Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition
Moderators: Domejandro, Calinks, Worm Guts
Re: Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition
- babyjax13
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,814
- And1: 18,312
- Joined: Jul 02, 2006
- Location: Fresno, eating Birria
-
Re: Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition
Some point guard ideas: De'Anthony Melton, Jevon Carter, Andrew Nembhard, Derrick White, Fred VanVleet, Tre Jones, Alex Caruso, Tyus Jones, TJ McConnell, Kyle Lowry
Not sure any of these guys individually are a solution, but I think any of them could help with some of Minnesota's issues.
Not sure any of these guys individually are a solution, but I think any of them could help with some of Minnesota's issues.

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.
JColl
Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition
-
Klomp
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 69,745
- And1: 23,077
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition
IceManBK1 wrote:?s=20&t=ACdFCsufU6KRNLTnTB-uQg
(ahem, that's exactly what I've speculated here...)
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition
-
moss_is_1
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,971
- And1: 2,385
- Joined: May 20, 2009
-
Re: Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition
minimus wrote:With high probability Lonzo Ball will miss 2022-23 season, would you still trade DLo and Forbes for Ball and Caruso?
Absolutely.
Re: Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition
- breatnach
- Starter
- Posts: 2,208
- And1: 832
- Joined: Apr 17, 2010
- Location: Munich
Re: Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition
younggunsmn wrote:I don't buy the Arod/Lore instant impact blame for the Gobert trade simply because of the huge contract and security they gave TC when they brought him in.
This was all on TC.
I also think so, simply because Gobert is not the big name you'd target if you want to make a big splash. I think ARod would have preferred a bigger market name like Kyrie or Westbrook (which would have been similarly bad moves, albeit perhaps cheaper).
Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition
- breatnach
- Starter
- Posts: 2,208
- And1: 832
- Joined: Apr 17, 2010
- Location: Munich
Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition
Any chance the Heat would be interested in a D'Lo for Lowry swap?
I don't think the Heat are going anywhere, so they clear cap space and try to rebuild. They are a major FA destination, so having cap space is more valuable to them than most teams. D'Lo expires a year sooner and Lowry provides much needed veteran leadership, while giving Ant more shots.
I don't think the Heat are going anywhere, so they clear cap space and try to rebuild. They are a major FA destination, so having cap space is more valuable to them than most teams. D'Lo expires a year sooner and Lowry provides much needed veteran leadership, while giving Ant more shots.
Re: Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition
-
Klomp
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 69,745
- And1: 23,077
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition
-
IceManBK1
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,232
- And1: 330
- Joined: Jul 14, 2017
-
Re: Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition
Any chance we can get Gobert for Randle+Quickley+couple of 1st riders?
Re: Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition
-
shrink
- RealGM
- Posts: 59,609
- And1: 19,712
- Joined: Sep 26, 2005
Re: Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition
IceManBK1 wrote:
Any chance we can get Gobert for Randle+Quickley+couple of 1st riders?
Interesting you used the term “we” as the Knicks.
And, MIN would say no. Connelly couldn’t take so much less in return after 20 games without admitting failure.
Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition
-
shrink
- RealGM
- Posts: 59,609
- And1: 19,712
- Joined: Sep 26, 2005
Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition
I can’t believe this is legit - the title is just to get a lot of clicks. The summation of the article makes a good case.
However, I doubt Connelly would have traded as much as he did for Gobert if he and the coaching staff didn’t believe strongly that they could make Gobert and KAT operate at a high level together. It would be entirely too long of a con because neither player can be traded until next season. As Vernon points out in The Mismatch, KAT is a better fit with Edwards on paper because floor spacing is helpful for Edwards. Additionally, the media would still criticize Connelly for the Gobert trade, even if they moved KAT and won a championship. Why? Because the optics of claiming it was your master plan to lie to one of your best players for a year just so you could trade him would be awful, regardless of the outcome.
Re: Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition
- Domejandro
- Forum Mod - Timberwolves

- Posts: 20,551
- And1: 31,007
- Joined: Jul 29, 2014
Re: Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition
IceManBK1 wrote:
Any chance we can get Gobert for Randle+Quickley+couple of 1st riders?
That is a horrible base for a trade unless a HUGE amount of picks are involved.
Re: Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition
-
IceManBK1
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,232
- And1: 330
- Joined: Jul 14, 2017
-
Re: Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition
Domejandro wrote:IceManBK1 wrote:
Any chance we can get Gobert for Randle+Quickley+couple of 1st riders?
That is a horrible base for a trade unless a HUGE amount of picks are involved.
Picks r overrated.. Reasons we gave up so many picks is jazz didn't get any Allstars. Randle is an all star and Quickley a very good PG. Maybe we also get Mitchell in the deal along 2 1st riders. But if Gobert/Towns don't work then don't think Towns/Mitchell works neither.
Re: Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition
-
Note30
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,233
- And1: 1,928
- Joined: Feb 25, 2014
-
Re: Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition
IceManBK1 wrote:Domejandro wrote:IceManBK1 wrote:
Any chance we can get Gobert for Randle+Quickley+couple of 1st riders?
That is a horrible base for a trade unless a HUGE amount of picks are involved.
Picks r overrated.. Reasons we gave up so many picks is jazz didn't get any Allstars. Randle is an all star and Quickley a very good PG. Maybe we also get Mitchell in the deal along 2 1st riders. But if Gobert/Towns don't work then don't think Towns/Mitchell works neither.
Dude what. Randle is a ball hog that shoots at a **** efficiency and is not a solid all star he just had one good season.
Quickley is a passable PG. That's it. Prince level player.
My god this trade is a **** show. If we're gonna trade anyone at this point it's gonna be KAT.
Re: Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition
-
shangrila
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,568
- And1: 6,653
- Joined: Dec 21, 2009
- Location: Land of Aus
-
Re: Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition
breatnach wrote:younggunsmn wrote:I don't buy the Arod/Lore instant impact blame for the Gobert trade simply because of the huge contract and security they gave TC when they brought him in.
This was all on TC.
I also think so, simply because Gobert is not the big name you'd target if you want to make a big splash. I think ARod would have preferred a bigger market name like Kyrie or Westbrook (which would have been similarly bad moves, albeit perhaps cheaper).
What's more believable? That a new GM, notorious for hating to make trades and preferring to build via the draft, comes into a completely new team he's unfamiliar with and immediately makes a huge trade sending out a ton of picks and players for a player he's never been attached to previously.
Or that a couple of new, notoriously risk taking owners bought into the hype from last season that we were "just one piece away" and "we'd have beat Memphis if we rebounded/defended better" so pushed their shiny new GM to go and fix those 2 issues no matter what?
I just don't buy that this was Connelly driven. That doesn't absolve him of blame or anything but it's equally moronic to try and believe it's all on him.
Re: Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition
-
Colbinii
- RealGM
- Posts: 34,243
- And1: 21,859
- Joined: Feb 13, 2013
Re: Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition
IceManBK1 wrote:
Any chance we can get Gobert for Randle+Quickley+couple of 1st riders?
No. Minnesota is all-in on Gobert. As the team continues to gel and identify the ways it wins, this will become more evident.
Re: Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition
-
Klomp
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 69,745
- And1: 23,077
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition
shangrila wrote:What's more believable? That a new GM, notorious for hating to make trades and preferring to build via the draft, comes into a completely new team he's unfamiliar with and immediately makes a huge trade sending out a ton of picks and players for a player he's never been attached to previously.
I made a post on this a long time ago but don't get too attached to individual picks with Connelly. While it's true that he prefers to build through the draft, he has never been afraid to trade picks. Go back and count how many times Denver made a draft pick with their own selection...I think it's under five times in the first round. They were always trading picks whether on draft night or a year in advance. That's part of why I feel so confident of the possibility to replenish lost picks down the road.
From May (Page 10 of Connelly hiring thread):
Klomp wrote:younggunsmn wrote:Has traded away quite a few draft picks in the past few years. Owe 2023 and 2025 1sts essentially for Aaron Gordon.
This is one of my big takeaways. Does a lot of pick trading. Doesn't mean he doesn't value draft picks; he just doesn't get too attached to a particular draft slot. He also does a lot of asset splitting, multiple times getting a 1st in the process. Traded down in the draft twice, with mixed results. Will also trade up or even back into the draft if he likes a guy enough.
Had a fair share of cap-clearing salary dumps that weren't necessarily great value, but were either owner-mandated or used to set up free agency and/or locking guys up.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition
-
lewdog
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,162
- And1: 94
- Joined: Jun 21, 2005
Re: Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition
What type of package (pre-Rudy trade) could've we offered Indiana for Turner?
Qui me amat, amet et canem meum
Re: Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition
-
Note30
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,233
- And1: 1,928
- Joined: Feb 25, 2014
-
Re: Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition
Colbinii wrote:IceManBK1 wrote:
Any chance we can get Gobert for Randle+Quickley+couple of 1st riders?
No. Minnesota is all-in on Gobert. As the team continues to gel and identify the ways it wins, this will become more evident.
That's not happening.
Re: Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition
-
Colbinii
- RealGM
- Posts: 34,243
- And1: 21,859
- Joined: Feb 13, 2013
Re: Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition
Note30 wrote:Colbinii wrote:IceManBK1 wrote:
Any chance we can get Gobert for Randle+Quickley+couple of 1st riders?
No. Minnesota is all-in on Gobert. As the team continues to gel and identify the ways it wins, this will become more evident.
That's not happening.
Time will tell. Lots of things happen in this world that you would say "Thats not happening" to and are far less likely than Gobert and company turning it around.
Re: Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition
-
minimus
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,803
- And1: 5,295
- Joined: Jan 28, 2011
- Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
-
Re: Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition
Note30 wrote:IceManBK1 wrote:Domejandro wrote:That is a horrible base for a trade unless a HUGE amount of picks are involved.
Picks r overrated.. Reasons we gave up so many picks is jazz didn't get any Allstars. Randle is an all star and Quickley a very good PG. Maybe we also get Mitchell in the deal along 2 1st riders. But if Gobert/Towns don't work then don't think Towns/Mitchell works neither.
Dude what. Randle is a ball hog that shoots at a **** efficiency and is not a solid all star he just had one good season.
Quickley is a passable PG. That's it. Prince level player.
My god this trade is a **** show. If we're gonna trade anyone at this point it's gonna be KAT.
IceManBK1 is known for horrible trades ideas. He is basically anti-Gupta
Re: Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition
-
TwolvesFanRome
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,434
- And1: 666
- Joined: Aug 25, 2014
- Location: Roma
-
Re: Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition
lewdog wrote:What type of package (pre-Rudy trade) could've we offered Indiana for Turner?
I really really like Turner...
Maybe Beasley Vanderbilt + picks?
"...I want to compliment him, we all expected that he would take up the game, we have prepared the plan race on him, we have doubled. And, as usual, he did what he wanted..."
Zelimir Obradovic, talking about Dejan Bodiroga
Zelimir Obradovic, talking about Dejan Bodiroga
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves





