ImageImageImage

Game 63: Minnesota @ Golden State

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

Folklore
Pro Prospect
Posts: 856
And1: 253
Joined: Jun 13, 2017
 

Re: Game 63: Minnesota @ Golden State 

Post#61 » by Folklore » Mon Feb 27, 2023 10:34 am

fattymcgee wrote:I hate to say it but the season's over. Even if the team clicks when KAT comes back, it will be too late.

With no KAT and D'Lo gone, we don't have enough offense.

But we had to trade him.
Baseline81
Analyst
Posts: 3,277
And1: 1,909
Joined: Jan 18, 2009

Re: Game 63: Minnesota @ Golden State 

Post#62 » by Baseline81 » Mon Feb 27, 2023 1:22 pm

Folklore wrote:But we had to trade him.

But Conley's going to unlock Gobert.
bluethunder0005
Pro Prospect
Posts: 825
And1: 238
Joined: Jun 27, 2010

Re: Game 63: Minnesota @ Golden State 

Post#63 » by bluethunder0005 » Mon Feb 27, 2023 2:40 pm

DLo still sucked here and we wouldn't have won any games we lost since he's been gone with maybe the exception of last night if he had a good shooting game. Other than that DLo was easily the second worst rotation player of the guys getting more than 20 minutes a night (Rivers is the worst). Conley can't go out and score 25+ often but maybe if Ant hadn't shot 5-19 we wouldn't be having this discussion. Not having other viable offensive threats never stops Luka from scoring well.
User avatar
_AIJ_
RealGM
Posts: 14,159
And1: 4,641
Joined: Oct 15, 2008
     

Re: Game 63: Minnesota @ Golden State 

Post#64 » by _AIJ_ » Mon Feb 27, 2023 2:41 pm

Rivers was -12 btw. I really dont know why that guy gets minutes
LETS GO WOLVES!!! 8-)
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,813
And1: 5,300
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: Game 63: Minnesota @ Golden State 

Post#65 » by minimus » Mon Feb 27, 2023 2:47 pm

_AIJ_ wrote:Rivers was -12 btw. I really dont know why that guy gets minutes


Because Nowell and TP were out? But yeah, I wish Moore gets a chance.
Baseline81
Analyst
Posts: 3,277
And1: 1,909
Joined: Jan 18, 2009

Re: Game 63: Minnesota @ Golden State 

Post#66 » by Baseline81 » Mon Feb 27, 2023 3:08 pm

Read on Twitter
papertrail
Ballboy
Posts: 38
And1: 17
Joined: Feb 08, 2023

Re: Game 63: Minnesota @ Golden State 

Post#67 » by papertrail » Mon Feb 27, 2023 5:10 pm

Domejandro wrote:
papertrail wrote:
Domejandro wrote:In reality, if Karl-Anthony Towns' calf doesn't implode, Minnesota likely wins at least three more games this season, which would amount to Minnesota being the fourth seed (honestly, a healthy Taurean Prince likely allows for that). If Towns doesn't go down, I think it is relatively likely that Minnesota would be in contention for the second seed right now (6-7 more wins).

That said, even with that information, it doesn't make the season feel any less miserable.


Second seed? Not sure if I watched the same Gobert-KAT pairing as you did...

Truthfully, not sure what you watched, given that Minnesota's early problems stemmed from Minnesota's guardplay being absolutely dreadful, to start the season. The Rudy Gobert and Karl-Anthony Towns combination was relatively fine.

But again, let's pretend that Minnesota wins only four more games if their best player was not injured. That's it, nothing more because the fit is janky, or whatever issues arise.

That would put them 1.5 games back from the third seed and 3 games back from the second seed.


You are probably the only member of this fandom who thinks that KAT-Gobert pairing was fine lol
papertrail
Ballboy
Posts: 38
And1: 17
Joined: Feb 08, 2023

Re: Game 63: Minnesota @ Golden State 

Post#68 » by papertrail » Mon Feb 27, 2023 5:11 pm

bluethunder0005 wrote:DLo still sucked here and we wouldn't have won any games we lost since he's been gone with maybe the exception of last night if he had a good shooting game. Other than that DLo was easily the second worst rotation player of the guys getting more than 20 minutes a night (Rivers is the worst). Conley can't go out and score 25+ often but maybe if Ant hadn't shot 5-19 we wouldn't be having this discussion. Not having other viable offensive threats never stops Luka from scoring well.


Smartest poster of this board, ladies and gentlemen.
Note30
Head Coach
Posts: 6,239
And1: 1,930
Joined: Feb 25, 2014
 

Re: Game 63: Minnesota @ Golden State 

Post#69 » by Note30 » Mon Feb 27, 2023 5:52 pm

bluethunder0005 wrote:DLo still sucked here and we wouldn't have won any games we lost since he's been gone with maybe the exception of last night if he had a good shooting game. Other than that DLo was easily the second worst rotation player of the guys getting more than 20 minutes a night (Rivers is the worst). Conley can't go out and score 25+ often but maybe if Ant hadn't shot 5-19 we wouldn't be having this discussion. Not having other viable offensive threats never stops Luka from scoring well.


Hold up. Does that mean Ant is our entire offense? If he is, it's def the first year and a select number of games for where that's true.

Luka is the 2nd best (arguably) best player in the league behind or in front of Giannis.

Edwards is two years younger and clearly not the playmaker that Luka is. Our entire offense is NOT dictated around Ant playmaking and scoring. Unlike Luka.

The Mavs have an entire heliocentric offense around Luka. They've constructed the roster as such and he's been playing this way for almost 5 years now.

Luka also has 3-4 GOOD shooters around him all the time. In fact outside of Powell everyone that plays regular minutes shoots above 36% from the 3.

Ant just got the keys to the kingdom where he's responsible for everything and you know what he has?

Ant has Gobert, Conley, and Anderson (who's shooting great on 1 shot attempt per game).

All of which is revolving around an offense designed to get almost every player involved but practically no cuts, flares, or spacing.

Any more asinine takes behind why this is Ants fault?

**** idiot.
Note30
Head Coach
Posts: 6,239
And1: 1,930
Joined: Feb 25, 2014
 

Re: Game 63: Minnesota @ Golden State 

Post#70 » by Note30 » Mon Feb 27, 2023 5:54 pm

papertrail wrote:
bluethunder0005 wrote:DLo still sucked here and we wouldn't have won any games we lost since he's been gone with maybe the exception of last night if he had a good shooting game. Other than that DLo was easily the second worst rotation player of the guys getting more than 20 minutes a night (Rivers is the worst). Conley can't go out and score 25+ often but maybe if Ant hadn't shot 5-19 we wouldn't be having this discussion. Not having other viable offensive threats never stops Luka from scoring well.


Smartest poster of this board, ladies and gentlemen.

Edit of the original post: This should be in green text.
Hey, no personal attacks! -Calinks
Shaka_Zulu
Starter
Posts: 2,163
And1: 2,998
Joined: Feb 11, 2018
   

Re: Game 63: Minnesota @ Golden State 

Post#71 » by Shaka_Zulu » Mon Feb 27, 2023 8:34 pm

I appreciated Finch so far. But its TIME for him to go, like right now. Same inexcusable bad coaching end of games, cant be tolerated further.


We suck again, and we dont even have our own pick to gain anything from it, meaning we suck even more then usual...
Neeva
General Manager
Posts: 7,571
And1: 2,935
Joined: Jun 03, 2016

Re: Game 63: Minnesota @ Golden State 

Post#72 » by Neeva » Mon Feb 27, 2023 8:58 pm

Yep Finch has to go our record against bad to mediocre teams and giving up big leads in the third is just inexcusable! He is not head coach material. He just doesn’t know when to put in the right players or when to bench them. When to call timeouts or motivate his players. Lacks the intangibles needed to be a successful head coach in the league.
bluethunder0005
Pro Prospect
Posts: 825
And1: 238
Joined: Jun 27, 2010

Re: Game 63: Minnesota @ Golden State 

Post#73 » by bluethunder0005 » Mon Feb 27, 2023 9:08 pm

Note30 wrote:
bluethunder0005 wrote:DLo still sucked here and we wouldn't have won any games we lost since he's been gone with maybe the exception of last night if he had a good shooting game. Other than that DLo was easily the second worst rotation player of the guys getting more than 20 minutes a night (Rivers is the worst). Conley can't go out and score 25+ often but maybe if Ant hadn't shot 5-19 we wouldn't be having this discussion. Not having other viable offensive threats never stops Luka from scoring well.


Hold up. Does that mean Ant is our entire offense? If he is, it's def the first year and a select number of games for where that's true.

Luka is the 2nd best (arguably) best player in the league behind or in front of Giannis.

Edwards is two years younger and clearly not the playmaker that Luka is. Our entire offense is NOT dictated around Ant playmaking and scoring. Unlike Luka.

The Mavs have an entire heliocentric offense around Luka. They've constructed the roster as such and he's been playing this way for almost 5 years now.

Luka also has 3-4 GOOD shooters around him all the time. In fact outside of Powell everyone that plays regular minutes shoots above 36% from the 3.

Ant just got the keys to the kingdom where he's responsible for everything and you know what he has?

Ant has Gobert, Conley, and Anderson (who's shooting great on 1 shot attempt per game).

All of which is revolving around an offense designed to get almost every player involved but practically no cuts, flares, or spacing.

Any more asinine takes behind why this is Ants fault?

**** idiot.


Last night was largely Ant's fault, and if you think it wasn't then there's no point in having a discussion with you about it. There is no excuse to shoot sub 30% in a game. I never said he should be as good as Luka but if you think we're in any better spot with DLo right now then you're wrong which was my point. It's like you read one sentence in my post and went "Oh damn, he thinks Ant should be as good as Luka" and ignored the rest. DLo sucks is my point. He had the 2nd worst On-Off numbers on the team and only Rivers was worse.
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,813
And1: 5,300
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: Game 63: Minnesota @ Golden State 

Post#74 » by minimus » Mon Feb 27, 2023 9:33 pm

bluethunder0005 wrote:
Note30 wrote:
bluethunder0005 wrote:DLo still sucked here and we wouldn't have won any games we lost since he's been gone with maybe the exception of last night if he had a good shooting game. Other than that DLo was easily the second worst rotation player of the guys getting more than 20 minutes a night (Rivers is the worst). Conley can't go out and score 25+ often but maybe if Ant hadn't shot 5-19 we wouldn't be having this discussion. Not having other viable offensive threats never stops Luka from scoring well.


Hold up. Does that mean Ant is our entire offense? If he is, it's def the first year and a select number of games for where that's true.

Luka is the 2nd best (arguably) best player in the league behind or in front of Giannis.

Edwards is two years younger and clearly not the playmaker that Luka is. Our entire offense is NOT dictated around Ant playmaking and scoring. Unlike Luka.

The Mavs have an entire heliocentric offense around Luka. They've constructed the roster as such and he's been playing this way for almost 5 years now.

Luka also has 3-4 GOOD shooters around him all the time. In fact outside of Powell everyone that plays regular minutes shoots above 36% from the 3.

Ant just got the keys to the kingdom where he's responsible for everything and you know what he has?

Ant has Gobert, Conley, and Anderson (who's shooting great on 1 shot attempt per game).

All of which is revolving around an offense designed to get almost every player involved but practically no cuts, flares, or spacing.

Any more asinine takes behind why this is Ants fault?

**** idiot.


Last night was largely Ant's fault, and if you think it wasn't then there's no point in having a discussion with you about it. There is no excuse to shoot sub 30% in a game. I never said he should be as good as Luka but if you think we're in any better spot with DLo right now then you're wrong which was my point. It's like you read one sentence in my post and went "Oh damn, he thinks Ant should be as good as Luka" and ignored the rest. DLo sucks is my point. He had the 2nd worst On-Off numbers on the team and only Rivers was worse.



Yesterday Edwards gave me Wiggins vibes: low effort, in one defensive possession he didn't box out twice, lost the ball multiple times.
User avatar
PharmD
Head Coach
Posts: 6,964
And1: 5,559
Joined: Aug 21, 2015
 

Re: Game 63: Minnesota @ Golden State 

Post#75 » by PharmD » Tue Feb 28, 2023 12:19 am

I did not know the wolves lost this game. It was 94-84 with like 8 minutes left when i left the bar. Assumed victory. Big loss too.
TimberKat
Head Coach
Posts: 6,196
And1: 3,134
Joined: Jul 02, 2022
         

Re: Game 63: Minnesota @ Golden State 

Post#76 » by TimberKat » Tue Feb 28, 2023 12:48 am

The good news (if we could call it that) is we had the lead in the 4qtr for all 3 games. We still could get the 9 or 10 seed because Zion is still out, LBJ is out, Lillard is not going to score 71 pts every game, and Ainge will fix Jazz to ensure they get into the lottery.
User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Game 63: Minnesota @ Golden State 

Post#77 » by Krapinsky » Tue Feb 28, 2023 1:05 am

PharmD wrote:I did not know the wolves lost this game. It was 94-84 with like 8 minutes left when i left the bar. Assumed victory. Big loss too.


:lol: You clearly haven't been following the Wolves too closely this year
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.

NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,640
And1: 19,739
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: Game 63: Minnesota @ Golden State 

Post#78 » by shrink » Tue Feb 28, 2023 4:44 am

I’m amused that TNT is hyping Wednesday’s game as the Timberwolves versus the Clippers “New Big Three.”

Westbrook waived by one LA team, and is suddenly part of a Big Three on the other! :lol:
Calinks
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 50,417
And1: 17,375
Joined: Mar 29, 2006
   

Re: Game 63: Minnesota @ Golden State 

Post#79 » by Calinks » Tue Feb 28, 2023 6:55 am

shrink wrote:I’m amused that TNT is hyping Wednesday’s game as the Timberwolves versus the Clippers “New Big Three.”

Westbrook waived by one LA team, and is suddenly part of a Big Three on the other! :lol:

I am so not looking forward to Charles Barkley annihilating our team again. He said we were dumb for making the trade early, he said its the worst trade in NBA history and now we will get ripped to shreds for losing these games and spiraling out of the playoff race.
When luck shuts the door skill comes in through the window.
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,813
And1: 5,300
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: Game 63: Minnesota @ Golden State 

Post#80 » by minimus » Tue Feb 28, 2023 7:29 am

Well, I thought GSW broke our defense, but actually it was not that bad, there were a few mistakes like McLaughlin allowing open 3 for J.Green, otherwise it was ok. But the GSW offense and execution was completely different level. One example we tried to run split action with Conley, Edwards and Garza. DDV recognized the play and jumped between Edwards and Garza and intercepted the pass. Meanwhile GSW run multiple actions without turnovers. I also felt like every GSW screen for Klay Thompson was a moving screen.

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves