KGdaBom wrote: I'm not afraid of you. I do believe you try to intimidate by the nasty way you talk to others. When I said stalking it is that I'm watching what you do and I'm going to call you out on bad behavior and bad logic.
sigh
Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks
KGdaBom wrote: I'm not afraid of you. I do believe you try to intimidate by the nasty way you talk to others. When I said stalking it is that I'm watching what you do and I'm going to call you out on bad behavior and bad logic.
KGdaBom wrote:That will last forever.

Jedzz wrote:KGdaBom wrote: I'm not afraid of you. I do believe you try to intimidate by the nasty way you talk to others. When I said stalking it is that I'm watching what you do and I'm going to call you out on bad behavior and bad logic.
sigh
Jedzz wrote:KGdaBom wrote:That will last forever.
![]()
KGdaBom wrote:Jedzz wrote:KGdaBom wrote: I'm not afraid of you. I do believe you try to intimidate by the nasty way you talk to others. When I said stalking it is that I'm watching what you do and I'm going to call you out on bad behavior and bad logic.
sigh
Sorry. When I feel people are being attacked it is in my nature to defend them.

Klomp wrote:Under-the-radar PF option: Bruno Caboclo
Young, long, defense-focused but yet mobile big who has shown glimpses of 3-point shooting

tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Klomp wrote:Here is the current breakdown of ages for our players when the new season begins in December.
Russell (24) / McLaughlin (24)
Beasley (24) / Layman (26) / Nowell (21)
Okogie (22) / Culver (21) / Martin (25) / Evans (23)
Hernangomez (25) / Johnson (33) / Vanderbilt (21)
Towns (25) / Reid (21) / Spellman (23)
A lot of people are in a rush to speed up the development of the roster by adding more vets but I'm not sure that's wise. Maybe a vet or two to help with mentorship, but I don't think a massive step forward by the end of next season is mandatory. I don't think there's any clock for Towns, especially after the team brought in Russell. Maybe a greater sense of urgency for the team, but no mandate from Towns to improve if they don't want to trade him.
This is a super young core. I'm not in a hurry to break it up.

minimus wrote:Klomp wrote:Here is the current breakdown of ages for our players when the new season begins in December.
Russell (24) / McLaughlin (24)
Beasley (24) / Layman (26) / Nowell (21)
Okogie (22) / Culver (21) / Martin (25) / Evans (23)
Hernangomez (25) / Johnson (33) / Vanderbilt (21)
Towns (25) / Reid (21) / Spellman (23)
A lot of people are in a rush to speed up the development of the roster by adding more vets but I'm not sure that's wise. Maybe a vet or two to help with mentorship, but I don't think a massive step forward by the end of next season is mandatory. I don't think there's any clock for Towns, especially after the team brought in Russell. Maybe a greater sense of urgency for the team, but no mandate from Towns to improve if they don't want to trade him.
This is a super young core. I'm not in a hurry to break it up.
After Thibs regime we have that bad feeling about veterans. But I believe that was more about Thibs coaching and vision. I would be happy to add guys like Crowder, Rubio, Joe Harris who are around 30yo, with plenty of experience, competitiveness, positive presence in locker room, who know their role and still 2-3 years of productive basketball left.
Would I rush to add veterans such as JC, Rose, Gibson, AT? No/
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment

Domejandro wrote:For the record, I got called crazy by a lot of people for being in favour of Chris Paul for Andrew Wiggins + whatever. Dude ended up comfortably being a top twenty player this season.
Me being whiny aside, it is a shame that we are time-locked on trading for Robert Covington again. I would happily trade (if Houston implodes in the Playoffs, which I do not expect at all)....
James Johnson, Jacob Evans, a miscellaneous player, and our pick (depending on where it lands)
for
Robert Covington, P.J. Tucker, and Danuel House
P.J. Tucker would be on his final year of his contract, while Robert Covington and Danuel House have two more years. Instantly our team wouldn't suck defensively.
D'Angelo Russell / Jordan McLaughlin
Malik Beasley (RFA) / Jarrett Culver
Robert Covington / Josh Okogie / Jake Layman
P.J. Tucker / Juancho Hernangomez (RFA) / Danuel House
Karl-Anthony Towns / Naz Reid
Realistically, you would likely let Juancho go, but just lazily throwing up a depth-chart.

shangrila wrote:It's not a bad idea. I do wonder how the finances are going to shake out and how teams will respond. The Houston owner seems like a penny pincher at the best of times and as a restaurant guy he's probably really hurting, so if we went in there with a ton of savings as the selling point I'd wonder what he'd bite on?
Like if you said we'll trade you Johnson, Spellman, Evans and Layman for Covington and Gordon, would they take it without including a pick? Or maybe only the Brooklyn one? I know people would wince at Gordon and especially his contract (I'm not sure what Morey's doing the last few years, he went from not matching Parsons because he'd be untradeable to throwing money at older guys like Paul and Gordon) but when he's on form he's a decent guy off the bench to space the floor and get hot.
Just spitballing I guess.

Domejandro wrote:For the record, I got called crazy by a lot of people for being in favour of Chris Paul for Andrew Wiggins + whatever. Dude ended up comfortably being a top twenty player this season.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment



tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Klomp wrote:Why is the 5-out floor-spacing model important?
This is what happens when you run two-big lineups.
No driving lanes, no passing lanes.
Sign5 wrote:Yea not happening, I expected a better retort but what do I expect from realgm(ers) in 2025. Just quote and state things that lack context, then repeat the same thing over and over as if something new and profound was said. Just lol.
KGdaBom wrote:Klomp wrote:Why is the 5-out floor-spacing model important?
This is what happens when you run two-big lineups.
No driving lanes, no passing lanes.
If it was KAT or OK Express driving do you think those guys would have stopped them? They'd have taken the defender to the hoop and dunked on them plus the and one. Also a stop and pop ten footer was available to Culver or anybody else.
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves