winforlose wrote:AbeVigodaLive wrote:winforlose wrote:
At the time he signed with GSW for 26 he passed on max deals from other teams. Take less now and when bird rights kick in we pay you more (or as more money becomes available.) Same principle as Joe Smith. Also taking a one year deal for less when he could have signed a 5 year max. What if had torn his ACL or suffered another serious injury. I agree this smelled less fishy, but it still stinks to high heaven.
I don't think that's accurate.
On July 2, 2016, the NBA set max contracts... for players with 9 years of NBA service... the max contract was $26,540,100.
https://www.hoopsrumors.com/2016/07/league-sets-201617-salary-cap.html
Kevin Durant signed on July 7, 2016... for $26,540,100. This was a $6M raise from the previous season.
_____
Now compare that to a 23-year-old signing for 1/2 of his rookie deal... turning down $80M to do so... and playing for $1.75M.
I'm at a loss how/why you're comparing those two situations.
I read your link and I could be conflating the situation with the pay cut he took the following year. But, he did take a two year deal with a player option instead of a four or five year deal. The total value of the contract is lower and that was the original point of the outrage.
You ask why I compare the situation, because it feels like bigger stars and bigger city teams get all the breaks in the NBA. Officiating, tampering, the lottery (which I believe is rigged,) you name it. The context in this thread is the issue of what suspension MB would have got as part of a Lakers or Warriors team.
I guess time will tell as more players commit crimes and we can see how the punishments come down.
1. You were wrong.
2. I proved you wrong.
3. You're still arguing the point?













