Steve_Holiday wrote:from Souhan on the strib site today:
Souhan's opinion makes me no more or no less likely to like Evan Turner.
Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks
Steve_Holiday wrote:from Souhan on the strib site today:
Esohny wrote:I don't know if I'd claim to be a "great scouting mind" but Souhan is a douche. I don't really consider anything he writes to be particularly legit.
Klomp wrote:Didn't Brad Miller back up Vlade Divac in SAC too?
Steve_Holiday wrote:from Souhan on the strib site today:
"Evan Turner? I like him, but he may be too slow to play point, he doesn't shoot the three well enough to play the 2, and he may be no more than a better-than-average 3.
His great advantage in college is he got to play point guard against smaller, lesser players. He will be a turnover machine if he has to play the point in the NBA."
I know most folks here are thinking ET or bust. From what I know, he sounds like a good fit. What would the great 'scouting minds' of this board say to souhan's take?
*Are his numbers/defensive capabilities inflated because he's dominating smaller players?
*If he was on the Wolves, would he play 2 or 3?
I'm not terribly concerned about shooting issue at this point. Tyreke can't shoot a lick, and it doesn't seem to be holding him back. This team needs talent in any form.
Biff Cooper wrote:Krapinsky wrote:I'm pretty sure Favors will also be much better as a rookie.
I agree that over the entire season, Favors will have a better year. He's bound to be given a much better opportunity to play and get better by getting minutes and experience on the NBA court. My statement was that JaJuan's three years of college experience might make him more NBA ready at the beginning of the year.
"A while back,'' Cardinal said, "I took a picture of the standings and texted it to Love, just to bust his chops,'' Cardinal said. "He sent me a picture back of a snowdrift.''
shangrila wrote:How would people feel about Avery Bradley? Seems like an ideal Triangle point and a good offensive backup type player who's actually good on defence. Obviously Flynn and Sessions would have to go when Rubio comes over but imagine being able to run a defensive rotation of Rubio and Bradley for 48 minutes.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.
NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
Krapinsky wrote:shangrila wrote:How would people feel about Avery Bradley? Seems like an ideal Triangle point and a good offensive backup type player who's actually good on defence. Obviously Flynn and Sessions would have to go when Rubio comes over but imagine being able to run a defensive rotation of Rubio and Bradley for 48 minutes.
That's what I'd like to think, but my feeling about him is that he's purely an undersized shooting guard, meaning he'll be even less adapt to running an offense than even Johnny.
Esohny wrote:Souhan is a douche.
Steve_Holiday wrote:Esohny wrote:Souhan is a douche.
I shouldn't have mentioned his name.
SMAC-K wrote:Mayo>>>>Love and that 5th pick
OJ Mayo is one of the best defenders in the league, hes a two way player and hes a great passer and playmaker.
shangrila wrote:Krapinsky wrote:shangrila wrote:How would people feel about Avery Bradley? Seems like an ideal Triangle point and a good offensive backup type player who's actually good on defence. Obviously Flynn and Sessions would have to go when Rubio comes over but imagine being able to run a defensive rotation of Rubio and Bradley for 48 minutes.
That's what I'd like to think, but my feeling about him is that he's purely an undersized shooting guard, meaning he'll be even less adapt to running an offense than even Johnny.
But that's the point. The Triangle offence usually just needs a point guard to dribble the ball up the floor and then flash to the corner and wait for a kick out for a 3pt shot. Something Bradley should be able to do easily.
And let's remember he is a freshman. While he's really raw as a point guard right now there's the chance he could develop atleast passable point guard skills and certainly enough to be the backup behind Rubio. It's not like he needs to be Steve Nash in that role.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.
NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
shangrila wrote:Well, if you're talking about being a running team all you'd need is a guy who's unselfish enough to make the extra pass on the break which I think Bradley could manage, although I can see what you're saying. But I think he's too undersized to be a SG of any kind and will have to play the point guard position, or atleast guard it.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.
NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
PeeDee wrote:On second thought... http://twitter.com/King24George
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Klomp wrote:PeeDee wrote:On second thought... http://twitter.com/King24George
You don't like him because he has a Twitter account?
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves