winforlose wrote:TimberKat wrote:younggunsmn wrote:
Um thats pretty much every single cheap young asset we will have for the next 7 years for a 37 year old.
Or what you call a TIm Connelly special.
I'd be mad if we traded for Durant and one or both of Randle/Gobert DIDNT go out the door for him.
Getting rid of them is a key PERK of the trade for me.
Why do we want cheap young assets when we are going from conference finals to NBA finals? You can also trade Ant for 6#1s and rebuild.
What if KD leaves next year. We lose whatever we sent out, we still have enough salary on the books to make it hard to add more, and we are not a contender anymore. This is how good teams like the Suns turn into disasters, like the Suns. TC already made one very bad trade sending Karl out, (a trade which turned the Rudy trade from valuable to terrible instantly,) and now you want him to make another that almost certainly loses Ant in 2 or 3 years.
You know why Dlo for Mike at that price was offered to us? It was because Mike’s salary slot was a dead end and we would struggle to add a starting PG. We are at the same spot now with KD, and that dead end is fatal to the Ant contention window.
So, we don't make the KD trade, we have all those young players to develop. We make the play-in for the next two years then what? You sure we have an all star besides Ant on the roster? What are we compare the KD scenario to?












