wolves_89 wrote:Klomp wrote:wolves_89 wrote:It's incredibly hard to see how Bronny James would make any sense for the Wolves. Looking at the guys who are likely to be available at 27 and 37, I'd rate James near the bottom in terms of players who can contribute in the short term. If the team is looking for upside, there are likely to be at least a half dozen young guys still on the board who would be ahead of James (Tyler Smith, Bobi Klintman, Carlton Carrington, Kyshawn George, Pacome Dadiet, Juan Nunez, AJ Johnson, Cam Christie, and Justin Edwards are all significantly better developmental prospects).
I get it, but I don't necessarily agree. Part of "upside" is how likely a prospect is to reach that upside. His upside might not be as high as some, but I feel very confident that he can reach the upside he has. Many of the guys you listed might have a higher upside in theory, but I don't know that reaching that upside is very likely for most of them.
Ndudi Ebi had more upside than anyone we had available to us in 2004. Josh Howard's upside was much lower, but was an upside that was more attainable.
I guess we have very different ideas on what Bronny James could be. To me the best case scenario for James is becoming a fringe rotation player with a very high chance of never even reaching that level. Personally, I think most of the guys I listed have a floor that is similar to Bronny, but with ceilings that are way higher.
Here's my Bronny scouting report:
No, he will probably never be a star and he might not ever be a starter, but he is someone who has a high basketball IQ, seems to be self-aware of who he is as a basketball player, and he is a connector. I also think that a good chunk of his USC tape and statistics could be thrown away by the mere fact of what he went through last offseason and working his way back from a significant health scare. He commits himself to the defensive end, and sees himself making an impact on that end by the way he compares himself to guys like Jrue Holiday, Derrick White and Davion Mitchell.
Yes, that's largely the only tape we've got and that forces a scouting staff to rely on their convictions of what a guy can be and how he can translate into the league, but I think that's exactly why we have someone like former 247Sports analyst Josh Gershon in the draft room, for example. He banged the table for a scrawny kid out of Washington who largely underwhelmed and had a temper to boot in his lone year of college, but Gershon was convinced that there was an NBA player inside of him. I also go back to a guy who averaged just 9.4 ppg in college on an okay UCLA team, but Flip Saunders was convicted that he was a guy with a high upside even though the tape didn't show it.
Now think about what we need, especially at guard: Defense, connector, and high IQ.
My NBA comparison: Patrick Beverley