Jedzz wrote:shrink wrote:Jedzz wrote:
"one of my biggest frustrations with" surely means there are a few posts on how the dlo trade will wreck your LaMelo hopes. Right? I never noticed them.
Trading for Dlo obviously did not preclude the option to draft LaMello either, given the Edwards choice. Edwards and Culver both displaced Dlo as starting Point in preseason and on opening day this year. Could have been LeMello all the same. Blame Rosas choice if you want.
“One of” means there are more. It does not mean, “erase your brain of all other reasons he listed.” As YOU CHOSE to write.
Grow up, or find a kid’s forum that thrives on kiddies trolling kiddies.
Come on man. Where do you think my post comes from asking for more than just after the fact LaMello claims? That's what I'm doing. I'm asking if this is just another after the fact thought now that LaMello had a decent 10-12 game start being passed off as one of your "biggest frustrations" with the Dlo trade. I never said you didn't have others. I said I never knew on of your biggest frustrations with the Dlo choice was how it would ruin your LaMello hopes here. That might have changed my views on your tunneled vision takes at the time that were loaded with cherry picked stats and jaded thoughts on Dlos worst moments without looking at anything positive. As far as I know this just wasn't the case before or after the Dlo trade. At least I never noticed while you spent plenty of our time reading your posts about how Dlo was just a terrible player on a terrible contract. Hey maybe you had some "don't trade for Dlo because it won't allow us to draft LaMello" posts and I just missed them. I'm giving you the chance to say you actually did and rub my nose in not remembering it.
So why should I ask? Maybe it was your passive aggressive shot at any of us posting here with a claim about people not sticking by their prior stances. This one:shrink wrote:First, kudos to you both for having takes and not hiding from them later when things don’t go the right way, like most internet posters’ norm,
Isn't taking credit for takes you never had on the same level? Again, maybe I missed those posts about one of your biggest frustrations with the thought of Dlo here.
Kudos to those that are not passive aggressive. The reality is trading for Dlo was not what stopped Rosas from drafting him. I suppose you don't want to discuss that though. Even when I agree it would have been horrible for Rosas to do that to Dlo. It would have been the second time a team drafted a Ball after having him. But as I already said, it's clear with the Edwards pick and use of him already that Rosas doesn't much care. He simply didn't choose LaMello.
You obviously don’t read what I write, as evidenced by the “we could have drafted LaMelo 1st anyway” which I had just addressed.
But do you even read what YOU write?
You did not write, “I’m asking another question” as you dishonestly claim. You wrote, “erase from your brain all other reasons!”
Ironically, you quote me giving credit to Krapinsky and mplsfonz23 for not hiding from what they write, like many internet trolls. You can’t even stand behind what you wrote an hour ago!
Kid, you have a long, long “enemies list” and you continually try to challenge or misquote anything said by those on your list. Again, save us all the time. I am not treating others like this - your enemy list is so long because you specifically are a petty child, and post that way towards me and many other people here. Either live by your words, grow up, or don’t bother us with these dishonest and childish posts. Who has the time?
