ImageImageImage

Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition

Moderators: Domejandro, Calinks, Worm Guts

User avatar
babyjax13
RealGM
Posts: 35,814
And1: 18,312
Joined: Jul 02, 2006
Location: Fresno, eating Birria
     

Re: Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition 

Post#621 » by babyjax13 » Wed Dec 7, 2022 5:54 pm

Some point guard ideas: De'Anthony Melton, Jevon Carter, Andrew Nembhard, Derrick White, Fred VanVleet, Tre Jones, Alex Caruso, Tyus Jones, TJ McConnell, Kyle Lowry

Not sure any of these guys individually are a solution, but I think any of them could help with some of Minnesota's issues.
Image

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.

JColl
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,745
And1: 23,077
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition 

Post#622 » by Klomp » Wed Dec 7, 2022 7:28 pm

IceManBK1 wrote:
Read on Twitter
?s=20&t=ACdFCsufU6KRNLTnTB-uQg

(ahem, that's exactly what I've speculated here...)
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
moss_is_1
RealGM
Posts: 10,971
And1: 2,385
Joined: May 20, 2009
   

Re: Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition 

Post#623 » by moss_is_1 » Wed Dec 7, 2022 9:14 pm

minimus wrote:With high probability Lonzo Ball will miss 2022-23 season, would you still trade DLo and Forbes for Ball and Caruso?

Absolutely.
User avatar
breatnach
Starter
Posts: 2,208
And1: 832
Joined: Apr 17, 2010
Location: Munich

Re: Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition 

Post#624 » by breatnach » Wed Dec 7, 2022 9:56 pm

younggunsmn wrote:I don't buy the Arod/Lore instant impact blame for the Gobert trade simply because of the huge contract and security they gave TC when they brought him in.
This was all on TC.


I also think so, simply because Gobert is not the big name you'd target if you want to make a big splash. I think ARod would have preferred a bigger market name like Kyrie or Westbrook (which would have been similarly bad moves, albeit perhaps cheaper).
User avatar
breatnach
Starter
Posts: 2,208
And1: 832
Joined: Apr 17, 2010
Location: Munich

Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition 

Post#625 » by breatnach » Wed Dec 7, 2022 10:01 pm

Any chance the Heat would be interested in a D'Lo for Lowry swap?

I don't think the Heat are going anywhere, so they clear cap space and try to rebuild. They are a major FA destination, so having cap space is more valuable to them than most teams. D'Lo expires a year sooner and Lowry provides much needed veteran leadership, while giving Ant more shots.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,745
And1: 23,077
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition 

Post#626 » by Klomp » Wed Dec 7, 2022 10:04 pm

Read on Twitter


Something to potentially keep an eye on...
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
IceManBK1
Analyst
Posts: 3,232
And1: 330
Joined: Jul 14, 2017
   

Re: Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition 

Post#627 » by IceManBK1 » Wed Dec 7, 2022 10:30 pm

Klomp wrote:
Read on Twitter


Something to potentially keep an eye on...


Any chance we can get Gobert for Randle+Quickley+couple of 1st riders?
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,609
And1: 19,712
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition 

Post#628 » by shrink » Wed Dec 7, 2022 10:52 pm

IceManBK1 wrote:
Klomp wrote:
Read on Twitter


Something to potentially keep an eye on...


Any chance we can get Gobert for Randle+Quickley+couple of 1st riders?

Interesting you used the term “we” as the Knicks.

And, MIN would say no. Connelly couldn’t take so much less in return after 20 games without admitting failure.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,609
And1: 19,712
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition 

Post#629 » by shrink » Wed Dec 7, 2022 10:57 pm

Read on Twitter


I can’t believe this is legit - the title is just to get a lot of clicks. The summation of the article makes a good case.

However, I doubt Connelly would have traded as much as he did for Gobert if he and the coaching staff didn’t believe strongly that they could make Gobert and KAT operate at a high level together. It would be entirely too long of a con because neither player can be traded until next season. As Vernon points out in The Mismatch, KAT is a better fit with Edwards on paper because floor spacing is helpful for Edwards. Additionally, the media would still criticize Connelly for the Gobert trade, even if they moved KAT and won a championship. Why? Because the optics of claiming it was your master plan to lie to one of your best players for a year just so you could trade him would be awful, regardless of the outcome.
User avatar
Domejandro
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 20,551
And1: 31,007
Joined: Jul 29, 2014

Re: Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition 

Post#630 » by Domejandro » Wed Dec 7, 2022 11:29 pm

IceManBK1 wrote:
Klomp wrote:
Read on Twitter


Something to potentially keep an eye on...


Any chance we can get Gobert for Randle+Quickley+couple of 1st riders?

That is a horrible base for a trade unless a HUGE amount of picks are involved.
IceManBK1
Analyst
Posts: 3,232
And1: 330
Joined: Jul 14, 2017
   

Re: Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition 

Post#631 » by IceManBK1 » Wed Dec 7, 2022 11:59 pm

Domejandro wrote:
IceManBK1 wrote:
Klomp wrote:
Read on Twitter


Something to potentially keep an eye on...


Any chance we can get Gobert for Randle+Quickley+couple of 1st riders?

That is a horrible base for a trade unless a HUGE amount of picks are involved.


Picks r overrated.. Reasons we gave up so many picks is jazz didn't get any Allstars. Randle is an all star and Quickley a very good PG. Maybe we also get Mitchell in the deal along 2 1st riders. But if Gobert/Towns don't work then don't think Towns/Mitchell works neither.
Note30
Head Coach
Posts: 6,233
And1: 1,928
Joined: Feb 25, 2014
 

Re: Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition 

Post#632 » by Note30 » Thu Dec 8, 2022 1:49 am

IceManBK1 wrote:
Domejandro wrote:
IceManBK1 wrote:
Any chance we can get Gobert for Randle+Quickley+couple of 1st riders?

That is a horrible base for a trade unless a HUGE amount of picks are involved.


Picks r overrated.. Reasons we gave up so many picks is jazz didn't get any Allstars. Randle is an all star and Quickley a very good PG. Maybe we also get Mitchell in the deal along 2 1st riders. But if Gobert/Towns don't work then don't think Towns/Mitchell works neither.


Dude what. Randle is a ball hog that shoots at a **** efficiency and is not a solid all star he just had one good season.

Quickley is a passable PG. That's it. Prince level player.

My god this trade is a **** show. If we're gonna trade anyone at this point it's gonna be KAT.
shangrila
RealGM
Posts: 13,568
And1: 6,653
Joined: Dec 21, 2009
Location: Land of Aus
 

Re: Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition 

Post#633 » by shangrila » Thu Dec 8, 2022 3:39 am

breatnach wrote:
younggunsmn wrote:I don't buy the Arod/Lore instant impact blame for the Gobert trade simply because of the huge contract and security they gave TC when they brought him in.
This was all on TC.


I also think so, simply because Gobert is not the big name you'd target if you want to make a big splash. I think ARod would have preferred a bigger market name like Kyrie or Westbrook (which would have been similarly bad moves, albeit perhaps cheaper).

What's more believable? That a new GM, notorious for hating to make trades and preferring to build via the draft, comes into a completely new team he's unfamiliar with and immediately makes a huge trade sending out a ton of picks and players for a player he's never been attached to previously.

Or that a couple of new, notoriously risk taking owners bought into the hype from last season that we were "just one piece away" and "we'd have beat Memphis if we rebounded/defended better" so pushed their shiny new GM to go and fix those 2 issues no matter what?

I just don't buy that this was Connelly driven. That doesn't absolve him of blame or anything but it's equally moronic to try and believe it's all on him.
Colbinii
RealGM
Posts: 34,243
And1: 21,859
Joined: Feb 13, 2013

Re: Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition 

Post#634 » by Colbinii » Thu Dec 8, 2022 3:45 am

IceManBK1 wrote:
Klomp wrote:
Read on Twitter


Something to potentially keep an eye on...


Any chance we can get Gobert for Randle+Quickley+couple of 1st riders?


No. Minnesota is all-in on Gobert. As the team continues to gel and identify the ways it wins, this will become more evident.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,745
And1: 23,077
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition 

Post#635 » by Klomp » Thu Dec 8, 2022 3:53 am

shangrila wrote:What's more believable? That a new GM, notorious for hating to make trades and preferring to build via the draft, comes into a completely new team he's unfamiliar with and immediately makes a huge trade sending out a ton of picks and players for a player he's never been attached to previously.

I made a post on this a long time ago but don't get too attached to individual picks with Connelly. While it's true that he prefers to build through the draft, he has never been afraid to trade picks. Go back and count how many times Denver made a draft pick with their own selection...I think it's under five times in the first round. They were always trading picks whether on draft night or a year in advance. That's part of why I feel so confident of the possibility to replenish lost picks down the road.

From May (Page 10 of Connelly hiring thread):
Klomp wrote:
younggunsmn wrote:Has traded away quite a few draft picks in the past few years. Owe 2023 and 2025 1sts essentially for Aaron Gordon.

This is one of my big takeaways. Does a lot of pick trading. Doesn't mean he doesn't value draft picks; he just doesn't get too attached to a particular draft slot. He also does a lot of asset splitting, multiple times getting a 1st in the process. Traded down in the draft twice, with mixed results. Will also trade up or even back into the draft if he likes a guy enough.

Had a fair share of cap-clearing salary dumps that weren't necessarily great value, but were either owner-mandated or used to set up free agency and/or locking guys up.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
lewdog
Rookie
Posts: 1,162
And1: 94
Joined: Jun 21, 2005

Re: Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition 

Post#636 » by lewdog » Thu Dec 8, 2022 4:35 am

What type of package (pre-Rudy trade) could've we offered Indiana for Turner?
Qui me amat, amet et canem meum
Note30
Head Coach
Posts: 6,233
And1: 1,928
Joined: Feb 25, 2014
 

Re: Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition 

Post#637 » by Note30 » Thu Dec 8, 2022 5:05 am

Colbinii wrote:
IceManBK1 wrote:
Klomp wrote:
Read on Twitter


Something to potentially keep an eye on...


Any chance we can get Gobert for Randle+Quickley+couple of 1st riders?


No. Minnesota is all-in on Gobert. As the team continues to gel and identify the ways it wins, this will become more evident.


That's not happening.
Colbinii
RealGM
Posts: 34,243
And1: 21,859
Joined: Feb 13, 2013

Re: Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition 

Post#638 » by Colbinii » Thu Dec 8, 2022 6:03 am

Note30 wrote:
Colbinii wrote:
IceManBK1 wrote:
Any chance we can get Gobert for Randle+Quickley+couple of 1st riders?


No. Minnesota is all-in on Gobert. As the team continues to gel and identify the ways it wins, this will become more evident.


That's not happening.


Time will tell. Lots of things happen in this world that you would say "Thats not happening" to and are far less likely than Gobert and company turning it around.
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,803
And1: 5,295
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition 

Post#639 » by minimus » Thu Dec 8, 2022 7:40 am

Note30 wrote:
IceManBK1 wrote:
Domejandro wrote:That is a horrible base for a trade unless a HUGE amount of picks are involved.


Picks r overrated.. Reasons we gave up so many picks is jazz didn't get any Allstars. Randle is an all star and Quickley a very good PG. Maybe we also get Mitchell in the deal along 2 1st riders. But if Gobert/Towns don't work then don't think Towns/Mitchell works neither.


Dude what. Randle is a ball hog that shoots at a **** efficiency and is not a solid all star he just had one good season.

Quickley is a passable PG. That's it. Prince level player.

My god this trade is a **** show. If we're gonna trade anyone at this point it's gonna be KAT.


IceManBK1 is known for horrible trades ideas. He is basically anti-Gupta
TwolvesFanRome
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,434
And1: 666
Joined: Aug 25, 2014
Location: Roma
   

Re: Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition 

Post#640 » by TwolvesFanRome » Thu Dec 8, 2022 8:43 am

lewdog wrote:What type of package (pre-Rudy trade) could've we offered Indiana for Turner?


I really really like Turner...

Maybe Beasley Vanderbilt + picks?
"...I want to compliment him, we all expected that he would take up the game, we have prepared the plan race on him, we have doubled. And, as usual, he did what he wanted..."

Zelimir Obradovic, talking about Dejan Bodiroga

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves