ImageImageImage

Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

moss_is_1
RealGM
Posts: 10,971
And1: 2,385
Joined: May 20, 2009
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#461 » by moss_is_1 » Thu Jun 12, 2025 4:12 am

shrink wrote:Ok, this might be an incredibly embarrassing idea, but I’ve been wondering how aggressive HOU gets at consolidating if SAS steps in and gets Kevin Durant. On draft night ..

HOU GETS: Julius Randle
MIN GETS: Jabari Smith + Reed Sheppard + Jock Londale + $2 mil in payroll relief


WHY HOU MIGHT: The Rockets were a good defensive team last year, but only 12th in OFF RTG. They start 6-6 Dillon Brooks at PF. They drafted Jabari Smith and Sheppard very highly, but neither start - Sheppard is deeply buried. These players have upside, but are very expensive from their high picks, and Jabari needs a new contract, Are they ready to abandon their lottery picks in exchange for cleaner books, and a starter? This also steals from a western contender.

WHY MIN MIGHT: They gamble that one of these two lottery picks is going to pay off. Sheppard might become the PG we need, Jabari continues as a back up PF behind Naz, and Londale is useful as a back up center. Maybe allows us to keep NAW.

Conley, Sheppard, Dillingham. (And Conley gradually fades out after this year)
Ant, DiVincenzo, Clark
McDaniels, NAW, TSJ
Naz, Jabari, LMiller
Gobert, Londale, Garza

On the downside, these guys are expensive Sheppard ($10.6, Jabari $12.3) , and it gives us 13 guys that need minutes. However, it could lead to a good young group around Ant in two years. Maybe we ship off TSJ and Clark for future late picks.

I would love it, but im not sure Houston would be willing to move off Sheppard so fast. Funny enough, Reeds game kind of reminded me of Conley coming out.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,421
And1: 19,471
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#462 » by shrink » Thu Jun 12, 2025 4:18 am

moss_is_1 wrote:
shrink wrote:Ok, this might be an incredibly embarrassing idea, but I’ve been wondering how aggressive HOU gets at consolidating if SAS steps in and gets Kevin Durant. On draft night ..

HOU GETS: Julius Randle
MIN GETS: Jabari Smith + Reed Sheppard + Jock Londale + $2 mil in payroll relief


WHY HOU MIGHT: The Rockets were a good defensive team last year, but only 12th in OFF RTG. They start 6-6 Dillon Brooks at PF. They drafted Jabari Smith and Sheppard very highly, but neither start - Sheppard is deeply buried. These players have upside, but are very expensive from their high picks, and Jabari needs a new contract, Are they ready to abandon their lottery picks in exchange for cleaner books, and a starter? This also steals from a western contender.

WHY MIN MIGHT: They gamble that one of these two lottery picks is going to pay off. Sheppard might become the PG we need, Jabari continues as a back up PF behind Naz, and Londale is useful as a back up center. Maybe allows us to keep NAW.

Conley, Sheppard, Dillingham. (And Conley gradually fades out after this year)
Ant, DiVincenzo, Clark
McDaniels, NAW, TSJ
Naz, Jabari, LMiller
Gobert, Londale, Garza

On the downside, these guys are expensive Sheppard ($10.6, Jabari $12.3) , and it gives us 13 guys that need minutes. However, it could lead to a good young group around Ant in two years. Maybe we ship off TSJ and Clark for future late picks.

I would love it, but im not sure Houston would be willing to move off Sheppard so fast. Funny enough, Reeds game kind of reminded me of Conley coming out.

Some on the Trade Board are talking $25-30 mil for Jabari next year, which scares the hell out of me.
moss_is_1
RealGM
Posts: 10,971
And1: 2,385
Joined: May 20, 2009
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#463 » by moss_is_1 » Thu Jun 12, 2025 4:26 am

shrink wrote:
moss_is_1 wrote:
shrink wrote:Ok, this might be an incredibly embarrassing idea, but I’ve been wondering how aggressive HOU gets at consolidating if SAS steps in and gets Kevin Durant. On draft night ..

HOU GETS: Julius Randle
MIN GETS: Jabari Smith + Reed Sheppard + Jock Londale + $2 mil in payroll relief


WHY HOU MIGHT: The Rockets were a good defensive team last year, but only 12th in OFF RTG. They start 6-6 Dillon Brooks at PF. They drafted Jabari Smith and Sheppard very highly, but neither start - Sheppard is deeply buried. These players have upside, but are very expensive from their high picks, and Jabari needs a new contract, Are they ready to abandon their lottery picks in exchange for cleaner books, and a starter? This also steals from a western contender.

WHY MIN MIGHT: They gamble that one of these two lottery picks is going to pay off. Sheppard might become the PG we need, Jabari continues as a back up PF behind Naz, and Londale is useful as a back up center. Maybe allows us to keep NAW.

Conley, Sheppard, Dillingham. (And Conley gradually fades out after this year)
Ant, DiVincenzo, Clark
McDaniels, NAW, TSJ
Naz, Jabari, LMiller
Gobert, Londale, Garza

On the downside, these guys are expensive Sheppard ($10.6, Jabari $12.3) , and it gives us 13 guys that need minutes. However, it could lead to a good young group around Ant in two years. Maybe we ship off TSJ and Clark for future late picks.

I would love it, but im not sure Houston would be willing to move off Sheppard so fast. Funny enough, Reeds game kind of reminded me of Conley coming out.

Some on the Trade Board are talking $25-30 mil for Jabari next year, which scares the hell out of me.

Just looking at his numbers, that seems like a massive overpay and would be hoping for a lot of improvement. Maybe he could up his value and be flipped at the deadline to a younger team who's willing to roll the dice.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,408
And1: 22,821
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#464 » by Klomp » Thu Jun 12, 2025 4:30 am

moss_is_1 wrote:
shrink wrote:
moss_is_1 wrote:I would love it, but im not sure Houston would be willing to move off Sheppard so fast. Funny enough, Reeds game kind of reminded me of Conley coming out.

Some on the Trade Board are talking $25-30 mil for Jabari next year, which scares the hell out of me.

Just looking at his numbers, that seems like a massive overpay and would be hoping for a lot of improvement. Maybe he could up his value and be flipped at the deadline to a younger team who's willing to roll the dice.

That's not too far off of Jaden's range, which I'd argue is pretty fair.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
User avatar
Domejandro
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 20,457
And1: 30,830
Joined: Jul 29, 2014

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#465 » by Domejandro » Thu Jun 12, 2025 5:13 am

I can't imagine Houston going for that (Julius Randle is a clunky fit on that roster), but if it is on the table, that is a no-brainer.
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,714
And1: 5,207
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#466 » by minimus » Thu Jun 12, 2025 8:27 am

Klomp wrote:
Read on Twitter



Would you trade Reid (sign-and-trade) for Lonzo Ball and Jalen Smith?

Gobert/Smith/???
Randle/???/Miller
McDaniels/TJ/Minott
Edwards/DDV/Clark
Ball/Rob/Conley
lewdog
Rookie
Posts: 1,162
And1: 94
Joined: Jun 21, 2005

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#467 » by lewdog » Thu Jun 12, 2025 12:53 pm

minimus wrote:
Klomp wrote:
Read on Twitter



Would you trade Reid (sign-and-trade) for Lonzo Ball and Jalen Smith?

Gobert/Smith/???
Randle/???/Miller
McDaniels/TJ/Minott
Edwards/DDV/Clark
Ball/Rob/Conley


Let this sink in, Ball has played in 35 games since 2022. And in the '21-'22 season he played 35 games.
We're not that team anymore that takes flyers on other teams "used-to-be" good player (i.e.Brandon Roy).
IMHO, Reid is the most popular Wolf since KG. There is no way, we would consider this.
Qui me amat, amet et canem meum
moss_is_1
RealGM
Posts: 10,971
And1: 2,385
Joined: May 20, 2009
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#468 » by moss_is_1 » Thu Jun 12, 2025 1:00 pm

Wonder if we are working on a Durant deal being a 3 team where we can get a center back for trading Rudy?

Nic Claxton is the most logical player that would be available. Maybe Gafford, Jakob Poetel(if they're drafting Maluach).
Norseman79
Starter
Posts: 2,403
And1: 872
Joined: Jul 26, 2017
     

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#469 » by Norseman79 » Thu Jun 12, 2025 2:51 pm

moss_is_1 wrote:Wonder if we are working on a Durant deal being a 3 team where we can get a center back for trading Rudy?

Nic Claxton is the most logical player that would be available. Maybe Gafford, Jakob Poetel(if they're drafting Maluach).


Naz for Claxton? How does that value line up? (Genuinely asking)
moss_is_1
RealGM
Posts: 10,971
And1: 2,385
Joined: May 20, 2009
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#470 » by moss_is_1 » Thu Jun 12, 2025 3:37 pm

Norseman79 wrote:
moss_is_1 wrote:Wonder if we are working on a Durant deal being a 3 team where we can get a center back for trading Rudy?

Nic Claxton is the most logical player that would be available. Maybe Gafford, Jakob Poetel(if they're drafting Maluach).


Naz for Claxton? How does that value line up? (Genuinely asking)

I think Naz is a pretty significantly better player. Him being a current free agent might impact that, but maybe not.

I also think the Wolves are not making Naz available, along with Ant, Jaden and Rob.
jpatrick
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,742
And1: 1,963
Joined: May 30, 2007
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#471 » by jpatrick » Thu Jun 12, 2025 4:00 pm

moss_is_1 wrote:
Norseman79 wrote:
moss_is_1 wrote:Wonder if we are working on a Durant deal being a 3 team where we can get a center back for trading Rudy?

Nic Claxton is the most logical player that would be available. Maybe Gafford, Jakob Poetel(if they're drafting Maluach).


Naz for Claxton? How does that value line up? (Genuinely asking)

I think Naz is a pretty significantly better player. Him being a current free agent might impact that, but maybe not.

I also think the Wolves are not making Naz available, along with Ant, Jaden and Rob.


I agree with Naz, Jaden, and Naz. They came in the same year and have been noted in the media as not available. I think Dillingham would be gone in a second if he was the hold up in a Durant trade. Personally, I value him about the same as the 17th picked, but I’m guessing TC thinks more highly of him.
User avatar
Domejandro
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 20,457
And1: 30,830
Joined: Jul 29, 2014

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#472 » by Domejandro » Thu Jun 12, 2025 4:07 pm

To be super clear again, Naz Reid is not picking up his Player Option to be traded, and teams are not trading significant value for the privilege of signing Naz Reid at his highest market-value. Minnesota can’t sign-and-trade players prior to free-agency.

I’ve said this previously, but there is a HUGE disconnect on this forum for what sign-and-trades look like.
ReggiesKnicks
Analyst
Posts: 3,182
And1: 2,644
Joined: Jan 25, 2025
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#473 » by ReggiesKnicks » Thu Jun 12, 2025 4:08 pm

Domejandro wrote:To be super clear again, Naz Reid is not picking up his Player Option to be traded, and teams are not trading significant value for the privilege of signing Naz Reid at his highest market-value.

I’ve said this previously, but there is a HUGE disconnect on this forum for what sign-and-trades look like.


You guys have one of the most active boards on here.

Nic Claxton isn't a positive value contract, so while Reid could acquire Claxton, I am not sure why your team would want Nic Claxton.
moss_is_1
RealGM
Posts: 10,971
And1: 2,385
Joined: May 20, 2009
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#474 » by moss_is_1 » Thu Jun 12, 2025 4:55 pm

ReggiesKnicks wrote:
Domejandro wrote:To be super clear again, Naz Reid is not picking up his Player Option to be traded, and teams are not trading significant value for the privilege of signing Naz Reid at his highest market-value.

I’ve said this previously, but there is a HUGE disconnect on this forum for what sign-and-trades look like.


You guys have one of the most active boards on here.

Nic Claxton isn't a positive value contract, so while Reid could acquire Claxton, I am not sure why your team would want Nic Claxton.

I just mentioned Claxton as a possible trade candidate if we are dangling Rudy in Durant deal. I don't love Claxton, and think hes pretty limited overall like a worse version of Rudy. But we cant deal Rudy without finding a starting level center back(I dont want to watch the layup line if Naz is starting at the 5).
jscott
Analyst
Posts: 3,062
And1: 1,353
Joined: Oct 14, 2004
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#475 » by jscott » Thu Jun 12, 2025 5:28 pm

Claxton could be alright but tbh I’d rather find a way to keep Rudy if we add Durant. I know that’s tough with caps but I think Rudy’s a big part of our success.
Norseman79
Starter
Posts: 2,403
And1: 872
Joined: Jul 26, 2017
     

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#476 » by Norseman79 » Thu Jun 12, 2025 5:41 pm

To be clear, the rumor is Rudy, DD, and Dilly for KD....not hearing picks or anything else, correct?

So

PG - ????, Mike
SG - Ant, Clark
SF - McDaniels, TSJr
PF - Durant, Randle, Reid
C. - ????, ????

(I didn't include guys like Miller, Minott, Garza etc...)

If the above is true, we need to move Randle and/or Naz, and we really need a legit starting C and PG.
Kineto
Junior
Posts: 276
And1: 301
Joined: Jan 05, 2013

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#477 » by Kineto » Thu Jun 12, 2025 5:56 pm

I don't understand why we should move Rudy to get Durant, unless Phoenix absolutely want him and no other trade is possible.

Rudy is currently the backbone of Minnesota's defence. The problem with Rudy is that the offence is so poor with him that Finch can't give him extended minutes in the playoffs.

But with a KD/Ant pairing, the offence will look much better, even with Rudy in the line-up.

I would guess that the defence would suffer much more from Rudy's absence than the offence would from his presence alongside a KD/Ant duo.
BlacJacMac
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,807
And1: 3,493
Joined: Aug 25, 2020
       

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#478 » by BlacJacMac » Thu Jun 12, 2025 6:00 pm

Kineto wrote:I don't understand why we should move Rudy to get Durant, unless Phoenix absolutely want him and no other trade is possible.

Rudy is currently the backbone of Minnesota's defence. The problem with Rudy is that the offence is so poor with him that Finch can't give him extended minutes in the playoffs.

But with a KD/Ant pairing, the offence will look much better, even with Rudy in the line-up.

I would guess that the defence would suffer much more from Rudy's absence than the offence would from his presence alongside a KD/Ant duo.


That's probably why. Randle doesn't really make sense for them, and they're desperate for defense.
cmoss84
Pro Prospect
Posts: 954
And1: 330
Joined: Jan 06, 2022

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#479 » by cmoss84 » Thu Jun 12, 2025 6:41 pm

*1st trade*
Rudy/DD/RD for KD

*2nd trade*
Nets give up #36 for an expiring Duncan Robinson and give Garza an audition.
Miami unloads two bad contracts (Robinson and Rozier) while receiving Randle and #31/#36. The price they pay: Mr. Ware.
Minnesota takes on a year of Conley/Rozier while finding a replacement (#17). Ware takes over at center after Rudy is traded to Suns.

Mike/Rozier/#17
Ant/Clark
Jaden/TSJ
KD/Naz
Ware/Naz
I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy.
cmoss84
Pro Prospect
Posts: 954
And1: 330
Joined: Jan 06, 2022

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#480 » by cmoss84 » Thu Jun 12, 2025 8:12 pm

Last one until the season starts! I promise! The money is slightly off, but you'll get the idea of the framework.

Nets: Have to start somewhere, so they roll the dice on Beal. They get a couple of young, cost-controlled players as well.
Suns: Ecstatic to have relief from Beal's contract, the Suns add two dynamic, yet highly risky players to balance out their roster.
Pelicans: New Orleans has seen enough of Zion, and add a similar player to run in their system. They get decent value for Missi, and ultimately help themselves in the short and long terms.
Timberwolves: Get outstanding value for Rudy, Randle, and #17/#31. They also cut enough pay roll to extend Naz.

Nets IN: Bradley Beal, Brandon Boston Jr., and Oso Ighodaro (1st apron)

Pelicans IN: Randle, Garza, #17, #31 (1st apron)
OUT: Zion, Missi, Alvarado
Murray/CJ/Murphy III/Jones/Olynyk/Randle/FA C

Suns IN: Rudy and Zion (2nd apron)
OUT: KD, Beal, Oso Ighodaro
Allen/Booker/O'Neale/Zion/Rudy

Timberwolves IN: KD, Alvarado, Missi
OUT: Rudy, Randle, Garza, #17/#31
Mike/Alvarado/RD
Ant/DD/Clark
Jaden/Naz/TSJ
KD/Naz
Missi/Naz
I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy.

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves