Zeitgeister wrote:KGdaBom wrote:AirP. wrote:Huh and teams weren't beating down the Timberwolves door when all it took was a 1st to get him... weird. You must be right, the whole NBA needs to get with analytics to see this.
AirP all I can say is Blah blah blah blah blah. You are like a broken record. We all get that Rubio is a sub par shooter. One aspect of the game. A lot of baseball Execs held out against moneyball too. ALL the FACTS prove Rubio to be a good player. Hopefully Teague who is a good player also plays very well for us and we win the title.
We'll see, he should have Utah rolling this season if that's the case. They may have lost Hayward but Gobert is their best player and they still have a lot of talent. Part of being a good player is how well you fit on good teams, portability. To me, Rubio is generally a poor fit with any high usage/playmaking wing because he's such a liability off the ball and that's where he'll spend a good deal of time with any good high usage/playmaking wing.
Rubio is a good player, but don't expect Utah to be better this year losing Hayward and Hill. For a minute it looked like they were going to get Crowder. With him they would have been a playoff team. Without him the playoffs will be a very nice accomplishment. So that is your benchmark for Rubio. Playoffs and it was a very nice season.