ImageImageImage

Ben Simmons Thread (READ FIRST POST)

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

Baseline81
Analyst
Posts: 3,270
And1: 1,908
Joined: Jan 18, 2009

Re: Ben Simmons Thread (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#461 » by Baseline81 » Wed Sep 1, 2021 10:11 pm

jpatrick wrote:It’s all posturing. I think the Spurs, Warriors, and Kings are all very interested. Wiggins wouldn’t be the centerpiece, Kuminga, Wiseman, and Moody would be.

I could see something like:

Wiggins, Moody, Kuminga, and 2 protected Charlotte picks to the 76ers.
Wiseman to Charlotte
Simmons to GSW.

Would give 76ers young pieces/picks to flip if/when a star becomes available.

What’s sad is that I think Wiggins has equal or more value than DLo, which makes giving up the #7 pick hurt.

Charlotte traded for Kai Jones. I'm not sure the Hornets would give up more picks for Wiseman.
KGdaBom
RealGM
Posts: 23,163
And1: 6,301
Joined: Jun 22, 2017
         

Re: Ben Simmons Thread (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#462 » by KGdaBom » Wed Sep 1, 2021 10:18 pm

shrink wrote:I happen to visit the GSW area. They asked whether they wanted Simmons, and 80% voted no.

They say that until they get him. Then 90% will say yes. It's a lot like so many Wolves fans saying they wouldn't trade McDaniels for Simmons. Being loyal to who you got now.
Calinks
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 50,348
And1: 17,275
Joined: Mar 29, 2006
   

Re: Ben Simmons Thread (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#463 » by Calinks » Wed Sep 1, 2021 10:23 pm

packforfreedom wrote:
TwolvesFanRome wrote:I would be very happy with Simmons but please don't let go McDaniels....


It would be nice but I think it's almost impossible. We actually might get Simmons, but it will be more expensive than many people on this board think.

I'd say that Beas, Prince or Bev, a couple of 1sts or swaps, McDaniels or Naz is the price we'd need to pay. Maybe even Dlo instead of one of the assets mentioned before.

Yea he's not coming cheap. I think McDaniels is pretty much a guarantee to go. Only exception may be if they covet Dlo.
When luck shuts the door skill comes in through the window.
Calinks
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 50,348
And1: 17,275
Joined: Mar 29, 2006
   

Re: Ben Simmons Thread (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#464 » by Calinks » Wed Sep 1, 2021 10:30 pm

KGdaBom wrote:
shrink wrote:I happen to visit the GSW area. They asked whether they wanted Simmons, and 80% voted no.

They say that until they get him. Then 90% will say yes. It's a lot like so many Wolves fans saying they wouldn't trade McDaniels for Simmons. Being loyal to who you got now.

Yep. Fans almost always overate their talent and underate other teams talent. I am not sold on Simmons but I don't doubt he would be a massive upgrade over anything we have outside of Towns or Ant's potential. This is a DPOTY candidate player we haven't seen that here since KG. That's a massive addition. Logically McDaniels shouldn't even factor in to that, maybe not Edwards either. I will be sad if we lose some pieces but I'll going nuts rooting for Simmons as soon as the season starts (unless he's just awful for some reason).
When luck shuts the door skill comes in through the window.
SO_MONEY
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,799
And1: 1,032
Joined: Sep 11, 2009
         

Re: Ben Simmons Thread (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#465 » by SO_MONEY » Wed Sep 1, 2021 10:38 pm

KGdaBom wrote:
shrink wrote:I happen to visit the GSW area. They asked whether they wanted Simmons, and 80% voted no.

They say that until they get him. Then 90% will say yes. It's a lot like so many Wolves fans saying they wouldn't trade McDaniels for Simmons. Being loyal to who you got now.


I think if you trade much of anything for Simmons many fans will not be happy, it is not that they wouldn't trade McDaniels unconditionally, it is that they know Simmons is hot garbage (relative to his talent) with an albatross contract and don't see the value in targeting him.

I am going to be pretty irate if in the end the trade creates a hole in the starting lineup, we should only trade for him to round out the starting 5, not create a hole and give up ways to address it.

But I have faith we see all of this.
gandlogo
Senior
Posts: 554
And1: 419
Joined: Jun 14, 2017
Location: Fountain Inn, SC
     

Re: Ben Simmons Thread (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#466 » by gandlogo » Wed Sep 1, 2021 10:51 pm

SO_MONEY wrote:
KGdaBom wrote:
shrink wrote:I happen to visit the GSW area. They asked whether they wanted Simmons, and 80% voted no.

They say that until they get him. Then 90% will say yes. It's a lot like so many Wolves fans saying they wouldn't trade McDaniels for Simmons. Being loyal to who you got now.


I think if you trade much of anything for Simmons many fans will not be happy, it is not that they wouldn't trade McDaniels unconditionally, it is that they know Simmons is hot garbage (relative to his talent) with an albatross contract and don't see the value in targeting him.

I am going to be pretty irate if in the end the trade creates a hole in the starting lineup, we should only trade for him to round out the starting 5, not create a hole and give up ways to address it.

But I have faith we see all of this.


User avatar
D1SGRUNTL3D
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,104
And1: 2,080
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Location: Minnesota
   

Re: Ben Simmons Thread (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#467 » by D1SGRUNTL3D » Wed Sep 1, 2021 10:58 pm

KGdaBom wrote:
jpatrick wrote:It’s all posturing. I think the Spurs, Warriors, and Kings are all very interested. Wiggins wouldn’t be the centerpiece, Kuminga, Wiseman, and Moody would be.

I could see something like:

Wiggins, Moody, Kuminga, and 2 protected Charlotte picks to the 76ers.
Wiseman to Charlotte
Simmons to GSW.

Would give 76ers young pieces/picks to flip if/when a star becomes available.

What’s sad is that I think Wiggins has equal or more value than DLo, which makes giving up the #7 pick hurt.

I believe Russell has more value than Wiggins and much more value to us. Wiggins just a terrible fit on the Wolves.

You could make that assumption with every team
User avatar
moonpie
General Manager
Posts: 9,017
And1: 2,692
Joined: Dec 14, 2010
     

Re: Ben Simmons Thread (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#468 » by moonpie » Wed Sep 1, 2021 11:10 pm

Read on Twitter
KGdaBom
RealGM
Posts: 23,163
And1: 6,301
Joined: Jun 22, 2017
         

Re: Ben Simmons Thread (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#469 » by KGdaBom » Wed Sep 1, 2021 11:16 pm

moonpie wrote:
Read on Twitter

Once again. It doesn't mean much. Posturing by both teams. If a trade is made they will meet in the middle.
SO_MONEY
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,799
And1: 1,032
Joined: Sep 11, 2009
         

Re: Ben Simmons Thread (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#470 » by SO_MONEY » Wed Sep 1, 2021 11:17 pm

moonpie wrote:
Read on Twitter


Teams just don't want to give up a lot with all his negatives, it is going to be difficult changing teams minds...or let's face it, next to impossible.
KGdaBom
RealGM
Posts: 23,163
And1: 6,301
Joined: Jun 22, 2017
         

Re: Ben Simmons Thread (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#471 » by KGdaBom » Wed Sep 1, 2021 11:19 pm

gandlogo wrote:
SO_MONEY wrote:
KGdaBom wrote:They say that until they get him. Then 90% will say yes. It's a lot like so many Wolves fans saying they wouldn't trade McDaniels for Simmons. Being loyal to who you got now.


I think if you trade much of anything for Simmons many fans will not be happy, it is not that they wouldn't trade McDaniels unconditionally, it is that they know Simmons is hot garbage (relative to his talent) with an albatross contract and don't see the value in targeting him.

I am going to be pretty irate if in the end the trade creates a hole in the starting lineup, we should only trade for him to round out the starting 5, not create a hole and give up ways to address it.

But I have faith we see all of this.



So Money I am going to ask a small favor of you. Please don't reply to my posts. If somebody else replies reply to them all you want. Just like I reply to somebody who has replied to yours.
SO_MONEY
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,799
And1: 1,032
Joined: Sep 11, 2009
         

Re: Ben Simmons Thread (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#472 » by SO_MONEY » Wed Sep 1, 2021 11:31 pm

KGdaBom wrote:
gandlogo wrote:
SO_MONEY wrote:
I think if you trade much of anything for Simmons many fans will not be happy, it is not that they wouldn't trade McDaniels unconditionally, it is that they know Simmons is hot garbage (relative to his talent) with an albatross contract and don't see the value in targeting him.

I am going to be pretty irate if in the end the trade creates a hole in the starting lineup, we should only trade for him to round out the starting 5, not create a hole and give up ways to address it.

But I have faith we see all of this.



So Money I am going to ask a small favor of you. Please don't reply to my posts. If somebody else replies reply to them all you want. Just like I reply to somebody who has replied to yours.


Respectfully, I don't look at who is posting all that often, nor do feel I have done anything wrong, so you can figure out what you want to do from here, because it sounds like a personal problem.
KGdaBom
RealGM
Posts: 23,163
And1: 6,301
Joined: Jun 22, 2017
         

Re: Ben Simmons Thread (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#473 » by KGdaBom » Wed Sep 1, 2021 11:33 pm

Clearly not going to honor my request.
Howard Cosell
Rookie
Posts: 1,181
And1: 313
Joined: Jun 01, 2013

Re: Ben Simmons Thread (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#474 » by Howard Cosell » Wed Sep 1, 2021 11:39 pm

I think everyone is going to have to get themselves ready mentally, emotionally and Twolves spiritually for the following things to happen:

McDaniels is gone.
Beasley is gone.
3 MN FRPs are gone.
Simmons is here.

All the other dots have not been connected.

But those 4 are happening.

Brace for impact.
jpatrick
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,738
And1: 1,960
Joined: May 30, 2007
 

Re: Ben Simmons Thread (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#475 » by jpatrick » Wed Sep 1, 2021 11:43 pm

SO_MONEY wrote:
moonpie wrote:
Read on Twitter


Teams just don't want to give up a lot with all his negatives, it is going to be difficult changing teams minds...or let's face it, next to impossible.


Fox for Simmons makes a lot of sense to me. Sacramento would still have Haliburton, Mitchell, and Hield in the backcourt with Simmons/Barnes at forward. Fox would give Philly another non-shooter but one that can give them some shot creation on the perimeter.

These articles are all posturing. Until they make a deal, they are publicly going to say they aren’t giving up anyone, only way to not upset your current roster if a deal doesn’t happen.
Neeva
Head Coach
Posts: 7,467
And1: 2,875
Joined: Jun 03, 2016

Re: Ben Simmons Thread (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#476 » by Neeva » Wed Sep 1, 2021 11:44 pm

Howard Cosell wrote:I think everyone is going to have to get themselves ready mentally, emotionally and Twolves spiritually for the following things to happen:

McDaniels is gone.
Beasley is gone.
3 MN FRPs are gone.
Simmons is here.

All the other dots have not been connected.

But those 4 are happening.

Brace for impact.


You are always wrong.
User avatar
moonpie
General Manager
Posts: 9,017
And1: 2,692
Joined: Dec 14, 2010
     

Re: Ben Simmons Thread (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#477 » by moonpie » Thu Sep 2, 2021 12:24 am

Read on Twitter
User avatar
D1SGRUNTL3D
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,104
And1: 2,080
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Location: Minnesota
   

Re: Ben Simmons Thread (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#478 » by D1SGRUNTL3D » Thu Sep 2, 2021 1:00 am

Howard Cosell wrote:I think everyone is going to have to get themselves ready mentally, emotionally and Twolves spiritually for the following things to happen:

McDaniels is gone.
Beasley is gone.
3 MN FRPs are gone.
Simmons is here.

All the other dots have not been connected.

But those 4 are happening.

Brace for impact.

We keep our main 3 and Beverly? Umm yes.
Slim Tubby
Veteran
Posts: 2,916
And1: 2,536
Joined: Jun 03, 2017
         

Re: Ben Simmons Thread (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#479 » by Slim Tubby » Thu Sep 2, 2021 1:05 am

SO_MONEY wrote:
Krapinsky wrote:
Slim Tubby wrote:
I'm thinking you're about spot on with what our Max Offer would be for Simmons but look at our roster before and after such a trade:

Before the Trade:

C KAT/Reid
PF McDaniels/Prince
SF Edwards/Okogie
SG Beasley/Nowell
PG Russell/Beverly

After the Trade:

C KAT/Reid
PF Simmons/Prince
SF Okogie/Bolmaro
SG Edwards/Nowell
PG Russell/McGlaughlin???

Our lack of depth after a Simmons trade would ensure the Wolves have the worst bench in the NBA. The Prince and Beverly acquisitions are being very underrated by many on the board IMO and we all love McDaniels' potential. They are very good NBA players and all three (3) will play extensive minutes for the team this year if they stay.

Acquiring Simmons would bring a sense of excitement to the franchise and we'd certainly get a ton of national media coverage compared to what we normally receive. I'm just not convinced that the trade MPLSwolves listed above would really improve the team and I haven't even factored in Ben's borderline bad contract. When the dust settles, I think Simmons ends up in SAC.

I would make Milsap a priority signing with the full MLE 2-year deal. I really like the balance and flexibility of the resulting roster:

C KAT/Reid
PF Milsap/Prince
SF McDaniels/Okogie
SG Edwards/Beasley
PG Russell/Beverly

I apologize in advance for such a long post.


I don't put much stock in these guys because they are on expiring deals. Maybe they provide depth this season, but we need to have a longer term outlook than that.


Beverly specifically isn't going to play "extensive" minutes.

I’ll be stunned if Beverly doesn’t average at least 20 minutes per game, some of which will be next to Russell.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Glen Taylor: "Is this moron #1 (Layden)? Put moron #2 (Thibs) on the phone."
Slim Tubby
Veteran
Posts: 2,916
And1: 2,536
Joined: Jun 03, 2017
         

Re: Ben Simmons Thread (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#480 » by Slim Tubby » Thu Sep 2, 2021 1:07 am

Krapinsky wrote:
Slim Tubby wrote:
MPLSwolves wrote:Beasely, Beverly, McDaniels, Unprotected 2022 FRP, 2022 SRP (Washington).

I wouldn't offer more than this, and because of that, I think Toronto might beat us -- Toronto fans are throwing out Siakam plus other attractive assets, which I think beats our package.

I don't want to give up D'Lo for Simmons.


I'm thinking you're about spot on with what our Max Offer would be for Simmons but look at our roster before and after such a trade:

Before the Trade:

C KAT/Reid
PF McDaniels/Prince
SF Edwards/Okogie
SG Beasley/Nowell
PG Russell/Beverly

After the Trade:

C KAT/Reid
PF Simmons/Prince
SF Okogie/Bolmaro
SG Edwards/Nowell
PG Russell/McGlaughlin???

Our lack of depth after a Simmons trade would ensure the Wolves have the worst bench in the NBA. The Prince and Beverly acquisitions are being very underrated by many on the board IMO and we all love McDaniels' potential. They are very good NBA players and all three (3) will play extensive minutes for the team this year if they stay.

Acquiring Simmons would bring a sense of excitement to the franchise and we'd certainly get a ton of national media coverage compared to what we normally receive. I'm just not convinced that the trade MPLSwolves listed above would really improve the team and I haven't even factored in Ben's borderline bad contract. When the dust settles, I think Simmons ends up in SAC.

I would make Milsap a priority signing with the full MLE 2-year deal. I really like the balance and flexibility of the resulting roster:

C KAT/Reid
PF Milsap/Prince
SF McDaniels/Okogie
SG Edwards/Beasley
PG Russell/Beverly

I apologize in advance for such a long post.


I don't put much stock in these guys because they are on expiring deals. Maybe they provide depth this season, but we need to have a longer term outlook than that.

My insight was for this season only but I agree 100% on your long term vision and line of thinking.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Glen Taylor: "Is this moron #1 (Layden)? Put moron #2 (Thibs) on the phone."

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves