ImageImageImage

Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

BlacJacMac
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,807
And1: 3,493
Joined: Aug 25, 2020
       

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#501 » by BlacJacMac » Fri Jun 13, 2025 11:38 pm

Rookie-Mistake wrote:If we do land Durant.. what does his contract look like after this year?

Sent from my SM-G991B using RealGM mobile app


Hopefully NOT this:

Read on Twitter
Rookie-Mistake
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,435
And1: 523
Joined: Jun 27, 2008
       

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#502 » by Rookie-Mistake » Fri Jun 13, 2025 11:42 pm

BlacJacMac wrote:
Rookie-Mistake wrote:If we do land Durant.. what does his contract look like after this year?

Sent from my SM-G991B using RealGM mobile app


Hopefully NOT this:

Read on Twitter
Omg..
Fair enough for a 30 year old durant but not a 40 year old..

Sent from my SM-G991B using RealGM mobile app
wolves_89
General Manager
Posts: 8,130
And1: 4,616
Joined: Jul 10, 2012
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#503 » by wolves_89 » Fri Jun 13, 2025 11:47 pm

Rookie-Mistake wrote:
BlacJacMac wrote:
Rookie-Mistake wrote:If we do land Durant.. what does his contract look like after this year?

Sent from my SM-G991B using RealGM mobile app


Hopefully NOT this:

Read on Twitter
Omg..
Fair enough for a 30 year old durant but not a 40 year old..

Sent from my SM-G991B using RealGM mobile app


This is the biggest reason I'm not all that interested in a Durant trade. Paying him $175M for his age 37-39 seasons seems like an incredibly risky thing to do. I look at the Sixers and Paul George (who is 2 years younger than Durant) as a scary example of what can happen with big extensions for older players.
moss_is_1
RealGM
Posts: 10,971
And1: 2,385
Joined: May 20, 2009
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#504 » by moss_is_1 » Fri Jun 13, 2025 11:50 pm

shangrila wrote:
Guest84 wrote:Posting for the details regarding the trade they discussed


The proposed trade is as follows if you want to skip a listen;

MIN out; Julius Randle, Rudy Gobert, Donte DiVincenzo, Rob Dillingham, Nickeil Alexander-Walker (S&T)
MIN in; Kevin Durant, Nic Claxton, Lonzo Ball

PHO out; Kevin Durant
PHO in; Rudy Gobert, Donte DiVincenzo, Rob Dillingham

MIA out; Duncan Robinson/Andrew Wiggins ("spare parts" was their wording)
MIA in; Julius Randle

BRK out; Nic Claxton
BRK in; Duncan Robinson/Andrew Wiggins, picks

CHI out; Lonzo Ball
CHI in; Nickeil Alexander-Walker (S&T)


They don't mention where the "picks" going to the Nets come into play, although the spreadsheet they have after the fact includes both the 17th and 31st picks so it isn't our current picks

The S&T of NAW, while including the draft picks for this season makes it extremely unlikely. We'd be picking guys and then holding them until free agency opens around a week later. Unless we waited until after the fact to just trade NAW for Ball in free agency in a separate deal.

Any deal sending out Rudy for Durant makes sense to then try and flip Randle to get Claxton. He's not as good but he's younger, more athletic, has a relationship with KD and his contract declines as an added bonus.

Rudy, Randle, DDV outgoing is 77.9m and KD/Claxton is 80m. If we include Leonard Miller's 2.2m or Minott's 2.1m we could save a bit, but not necessary.
moss_is_1
RealGM
Posts: 10,971
And1: 2,385
Joined: May 20, 2009
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#505 » by moss_is_1 » Fri Jun 13, 2025 11:51 pm

BlacJacMac wrote:
Rookie-Mistake wrote:If we do land Durant.. what does his contract look like after this year?

Sent from my SM-G991B using RealGM mobile app


Hopefully NOT this:

Read on Twitter

Yikes. I have no interest in paying Durant 60m per season at almost 40 years old.
shangrila
RealGM
Posts: 13,531
And1: 6,602
Joined: Dec 21, 2009
Location: Land of Aus
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#506 » by shangrila » Sat Jun 14, 2025 12:58 am

moss_is_1 wrote:
shangrila wrote:
Guest84 wrote:Posting for the details regarding the trade they discussed


The proposed trade is as follows if you want to skip a listen;

MIN out; Julius Randle, Rudy Gobert, Donte DiVincenzo, Rob Dillingham, Nickeil Alexander-Walker (S&T)
MIN in; Kevin Durant, Nic Claxton, Lonzo Ball

PHO out; Kevin Durant
PHO in; Rudy Gobert, Donte DiVincenzo, Rob Dillingham

MIA out; Duncan Robinson/Andrew Wiggins ("spare parts" was their wording)
MIA in; Julius Randle

BRK out; Nic Claxton
BRK in; Duncan Robinson/Andrew Wiggins, picks

CHI out; Lonzo Ball
CHI in; Nickeil Alexander-Walker (S&T)


They don't mention where the "picks" going to the Nets come into play, although the spreadsheet they have after the fact includes both the 17th and 31st picks so it isn't our current picks

The S&T of NAW, while including the draft picks for this season makes it extremely unlikely. We'd be picking guys and then holding them until free agency opens around a week later. Unless we waited until after the fact to just trade NAW for Ball in free agency in a separate deal.

Any deal sending out Rudy for Durant makes sense to then try and flip Randle to get Claxton. He's not as good but he's younger, more athletic, has a relationship with KD and his contract declines as an added bonus.

Rudy, Randle, DDV outgoing is 77.9m and KD/Claxton is 80m. If we include Leonard Miller's 2.2m or Minott's 2.1m we could save a bit, but not necessary.

The Lonzo-NAW part could easily be separate.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,408
And1: 22,821
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#507 » by Klomp » Sat Jun 14, 2025 2:30 am

moss_is_1 wrote:Yikes. I have no interest in paying Durant 60m per season at almost 40 years old.

We're going to have to start getting used to it as a fan base, especially if we want Anthony Edwards to retire in a Timberwolves uniform. By the time Ant gets to that age, I bet his contract will be closer to $90 million.

Kevin Durant's game has aged like fine wine. Is there risk? Of course. But we have to start being okay taking risks as a franchise if we want to be making the conference finals or better on a regular basis. If we're too scared to pay players, get ready for first round exits at best.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
User avatar
Domejandro
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 20,458
And1: 30,830
Joined: Jul 29, 2014

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#508 » by Domejandro » Sat Jun 14, 2025 2:39 am

moss_is_1 wrote:
shangrila wrote:
Guest84 wrote:Posting for the details regarding the trade they discussed

The proposed trade is as follows if you want to skip a listen;

MIN out; Julius Randle, Rudy Gobert, Donte DiVincenzo, Rob Dillingham, Nickeil Alexander-Walker (S&T)
MIN in; Kevin Durant, Nic Claxton, Lonzo Ball

PHO out; Kevin Durant
PHO in; Rudy Gobert, Donte DiVincenzo, Rob Dillingham

MIA out; Duncan Robinson/Andrew Wiggins ("spare parts" was their wording)
MIA in; Julius Randle

BRK out; Nic Claxton
BRK in; Duncan Robinson/Andrew Wiggins, picks

CHI out; Lonzo Ball
CHI in; Nickeil Alexander-Walker (S&T)


They don't mention where the "picks" going to the Nets come into play, although the spreadsheet they have after the fact includes both the 17th and 31st picks so it isn't our current picks

The S&T of NAW, while including the draft picks for this season makes it extremely unlikely. We'd be picking guys and then holding them until free agency opens around a week later. Unless we waited until after the fact to just trade NAW for Ball in free agency in a separate deal.

Any deal sending out Rudy for Durant makes sense to then try and flip Randle to get Claxton. He's not as good but he's younger, more athletic, has a relationship with KD and his contract declines as an added bonus.

Rudy, Randle, DDV outgoing is 77.9m and KD/Claxton is 80m. If we include Leonard Miller's 2.2m or Minott's 2.1m we could save a bit, but not necessary.

Yeah, that trade proposal is a logistical disaster, but I don't expect anything else from Timberwolves podcasters. :lol:

Actually a ludicrous trade idea, NAW cannot be sign-and-traded until free-agency starts. They are effectively saying "let's hold up the trade until free-agency and have Chicago commit the most blatant tampering in NBA history for Nickeil Alexander-Walker."
Guest84
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,818
And1: 882
Joined: Dec 13, 2017
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#509 » by Guest84 » Sat Jun 14, 2025 2:59 am

I thought they mentioned the trade idea came from Zach Lowe initially. I was driving so wasn’t fully paying attention
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,717
And1: 5,207
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part 1[emoji239[emoji2393]]): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#510 » by minimus » Sat Jun 14, 2025 4:32 am

Nic Claxton bad back is concerning.
User avatar
karch34
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,888
And1: 864
Joined: Jul 05, 2001
Location: Valley of the Sun
     

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#511 » by karch34 » Sat Jun 14, 2025 4:45 am

Rookie-Mistake wrote:
BlacJacMac wrote:
Rookie-Mistake wrote:If we do land Durant.. what does his contract look like after this year?

Sent from my SM-G991B using RealGM mobile app


Hopefully NOT this:

Read on Twitter
Omg..
Fair enough for a 30 year old durant but not a 40 year old..

Sent from my SM-G991B using RealGM mobile app

Agreed
shangrila
RealGM
Posts: 13,531
And1: 6,602
Joined: Dec 21, 2009
Location: Land of Aus
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#512 » by shangrila » Sat Jun 14, 2025 6:50 am

Domejandro wrote:
moss_is_1 wrote:
shangrila wrote:The proposed trade is as follows if you want to skip a listen;

MIN out; Julius Randle, Rudy Gobert, Donte DiVincenzo, Rob Dillingham, Nickeil Alexander-Walker (S&T)
MIN in; Kevin Durant, Nic Claxton, Lonzo Ball

PHO out; Kevin Durant
PHO in; Rudy Gobert, Donte DiVincenzo, Rob Dillingham

MIA out; Duncan Robinson/Andrew Wiggins ("spare parts" was their wording)
MIA in; Julius Randle

BRK out; Nic Claxton
BRK in; Duncan Robinson/Andrew Wiggins, picks

CHI out; Lonzo Ball
CHI in; Nickeil Alexander-Walker (S&T)


They don't mention where the "picks" going to the Nets come into play, although the spreadsheet they have after the fact includes both the 17th and 31st picks so it isn't our current picks

The S&T of NAW, while including the draft picks for this season makes it extremely unlikely. We'd be picking guys and then holding them until free agency opens around a week later. Unless we waited until after the fact to just trade NAW for Ball in free agency in a separate deal.

Any deal sending out Rudy for Durant makes sense to then try and flip Randle to get Claxton. He's not as good but he's younger, more athletic, has a relationship with KD and his contract declines as an added bonus.

Rudy, Randle, DDV outgoing is 77.9m and KD/Claxton is 80m. If we include Leonard Miller's 2.2m or Minott's 2.1m we could save a bit, but not necessary.

Yeah, that trade proposal is a logistical disaster, but I don't expect anything else from Timberwolves podcasters. :lol:

Actually a ludicrous trade idea, NAW cannot be sign-and-traded until free-agency starts. They are effectively saying "let's hold up the trade until free-agency and have Chicago commit the most blatant tampering in NBA history for Nickeil Alexander-Walker."

2 things;

1. This originally came from Zach Lowe
2. The NAW-Lonzo swap is it's own thing. They've packaged them together to show the total offseason plan but there's nothing stopping this deal from going ahead without it.
FrenchMinnyFan
Starter
Posts: 2,025
And1: 1,231
Joined: Feb 10, 2023
     

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#513 » by FrenchMinnyFan » Sat Jun 14, 2025 12:10 pm

I'm all for a big trade. Why? Because ANT need to be paired with a star. Randle did have up and down all season but he hold ball way too long which is not good for others players. we have one ball dominant ANT, another is not good specially as both turn over the ball a lot. Second point is about ANT situation, i don't think this guy will be patient for ever to win a championship. I would not be surprised if in 2 years, he request for trade if we remain where we are now.
We have a window to win now, in the next 2 or 3 years and in NBA windows like that don't last long.
That's why I'm all for a big trade, including trading Rudy if we got something bigger.
TheZachAttack
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,765
And1: 1,327
Joined: Jul 23, 2014
       

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#514 » by TheZachAttack » Sat Jun 14, 2025 7:17 pm

Klomp wrote:
moss_is_1 wrote:Yikes. I have no interest in paying Durant 60m per season at almost 40 years old.

We're going to have to start getting used to it as a fan base, especially if we want Anthony Edwards to retire in a Timberwolves uniform. By the time Ant gets to that age, I bet his contract will be closer to $90 million.

Kevin Durant's game has aged like fine wine. Is there risk? Of course. But we have to start being okay taking risks as a franchise if we want to be making the conference finals or better on a regular basis. If we're too scared to pay players, get ready for first round exits at best.


Exactly. I am not going to say Durant will be what he was at 30. But this version of him involves him getting to spots and making jump shots. With his length and jump shot — it’s not like these shots aren’t open shots for him and that doesn’t change much with athleticism. I think he increasingly can’t takeover games and get to the rim/etc like a #1 needs to but he has Ant for that.
Guest84
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,818
And1: 882
Joined: Dec 13, 2017
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#515 » by Guest84 » Sun Jun 15, 2025 2:18 am

Anyone else hearing more about Rudy being the centerpiece of a Durant trade? I’ve been hearing more about phx wanting to get bigger.
wolves_89
General Manager
Posts: 8,130
And1: 4,616
Joined: Jul 10, 2012
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#516 » by wolves_89 » Sun Jun 15, 2025 5:12 am

Read on Twitter


If the Wolves aren't among Durant's preferred choices I don't see a trade working out for Minnesota. The only way I saw a chance for a KD trade to make sense for the Wolves was if he was fully onboard.
TimberKat
Head Coach
Posts: 6,083
And1: 3,061
Joined: Jul 02, 2022
         

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#517 » by TimberKat » Sun Jun 15, 2025 7:28 am

wolves_89 wrote:
Read on Twitter


If the Wolves aren't among Durant's preferred choices I don't see a trade working out for Minnesota. The only way I saw a chance for a KD trade to make sense for the Wolves was if he was fully onboard.

That is why the Towns trade suck so much. Towns is a legit all star that wants to be here.
Rookie-Mistake
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,435
And1: 523
Joined: Jun 27, 2008
       

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#518 » by Rookie-Mistake » Sun Jun 15, 2025 8:28 am

Well.
I guess we're running it back.

Sent from my SM-G991B using RealGM mobile app
Neeva
Head Coach
Posts: 7,483
And1: 2,879
Joined: Jun 03, 2016

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#519 » by Neeva » Sun Jun 15, 2025 11:11 am

Good let Durant **** up one of those teams for the next 2-3 seasons. I still say Connelly will make some moves though. Draft day trades are his thing.
Neeva
Head Coach
Posts: 7,483
And1: 2,879
Joined: Jun 03, 2016

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#520 » by Neeva » Sun Jun 15, 2025 11:13 am

I think Naz may be sign and traded, fans will be upset but it’s for the best, He’s not really a playoff performer, and his value will probably decrease in upcoming seasons.

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves