ImageImageImage

The Jarrett Culver Thread

Moderators: Domejandro, Calinks, Worm Guts

TheProdigy
Starter
Posts: 2,440
And1: 1,128
Joined: Feb 21, 2001

Re: The Jarrett Culver Thread 

Post#61 » by TheProdigy » Sat Jun 22, 2019 8:04 pm

Klomp wrote:
DaKidKG wrote:I hope you're right though. Would be pretty cool if we had a guy that had more ups than Vince Carter or Zach LaVine.

Last I checked, 45 is less than 46.

For all the question marks that follow him as he treks his way through pre-draft workouts, UCLA freshman guard Zach LaVine strongly showcased something that has become awfully familiar.

The guy can jump. Very high. So high that he set a Lakers pre-draft workout record on Wednesday with a 46-inch vertical jump.


http://www.insidesocal.com/lakers/2014/06/04/nba-draft-zach-lavine-sets-lakers-workout-record-with-46-inch-vertical/

You're right, I forgot about the private workout vertical. I was thinking of the 41.5 inch vertical he had at the combine. Ironically, this backs up the point I've been making about unreliable private workout measurements.

https://www.nbadraft.net/2014-nba-draft-combine-athleticism-test-analysis
KGdaBom
RealGM
Posts: 23,337
And1: 6,373
Joined: Jun 22, 2017
         

Re: The Jarrett Culver Thread 

Post#62 » by KGdaBom » Sat Jun 22, 2019 8:04 pm

minimus wrote:More I watch his workout/highlights more I like his skills set.

1) I am very surprised that even with that jumping ability he relies on his ballhandling and body control to score. I like that he uses more his agility and quickness.

2) his body is still growing and he does not have a strong upper and lower body yet. I am thrilled to see what he can do once his body matures. And I have high hopes that he will develop Butler like body because he has thick, strong legs.

3) his shoot is not pretty, is not consistent. But it is fixable. Better footwork, better timing and repetition will make him an average shooter.

4) it is hard to evaluate his individual defense. But he has all tools to become a serviceable team defender within a smart defensive scheme. He can switch between 1-2-3. I can't see him a lockdown defender, more like Danny Green type.

I believe he was considered one of the three best defenders in college ball along with Hunter and Clarke. However, shouldn't Zion be considered.
KGdaBom
RealGM
Posts: 23,337
And1: 6,373
Joined: Jun 22, 2017
         

Re: The Jarrett Culver Thread 

Post#63 » by KGdaBom » Sat Jun 22, 2019 8:06 pm

DaKidKG wrote:
Klomp wrote:
DaKidKG wrote:I hope you're right though. Would be pretty cool if we had a guy that had more ups than Vince Carter or Zach LaVine.

Last I checked, 45 is less than 46.

For all the question marks that follow him as he treks his way through pre-draft workouts, UCLA freshman guard Zach LaVine strongly showcased something that has become awfully familiar.

The guy can jump. Very high. So high that he set a Lakers pre-draft workout record on Wednesday with a 46-inch vertical jump.


http://www.insidesocal.com/lakers/2014/06/04/nba-draft-zach-lavine-sets-lakers-workout-record-with-46-inch-vertical/

You're right, I forgot about the private workout vertical. I was thinking of the 41.5 inch vertical he had at the combine. Ironically, this backs up the point I've been making about unreliable private workout measurements.

https://www.nbadraft.net/2014-nba-draft-combine-athleticism-test-analysis

I believe Zach at 46 without a moments hesitation.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,568
And1: 22,939
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: The Jarrett Culver Thread 

Post#64 » by Klomp » Sat Jun 22, 2019 8:08 pm

I think a guy he has a lot of similarities to is Andre Iguodala. Iggy was a little bit thicker coming into the league though.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,568
And1: 22,939
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: The Jarrett Culver Thread 

Post#65 » by Klomp » Sat Jun 22, 2019 8:11 pm

DaKidKG wrote:You're right, I forgot about the private workout vertical. I was thinking of the 41.5 inch vertical he had at the combine. Ironically, this backs up the point I've been making about unreliable private workout measurements.

https://www.nbadraft.net/2014-nba-draft-combine-athleticism-test-analysis

I don't know that I would call them unreliable. It's not like they're making up fake measurements. The thing to remember is that the combine is a lot more strict about how many steps they can make before taking off.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
User avatar
mandurugo
Starter
Posts: 2,120
And1: 231
Joined: Aug 14, 2002

Re: The Jarrett Culver Thread 

Post#66 » by mandurugo » Sat Jun 22, 2019 9:31 pm

I don't think it matters too much how good his closed gym measurements are. As has been pointed out by several people already, if you simply watch his game footage or even his highlight reels it's clear he's pretty much an average NBA athlete, with no indications of unusual explosiveness or burst speed. The question of how well his game will translate and how much he can improve is still an open book. Let's hope for the best.
User avatar
wildvikeswolves
Starter
Posts: 2,025
And1: 577
Joined: Feb 12, 2009
       

Re: The Jarrett Culver Thread 

Post#67 » by wildvikeswolves » Sat Jun 22, 2019 10:00 pm

Thought it was the right pick at the time and loving it more and more
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,568
And1: 22,939
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: The Jarrett Culver Thread 

Post#68 » by Klomp » Sat Jun 22, 2019 11:05 pm

mandurugo wrote:I don't think it matters too much how good his closed gym measurements are. As has been pointed out by several people already, if you simply watch his game footage or even his highlight reels it's clear he's pretty much an average NBA athlete, with no indications of unusual explosiveness or burst speed. The question of how well his game will translate and how much he can improve is still an open book. Let's hope for the best.


I think a lot of that can be hidden because he didn't play in an uptempo offensive system. Texas Tech was bottom-third of the country in pace.

I wouldn't call him an average NBA athlete at all. I would say his game isn't flashy, but that doesn't mean he's just an average athlete.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Norseman79
Starter
Posts: 2,419
And1: 875
Joined: Jul 26, 2017
     

Re: The Jarrett Culver Thread 

Post#69 » by Norseman79 » Sat Jun 22, 2019 11:11 pm

mandurugo wrote:I don't think it matters too much how good his closed gym measurements are. As has been pointed out by several people already, if you simply watch his game footage or even his highlight reels it's clear he's pretty much an average NBA athlete, with no indications of unusual explosiveness or burst speed. The question of how well his game will translate and how much he can improve is still an open book. Let's hope for the best.



At the same time, we also need to look at game tape and see if there were situations where his athleticism hurt him. If he drove the basket and simply laid it off the glass instead of trying to elevate over someone and throw it down, does it really matter? Culver strikes me as a smart player who isn't trying to wow people with flashy dunks or plays, just make the easier smart one. Seen plenty of footage of his lateral quickness on defense and a great first/second step on offense. The closed gym measurements mean he is capable of doing those things, the game footage shows what he chooses to use.
wesleyt95
Rookie
Posts: 1,158
And1: 277
Joined: Sep 23, 2018
 

Re: The Jarrett Culver Thread 

Post#70 » by wesleyt95 » Sat Jun 22, 2019 11:16 pm

Jarrett Culver is athletic enough to do everything he needs to do on the court, Jamario Moon is a better fast twitch athlete than Jimmy Butler that doesn’t make him a better basketball player
User avatar
Killboard
Analyst
Posts: 3,374
And1: 943
Joined: Jul 16, 2010

Re: The Jarrett Culver Thread 

Post#71 » by Killboard » Sat Jun 22, 2019 11:18 pm

mandurugo wrote:I don't think it matters too much how good his closed gym measurements are. As has been pointed out by several people already, if you simply watch his game footage or even his highlight reels it's clear he's pretty much an average NBA athlete, with no indications of unusual explosiveness or burst speed. The question of how well his game will translate and how much he can improve is still an open book. Let's hope for the best.


Is finish through contact considered athelticism? Beacuse if it is the FG% of unassisted shots at the rim and his free throw ratio in college make him an above average athlete for his age.
User avatar
Foye
Club Captain- German Soccer
Posts: 25,090
And1: 3,623
Joined: Jul 29, 2008
Location: Frankfurt
 

Re: The Jarrett Culver Thread 

Post#72 » by Foye » Sat Jun 22, 2019 11:42 pm

Right after the draft he requested his agent to find him a gym to workout. This is the mentality we need.

No matter whether he can shoot currently, whether people say he is not above average athletically or does not possess an elite skill on NBA level.

Give him 2-3 years time to develop and this guy will be quite a player.
KGdaBom
RealGM
Posts: 23,337
And1: 6,373
Joined: Jun 22, 2017
         

Re: The Jarrett Culver Thread 

Post#73 » by KGdaBom » Sat Jun 22, 2019 11:48 pm

Foye wrote:Right after the draft he requested his agent to find him a gym to workout. This is the mentality we need.

No matter whether he can shoot currently, whether people say he is not above average athletically or does not possess an elite skill on NBA level.

Give him 2-3 years time to develop and this guy will be quite a player.

I appreciate what you are saying, but if he isn't significantly better than Okogie on day one I will be disappointed.
User avatar
Foye
Club Captain- German Soccer
Posts: 25,090
And1: 3,623
Joined: Jul 29, 2008
Location: Frankfurt
 

Re: The Jarrett Culver Thread 

Post#74 » by Foye » Sun Jun 23, 2019 12:46 am

KGdaBom wrote:
Foye wrote:Right after the draft he requested his agent to find him a gym to workout. This is the mentality we need.

No matter whether he can shoot currently, whether people say he is not above average athletically or does not possess an elite skill on NBA level.

Give him 2-3 years time to develop and this guy will be quite a player.

I appreciate what you are saying, but if he isn't significantly better than Okogie on day one I will be disappointed.



I dont know.

Everyone in this draft screams crap to me. Even Zion. I dont see the hype. Just look how this guy is even walking. Looks like he needs to start physiotherapie sooner than soon. Definitely not looking healthy.

Last year was a **** great draft. Dont forget about it. Okogie is probably a lotto pick too this year.

So I am happy we got a guy who will work his ass off and we will see how it translates.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,568
And1: 22,939
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: The Jarrett Culver Thread 

Post#75 » by Klomp » Sun Jun 23, 2019 1:08 am

Read on Twitter
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Nick K
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,784
And1: 2,394
Joined: Nov 23, 2016
       

Re: The Jarrett Culver Thread 

Post#76 » by Nick K » Sun Jun 23, 2019 1:08 am

What Culver seems to do best is drive to the basket and finish in a variety of ways. We could use that. He has a high floor but I don't think his ceiling is very high but that was typical of the draft after the top 3 or 4 picks.
Ray_S
Ballboy
Posts: 13
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 21, 2019

Re: The Jarrett Culver Thread 

Post#77 » by Ray_S » Sun Jun 23, 2019 1:15 am

Anyone else concerned he only measured six foot five at the combine and only shot 30% from three-point line?

Go Wolves!!
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,568
And1: 22,939
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: The Jarrett Culver Thread 

Post#78 » by Klomp » Sun Jun 23, 2019 1:30 am

Read on Twitter
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Nick K
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,784
And1: 2,394
Joined: Nov 23, 2016
       

Re: The Jarrett Culver Thread 

Post#79 » by Nick K » Sun Jun 23, 2019 1:32 am

Ray_S wrote:Anyone else concerned he only measured six foot five at the combine and only shot 30% from three-point line?

Go Wolves!!


In May at the combine he measured 6' 6.75", with a 6' 9.5" wingspan. Not bad. Ideal reall, for a shooting guard.

The 30% from 3 was an outlier due to many factors. He's better than that.

He needs to improve his guide hand in his shooting technique.
wablty
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,940
And1: 1,099
Joined: Jun 18, 2012

Re: The Jarrett Culver Thread 

Post#80 » by wablty » Sun Jun 23, 2019 1:34 am

Ray_S wrote:Anyone else concerned he only measured six foot five at the combine and only shot 30% from three-point line?

Go Wolves!!


6'5" and change barefoot. Most NBA rosters lie about height, or use "with shoes". Culver was actually the 2nd tallest 'SG' measured. He's not a short wing.

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves