD btw, one of my all time favs, but they need a point guard BAD
minimus wrote:ILC wrote:Would love KD btw, one of my all time favs, but they need a point guard BAD
In modern NBA you can get playmaking from any position. Even from bigman.
BlacJacMac wrote:minimus wrote:ILC wrote:Would love KD btw, one of my all time favs, but they need a point guard BAD
In modern NBA you can get playmaking from any position. Even from bigman.
Sure. But that guy isn't on our roster either.
minimus wrote:BlacJacMac wrote:minimus wrote:
In modern NBA you can get playmaking from any position. Even from bigman.
Sure. But that guy isn't on our roster either.
Sure, but you can kind of compensate lack of true PG. See TOR example from championship year. Gasol gave them some playmaking, Lowry and FVV were both comboguards, Kawai gave something.
Klomp wrote:ILC wrote:Two years in a row the biggest obstacle for this team in the playoffs has been the lack of easy offense. They can get enough stops when they need to, but offense is poking your eyes out bad and it's because they have no one who can reliably touch the paint every possession down.
Kevin Durant can get some of the easiest offense in the league by himself
LarryBirdsFingr wrote:Redemption. Water into wine....rondo is Jesus
Guest84 wrote:Posting for the details regarding the trade they discussed
;si=78h_DujkJwvVQ4RE
ILC wrote:Klomp wrote:ILC wrote:Two years in a row the biggest obstacle for this team in the playoffs has been the lack of easy offense. They can get enough stops when they need to, but offense is poking your eyes out bad and it's because they have no one who can reliably touch the paint every possession down.
Kevin Durant can get some of the easiest offense in the league by himself
Not when the whole defense clamps down on him like the Wolves did two years ago on him and Booker. A starting level point guard is a MUST
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
BlacJacMac wrote:minimus wrote:BlacJacMac wrote:
Sure. But that guy isn't on our roster either.
Sure, but you can kind of compensate lack of true PG. See TOR example from championship year. Gasol gave them some playmaking, Lowry and FVV were both comboguards, Kawai gave something.
Sure. So we still need to add high level playmakers.
shrink wrote:Guest84 wrote:Posting for the details regarding the trade they discussed
;si=78h_DujkJwvVQ4RE
I’m going to spare people from having to listen to big takes from Judd and Mackey, who don’t educate themselves on basketball, and just post what they remembered or Zach Lowe’s trade proposal to discuss.
MIN GETS: Kevin Durant, Nick Claxton Nikola Jovic
MIN SENDS: Julius Randle, Rudy Gobert, Donte DiVincenzo, Rob Dillingham,
PHX GETS: Rudy Gobert, Donte DiVincenzo, Rob Dillingham
PHX GIVES: Kevin Durant
MIA GETS: Julius Randle
MIA GIVES: Duncan Robinson Nikola Jovic, Kevin Love, Future 1st
BRK GETS: Duncan Robinson, Kevin Love, Future protected Miami 1st,
BRK GIVES: Nick Claxton
Then some Nickiel Alexander-Walker sign and trade for Lonzo Ball.
minimus wrote:BlacJacMac wrote:minimus wrote:
Sure, but you can kind of compensate lack of true PG. See TOR example from championship year. Gasol gave them some playmaking, Lowry and FVV were both comboguards, Kawai gave something.
Sure. So we still need to add high level playmakers.
Sure, one of them is KD. Another one could be Lonzo Ball or Tyus Jones type of low profile player. I feel like fans want high caliber PG like Garland which I would not expect.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
younggunsmn wrote:Honestly though with Connelly's recent history I'm ready to wake up any day now to the news that TC traded for Durant and included 17,31, '28 pickswap, Dillingham, and TJ Shannon.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Klomp wrote:younggunsmn wrote:Honestly though with Connelly's recent history I'm ready to wake up any day now to the news that TC traded for Durant and included 17,31, '28 pickswap, Dillingham, and TJ Shannon.
So you'd be mad about trading for a 28 ppg scorer without giving up a single rotation player?
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Klomp wrote:
Klomp wrote:younggunsmn wrote:Honestly though with Connelly's recent history I'm ready to wake up any day now to the news that TC traded for Durant and included 17,31, '28 pickswap, Dillingham, and TJ Shannon.
So you'd be mad about trading for a 28 ppg scorer without giving up a single rotation player?
younggunsmn wrote:Klomp wrote:younggunsmn wrote:Honestly though with Connelly's recent history I'm ready to wake up any day now to the news that TC traded for Durant and included 17,31, '28 pickswap, Dillingham, and TJ Shannon.
So you'd be mad about trading for a 28 ppg scorer without giving up a single rotation player?
Um thats pretty much every single cheap young asset we will have for the next 7 years for a 37 year old.
Or what you call a TIm Connelly special.
I'd be mad if we traded for Durant and one or both of Randle/Gobert DIDNT go out the door for him.
Getting rid of them is a key PERK of the trade for me.
TimberKat wrote:younggunsmn wrote:Klomp wrote:So you'd be mad about trading for a 28 ppg scorer without giving up a single rotation player?
Um thats pretty much every single cheap young asset we will have for the next 7 years for a 37 year old.
Or what you call a TIm Connelly special.
I'd be mad if we traded for Durant and one or both of Randle/Gobert DIDNT go out the door for him.
Getting rid of them is a key PERK of the trade for me.
Why do we want cheap young assets when we are going from conference finals to NBA finals? You can also trade Ant for 6#1s and rebuild.
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves