shangrila wrote:panth181 wrote:shangrila wrote:He can't dribble the ball at all, he struggles to shoot, he's not a great passer and his defence relies more on his athleticism and quickness then any sort of fundamentals. Jeff Green is a much better player and was a much better prospect coming out then James ever could be.
I never said James was as good a prospect. Just that Green at #5 and James completely out of the first round is nonsense.
And it is.
Yeah I guess. I suppose the main thing is that scouts look at him, see his lack of improvement and that he's a senior and figure he's plateaued which is fair enough. Green was drafted equal parts for his skill and potential, but yes I'll agree he was a reach at 5.
James absolutely has plateaud physically. But this isn't a bad thing. He's got a pro's body, a chiseled frame, perfect for an NBA SF and even undersized PF against certain matchups in an up tempo system.
And while his shooting percentages haven't improved a ton, he's got all the basic tools there. He doesn't need an overhaul on his outside shot. His ability to attack and shoot off the dribble is much improved from where he was as a freshman. His defense will be there if the effort is there, and with James I believe the effort is there.
His rebounding prowess is a huge plus. We all know big, athletic wings that rebound well in college translate better to the NBA than any other position. And what is James if not exactly this?
All in all, you say he hasn't improved much. I say he doesn't need to improve much to be a starting caliber player at the NBA level, especially if somebody can convince him to focus on his complementary skillset rather than his "go-to" one (that's the one thing Green really has on him - not just the skillset of a complementary player, but also the mindset).
Sure would suck to have to draft one of those in the late first round, eh?